|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: If you're drunk and you know it, post here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William Hooper
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1879
From: Mobile, AL USA
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 08-02-2004 03:51 AM
Jason Burroughs is correct, Congress passed a law witholding federal highway money from states which did not raise the dinking age to 21. It was blackmail; even the bill's proponents called it that, but they didn't care if it acheived their ends.
Personally, I think it's one of the stupidest things done. The impact was minuscule on highway safety, it's bigoted in its viewpoint of 'It was OK when I drank at that age, but we were somehow more different than you little rapscallions', & it's brought about destructive social changes.
I've noticed a HUGE change in drinking behavior in young people since the drinking age was raised to 21. Instead of hitting 18, going to a club & having a drink to loosen inhibitions & refine social skills, now the point is to just get drunk. Learned at a club, since the primary objective was socializing, folks didn't get so damn drunk because they lost ability to socialize & achieve their objective.
Now, like in the days of prohibition, there's a 'find booze & drink to intoxication' objective. Drink while ya got 'em.
It's stupid to think young folks won't be looking for alcohol. In moderation, which they're not learning now, it's never more enjoyable than when you're 18 - 21. There's little that can compare with a social drink at that age in a club, or splitting a couple of beers or bottles of wine while sitting at the beach with friends at night watching the stars & stuff. By about 21 - 22, it's really more of a learned custom.
The drinking behavior that's learned at that age continues afterwards. 22 & 23 year-olds are now still getting overwhelmingly plastered while drinking, & doing it more often since they can then get alcohol more easily (legally). It's like the aftermath of prohibition, when for decades after the adult population had a much larger, unsurprisedly to all, population of drunks that couldn't moderate at parties, had their problem exacerbated into showing up hungover & plastered at work, etc.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 08-02-2004 04:25 AM
We've seen a similar thing happen here, though I'm not sure that it's entirely age-related. The way alcohol is served in public seems to be more geared to getting pissed quick than to having a drink or two as a social activity. Chain pubs with a large floorspace (basically, aircraft hangars with a bar at one end) but very few seats and tables are opening up all over the place and most of them run 'happy hour' promotions. While the Brits have always traditionally drunk beer in pints, it has until recently been home-grown stuff with an alcohol content of 2-3%. Over the last 10-15 years European lagers of 5-7%, also served by the pint, increasingly became the young thug's beverage of choice (hence the term 'lager lout'): even though if you go to their countries of origin you'll find that they're hardly ever served in quantities larger than a 330cl bottle. And finally, there is the 11pm mandatory closing time, which encourages those who don't know better to get as pissed as possible before the deadline.
There are some well-run pubs, which have plenty of tables, the day's newspapers, quiet music if any and an atmosphere which encourages having a drink as one part - but not the only part - of going out in the evening or a weekend lunchtime, but they're increasingly becoming the exception which proves the rule. Unless we can start to convince teenagers away from the idea that the only justification for having a drink at all is to get totally and utterly trollied, then it really doesn't matter what we make the legal minimum age: alcohol abuse will continue to be a major social problem.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|