Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Shaky movies SUCK! (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Shaky movies SUCK!
Paul Burt
Film Handler

Posts: 46
From: San Francisco, CA, United States
Registered: Apr 2006


 - posted 03-01-2007 12:51 AM      Profile for Paul Burt   Email Paul Burt   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The only hand-held feature that really was done right, imho, is Children of Men. It works, there's no headache, and it's not at all distracting. That's because the technique is integral to the film.
I saw a Lars von Trier film, Breaking the Waves, some years ago. Hand-held SCOPE, the whole film. An utter atrocity in terms of cinematography. I won't comment on the film itself, but the technique was making people in the audience physically ill. If there's a decent dogme film it's in spite of the concept, not because of it.

 |  IP: Logged

Allison Parsons
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 630
From: East Peoria, IL
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted 03-01-2007 01:16 AM      Profile for Allison Parsons   Author's Homepage   Email Allison Parsons   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
And we can't forget the king of all shaky movies: The Blair Witch Project!

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 03-01-2007 02:29 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The scary thing is ... you never get to see Cherie!

 |  IP: Logged

Carl Martin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1424
From: Oakland, CA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-01-2007 03:14 AM      Profile for Carl Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Carl Martin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
better a film make you ill than put you to sleep.

i like the dogme 95 movement. i don't necessarily like everything it's produced, in fact i've only seen (looking at list) 6 of them. i sure as hell wouldn't want it to be the only movement around. the worst thing about dogme is that it's mostly done on video, although that's not a requirement at all.

randy, i didn't mean to imply you had a shaky projector, just that i wouldn't confuse it with a handheld shot.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-01-2007 03:35 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What? I'd rather catch some ZZZ's than vomit. I think most humans would. Anyone who makes a movie in which the audience becomes ill does not deserve to be alive.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Schindler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1039
From: Oak Park, IL, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 03-01-2007 09:50 AM      Profile for Mike Schindler   Email Mike Schindler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Carl Martin
the worst thing about dogme is that it's mostly done on video, although that's not a requirement at all.
In fact, it was originally a requirement that films be shot on 35mm.

quote: Joe Redifer
I'd rather catch some ZZZ's than vomit. I think most humans would.
There are lots of people out there who are willing to vomit if the price is right. Look at the world's crazy/stupid obsession with alcohol.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-01-2007 03:35 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I really hate stupid people.

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Jorgenson
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1002
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: Feb 2005


 - posted 03-04-2007 07:18 AM      Profile for Jeremy Jorgenson   Author's Homepage   Email Jeremy Jorgenson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Randy Stankey
who in the world could want to watch this piece of shit?!
I saw it ('Moartea domnului Lazarescu') theatrically back in May, and I quite liked it. I can honestly say that in remembering the movie I never thought of it as shaky. Now you've piqued my interest and I'd like to take another look at it.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.