Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Theatres with a massive lobby (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Theatres with a massive lobby
Christopher Crouch
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 128
From: Holywood, ca, usa
Registered: May 2006


 - posted 08-19-2013 12:45 AM      Profile for Christopher Crouch   Email Christopher Crouch       Edit/Delete Post 
The AMC Puente Hills 20 has an unusually large lobby (more generic floorspace than impressive grandeur). Reminiscent of an indoor football field (with about the same level of atmosphere/charm), this oddity of 90's AMC megaplexes was the result of the theatre being built within the shell of a former department store.

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 01-27-2014 12:22 PM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
 -

 -

 -

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-05-2014 04:38 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yikes. Can can anyone say: garish, hard, sensory-overload. Can you say UGLY? Imagine what the place sounds like when it's filled with patrons (think kids) and all those hard surfaces reverberating and amplifying that cacophony -- not only voices, but there must be a dozen monitors blaring trailer soundtracks non-stop and the electronic bells and whistles of rows of arcade games all upping the decibel level. And although the pictures don't show it, I'll bet there are strobe lights going off somewhere in that visual mess. It's simply a big, noisy carnival midway. All that it's missing are the barkers hawking games of chance.

The atmosphere is not conducive to establishing a mood for anything but the big, noisy blockbusters where patrons can go from deafening noise and chaos in the lobby to deafening noise and chaos on the screen. Maybe it works for the action genre, but for any other type of movies (MOST, I'd say), this place screams pre-show stress.

I think of the RKO Keiths in Flushing/Queens NY with its huge, but graceful lobby with muted, warm colors and its stunning center-piece -- a three story rococo style fountain with the sound of gently cascading water flowing over status of baroque marble young maidens; it was able to be functional but with some sense of class and style. And then I look at this thing....

I suppose it is doing it job, evoking the motion picture milieu, such as it is -- but for me at least, the movie that jumps immediately to mind is one with Marlon Brando with the appropriate title for this place -- The Ugly American. All it needs to round off the scenario are a few thousand inebriated college spring-breakers cavorting through the place, occasionally vomiting hither and yon. Perfection.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 02-05-2014 08:16 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
All I think when I see a lobby like that: what a freaking waste of money. How much better could the auditoriums have been if more of the budget was spent on them rather than the damned lobby?

Today's multiplex theater executive must believe customers spend most of their time socializing in the lobby and only pop into the movie once in awhile to see what's happening.
[Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-05-2014 08:21 AM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Looks like an airport from hell

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 02-05-2014 09:51 AM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Frank Angel
Imagine what the place sounds like when it's filled with patrons (think kids) and all those hard surfaces reverberating and amplifying that cacophony -- not only voices, but there must be a dozen monitors blaring trailer soundtracks non-stop and the electronic bells and whistles of rows of arcade games all upping the decibel level.
You would actually be surprised at how quiet these locations are today. There is no audio on the screens and the arcade usually is tucked away in its own room. When the theatres did open, yes they were loud and obnoxious, one of the locations even had a theme park like popcorn popper that would shoot giant plastic boulder like popcorn pieces up in the air while making these really loud pops. But today the theatre is quieter than ever.

Originally many of these locations had Burger King, Taco Bell, New York Fries and KFC all located within the concession area. That has now changed. The Colossus and Paramount (Now Scotiabank) served alcohol.

quote: Frank Angel
The atmosphere is not conducive to establishing a mood for anything but the big, noisy blockbusters where patrons can go from deafening noise and chaos in the lobby to deafening noise and chaos on the screen. Maybe it works for the action genre, but for any other type of movies (MOST, I'd say), this place screams pre-show stress.
It was mostly blockbusters that would play at these locations. Famous Players had four trademarked concepts, the Silver City, Coliseum, Colossus and the Paramount flagship theatres. These theatre made a ton of money and they dominated Cineplex until Cineplex bought Famous Players out. The studios gave these locations preferential treatment most of the time, they were real money making locations and they were game changers.

quote: Frank Angel
I suppose it is doing it job, evoking the motion picture milieu, such as it is
Famous Players at the time had a slogan called "Big Screen, Big Sound, Big Difference" and if you look closely at the photos, you will see the slogans posted on one of the walls. The lobby did its job at the time, but so did the actual auditoriums as well. These theatres were spared no expense when it came to the actual auditoriums, all four of the Famous Players concepts (Silver City, Coliseum, Colossus and the Paramount flagship theatres) had THX auditoriums while the Colossus and Paramount theatre were all THX approved. When Paramount opened on May 19, 1999 (same day as Star Wars), the theatre was equipped right from the start with Dolby EX.

Paramount, Colossus and Coliseum had purpose built IMAX theatres added into the complex, I still go to the Coliseum IMAX location from time to time. I saw Dark Knight Rises at the Paramount (now called Scotiabank). The original Famous Players IMAX venues are really nice.

quote: Martin McCaffery
Looks like an airport from hell
LOL

Here are some exterior and interior pics of the Paramount now called Scotiabank:

 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
ULTRA AVX, not just AVX
 -

 -

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-05-2014 12:04 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hmm, additional pics of this monstrosity aren't doing much to change my mind. In fact, if you think back of how cartoonists traditionally portrayed their characters going crazy or being hit over the head, it was invariably with spiral circles in their eyes...yes, JUST like the spiral circles the designer-on-crack use all over the ceiling in the third picture (first interior) above. I guess that's exactly what he/she (nah, it had to be a he) was going for. You know, like this:

 -

A design that says, you're in TOON-town and you've just been hit over the head with a toon bat.

