Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » How to interface line-level audio to amps 40 ft away (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: How to interface line-level audio to amps 40 ft away
John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 07-06-2008 06:09 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Remember that UL-listed devices with 2-prong plugs are frequently better devices than those with 3 prongs. The UL standard for leakage current on 2-prong devices is significantly more strict. It's only when the leakage current exceeds some threshold that manufacturers add the third prong.

Phil's constraints seems really weird. He wants to do it on-the-cheap, but doesn't want to use transformers and is considering much more expensive CAT5 transports? Is this for the home screening room, Phil?

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 07-06-2008 08:35 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The point John, is that with consumer grade equipment (or crap) is that they ARE 2 prong devices. Everything that touches their low-side can affect the reference...including a Cinema processor, that will be grounded, 45-feet away.

UL is concerned with safety...we are talking about noise immunity over the extended run for an unbalanced input.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug

Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 07-06-2008 08:57 PM      Profile for Phil Hill   Email Phil Hill       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes jhawk, this is for my home screening room.

Let me clarify the issue from my POV:

My 1st choice was to "do it right" and use Jensen Transformers and Belden 8451/9451 cables. But:

DIN-PC $135 x 6 = $810 ...way too expensive!

JT-11P-1 $70 x 6 = $420 ...still too expensive!

JT-10KB-D open frame 4:1 xmfr $60 x 6 = $360 Not sure about the open frame thingie...might be the best solution.

The Calrad baluns are transformers and would provide ground/hum isolation. The specs look like they have respectable performance and are about $60 pr.

But JFC! Almost $400 for the interface? At that point, I may as well do as Brad suggested and buy the QSC amps.

Side note: There is a 1.5" steel flex conduit between the locations and a #12AWG insulated common ground wire.

In some pile of stuff around this joint I call home, I have 10ea of Jensen-in-a-can input xmfrs 600-ohm to 10k...just don't know where.

Oh, and FWIW, Brad is right... I am a cheapass. And BTW: No matter how cute, I've NEVER tipped ANY pizza boy more than $60 on a $18 pizza! [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 07-06-2008 09:24 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I probably should have made a more narrowly-scoped statement.

In UL-listed devices, in a 2-prong device (Class II), leakage current is limited 0.75 mA (aka 750 MICRO-amps). For a 3-prong device (Class I), the limit is 5 mA (6x as much). Three-prong devices are frequently those that cannot meet the strict requirements for two-prong devices. So it's a misconception that "three-prong devices are better."

Is this directly applicable to the question of "Which crummy unbalanced consumer device is crummiest?" I'm not sure. Yes, everything that affects the low side of the signal can affect the noise floor, but just because there is a third prong does not mean that there is no connection between chassis ground and neutral (yes, there is no direct connection. But noise can run across caps, etc., etc.), or that the ground of an unbalanced signal wire is less noisy.

Bill Whitlock (at Jensen) gives a good explanation of this in his talk...it does not seem to be in the notes associated with that talk, alas.

(There is some peripheral discussion around page 9 of his Understanding, Finding, & Elminating AV Ground Loops, which is quite a good discusson of grounding-related issues.)

------------------

So Phil: What happens if you Just Do It? Do you actually have a problem?
--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 07-06-2008 10:38 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Phil, the BEST "bang-for-the-buck" audio transformers are by RDL. Not necessarily the "best" but when one weighs price and performance...they more than do the job.

For your application, there is the TX-1A (which is quite handy for one to lower a +4dBu to -10dBV as it has a trim on it)...the TX-10B is a straight bridging 10K transformer. These are on the "cheap" side of things but are flat 20-20KHz with only a +/- .5dB. THD is less than .05%. In short, they are good.

If you want the frequency response down to .1dB 20-20KHz then they have that too with the TX-AFC1F. However, they are going to creep you back up into the Jensen price range again as they are direct competitors.

If interested...visit www.rdlnet.com

We do sell them so I can speak to their quality.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 07-06-2008 10:55 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'll second the RDL suggestion. I've used their "hum-killers" to great satisfaction.

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug

Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 07-07-2008 05:36 PM      Profile for Phil Hill   Email Phil Hill       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve,
I totally forgot about RDL's stuff even though I've used their products many times in the past.

I will take your suggestion to use the RDL TX-1A. It looks like a good solution at $30 ea.

Thanks!

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-07-2008 07:06 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Told you he was cheap!

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug

Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 07-07-2008 07:17 PM      Profile for Phil Hill   Email Phil Hill       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey Grand-Poopie-BAH, NOT cheap but frugal! HA! [fu] [beer] [Razz]

 |  IP: Logged

Kenneth Wuepper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1026
From: Saginaw, MI, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 07-07-2008 08:59 PM      Profile for Kenneth Wuepper   Email Kenneth Wuepper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
NO! Parsimonious!

That's it.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.