|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Newsweek article on 3D: nothing new, move on
|
|
|
Jonathan Smith
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 201
From: Youngstown, OH
Registered: Jan 2010
|
posted 05-02-2010 11:02 PM
Well, Mike, when you are selling news to an audience comprised of a majority of idiots, it makes sense to write it with them in mind.
That's why conspiracy theorists and stories about "the man" are so pervasively popular.
One of the FEW examples of journalism I've seen that was fair to business was a report, I think in the Cleve. Plain Dealer about a gas station owner who was talking about how he was selling his gasoline at a loss for $3.999/Gal. when the companies started charging $4. He said that even if his sign COULD display a price higher than that, customers stopped coming to other stations when they went above that price almost completely.
It's a crazy world where businesses have to sell certain products at a loss to bring business in. And it ought to be illegal, because it often means that only companies that have a "trust" status, of selling so many items they can afford to take a loss on some of them, can stay in business.
How is a "dollar menu," for instance, where the big fast food chains are losing money on almost all of the items on it, fair to small locally owned burger businesses who simply cannot afford to sell much of anything at a loss and stay in business?
If news reporters cared what the hell they were talking about, with business, they would talk about what businesses are NETTING on products they sell, after all is said and done all the bills are paid, payroll settled, and wear and tear & depreciation taken into account.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 05-03-2010 05:46 AM
Rant on.
I have no problem with paying a fair price for stuff. But I do not like being nickeled and dimed to death.
It becomes sort of like buying tires: the tire is advertised at a cheap price, which does not include mounting, balancing, stems, etc. The same applies to the current state of the airline industry: in addition to the ticket price, there are security surcharges, checked bag surcharges, food surcharges, etc. It all feels somewhat deceptive (and I say that as one who never checks bags and doesn't generally eat airline food).
Just give me one fair price, and I will pay it without argument. Having 3D capability should increase market share, just as 70mm or digital sound would. Thus, there should be no need to charge extra for it.
Rant off.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|