Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » mp4 question for Mac geeks (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: mp4 question for Mac geeks
Mike Olpin
Chop Chop!

Posts: 1852
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 03-23-2007 06:29 PM      Profile for Mike Olpin   Email Mike Olpin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Odd. The copy I know I didn't pay for works fine. Go fig. [Confused]

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Schaffer
"Where is the
Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 03-24-2007 04:58 AM      Profile for Michael Schaffer   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Schaffer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Joe Redifer
Yeah I've had VLC for a long time. Your sample file played perfectly fine. It also played in Quicktime, but was a bit stuttery, but all of the colors looked good.
Interesting. It was totally mosaicked when I played it in Quicktime on the PC. In the complete video, longer stretches sometimes work OK at first, but it seems that whenever a shot lasts for a while, the picture gets progressively greenish and then more and moe psychedelic, and then it starts breaking up. When you pause it for a moment or the shot changes, the picture seems to "recover", but then it gets funky again. I guess it must have something to do with progressive frame encoding.

I think the brief sample already demonstrates why Nero Digital is a pretty good format for this use. The image quality is slightly mre pixellated than on the original DVD, and the sound quality is fairly good (the original recording isn't all that brilliant either, it's from 1972). I chose the moment with the triangel and glockenspiel because plingy, belly sounds like that often don't work at all with compressed audio codecs - you hear massive artifacting -, but here, you can hear them quite clearly. Yet the overall file (1h15m) is just 680MB, not too bad at all, and much less than the VOB.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-24-2007 05:19 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The resolution is only a wimpy 608 x 464. That's weak. Nero must suck.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.