Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » And the Oscar will Go To... (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: And the Oscar will Go To...
Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 02-01-2006 10:20 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My predictions are...

A) This year's viewership of the Academy Awards will be the lowest ever; and
B) Hollywood, who chose the #48, #54, #68, #99, and #129 on the chart of highest grossing films of 2005 as "The Best Of The Best", will scratch their collective pointed heads on the morning of March 6th wondering why no one watched their stupid little TV show.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 02-02-2006 01:37 AM      Profile for Michael Coate   Email Michael Coate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Best Achievement in Music Written for Motion Pictures, Original Score
Nominees:
Memoirs of a Geisha (2005) - John Williams
Munich (2005) - John Williams

This has got to be, what, the fifth or sixth or tenth or fifteenth time in Williams' career that he has received two nominations in the same year! And to think, he could've (and perhaps should've) been nominated as well for "Episode III." Is this guy AMAZING, or what?!

quote: Bobby Henderson
I do think Episode III did get shafted
No kiddng. I realize that a lot of folks are tired of the whole "Star Wars" thing and are probably glad it got only a single nomination. Knock the dialogue, if you like, but come on...this was a tour de force (no pun intended) in all of the "craft" departments. And no Visual Effects nomination? I guess the perception is that this type of work is just "too easy" for ILM or that they've won too many times in the past. Whatever... Considering the number of effects-oriented movies these days, I think the Academy should consider making this a traditional five-nominee category.

And, call me crazy, but I actually think Ian McDiarmid (Palpatine/Emperor) deserved a supporting acting nom.

 |  IP: Logged

Gracia L. Babbidge
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 709
From: Bowdoin, Maine
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 02-02-2006 11:56 AM      Profile for Gracia L. Babbidge   Author's Homepage   Email Gracia L. Babbidge   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Seeing the nominations, I can't help but grin - a fair number of those films played at my theatre - or will be in the near future. Freaking sweet. [thumbsup]

For the curious we ran:
Junebug
The Squid And The Whale
Good Night And Good Luck
The Constant Gardener
Pride And Prejudice
Hauru no ugoku shiro
(our marquee said Howl's Moving Castle)
Enron: the Smartest Guys In The Room
Marche de l'empereur, La
(our marquee said the March of the Penguins)
Murderball

We're currently running: Capote

We shall soon be running:
Brokeback Mountain
Mrs. Henderson Presents
Paradise Now


...Hey we even ran Grizzly Man, and the Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill!

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Scott
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1300
From: Minneapolis, MN
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 02-02-2006 12:04 PM      Profile for Steve Scott   Email Steve Scott   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
VFX deserves to be treated like art direction or costume design. True, it is a highly integral part of modern filmmaking, but it ought to be treated like any other technical component of filmmaking.

Jar-Jar was not the star.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-02-2006 12:30 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
To follow up Gracia's list, here are the nomainated films which I have shown (at several different venues):

A History of Violence
Brokeback Mountain
Capote
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
Crash
Darwin's Nightmare
Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room
Good Night, and Good Luck.
Howl's Moving Castle
Junebug
Marche de l'empereur, La
Mrs. Henderson Presents
Murderball
North Country
Pride & Prejudice
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
The Squid and the Whale
Walk the Line
War of the Worlds

I've also shown Wild Parrots, but not Grizzly Man (which I want to see, but which didn't last long enough in this market for me to have the chance).

My personal favorite of 2005 was "Good Night and Good Luck" and I'd like to see it win Best Picture, Best Cinematography, and Best Art Direction.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Scott
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1300
From: Minneapolis, MN
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 02-02-2006 12:51 PM      Profile for Steve Scott   Email Steve Scott   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Grizzly Man will be shown on the Discovery Channel Friday, Feb. 3rd during prime time. I'm sure the DVD is rentable since it didn't get nominated [Frown]

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 02-02-2006 12:52 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Scott
VFX deserves to be treated like art direction or costume design. True, it is a highly integral part of modern filmmaking, but it ought to be treated like any other technical component of filmmaking.

Jar-Jar was not the star.

