Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Everything is Scope this summer (Page 4)

 
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
Author Topic: Everything is Scope this summer
Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-18-2007 01:15 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
Mark, stick your comment up your butt. Watch Apocalypto carefully. There's a lot of points in there that very much look like they were video sourced. Same goes for the stuff from Michael Mann's last 2 movies. You can try as hard as you like to discredit me for commenting on what IS PLAINLY VISIBLE TO ANYONE WATCHING THOSE MOVIES. You're blind as a bat (or just lying your ass off) if you claim you don't see the problems either.

Bobby, You need to stop assuming things, thats the problem with 85% of your postings... its all speculation. In fact you'd get he F-T Award for amount of pure speculation per content. First off you need to see native Digital Cinema footage or dailies... as well as film dailies and then you might post something that some of us will believe. I have no interest in seeing Apocolypto myself but did you consider that some of it actually might have come from from HD video. The two are very different! That is very possible!! Also many times digital to film transfers greatly affect the image quality of the resulting film release sometimes it literally sucks. Take a look at any Pixar and compare the digtal and film print and the digital blows the film print away. So when you take all the other factors into play AND after you've see a variety of both native digital stuff and film then you'll have to swallow your foot as well. Its already badly damaged!

quote: Brad Allen
Exactly. Joe six pack has thought it is all video for years now. "you use a vcr in there right?"

You're right Brad!! can't count how many people have thought that only to be lown away by a trip up to the booth. They are totally blown away by the time by that huge "camera" up there.

Mark

[ 07-18-2007, 03:51 PM: Message edited by: Mark Gulbrandsen ]

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Enos
Film God

Posts: 2081
From: Richmond, Virginia, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 07-18-2007 03:14 PM      Profile for Bill Enos   Email Bill Enos   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One thing we can count on with discussions like these is that Mark G. can be counted on for an emotional input and Steve G. will give pretty much spot on information.

One thing though, when visitors come to the booth, they enjoy seeing the film projectors running while the the Barco DP 100 gets a glance at most and a big So What!

 |  IP: Logged

Thomas Pitt
Master Film Handler

Posts: 266
From: Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
Registered: May 2007


 - posted 07-18-2007 03:33 PM      Profile for Thomas Pitt   Email Thomas Pitt   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Not everything is scope these days... I went to see Shrek the Third a couple of days ago, and that was a flat format print.

Also, even if a movie is in scope, most (if not all) of the ads and trailers beforehand are in the flat format - requiring a lens and masking changeover just before the movie starts. I'm not sure if this is the case elsewhere, but in the UK it is.

This can introduce problems, however. Most projectionists will just press the start button, check if the first advert (or trailer) is in frame and focus and adjust if necessary. Then they just leave it for the rest of the movie.
All sorts of things can go wrong though - the lens, masking and aperture gate may not change over properly, the image may require refocusing etc.

Regarding anamorphic lenses on digital projectors; I think this is unnecessary. Simply align the projector to the screen in flat ratio. When you have a 'scope' aspect ratio digital showing, change the masking for scope and feed a letterboxed image to the projector. No lens changeovers required.

 |  IP: Logged

Dustin Mitchell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1865
From: Mondovi, WI, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 07-18-2007 03:51 PM      Profile for Dustin Mitchell   Email Dustin Mitchell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In the US scope versions of advertisements and movie previews are commonly available. Running the pre-show in flat and the feature in scope is a very rare thing, though some do it, either out of necessity (they are sub-run or running very old films and any trailers they might run are long out of circulation) or because they think its good showmanship (which hey, probably is).

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 07-18-2007 04:34 PM      Profile for Paul Linfesty   Email Paul Linfesty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I never saw a scope preview until 1981. They were always flat (1.85), regardless of origination (and the previews for scope films weren't letterbxed within the flat image, either). When Bakersfield's first plattered 6-plex opened in 1974, previews were only shown before flat features. Scope films went without any previews at all. Only when that AMC switched from true scope to cropped scope (around 2.0) Only in 1976 did they start performing a lens change between the flat previews and scope feature. When the UA opened in 1979, they also only ran previews only before flat films (you rarely saw more than two previews back in those days anyway. As a matter of fact, I saw many features of both ratios with no previews shown).

