|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Arthur C. Clarke - 1917 - 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian Michael Weidemann
Expert cat molester

Posts: 944
From: Costa Mesa, CA United States
Registered: Feb 2004
|
posted 03-20-2008 03:02 AM
All of Clarke's work was "serious" sci-fi. Most of the good, classic sci-fi was serious, in that, yes, they tried to keep sets of scientific facts straight. It's a genre that pioneers ideas. Clarke never seemed to be stretching reality. He made it seem very plausible, because it built rationally on science; it was well grounded. In fantasy books, I find myself unable to get into a story because this or that "wouldn't happen". Clarke's stories, for me, were always along the "that could and probably WOULD happen", given technological premises that were themselves plausible.
The core of Jupiter, after all, just may be pure diamond.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|