Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Philip Seymour Hoffman was found dead today (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
Author Topic: Philip Seymour Hoffman was found dead today
Rick Raskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1100
From: Manassas Virginia
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 02-03-2014 04:17 PM      Profile for Rick Raskin   Email Rick Raskin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As Steve mentioned above, life is about choices. We all make choices and we all have to live with the consequences. The problem is stupid people make stupid choices and using hard drugs is one of them.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 02-03-2014 04:51 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The pro-legalization crowd often spin their point of view on the notion that drug users are mature grown-ups who have absolute, full control over their habits. They can quit at any time. Naturally, that's bullshit. Rational human will is only so strong in the face of a serious addiction to hard drugs.

In one interview Philip Seymour Hoffman said, bluntly, he would have been dead if he had the same access to money and drugs afforded to some of the better looking, better paid popular young actors.

The idea that legalizing hard drugs will reduce the danger is pure fantasy. Here's one fact: most overdose deaths occur via prescription drug abuse -controlled yet legal drugs.

Marijuana is the only drug I could go along with on legalizing. On its own Marijuana is not physically addictive. With that being said, I'll throw in my observation that every pot user I've known has used all kinds of other harder drugs. Pot alone simply isn't enough for most drug users.

Legalizing pot won't get rid of the illegal street drug trade. The only way to remove the criminal element from the drug business is by having no controls at all on any kind of drugs, including prescription drugs. As I said before, the crime problem surrounding drug use is very minor in comparison to a far larger substance abuse problem our media continues to hide at any opportunity. Legalizing many hard drugs and removing controls on prescription drugs would make an already enormous problem a whole lot worse.

And then there's no guarantee the crime would stop. Even if many drugs were legalized a lot of businesses would refuse to hire drug users. My workplace has a company-wide random drug screening policy. That won't go away if Oklahoma legalizes recreational pot use. We have different types of liability insurance policies to consider, not to mention regulations from DOT that mandate screenings for our crane truck drivers. In the end, an already large group of unemployable people will grow and strain our social services sector. They will resort to all kinds of crime to support their habits since they can't hold real jobs, be it robbery, burglary, prostitution, etc.

Health care costs are already bad enough in the United States as it is. Drug legalization will increase health care demand and make prices rise even higher. Insurance premiums for all kinds of things would be sure to rise too with a greater share of the population indulging in high risk activities like drug abuse.

We need to be attacking this problem head on rather than simply giving up, which is what broad legalization would do. I'm not for warehousing millions of non-violent drug offenders. That is a huge waste of money. But a better effort must be made to help drug users quit and lead healthier, less costly life styles.

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 02-03-2014 05:48 PM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Rick Raskin
stupid people make stupid choices and using hard drugs is one of them
So are soft drugs a less, more or not a stupid choice at all?

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 02-03-2014 06:30 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Once again, I'm with Bobby.

Choosing the right legal response to a given drug basically means one of four choices.

1 - totally illegal with active enforcement, e.g. heroin, crystal meth, alcohol in some Islamic theocracies and cannabis in some Asian countries with a big production/smuggling problem.
2 - totally illegal but without serious attempts at enforcement, e.g. cannabis in most countries, and absinthe and stevia in some.
3 - legal but regulated (e.g. by age restriction, taxation and/or a professional gatekeeper), e.g. alcohol, tobacco and prescription drugs.
4 - legal and unregulated, e.g. caffeine and non-prescription medicines.

As a general rule, a given substance hasn't ended up in the category it has by default: an active decision has been made by lawmakers in any given society. I guess the trick is to calibrate the tipping point at which the harm or cost of regulatory intervention starts to outweigh its benefits, and design your laws accordingly.

 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 02-03-2014 07:00 PM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 

 |  IP: Logged

Pravin Ratnam
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 844
From: Atlanta, GA,USA
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 02-03-2014 07:14 PM      Profile for Pravin Ratnam   Email Pravin Ratnam   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
From what I gather, in Hoffman's case, he did it as part of a partying lifestyle when he was still in NYU. So the culprit is the collective culture of he and his peer group. Even worse than an addict who does it in isolation are those who make it a group activity increasing the number of addicts. That is why pot should be legalized so the government can go after harder drugs with more focus. I would target the student population more than the adults who are lost cases by that time anyway.