Interestingly, scope previews must have existed at some point, because there are plenty of DVDs containing them for older movies.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-18-2007 05:48 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Dustin Mitchell
In the US scope versions of advertisements and movie previews are commonly available. Running the pre-show in flat and the feature in scope is a very rare thing, though some do it, either out of necessity
When I first got in the biz, all trailers were flat, so there was always a lens change after the trailers if the feature was scope.

The first time I ran an entire program in scope was Titanic (early 1998). Up till then and for several years after, we might run the first one or two trailers in one format and switch to the other for the rest of the trailers and the feature, depending on what trailers we had on hand. I always hated to switch from scope trailers to a flat feature, but sometimes you do what you gotta do.

Nowadays, lens changes mid-show are pretty rare, but I'll still do it if we have a movie that we REALLY need to promote but only have the trailer in one format.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-18-2007 06:51 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bill Enos
One thing we can count on with discussions like these is that Mark G. can be counted on for an emotional input
Sorry Bill,

I'm a very laid back person... those that know me know that very well, I rarely get emotional, ok, perhaps once or twice a year.

quote: Bobby Henderson
Super35 is the pussy-ass oh I want to play it safe and bullshit fuck all lets make everything spherically fit all formats no matter what grainy ass compromise occurs.

Have you ever read a post from me containing stuff as is in the above quote? I just don't do that but there's no doubt that person is getting emotional, perhaps out of control! Sad that people resort to stuff like that any place in life. What I really dislike are false comments by people that haven't been there and done that. What you see on the screen in one theater is going to be different at the next theater... perhaps better... perhaps worse. My statements posted here are 95% from experience and 5% speculation or guess work.

If my experience and findings don't jive with Mr. Guttags findings all the time then thats life but thats also what makes this buisness interesting. Besides I love sparring with him... its alot of fun even though I loose most of the time!! We work in two completely different parts of the country under completely different conditions so different findings,opinions and experiences are very definately going to be the case much of the time. As for Bobby... well he has no experience in any of the film/digital fields he claims to be an expert in. But thats not my fault... thats his own.

RE: Scope Previews..... Yes they used to make them back in the 80's when I started in this biz but they were hard to come by especially for 2nd run houses. There were even scope trailers of some of the flat films but not all of them. They had to be spoken for well in advance in many cases. Today thankfully they are common. Even National Screen Service usually had scope previews of scope films if you ordered in advance.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 07-18-2007 07:11 PM      Profile for Bill Gabel   Email Bill Gabel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One thing to add about flat and scope trailers from the 1980's was almost all the flat trailers had mono soundtracks and 99% of the scope trailers had stereo soundtracks.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Heenan
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1896
From: Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 07-18-2007 09:15 PM      Profile for Mike Heenan   Email Mike Heenan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I once had a scope trailer for a Dudley Moore film from the early 80s that had the worst cropping I've ever seen... it's strange they didn't do the windowbox thing to preserve the aspect ratio. I recently found a Rocky 2 scope trailer that was windowboxed, and apparently it was attached to Moonraker.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 07-19-2007 04:04 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I did see a full track mag (no optical track) 35mm SCOPE trailer of the 1954's FOX CinemaScope film "How to marry a Millionaire" rolled up in a SLC theatre booth's storage room many moons ago..in IB Technicolor. Wish I could have snitched it now, but never even though of it then ....

 |  IP: Logged

John Koutsoumis
Master Film Handler

Posts: 261
From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 07-19-2007 05:19 AM      Profile for John Koutsoumis   Email John Koutsoumis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: David Stambaugh
It's great that The Simpsons Movie is scope after years of seeing the TV show in 1.33.
The Simpsons Movie would be fantastic in 35mm & in the 1.37 ratio. Imagine the picture so bright and sharp [Cool] . Forget scope. Quality over size any day.

 |  IP: Logged

Anslem Rayburn
Master Film Handler

Posts: 476
From: Yuma, AZ, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 07-19-2007 06:11 AM      Profile for Anslem Rayburn   Email Anslem Rayburn   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jeebus, why does everyone have to argue on here? Film-Tech has already banned religion and politics, is any sort of opinion next?

