|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: 76 injured in London theatre ceiling collapse
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 12-23-2013 01:23 PM
quote: Steve Matz I think most of your Old Buildings built before the Depression had real quality workmanship in them.
Interesting. The cinema building boom in Britain really happened between the late '20s (the 1927 Films Act caused a sort of dotcom bubble in the movie business) and the outbreak of WWII, i.e. actually during the Great Depression. The movie business must have been one the very few that actually grew during this period. My first job was in a 1930-built picture palace of the sort that went up in almost every major town and city in Britain during the following decade. I remember the chief telling me that although these buildings look grand and impressive, appearances deceive and the truth is that most of them were thrown up as cheaply as possible, and the bare minimum was spent on maintenance thereafter.
That, combined with bomb damage during the war, a lot of which was bodge-repaired at best, was part of the reason why the chains were keen to close, pull down and replace with hangar-like ring road buildings so many of them once the multiplex era began in the '80s: the amount they were costing in maintenance, just to keep them open, was staggering.
I get the impression that a lot more theatre building went on during the '20s in the US than in Britain: Hollywood's aggressive international expansion (especially into other English-speaking markets, which caused the cinema-building boom there) really went into top gear with the arrival of sound, partly because of the need to recoup the huge investment that needed.
As for the West End incident being triggered by a simple weather event, that doesn't surprise me: what does is that whatever inspection regime existed was unable to establish that the building would not be able to withstand that event. I've been visiting relatives in London for the last week (got home yesterday), and the weather in the few days leading up to the event was unusually rainy, but, writing as someone who was born and brought up in Wimbledon, not exceptionally so.
The good news is no deaths and very few serious injuries, and hopefully the publicity resulting from this will result in preventative action taking place. Unlike the Knickerbocker Theatre disaster, this appears to be a failure of maintenance rather than of design, which in a way is also a positive.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|