Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » What is your computer's monitor resolution? (Page 4)

 
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
Author Topic: What is your computer's monitor resolution?
Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-30-2005 02:42 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
on the laptop 800x600
1024x768 on the desktop windows machine the OS2 machine is 1280x1074

[ 10-30-2005, 06:33 PM: Message edited by: Gordon McLeod ]

 |  IP: Logged

Joshua Waaland
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 800
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-30-2005 03:53 PM      Profile for Joshua Waaland   Email Joshua Waaland   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm running 1280 x 1024 here.

 |  IP: Logged

Gunnar Johansson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 181
From: Gothenburg, Sweden
Registered: Mar 2003


 - posted 10-31-2005 05:58 AM      Profile for Gunnar Johansson   Author's Homepage   Email Gunnar Johansson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
1280x1024

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Gordon
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 580
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Aug 2005


 - posted 10-31-2005 06:56 AM      Profile for Paul Gordon   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Gordon   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
i'm running at 1152 x 870 on a OS x system

 |  IP: Logged

Cory Isemann
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 500
From: White Plains, MD, USA
Registered: Jun 2004


 - posted 10-31-2005 07:43 AM      Profile for Cory Isemann   Author's Homepage   Email Cory Isemann   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Work: 1280x1024 on 19" CRT and extended to an 18" flat panel at 1280x1024 also.

Home: 1024x768 on a 17" CRT. (hangs head in shame)

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Fuentes
Mmmm, Dr. Pepper!

Posts: 1168
From: Corpus Christi, TX United States
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 10-31-2005 07:44 AM      Profile for Jeremy Fuentes   Email Jeremy Fuentes   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Not that it matters anymore, since it looks like things have changed, but I'm on 1024x768.

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Wilbert
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 590
From: Bellingham, WA, USA
Registered: Mar 2002


 - posted 10-31-2005 12:03 PM      Profile for Adam Wilbert   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Wilbert   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
both at home and on my laptop : 1440x900

widescreen is the only true film-tech way to go. [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Jorgenson
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1002
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: Feb 2005


 - posted 11-01-2005 05:12 AM      Profile for Jeremy Jorgenson   Author's Homepage   Email Jeremy Jorgenson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
1280x1024

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Jentsch
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: New Berlin, WI, USA
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 11-02-2005 12:37 PM      Profile for Scott Jentsch   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Jentsch   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It sounds like it doesn't matter, but I'll put in my reply nonetheless...

1280x1024 (x2 side-by-side monitors)

But...

My browser window size is typically around 900x950. I rarely maximize my browser window, because doing so reduces your computer into a glorified terminal. Single-tasking is not for me...

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 11-02-2005 03:30 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
1024x768 on an IBM ThinkPad

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 11-03-2005 07:20 AM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
1280x1024 at work

 |  IP: Logged

Bruce McGee
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1776
From: Asheville, NC USA... Nowhere in Particular.
Registered: Aug 1999


 - posted 11-03-2005 08:55 AM      Profile for Bruce McGee   Email Bruce McGee   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
1024x768 until I realized that I have to squint to read the screen...

Its on 800 x 600 right now. I can read. Life is good. 2 year old Dell 17" Trinitron monitor.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 11-03-2005 12:17 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
1024 x 768 at home or at work.

 |  IP: Logged

Paer Hoegberg
Film Handler

Posts: 81
From: Borlänge, Sweden
Registered: Apr 2005


 - posted 11-03-2005 06:27 PM      Profile for Paer Hoegberg   Email Paer Hoegberg   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
1280x1024 (x2 monitors) at home
1600x1200 (x2 monitors) at work

1024x768 on my laptop

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 11-06-2005 05:21 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've been looking at new notebooks. I wanted to try and keep it around $1K and no more. I ended up buying a Dell Latitude D810 from the Dell Outlet (refurbished). Very nicely equipped, has incredible battery life, 1GB RAM, 60GB 7200RPM drive, 3 year warranty. Best part is there was no CRAP installed on it, just plain vanilla XP Home, no activation required. And Dell still gives you a real XP install CD, which almost nobody else does these days.

The one thing I've decided I really don't like though is the WXGA screen resolution. WXGA is 1280 x 800, found on many notebooks in the $800-$1500 retail price range. I thought I could live with it, but it's really bugging me. I'm accustomed to using 1280 x 1024. 1280 x 800 is like a 4:3 display that's been matted to 16:9 (really 16:10).

WXGA is like the bastard stepchild of screen resolutions. Bah.

I'm still deciding if I'm going to keep this notebook. I think I'd be happier with a 1280 x 1024 4:3 display. There's no way I'm gonna fork over another grand to get WUXGA+ or whatever the highest widescreen notebook rez is these days.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.