BTW, yes the interiors are noisy, garrish, but the exteriors....only one word comes to mind -- HIDIOUS. Oh wait...did I say one word? How silly of me: ghastly, repulsive, grisly, appalling and downright nasty. etc.

And PS, with all that tech-ie looking stuff outside in the lobby supposedly to give the impression you are in a state-of-the-art motion picture theatre, they couldn't seem to get the UltraAVXXX image to be framed properly on the screen, or is that "frame line" at the top of the screen there just for nostalgia's sake, reminiscent of how they used to have their film presentations start out-of-frame? "PROJECTIONIST"! [evil]

 |  IP: Logged

Buck Wilson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 894
From: St. Joseph MO, USA
Registered: Sep 2010


 - posted 02-05-2014 12:27 PM      Profile for Buck Wilson   Email Buck Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I quite like the look of that auditorium, save for the top-of-screen issue obviously.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Ogden
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 943
From: Little Falls, N.J.
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-05-2014 12:28 PM      Profile for Mark Ogden   Email Mark Ogden   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I spend a considerable amount of time in the GTA, and I avoid Cineplex and their overblown tacky eyesore theaters like the plague, even though their projection and sound are generally pretty good. The exception is the more tastefully appointed Varsity which is only a few blocks from where I stay. I understand that some of these places were originally built by Famous Players, but Cineplex has always been a lousy chain, dating from its days being run by the notorious craphound Garth Drabinsky (or as he was usually called, Darth Grabinsky). I don't know how old you are, Terry, but I wonder if you recall the Cineplex Eaton Center 18, probably the single worst example of film done wrong that I have ever personally encountered. Rear screen projection in most of the tiny, bare walled auditoriums, some of which were 16mm. For someone who used to visit great old Toronto theaters like the University, Uptown, Eglinton, Glendale, it was horrible.

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 02-05-2014 04:10 PM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mark Ogden
I don't know how old you are, Terry, but I wonder if you recall the Cineplex Eaton Center 18, probably the single worst example of film done wrong that I have ever personally encountered. Rear screen projection in most of the tiny, bare walled auditoriums, some of which were 16mm.
Mark, I have been around a really long time. The Eaton Center I remember very well, went there on many occasions. Yes a terrible way of projecting film for an audience and the cinemas were tiny. I believe the Eaton Center was on of the first theatres that Drabinsky opened under the Cineplex banner.

quote: Mark Ogden
but Cineplex has always been a lousy chain, dating from its days being run by the notorious craphound Garth Drabinsky
Yes they were a lousy chains, but Darth did open up some really nice THX approved theatres in the mid to late 80s, it was after they ousted him that Cineplex really went into the gutter in the mid 90s.

Cineplex under Drabinksy did have some good theatre and some bad ones. The original Varsity was his location.

The Uptown, Eglinton, Runnymede, Sheraton, Hollywood, York and Hyland were are great theatres. Some were Cineplex and some were Famous.

quote:
The exception is the more tastefully appointed Varsity which is only a few blocks from where I stay. I understand that some of these places were originally built by Famous Players,
I have never been fan of the Varsity, but it is a nice place. The newer Cineplex Cinemas were indeed formerly built by Famous Players.

quote:
Hmm, additional pics of this monstrosity aren't doing much to change my mind. In fact,
Does this change your mind?
 -
 -

quote: Buck Wilson
I quite like the look of that auditorium, save for the top-of-screen issue obviously.
The Ultra AVX screens are not bad, but they do not have masking.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-05-2014 05:32 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Cineplex eaton centre was the first of the Nat Taylor Drabinsky venture and was when built all 16mm rear screen and later 3 basement front screen 16mm were added Also Warden Woods, Scarbro town centre Hillcrest richmondhill, Market Sq,and Carlton in toronto were all front screen 16mm
The rear screen eatons used Bell& Howell machines converted to a 450 watt vertical lamphouse mounted on top shining down into the place where a regulare incadescent lamp went into a 45 degree mirror
The Front screen locations used Fumeo's and Prevost Favorite 16mm machines
When they switched to 35mm they replaced them with either Ernamann9 Prevost P35 or Ballantyne Pro35 in the front screens and in the rear screens it was Micocine or prevost
The Varsity twin was built by Canadian Odeon Theatres long before Cineplex ever surfaced

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 02-05-2014 05:42 PM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
And when was Eaton Centre upgraded to 35mm exactly?

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Ogden
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 943
From: Little Falls, N.J.
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-05-2014 07:55 PM      Profile for Mark Ogden   Email Mark Ogden   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Don't know when the 35mm conversion took place, but the Eaton Center's screen configuration changed several times during the years it was open. Started out as 18 screens, then it became 21, then it finished as 16, I think. There was one fairly large auditorium that at one point was actually 70mm capable by virtue of having a Vic-10, but I don't know if they ever took advantage of the capability. The rear screen auditoriums that I saw had Prevost machines that sat on the floor that were fed from double MUTS.

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 02-06-2014 12:17 AM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think Eaton Center opened with 18 and then was expanded to 21 or something, maybe it was reduced. It's been so long so it's hard to tell.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-06-2014 11:14 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Eaton Centre was 18 screens 3 in the basement were added then on the main level and upper level several were gutted to make #5 with the balcony it had a Prevost Favorite70 that had been at market sq initially ( used there for Tarzan in 70) later it was replaced with the V10 from the Don Mills theatre and it ran 70 several times It had a Xetron lamphouse and Balco platter
The rear screens except cinema 4 had prevosts that sat on the floor with cinemecanic single sided towers (not muts) or the imfamous 2 deck manford platters (originally built for 16mm)

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.