Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Brad: Where Is Rockwall? (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Brad: Where Is Rockwall?
Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 01-17-2004 10:56 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dang, Brad! I was really close to your place on my last trip! I dropped a trailer at the railyard in Garland, and then snuck over to Dickey's in Rowlett.

If I'd known we were that close, we could've crashed Dickey's.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-17-2004 11:24 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Dickey's rules! I have one about 4 miles from my place.

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 01-18-2004 12:03 AM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeahhh, man! Hey, I found a Dickey's in New Jersey, too. Can you believe that?! The same people. I freaked.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-18-2004 12:20 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
There is one in Denver near the Chinese 16 too! Amazingly I lived there for a year and only ate there one time. It was excellent, as always.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Hipp
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1462
From: Mesquite, Tx (east of Dallas)
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 01-18-2004 01:46 AM      Profile for Chris Hipp   Email Chris Hipp   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dallas streets are pretty bad, but I agree it is mostly the retard drivers. It is not uncommon to creep along at 5mph for over a mile when the wreck is on the other side of the road.

There should also be some sort of PSA to explain the purpose of the entrance ramp.

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug

Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 01-18-2004 01:50 AM      Profile for Phil Hill   Email Phil Hill       Edit/Delete Post 
So Brad, it appears that you and Tim are into "Dickeys"... Hubba Hubba!

>>> Phil

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-18-2004 02:21 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Daryl wrote:
Maybe it's the traffic engineers who need the higher IQ.

It would help at least a little. Anything less than 3 lanes each way on any road should be illegal.

Round-a-bouts are extrememly retarded. Whoever thought those up deserves to decompose alive! A few may disagree, but that is only because they are wrong.

 |  IP: Logged

Gracia L. Babbidge
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 709
From: Bowdoin, Maine
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 01-18-2004 02:34 AM      Profile for Gracia L. Babbidge   Author's Homepage   Email Gracia L. Babbidge   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You want to talk about roads that are laid out crazily & inefficiently?
Virtually anywhere in New England fits that bill.

Boothbay Harbor, Maine is particularly wacky!

 |  IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 01-18-2004 02:43 AM      Profile for Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Author's Homepage   Email Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Round-a-bouts are fine, and actually more efficient, for lower traffic densities if designed properly. The problem is the bureaucrats that don't want to pay to get rid of them when cities grow and traffic density rises.

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 01-18-2004 09:17 AM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I can't think of one place on Earth with low traffic density. Try driving an 18-wheeler in a rotary! [Smile] And people are so ignorant/impatient they don't realize about the trailer off-tracking, so they try to come around me. Then, I have to stand on the brakes to keep from running over them. I could go on and on about stupid drivers in 4-wheelers! You wouldn't believe some of the chances they take with big rigs.

Like Gracia said, New England is the worst for poorly-designed roads. Sometimes on a 4-lane road (2 each direction), the right lane is a right-turn only and ends; sometimes the left one is the one that ends. There are no signs or road markings telling you this is going to happen, you just have to know it. Also, they never saw fit to post street signs anywhere. Most (MA, at least) are not marked in any way!

But the most utterly stupid thing I've ever seen is the way pedestrians cross the street. They didn't seem to learn in elementary school to look both ways and wait for traffic to stop before crossing the street! They just start walking, without even looking!! Every week on the news, you hear about someone getting hit, and guess who gets charged with the accident? Forget that the guy walked out in front of you 10 ft. from the crossing, it doesn't matter to MA.

 |  IP: Logged

Rachel Craven
Madam Moderator

Posts: 2190
From: Pensacola, FL
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 01-18-2004 10:33 AM      Profile for Rachel Craven   Email Rachel Craven   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yep, Mass is good. I miss driving there - its too boring here. Basically back home you just jump out in the middle of the road with the assumption that people will stop, if they don't, your family will get lots of money! [Big Grin] Seriously.

Driving conversation continued in "Worst Places to Drive" thread.

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 01-18-2004 10:51 AM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yep, you know what they say in the Army about assuming things.
[Wink]

I'm a little more cautious crossing the street. I count on making it to the other side of the road, not the other side of existence.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 01-18-2004 02:53 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
IMHO most of the roadways in the United States are inefficiently designed compared to other developed countries
I disagree with that. On the basis of road design, the United States has the largest and most advanced road system on the planet. My jaw falls agape at some of the engineering marvels such as the Dallas High Five interchange project (LBJ Freeway and North Central in North Dallas). America is the only place with road projects as grand as that. The roads in Europe, Asia, Austrailia and all other developed nations are smaller and very cramped. Canada is the only country whose roads are designed with some similarity of scale to the U.S.

The problem with our road system is NO BALANCE. Everyone drives. Most other developed nations in the world have well maintained mass-transit systems, many of which cover the entire country. In Japan, all you need to get around is a fold up bicycle to get you to the nearest train station. You can go anywhere in the country because passenger rail is ubiquitous. The same can be said for many areas of Europe.

In the United States, mass transit for the most part is a disaster. The only networks that function well at all are the oldest ones in New York, Boston and Chicago. Mass transit systems in America are rife with corruption, especially in new construction projects. Why should it cost billions upon billions of dollars just to build a damned light rail system!?

Another problem in the U.S. is the powerful auto-industry, road and airline lobbies. They all do a great job for killing off any efforts in developing mass transit alternatives, particularly anything rail-related. I think the United States is a laughing stock for not having any kind of modern, high-speed rail network. The AmTrak Acela Train on the Eastern Seaboard hardly counts either; that only serves the DC/Philly/NYC/Boston corridor on a single line. It pales in comparison to the TGV in France or Shinkansen ("Bullet Train") in Japan.

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 01-18-2004 03:38 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
What part of

quote:
Driving conversation continued in "Worst Places to Drive" thread.
did you not understand?

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-18-2004 03:41 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
But Adam, there was no convenient link to the Worst Places to Drive thread!

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.