Or just decriminalize it and let people die faster. That will be offset by the decrease in gang deaths in the drug trade. Also it will give law enforcement more time to really crank down hard on young people taking hard drugs.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Ogden
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 943
From: Little Falls, N.J.
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-03-2014 07:34 PM      Profile for Mark Ogden   Email Mark Ogden   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
I am all for legalizing most drugs,
I see. So then Hoffman would still have died from his hot shot, but it would have been a legal hot shot. Great.

Even though I once had a drug era myself, I am against legalization. I constantly hear that "drugs are no worse than alcohol", but look at the toll drinking takes on our society in illness, loss of productivity, disease, death. Everyone on this board knows an alcoholic. Does that kind of lifestyle look appealing to you? I've seen alcoholism up close, and believe me, there are NO cute, lovable "Arthur" types among those living in a bottle.

The last thing the United States or any country needs to do is legislate into acceptability another great national tragedy. I know the war against narcotics is costly, but a nation of crackheads and heroin freaks will be costlier still. And from what I have noticed from among my acquaintances that fell along the way: dope is a gateway drug.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Matz
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 672
From: Billings, Montana, USA
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 02-03-2014 07:40 PM      Profile for Steve Matz   Email Steve Matz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just watched the insider, Hoffman lived in a New York Apt that cost $11,000 a month. He was found in his bathroom with a syringe in his arm and syringes all over his apt, plus about 40 bins of Heroin according to police.

Too Bad this Garbage he was shooting in his Arm was more important to him in Life than his 3 young Daughters who now don't have a Father. Being able to spend 10 grand a month on getting high must have been Nice;How much did he spend on his Girls a Month.Good Actor or not, he was just another POS Druggie That the Hollywood crowd will cottle. I Don't feel sorry
for these People they have it made and throw it all away for
a temporary Thrill/High... Too bad he didn't spend as much time trying to live clean as he did perfecting his acting Talent... [thumbsdown]

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-04-2014 12:51 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't mind people dying from drug-related things. I have no sympathy for Hoffman. I will not miss him. He did it to himself. Also I hated him because he made Synedouche NY which is one of the worst movies ever conceived. I'd turn to drugs if I were in that turd, too. But still, his life, his responsibility.

What I DO mind is when drugs affect others. Like because of your crappy drug use you cause the death or injury of others. Fortunately Hoffman only caused comas with his pretentious Synedouche NY movie but no injuries or deaths due to his drug use. So legalization is tricky. I'm all for letting idiots destroy themselves, but not others.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 02-04-2014 09:23 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That's just it. A drug user doesn't enter his downward spiral alone. Drug users also use people and will drag anyone within reach down as far as they'll let him. It really pisses me off when kids are involved.

I have two cousins who have wasted much of their adult lives indulging in drugs and alcohol. Incidentally, both have been living in Colorado for the past few years to take advantage of that state's Marijuana laws. One has been in prison numerous times for things like DUI and drug possession. The other hadn't been in jail nearly as much, but he came close to strangling his teen-aged son during some hallucinogenic stupor. My parents wound up being legal guardians for his kids for a couple years, which cost them a bunch of money.

I have close friends and coworkers who have been through similar hell dealing with spouses, kids or other family members caught up in drug abuse. When you see enough of this selfish, insidious shit close up enough it's very easy to develop a hard, intolerant attitude toward drugs. I can understand pretty easily why our criminal justice system is handling this problem in such an unforgiving manner. When you see drug users pulling some of the crap they do it just makes you want to beat the shit of them with a tire iron.

One of the biggest problems is our popular culture. The movie industry, music industry, fashion industry and art world all romanticize drug use and risky behavior in general. Wanna be one of the cool kids? Try this!

The next thing the impressionable kid knows is he's a young adult with a felony conviction and a whole lot of life ahead of him, but with no opportunities thanks to some stupid choices. So then be becomes a full time piece of shit as an adult.

Drugs aren't the only addiction ruining the lives of Americans. Here in Oklahoma we have so many casinos if you closed your eyes and threw a rock you would hit one. Gambling addiction will make normally good people do some very crazy shit. I'd never imagine an old grandmother knocking over a bank at gunpoint or a model employee getting caught embezzling $500,000. But that's what gambling addiction will do to people.

