|
|
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5
|
|
Author
|
Topic: What's your favorite movie poster?
|
Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 02-20-2006 01:42 AM
Anyone notice that the "transparency" posters (as we call them - you put them in a light box and that's what they look like...almost) have this tendency to crack more easily. If you fold them the paper cracks alot easier than one sided 1 sheets. I have no idea why, they just seem durable.
My favorite, which I won't post again is the 2001 - Star Child 1-sheet. Mine is not in as good a shape but it's dry-board mounted because the paper has become brittle and can no longer be handled. For me, aside from the fact that I think 2001 is a truly a masterpiece, but it also was the seminal film for the opening of our big theatre. Before I got there, the projection booth was empty except for the Eastman 25Bs. I told them if they wanted to run film in a 2500 seat house, we needed to put in 70mm. I got the go for only 35mm, not 70 (bureaucratic morons all).
I insisted that they needed mag penthouses -- I knew I wanted to open with 2001. Somehow they got the impression from the way I worded it that you couldn't get sound on any 35mm prints unless you had mag and a 4 channel house sound system.
Since then, I've run 2001 at least 5 times in all these years and I ran it again just last year with Keir Dullea speaking after the film. He was as charming as he was informative.
In all my years at the Center, working with a list of artists and celebrities, I have never done the trashy thing of asking for an autograph; it's considered unprofessional and quite low-brow, but for Keir Dullea, I swallowed my pride and after the show told him how this film was our seminal picture which opened Brooklyn Center Cinema. I asked if he wouldn't mind signing some of the original 11x14 graphics from the film that I just happened to have saved over the years and right there with me in my briefcase. I handed him 8 of them, asking if he would pick anyone he liked to sign. He was amazed that this stuff still existed. Not only did he sign one and then another, but on one he wrote, "Thanks Brooklyn Center Cinema and Frank for a great show." Then he let myself and our stage crew take pictures with him standing in front of the 1 sheet. I also have a 3-sheet (remember those?) but I didn't drag that out. I also have a replica of the HAL interface (red LED in the "eye" and all). He is quite a gracious gentleman. And of course I was floating on a cloud for a week.
I also have a CAMELOT odd size poster "NOW AT POPULAR PRICES" across the top after it came out of Roadshow. [ 02-23-2006, 11:41 AM: Message edited by: Frank Angel ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 02-23-2006 12:13 PM

Guys, I apologize for posting a 1-sheet in such poor condition as this is, but I still love the 70's look of this poster of what I still think is the best Disney film of all time (it doesn't look quite this bad in person -- reflections were problematic). The lettering, which has no relation to the film in terms of style, is very reminiscent of the hand draw publicity cards of the period of that re-release which had become very popular at the Filmore East and West (rock clubs) and the Electric Circus on in the East Village in NYC -- fluid, fat letters, usually curving around the central artwork. Many were sold as art posters in their own right. The Beatles "Rubber Soul" is a good example of this hand drawn style. No doubt Bobby can tell us if it has been turned into an actual font with a name.

And since CAMELOT was mentioned, here is one of the non-standard posters they used in the NYC subways.

Are any films nowadays released at popular prices? Or do they pretty much keep them all at unpopular prices?
Talking about font styles, is there a name for the bizzare font that you always find at the bottom of movie posters --that elongated, squished font that so often marrs an otherwise nice looking 1 sheet? It is obvious that it came out of the need to squeeze tons of credits in a small space while still maintaining size and where small point size wouldn't work. Thing is, most people couldn't give a flying rat's ass about most of the people listed. I guess you could call it EgoUtilitarian.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|