Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Wireless Networks / Routers (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Wireless Networks / Routers
Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-21-2004 01:41 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wouldn't that be like saying that you just bought a new car and didn't know how to drive it?

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 12-21-2004 01:52 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Scott, I don't think many consumers are likely to be willing
to upgrade firmware with tftp.

There's nothing wrong with running an open wireless network, as long as you understand the risks. Many people do it deliberately. Friendliness and openness and all that.

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Williams
Master Film Handler

Posts: 255
From: Knoxville, TN
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 12-21-2004 01:53 PM      Profile for Mike Williams   Email Mike Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Scott Norwood
Wouldn't that be like saying that you just bought a new car and didn't know how to drive it?

I don't think so. Using the car analogy, I think it would be like saying "I bought a new car, but did not know that my neighbor's kid was joy riding in it at night when I was asleep."

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 12-21-2004 06:52 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: John Hawkinson
There's nothing wrong with running an open wireless network, as long as you understand the risks. Many people do it deliberately. Friendliness and openness and all that.
This is a pretty good marketing tool for certain kinds of businesses, such as coffee shops, restaurants, bookstores and any other place geared to attract a more technologically oriented (and likely more affluent) crowd. I was amazed that free WiFi hotspots were popping up in places like new rest areas along Texas highways.

What isn't smart is when someone is running their home computing network behind an unsecured wireless router. Anyone with a notebook computer could drive around neighborhoods in just about any city and find unsecured routers and full access to computers behind the routers.

 |  IP: Logged

David Yauch
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 206
From: Mesa, AZ, USA
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted 12-22-2004 11:02 PM      Profile for David Yauch   Email David Yauch   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree with bobby. And if you don't secure your network, at LEAST put a password on all of your network files.

Another option is to leave it unsecure, wait for some activity that isn't your own, and then run outside with a shotgun and chase off the perp. Either that or throw a bunch of files with names like "credit card numbers," "banking account numbers," and "porn site passwords" in your documents folder, making sure they are thoroughly virus ridden first...

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 12-23-2004 03:07 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Some of us believe in securing our endsystems so they're not vulnerable to network attack. If you grow dependant on a firewall, you are eventually doomed to failure. Someone will plug in another machine on the network with virus, or crack the encryption on your wireless network, etc. You are inevitably doomed to fail.

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 12-23-2004 05:47 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Indeed, because nobody would ever attack an unencrypted connection.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-23-2004 09:35 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Agreed completely with jhawk. Your systems should be set up in a reasonably "secure" fashion regardless of what sort of packet filter is (or isn't) between them and the rest of the world.

Thus, the real concern with open access points isn't one of intrusion, but rather one of misuse of one's network connectivity (e.g. to send out spam, attack remote hosts, or do any number of other "bad" things for which a typical ISP would kill your account).

 |  IP: Logged

Scott D. Neff
Theatre Dork

Posts: 919
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 12-24-2004 02:38 AM      Profile for Scott D. Neff   Author's Homepage   Email Scott D. Neff   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks to everybody for their replies.

I've been too busy Christmas shopping to dick around with the silly router since I posted.

The issue that sounds most likely to be the problem would be the firewall situation. I am running the McAfee personal firewall+ program that came with my compy, so that's probably one evil I need to root out.

Hopefully tomorrow I can figure it all out.

Merry Christmas everybody.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 12-24-2004 10:52 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I guess I wasn't clear enough in my point. The problem with most unsecured wireless access points is that most computers behind them have low levels of security.

You can wardrive around town and find at least a few computers with shared level access and be able to see and alter the contents of the hard disc. Jhawk is right that a firewall inside a router is not enough.

There's at least several different things users should be doing to protect their machines. The most basic steps for any WindowsXP machine should be controlling or removing any shared level access from the machine on the network, having a software firewall running to control data leaving the computer and having updated anti-viral/anti-spyware software.

Most WindowsXP users simply use a single login with full administrator rights. I don't agree with that practice. It's a lot better to have an admin-level login to only use when you're making alterations to software or accessing sensitive data. Use a more restricted login for everyday/casual use.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.