|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Book writing and self-publishing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 11-27-2005 09:56 AM
It's actually 280 pages (total length 101,724 words excluding the index). I've emailed Amazon asking them to correct that, but they only accept requests for those sorts of corrections from the publisher. Wallflower Press has done likewise, but Amazon has not responded as yet.
quote: Michael Schaffer Not a whole lot for such a complex subject
The point of the book is to 'boil down' a complex subject for people who need a starting point. Believe it or not, it would have taken me half the time to write if I'd been allowed three times the length. Editing text down to fit a word length limit was, I found, the most difficult part of the whole business, and gave me a lot of respect for newspaper journalists who have to boil down often complicated issues into 300 or 500 words day in and day out. Specialists in those issues are of course going to complain that the journalist didn't get that judgement call right, but as a writer you've got to make the best judgement you can as to the most important things your reader needs to know within a given limit.
quote: Michael Schaffer Does it have pictures?
Yes, but not as many or to the quality I'd have liked. Again, that's a budget issue. Some of them I took myself, and others were licensed in. The worst moment came when I got the first set of proofs back. In the chapter on archival preservation I'd prepared 'before' and 'after' colour fading pics (a scanned frame from an element in our collection), similar to the ones Stephen Furley posted on another thread here. There was a detailed caption underneath explaining how dye fading happens ('The picture far right has a pink hue because...') and how archivists can correct it. When the proofs arrived, these pictures were there in black-and-white! In the end the publisher wasn't willing to go to the expense of a colour page, and so those pictures were taken out altogether (for obvious reasons). The relative weakness of the illustrations has been picked up in one review, which was a fair comment.
OK - a shameless self-promotion exercise, I admit - would anyone like to review the book for Film-Tech (in the 'ancillary equipment' section, I guess!)? I could bring a copy for Brad when we meet in Austin next week.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|