|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: How to replace "The Movie Title" with "Movie Title, The" in Excel
|
Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 09-01-2011 09:53 PM
We'll have to disagree. All I know was that I did fine with WP and ever nearly had the frustrations that I had later when we went to WinWord. I started with the monospace DOS version of WP, but only for a short while -- then we quickly moved to WP's WYSIWYG DOS version where what you saw was what actually came out of the printer. We did posters, newsletters, brochures with ease, pictures, a great variety of mixed fonts, multiple columns for newsletters and great mail-merge work. Our current logo was created in WP and we still use it today.
Maybe the Mac version wasn't as sweet, but yes, I call it very intuitive. The key cheats that you seem to dislike were great, right there in front of your eyeballs and within no time at all you had them all 12 F keys X4 memorized. Then along came Word and all those commands were NOT in front of your eyeballs, they were BURRIED quite illogically in menus after menus. Oh sure, after a decade of working with Word, it's no problem, but all I can tell you is that I found WP much easier at the very start that I did Word. Maybe this is because our first computers were running CP/M, so coming to a much more sophistocated WP in DOS seemed like an intuitive miracle. Try dealing with wordprocessing in the CP/M OS and then switch to WP; it's all relative.
Actually I take that back; our first computers were a small network (only 8 workstations) -- an ALTOS system running on an early Linux. Just BREATH on that thing and all 8 stations would freeze. The server was so sensitive that if you accidently bumped into the table it was sitting on, the hard drive would crash...I mean, ruined. You gave that thing wide berth and walked quietly. When we had to move it, they walked with it as if they were carrying nitroglycerin.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002
|
posted 09-02-2011 09:34 AM
We had Apple IIEs and II Pluses or whatever they all were when I was in Middle school, and IIGSs in High School.
Visual Basic is one of the most illogically structured languages I have ever seen. Maybe it's just me, but I've written code in C, C++, TI Basic, TI Extended Basic, Apple Basic, Amiga Basic, PHP, Java, Javascript, and who knows how many scripting languages, and I've read books on Pascal, Assembly language, and MySQL stored procedures. Visual Basic doesn't make sense to me.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Scott Jentsch
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: New Berlin, WI, USA
Registered: Apr 2003
|
posted 09-09-2011 11:13 AM
I was a WordPerfect junkie from the 4.2 days, when all you had was a text-based interface with the function keys to do just about every command you would need. Others are correct in their statements that once you learned these keystrokes, you could get so much done in so much less time than having to hunt through menus. For those looking for true efficiency, keyboard shortcuts are always going to be faster than point and click menu choices.
While WordPerfect 5 tried to introduce mouse control into the text-based interface, it wasn't as easy as just using the keyboard shortcuts. It took WordPerfect a few versions to get the hang of a GUI interface, but they did it, and once they did, they had a program that was very functional and negated the need for many to have expensive and difficult to use desktop publishing programs, like Ventura and Pagemaker. Really advanced page layout still needed those programs, but WordPerfect was very good at it.
The most powerful thing about WordPerfect? Reveal Codes. With Reveal Codes turned on, you could figure anything out.
I had to give up on WordPerfect when I moved to Windows 7 64-bit and couldn't get it to install properly. As I wasn't doing much document writing any longer, and rather than purchase an updated version of the program, I decided to make do with Word. After several years, I still swear while using Word. It does inexplicable things, and it can't do labels decently to save its life.
Publisher is page layout for dummies, but it actually does labels better than Word can. I use both programs as little as humanly possible because they often waste more time than they're worth.
If I ever have to do more work in a Word Processor, I'll probably just purchase the latest copy of WordPerfect that will hopefully work on my system. I'll be money, time, and frustration ahead.
All this is said, of course, with the realization that people who grew up with Word feel the same way about WordPerfect that I do about Word. I guess it's all about what you cut your teeth with...
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|