|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: CBS Eye Logo Turns 60
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 10-24-2011 02:32 PM
While the CBS eye logo is very simple (as in "they paid someone for that design!?" simple) it is an important example of the sweeping change that took hold in graphic design during the 1950's.
The "International Typographic Movement," often called the "Swiss Movement" gave birth to things like the Helvetica type family and lots of bold, minimalist design. It shoved aside the previous trend of hand lettered scripts, twinkling stars & arrows and illustrations riffing off Norman Rockwell. That very dated looking "retro" style has tried to re-emerge from time to time, but only does so out of schtick. In reducing designs down to their most minimal, fundamental level the Swiss movement succeeded in creating arguably timeless designs.
For better or worse, large corporations embraced this graphic design movement over the next 20 years. They shed brand marks that either looked dated, too complicated or even too illustrational to be clean, timeless and truly corporate looking. William Golden's CBS Eye logo design is one of the examples that has endured for decades.
Paul Rand and Saul Bass deserve mention in this topic because the two were among the heaviest hitters in creating minimalist brand marks. Paul Rand created the logos for IBM, ABC, Westinghouse and UPS. Saul Bass designed the old Bell Telephone AT&T logo as well as the newer "death star" logo. He made logos for the United Way, Girl Scouts, Minolta, Warner Bros. (1970's version), United Airlines and many more.
I don't like the current brand mark CBS is using. Obviously they still use the eye logo. But they have some clunky looking techie lettering set next to it. When William Golden originally designed the logo he set the "CBS" letters in the Didot typeface. That combination works. The new one doesn't.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|