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 02-04-2014 10:28 AM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
IMHO, Gambling addiction is more about boredom about a life that lacks meaning and excitement. I had a relative who mortgaged the paid for house her husband left her.

I claim no particular insight about drugs but my brother spent the first 40 years of his life doing and selling drugs with all that entails, cleaned out my mothers life savings, etc.

He met a woman from the burbs who came to Berkeley looking for excitement and found him. She died a few years later but left him something like $500,000 so what's it all about?

A whole lot of musicians did some fine work while under the influence (Miles Davis, Stan Getz, Ray Charles,et al).

Drugs and hard living seem to be part of the life and yet we glorify them for not following the rules the rest of us seemed resigned to following.

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Bird
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 777
From: Perth, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Jun 2000


 - posted 02-04-2014 11:05 AM      Profile for Dave Bird   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Bird   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My mother died at 46, a true tragedy, to the evil that is cancer. She was a "creative intellectual" too. But for her, what was most precious was just a few more minutes, just a little more time of coherent conversation in the company of family, friends, those she loved. So for her, pressing that little button that delivered the morphine was the LAST thing to do, only when the pain was unbearable, plus a minute or two more. Any of those minutes could be the last.

Losers like this who die in the gutter chasing a buzz? No tragedy there (other than to his wife and kids who he selfishly ignored). Rest in peace? None of these losers can be, so just keep it down, you're disturbing the angels.

 |  IP: Logged

Justin Hamaker
Film God

Posts: 2253
From: Lakeport, CA USA
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 02-04-2014 02:42 PM      Profile for Justin Hamaker   Author's Homepage   Email Justin Hamaker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bobby, I don't think the media is actively hiding the issue of drug abuse and the destruction it causes, I just think that it's not a news worthy issue in most case because it's an issue that really comes down to statistics. However, the violence and other crime that goes along with the drug trade does make news.

As an example, we had an incident in my community on Christmas Day, where a home owner shot and killed someone "invading" their home. Normally an open and shut case of self defense. However, it turns out the home own was a felon in possession of firearms, and illegal ammunition (so called cop killer rounds). Further investigation found nearly 1000 pounds of processed marijuana between his home, his business, and a third location. Plus his home where the shooting happened was a grow site.

This story is far more "news worthy" than that of some no-name junkie found dead of an overdose in an abandon building. The issue isn't really any different than why the media will spend so much time covering Justin Bieber or Kim Kardashian, rather than any of a million more important topics.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 02-04-2014 03:35 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I understand why the news media chooses to air certain stories. Unfortunately the general public ends up with a very distorted view on many issues because of the lack of balance in how those issues are reported.

Much of the drug legalization movement is centered around the very wrong idea that violent street crime is the worst part of illegal drug use. The news media is very guilty of presenting the issue in this manner. They don't say squat about the tens of thousands of Americans who die every year from their own substance abuse habits. They won't even look forward & imagine the kind of folly that would occur through "decriminalization" of street drugs. The nation would still be stuck with a large and now suddenly growing group of unemployable people. What will those shit-birds do for money if they can't hold down a job? That's right: resort to crime. So much for legalization getting criminals off the street. I think people in the news media would suck at chess because they can't think a few moves ahead.

Not only does the media obsess over violent street crime, they would have every American believing the situation is now worse than it has ever been when the fact of the matter is America's streets are probably safer now than they have ever been in this country's history. I feel sorry for kids growing up these days. Many are imprisoned in their own homes or constantly shadowed by their parents at every turn. When my brother and I were kids we had independence. It was pretty nice.

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 02-04-2014 08:19 PM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Justin Hamaker
However, the violence and other crime that goes along with the drug trade does make news.
Exactly, bingo, you get it! The media reports the issue because it is interesting the average person. It is interesting because there is crime involved.

If the government removes the criminal aspect of drugs and they actively regulate drugs and provide the drugs for a low price (just like cigarettes) then you will effectively reduce the amount of crime that is connected to drug use. The media will move on to other things.

The whole concept of legalization is not to reduce drug use, it is to reduce the crime connected with drug use. This is what a lot of forum members simply do not understand.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.