Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Spielberg says he wants to stick with film (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Spielberg says he wants to stick with film
Bill Enos
Film God

Posts: 2081
From: Richmond, Virginia, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 10-18-2007 04:20 PM      Profile for Bill Enos   Email Bill Enos   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
3D with polarized lenses and cheapo cardboard or plastic glasses is good only for selling headache remedies, anti nausea medicine and vomit clean up products. Too many people just can't tolerate it for long periods.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-18-2007 06:38 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
I'm afraid it is he who is going to end up do the deciding and the members need to let him know it should be them.

That'd never work, Mark. I'll bet half of the CBG members don't know anything at all about digital cinema, so they're in no position to make intelligent decisions but they'd certainly be willing to bog down the process with their uninformed opinions. (I know this because I've seen the same thing happen at our state meetings, just on different topics.)

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 10-19-2007 08:13 AM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Not true, Bill. Thousands of people sat through hours upon hours of polarized 3D at the two ten day 3D film fests in LA with no problems at all. I would suspect that more people threw up watching The Blair Witch Project than watching any properly presented polarized 3D movies during the 50s.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-19-2007 09:53 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark: There's a big difference between 3D fans at a 3D film fest and the "general public." Personally, I don't really care much for 3D except in novelty situations like Disney theme park attractions and such. That's really the only place it's "needed" except maybe in the occasional horror flick or kiddie movie.

I do expect the glasses situation to improve. If 3D catches on like the suits think it will, you'll probably be able to buy comfortable 3D glasses at any pharmacy along with the reading glasses and the sunglasses.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Enos
Film God

Posts: 2081
From: Richmond, Virginia, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 10-23-2007 07:18 PM      Profile for Bill Enos   Email Bill Enos   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
How many of those thousands watched solid straight thru whole films and how many have to look away for a couple minutes occasionally to maintain composure? Many will suffer through the discomfort for the rest of the experience.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 10-23-2007 11:58 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The first time watching Friday the 13th, Part III in 3D I had to take an eyeball break a couple times through the movie.

Never had to do that watching IMAX 3D movies, but I haven't seen any where the 3D content lasted 2 hours either.

Meet the Robinsons was a fairly short movie. It didn't seem to push me to the eye-strain limit, although I did peek at the picture a couple times without the glasses just to see how "doubled" the image looked.

I watched the 3D version of Tim Burton's Nightmare Before Christmas Monday night. Again, it's another short movie. So my eyes didn't "run out of gas" in a matter of speaking. The post-produced 3D effect was certainly better than what I saw with Superman Returns, but there were some areas where the effect was still fleeting. The 3D effect worked reasonably well on shots with deep depth of field (where everything was in sharp focus) and even better on shots where the camera was perfectly still. The trailer for New Line's Journey 3D looked pretty good.

BTW, Carmike seems to be going through another wave of Real-D system installations. The location here in Lawton now has three booths equipped with the process for three different sized houses. You can see the Z-filters through the port glass. The theater will be able to play a movie like Beowulf in 3D for its entire run, going from the biggest house to next to smallest auditorium.

quote: Mike Blakesley
Personally, I don't really care much for 3D except in novelty situations like Disney theme park attractions and such. That's really the only place it's "needed" except maybe in the occasional horror flick or kiddie movie.
Happy Feet is now playing on HBO. Hadn't seen it before. But judging how some of the "action" sequences and such were staged, it's easy to see how the movie was originally meant to be rendered in 3D. Lots of "in your face" kinds of effects.

I did see a 3D trailer for Happy Feet on the front of the IMAX 3D version of Superman Returns. The 3D on that looked really good.

I think 3D would be great for horror movies. The 3D in Friday the 13th Part III in 3D was the best thing about it. If the show had just been in 2D it would have been just another run of the mill "dying teenager movie."

 |  IP: Logged

Carl Martin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1424
From: Oakland, CA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 10-30-2007 08:38 PM      Profile for Carl Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Carl Martin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
friday the 13th 3 was in the less-than-ideal over-under process. i wasn't impressed with the 3-d, though you're right: that was the best thing about it.

i sat through all 39 (i think) shows at the second 3-d fest in l.a. without any problems except from pulling an almost-all-nighter at work before flying down.

during films i do sometimes rub one eye or the other. can't do that with 3-d, obviously.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.