|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Mini DV vs. DVD for public screening
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 09-08-2004 11:06 AM
Brad,
I have no doubt that you and Joe have had wonderful experiences with your cameras and tapes. That is wonderful news and I hope you guys continue to enjoy success. I would simply attribute your success and Joe's to luck-of-the-draw and, perhaps, comparatively limited experience with the format.
Based on my experience shooting well over 200 hours of footage and producing 2 features, 2 documentaries, 2 concerts, about a dozen commercials and over 20 hours of television product...
1. Data dropouts right out of the camera. 2. Data dropouts over time. In other words the tape *was* perfect a year ago and now it won't playback. (Sometimes if you have enough machines you might get lucky and find one that will playback.) 3. Inability to play certain tapes in certain machines, which is why I would not rely on DV tape as the principal medium for an important screening.
These problems are not unique to my experience nor are they "user failure" problems. The DV format has opened many doors for independent producers and is definitely a "good thing." But the truth is that it is an imperfect format. My negative experiences have been shared by others. In addition, it is widely known that you cannot record in LP mode and expect other machines to playback -- this is actually printed in instruction manuals. That is a serious flaw in the design of the format; any miniDV tape should playback in any unit bearing the miniDV logo regardless of tape speed. Added to which, the tape and cassette are teenie-tiny making them (and the data) VERY susceptible to damage.
I have used miniDV media by Sony and Panasonic. Both cameras are Canon GL-1. I also have a Sony GVD300 deck. Most times everything works fine but certainly not 100% of the time.
I owned an XL-1 initially but then sold it after comparing the image between it and the GL-1. To my eye, the GL-1 produces a better image.
Right now I'm in college but I will be capturing direct-to-disk when I start producing again. [ 09-08-2004, 01:51 PM: Message edited by: Manny Knowles ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|