|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Bill Gates...knighted!???
|
|
|
|
|
Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 01-28-2004 09:39 PM
From the Seattle Times:
According to the British rules, we cannot call him Sir Bill. That is fine. As Americans, it is not our way; we did not say Sir Bob for Bob Hope, or Sir Rudy for Rudy Giuliani or Sir Alan for Alan Greenspan, all of them also Knights Commander of the British Empire.
William Gates III will have to make do with the initials "KBE" if he wants something more than the three sticks. He should be warned, though, that in this egalitarian land, the "KBE" will be made fun of, even in his own company.
He could take a cue from Wesley Clark, also a Knight Commander of the British Empire, for his services in the NATO war against Serbia. In his run for president, Clark is proudly "Gen. Clark" — but never "Gen. Wesley Clark, KBE." Americans would consider it affected, and some might not vote for him if they knew what "KBE" meant.
Some honorees have turned down knighthoods. Authors Roald Dahl, Evelyn Waugh and J.G. Ballard reportedly did, as did comedian John Cleese and actress Honor Blackman, best known to Americans as Bond Girl "Pussy Galore."
It was all right to accept the award. We appreciate that Jack Straw, the British foreign minister, honored our Bill for his "profound impact on the British economy." He impacts us with even greater profundity.
But this is an informal part of an officially de-royalized republic. People here might adorn a name with "Ph.D." or even "C.L.U." but "KBE" is beyond the pale.
Bill knows that; it can be seen in his house: $50 million made to look like $2 million. Also, soon enough, in his name — officially William Gates III, KBE; to us, as always, Bill.
Copyright © 2004 The Seattle Times Company
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|