I am personally offended by Mark G's apparent assumption that because Bobby H doesn't work in a theater or on an active film set that he has no idea what he's talking about. I have always found Mark G. and Bobby H. to be knowledgable and respectful. I wish you both would talk this off-line and settle this, for the sake of everyone else on this site.

We don't always have to agree, but a little bit of respect for one another is appreciated.

 |  IP: Logged

Cameron Glendinning
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 845
From: West Ryde, Sydney, NSW Australia
Registered: Dec 2005


 - posted 07-19-2007 06:33 AM      Profile for Cameron Glendinning   Email Cameron Glendinning   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John. I love films shot well in 1.33 too. Its a great frame for composition, and the extra resolution on a smaller screen.

quote: Bobby Henderson
The native image from those cameras still looks like video. It doesn't look like a film image at all until it has undergone a lot of processing in post production.
Unfortunatly a one light digital transfer of film can look pretty video as well! Grading of film is the most expensive but fun bit of the whole film post production chain, but it is fair to say that for decades now, The colorist and film grading have been a big part of the film look. Before and during the 80's it was common to pick different brands and types of film for a look, ie fuji for its greens, kodak for its warm skin tones, for different scenes in the same movie.

Bobby I agree with you on the examples of crappy digital productions, I too can spot the difference, but its been getting harder and taking longer for me to pick! Personally Zodiac is the first digital film that I actually love the look and didn't realise nor care it was digital.

quote: Anslem Rayburn
Jeebus, why does everyone have to argue on here?
um it is so we can all learn. we do all have different and valid points of view and by uniting in one place people can see and make there own minds up! agreeing and being yes men does no one any good!

 |  IP: Logged

John Koutsoumis
Master Film Handler

Posts: 261
From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 07-19-2007 07:55 AM      Profile for John Koutsoumis   Email John Koutsoumis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Cameron Glendinning
John. I love films shot well in 1.33 too. Its a great frame for composition, and the extra resolution on a smaller screen.


Just today I did a test screen for the Melbourne International Film Festival of reel 1 of the 1925 silent version of "The Phantom of the Opera". In this restoration they have re-printed it so it can be shown in 1.37 as you would a sound film as opposed to full gate..

Our screening room has carbon arc lamphouses and the film just came up a real treat. It was something really special. Visually enthralling and several scenes to my eyes had deep focus (when do you see that in films today?). This 82 year old film looked better than most scope films of today [Cool] [Big Grin] [Razz] .

The film will screen at The Regent Theatre here in Melbourne as part of this years MIFF with David Johnson accompanying on a Wurlitzer 36 rank organ.

Recently films such as "The Illusionist", "Pan's Labyrinth", "Amazing Grace" and "Children of Men", show that one could make a film look dazzling (for the type of story the film tells) in the 1.85 format without having to resort to shooting in scope or super-35 2.39.

 |  IP: Logged

John Lasher
Master Film Handler

Posts: 493
From: Newark, DE
Registered: Aug 2001


 - posted 07-19-2007 07:35 PM      Profile for John Lasher   Author's Homepage   Email John Lasher   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Thomas Pitt
Also, even if a movie is in scope, most (if not all) of the ads and trailers beforehand are in the flat format - requiring a lens and masking changeover just before the movie starts.
Actually, here in the US, trailers for flat movies playing in front of scope movies are usually either...
  • ...pillar-boxed within the scope frame
  • ...enlarged to fill the scope frame a la Super35
OR
  • ...flat trailers projected in scope by the sort of idiots who you can stand with in front of a 16x9 tv in the electronics store where you both work and say, "Look at how stretched out that image is?" and after taking a moment to process this bit of information, they respond with something earth-shattering like, "Oh, it is? Gee, I hadn't noticed." (This type of presentation seems to be more prevalent the larger multiplex chains.)

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.