|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Advice needed on venue reference footage
|
|
|
Justin Silverstein
Film Handler
Posts: 10
From: Northport, NY, USA
Registered: Feb 2014
|
posted 02-10-2014 11:28 PM
Frank, while I of course understand and respect what you're saying, I don't think it's necessary for people to contact their own lawyers pre-emptively. If desired, I would be happy to write up and sign a formal contract affirming that the footage will be shared with no one and seen by no one, and offering to assume the burden of any legal culpability that might result were I to violate that promise. (IMHO, this would really be overkill, as the level of legal risk involved is minimal as far as I can tell, but I'll do it if that's what people need to feel comfortable working with me.) Paying for pre-emptive legal consultation fees for each individual who works with me isn't going to work for my budget, though.
And, Mike- interesting idea, and one of the first to occur to me, but none of the theater owners I spoke to would have any of it.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 02-11-2014 04:26 PM
quote: Terry Lynn-Stevens If I am correct, I believe it is a criminal offense to operate a recording device inside a movie theatre, I don't think it matters if you are recording the movie or not. There would be some legal matters here...
And I'd speculate that there are civil, as well as criminal ones, focusing mainly on copyright.
I'm doing a lot of speculating here, because I don't have the background knowledge needed to quote the chapter and verse of US (federal and individual states') law on the issue. As regulars on this forum know, but the OP of this thread might not, I'm originally from the UK and only emigrated here last year. However, I did do a lot of moving image archiving work on the other side of the pond, which involved me in quite a bit of the geekery around footage licensing and the copyright issues associated with that.
The first thing I'm not sure about is whether a movie theater qualifies as a public place for the purposes of privacy and copyright law here. I'm guessing that it probably doesn't, given that they are privately owned buildings that people are admitted to in exchange for payment (payment = a contract exists, and therefore the building owner has certain legal responsibilities to the customer).
England and Wales statutes basically establish that filming and photography in a public place is an absolute right, and that no-one can claim copyright ("peronality rights" or "image rights") in any photographic image of them made in a public place. This is why celebs cannot stop paparazzi from selling the photos of them they take while walking from a hotel lobby ot their limo, etc. Apart from one or two situations that are covered by official secrets or anti kiddie-fiddling laws, you can do what you like with a camera in public.
However, that does not apply in private premises. Under the 2001 EU Copyright Directive, someone filmed or photographed on private premises has the right to restrict the use of those images unless they've signed a release form, hence the reason anyone who appears on a TV show etc. is asked to sign one. I can't find any clear answer as to whether it's the same deal here. This article (a "Filming in Public Places 101" piece on an educational video company's website) would tend to suggest that it is.
So I suspect that Bobby and Terry are right, in that you'd need the permission of everyone you video for this to be legal. There might be a workaround, e.g. a notice placed in the theatre's lobby stating that audiences in the auditorium are being videoed for the purposes of an academic research project, and that by buying a ticket you agree to this. But my gut feeling is that investing in an hour or two of a good IP attorney's time is probably the next step you need to take.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Carsten Kurz
Film God
Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009
|
posted 02-11-2014 05:14 PM
We have pictures and footage like this captured on multiple events, we publish this on our own site, press, etc. Frankly, I wouldn't know why this should be evaluated by a lawyer. The nature of footage like this will not allow to identify or pick out individuals, that would be my only concern IF this footage at some point might be published. IF individuals are featured in any special way, you have to get their permission. This is common law in germany.
As we own and operate the place, I do not need to ask anyone for permission to capture these images. If you're a patron trying to capture images inside the building, then of course you have to ask the manager beforehand.
- Carsten
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|