Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Spammer Sentenced to 7 Years in Prison (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Spammer Sentenced to 7 Years in Prison
Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 04-09-2005 10:47 AM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I love it. Here's to the "spam" those two will be taking in their "outboxes" in jail every day for the next several years:

"You've got male."

[beer]

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 04-09-2005 01:18 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Spamming would not be such a problem if Internet Service Providers would auto-delete any malware-infected e-mail that visits their servers.

A great deal of the "bot" or "zombie" computers vomiting out spam are those from people too cheap, too lazy (or both) to buy any anti-virus software and run other security measures on their machines. If all their e-mail was getting auto-deleted as soon as it left their machine, then they might do something about fixing the problem. Still, the big part of the responsibility lies with the ISPs and how they govern their mail servers.

It also doesn't help that the US Congress is a whore to the direct marketing industry. Lobbyists convinced those guys to create a spam-friendly "can spam act" law that is pretty much nothing more than a "you can spam" law. The act blocked effective caller ID for e-mail technologies being developed by Yahoo, Microsoft and others. Still, the ever growing tide of spam may force ISPs, NAPs and other parts of the Internet to adopt new methods for sending and receiving e-mail where it is much harder or even impossible for criminals to falsify headers.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 04-09-2005 10:36 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We use Mailsweeper to scan for incoming spam. One thing it does is a reverse DNS lookup. So, when an email "server" connects to us, if there's no DNS record for that IP address, our server drops the connection immediately. Conveniently, the amount of spam making it into the system here dropped probably eighty five percent.

One thing that would be helpful for them to add to Mailsweeper is a "Spell Check" on the subject line. If email comes in with "V1a.grA" in the subject.... since it fails a spell check... DELETE. Have a nice day. (Actually, you'd want to put it into quarantine to see if it's real mail or not.)

I don't want anyone who can't spell emailing me anyway. [Razz]

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 04-10-2005 12:12 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
While I'm glad these spammers got arrested, I agree with Joe: they are only being charges with some 'other' crime. And Bobby is right in that Congress won't do anything, and (I will add) neither will ISP's. AOL didn't know someone was sending 10 million e-mails a day, even if it was spread out over several user accounts? Bite me!

Abby Hoffman once suggested that, whenever a politician says; "... I promise to ..." in a speech, that everyone go and flush the toilet, messing things up so no one dare do it again. We need to do the same whenever Congress votes to allow spammers to continue. 'Ping day' or whatever.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.