Sounds like you're making two arguments there. On the first, I agree with you.

On your second point, it's true that Jar-Jar wasn't the star of Sith, but he was a (bad) supporting character in Menace. And generally speaking, what about Gollum? Gollum was certainly a supporting character in the second two Lord Of The Rings movies, and I don't see why Andy Serkis couldn't have been nominated for his performance (yes, it was his performance - most if not all of it was motion captured) in Return Of The King. I think actors who lend their talent to digital characters should be able to be nominated for lead/supporting actor/actress awards. I also think Frank Oz should have been nominated for Yoda's performance in Empire.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Scott
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1300
From: Minneapolis, MN
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 02-02-2006 03:06 PM      Profile for Steve Scott   Email Steve Scott   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark, I was trying to personify VFX, but you're right on Andy Serkis and Frank Oz. However, it's always about the selection of decent films each year. While I could justify Oz being a great pick in 1980-81, Serkis was met with decent competition in past years' Academy Awards, probably due in no small part to the effort put out by Hollywood to compete with LOTR in those previous years.

I'm just amazed by how the 2005 crop was slight enough to allow a debate over a film like EP3 deserving more nominations. I felt let down by Lucas' new trilogy; to me, it lacked the classic movie passion of the original, something I see most "oscar-worthy" films & performances striving for. Even putting dialoge aside, there was nothing that drew me into the new trilogy.

But I will probably be all riled up next year if Snakes on a Plane gets snubbed, so I guess it's moot. [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Ron Yost
Master Film Handler

Posts: 344
From: Paso Robles, CA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 02-02-2006 09:15 PM      Profile for Ron Yost   Email Ron Yost   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
According to The Discovery Channel's website, "Grizzly Man" will be shown both tomorrow, 2/3 and Sat., 2/4, at 8 pm ET/PT. [Smile]

Ron Yost .. hasn't seen it yet, either.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 02-02-2006 10:54 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
All good points, Steve.

I still think there should be an award for "Most Successful Film". But Hollywood would probably find a way to snub Sith for that too.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 02-02-2006 11:35 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Scott
I'm just amazed by how the 2005 crop was slight enough to allow a debate over a film like EP3 deserving more nominations. I felt let down by Lucas' new trilogy; to me, it lacked the classic movie passion of the original, something I see most "oscar-worthy" films & performances striving for. Even putting dialoge aside, there was nothing that drew me into the new trilogy.
The Best Visual Effects Oscar is not awarded for things like writing quality, acting quality or any other qualities of dramatic narrative. Those qualities are totally irrelevant in that category.

I wasn't exactly blown away by Revenge of the Sith either. And I have certain deep philosophical disagreements with George Lucas with regard to the use of video in movie making -enough that some could mis-characterize it as being an "anti-Lucas" attitude. Still, what's fair is fair.

If the choice were mine, I would probably still give the Best Achievement in Visual Effects Oscar to King Kong. However, the visuals in Episode III were awful damned incredible at many points throughout that movie. The show should have at least been nominated in that category (as well as Best Sound, Sound Effects Editing and possibly a couple others).

Few, if anyone, in the entertainment press will point out this nominations slight. They're all too consumed in celebrity worship that they probably wish the categories like Best Editing, Cinematography, Visual Effects, etc. were handed out in the separate Scientic Achievement Awards ceremony. Let's devote 7 hours of network time to kiss actor ass!

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Jorgenson
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1002
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: Feb 2005


 - posted 02-03-2006 04:21 PM      Profile for Jeremy Jorgenson   Author's Homepage   Email Jeremy Jorgenson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
RE: lack of nominations for Episode III. To me it's not surprising, the second trilogy hasn't been met with as many technical nominations as it perhaps deserves. For example, Episode I deserved a costume design nomination, but instead The Talented Mr. Ripley got one (I'm not taking anything away from Ann Roth's designs ... I just feel Episode I was more worthy of note).

quote: Steve Scott
Serkis was met with decent competition in past years' Academy Awards
Last year's awards? He was fine in 13 Going on 30 and all, but yeah, I agree that those nominated were more deserving. [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.