|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Do you leave your PC on or turn it off when not using it?
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 07-26-2004 08:57 PM
Just to upset Brad and his Windows fetish
# uname -a ULTRIX armadillo 4.5 0 RISC # uptime 9:57pm up 727 days, 1:51, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 --------------- $ uname -a SunOS dragon 5.8 Generic_108528-23 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2 $ uptime 9:57pm up 335 days, 6:51, 9 users, load average: 0.14, 0.13, 0.10 --------------- H:\>ver
Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195]
H:\>net statistics workstation Workstation Statistics for \\BUTTERFLY
Statistics since 6/13/2004 6:31 PM
[snippage]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ryan Luby
Film Handler

Posts: 70
From: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Registered: Jun 2004
|
posted 07-28-2004 02:34 PM
Because it's relevent and new: Go Green: Shut down idle PCs
--------- Go green: Shut down idle PCs
By Brian Bergstein Associated Press Wednesday, July 28, 2004 Posted: 12:37 PM EDT (1637 GMT)
(AP) -- Q. I've heard that frequently turning my computer on and off can hurt the performance of internal parts. But I don't want to leave it on all the time either and waste power. What's the best course?
A. While it once might have been true that computer hard drives or power-supply systems could be degraded over time by turning the machines on and off, there's little reason now not to go the green (and money-saving) route: Shut things completely down if you're not going to be using your PC for many hours.
Recent tests at Canada's University of Waterloo found that computers with Pentium 4 processors running at 1.7 gigahertz drew 110 watts of electricity while booting up and 60 watts when they were on but idle. A 17-inch cathode-ray tube (CRT) monitor added an additional 75 watts. Newer, flat-screen LCD monitors use about half as much juice as CRTs.
In a sense, then, the PC isn't a big juice hog. A microwave oven devours electricity at a rate of 750 to 1,100 watts, according to the U.S. Department of Energy.
PCs in power-saving standby or sleep mode have even less of a presence. In the Waterloo tests, they were draining 35 watts. That's roughly equivalent to three clock radios.
But add up hours of standby time, and multiply that by the millions of computers in the world, and it is some serious electricity.
In fact, microchip maker Infineon Technologies AG, which is working on making electronics' sleep modes more energy-efficient, estimates that a mere 1 percent decrease in standby power consumption would save the nation 360 megawatts -- the equivalent of a medium-sized power plant. Put another way, 10 percent of an average home's electricity consumption comes from machines of some kind sitting on standby, said Infineon spokesman Saswato Das.
Dell Inc., the world's leading seller of PCs, has no official position on whether its customers should leave the machines running or not. Leaving computers on all the time doesn't erode their performance, but it doesn't appear that turning them off and on does either, because the reliability of key parts has improved significantly, spokesman Lionel Menchaca said.
"There used to be a bigger difference in terms of wear and tear when you power up your PC, but it's not as much of an issue now," Menchaca said.
After the tests at Waterloo, Manfred Grisebach of the university's information systems and technology group pointed out that hard drives that never get shut down seem to live a long time. But, he said, so do drives that get shut off all the time.
"What we can't say is which last longer," he said.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|