|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: 60 million gallons of gasoline blow up near London
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dick Vaughan
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1032
From: Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 12-20-2005 08:37 AM
Kodak may have benn spared but Fujifilm Electronic Imaging didn't fare so well according to this BBC online article here
Blast depot 'must not be rebuilt' The deputy PM faced pleas for financial help Residents and business people near the Buncefield oil depot have told Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott the site should not be rebuilt. Mr Prescott held meetings with local people on Saturday, nearly a week after the explosions at the site in Hemel Hempstead.
He described the scale of the blast damage as "just unbelievable".
Nearby residents and workers at the destroyed site said they wanted financial help from the government.
Mr Prescott held the meeting with 30 local residents and businesses on the Mayland Industrial Estate.
The local MP had urged him to bring "a chequebook in his back pocket" before the meeting.
The deputy prime minister said the government would draw from its experience helping those affected by the Boscastle floods.
'Tax rebate'
After surveying the devastated site he said: "The scale of the damage is just unbelievable. I don't think I've ever seen such destruction like that.
It is total destruction and I could not imagine anybody would have survived had that have been during normal business hours
Fujifilm spokesman
"It's well understandable why perhaps companies and indeed residents have been saying to me is it safe to live and work alongside them? That is a fundamental question which we will have to address ourselves to."
A spokesman from Fujifilm, who were based at the site, said: "We have about 140 people on that site normally.
"We were completely and utterly shocked to see... it is total destruction and I could not imagine anybody would have survived had that have been during normal business hours."
'Total disaster'
Workers who have lost their jobs face Christmas with no income, while some families will remain unable to go home.
Helen Morrell, 44, has run a sandwich shop near the depot since 1999.
Nearby businesses have begun to assess damage
She said: "The shop pays my mortgage. I would like some monetary aid, at least a tax rebate. That's the sort of thing the government should be thinking of."
Residents Debbie Zikmund and Derek Hood face thousands of pounds in repair bills on their house, which they were planning to sell.
"It's just a total disaster," said Ms Zikmund, 35. "We were due to exchange contracts and have people move in, but they are now refusing to."
Hertfordshire Oil Storage Limited, which runs the depot in Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, and is jointly owned by Total and Texaco, has given £150,000 to a council emergency fund.
The Conservative MP for Hemel Hempstead, Mike Penning, told BBC News the fire which followed a series of explosions last Sunday had deprived about 5,000 workers of their place of employment.
Before the meeting, Mr Prescott said: "My concern was to come... just to hear how people feel a week later.
"Of course there are longer term issues. There is the matter of resources."
Flight pitstops
When Mr Prescott first visited the site on Monday, the day after the explosions, he offered government help to the emergency services but was told they were able to cope.
The same day, he told the Commons the government would provide support and assistance after the fire.
The blaze sent a plume of thick smoke across southern England
The Buncefield depot is a major distribution terminal operated by Total and part-owned by Texaco, storing oil and petrol as well as kerosene for airports across the region, including Heathrow and Luton.
Rationing at the airport now means long-haul flights to Australia, the Far East and South Africa are having to make unscheduled stops to take on more fuel.
The depot, the UK's fifth-largest, also feeds filling stations for diesel and petrol, industrial oil and domestic heating oil for north London, Hertfordshire, Buckinghamshire and Northamptonshire.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 12-20-2005 02:31 PM
A pilot friend is reporting that the Heathrow situation could develop into political trouble. Apparently, if Buncefield is not rebuilt and recommissioned quickly, restoring the fuel supply to Heathrow is going to take years rather than months while an alternative replacement depot goes through the planning process. Heathrow is currently dealing with the shortage by rationing the amount of fuel it makes available to airlines.
This means that at the moment, many short haul airliners are having to fly into Heathrow with enough fuel to carry on to their next destination, and fuel is a lot more expensive if you buy it at a small regional airport than if you buy it at a major hub. As the article posted by Dick notes, long haul airliners are having to make a fuel stop somewhere else on their way in and/or out of Heathrow. According to my friend, the extra take-offs and landings burn a lot of extra fuel, increase the maintenance costs and accelerate the depreciation of the capital value of an aircraft. There's also the environmental impact of the extra fuel being burnt to consider.
The result is that airlines are willing to put up with the reduced fuel supply and increased cost for a few weeks, but if the shortages go on longer than that some long-haul airlines are thinking seriously about abandoning Heathrow for good, and even looking at somewhere other than London for the main airport of entry to the UK. For the regional cities which have good airports - e.g. Birmingham, Manchester and Newcastle - this could potentially be a welcome economic boost, I'd have thought.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|