Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Why didn't Mitchell continue building Projectors? (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Why didn't Mitchell continue building Projectors?
Steve Matz
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 672
From: Billings, Montana, USA
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 06-30-2014 09:40 PM      Profile for Steve Matz   Email Steve Matz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bob; If your Projection Skills were as good as your Spelling and Punctuation in your above post,I would venture to bet that anything you ran was probably Junk.I wasn't admonishing you personally on your comment about Devry Projectors(maybe you were running a Uevry Projector)I simply said almost all the old school projectionists I interviewed in the 60's didn't seem to have the same opinion that you have. As far as not knowing anything about Devry Projectors I have owned a 2810 XD for a number of years and it has always ran flawlessly; and no chain issues either. I also ran a Film Library for over 20 years. so never being in the Business Dope you apparently believe me to be doesn't Fly.If you want to start slinging Mud about someone you have never met or known expect some return Mud...S.M.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-30-2014 11:25 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Devry was what it was it was a low cost machine in many ways clever.In away it predated the use of the timing belt in the victoria 5, the christie , and the ernamann12
It was not stellar but it also wasn't junk I worked and serviced many of them that were used for dailies projection
Is it my favorite far from it but also not the worst

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Matz
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 672
From: Billings, Montana, USA
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 07-01-2014 10:46 PM      Profile for Steve Matz   Email Steve Matz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What I liked about Devry! While every other Projector Mfger was essentially revising their Silent Projector head(i.e. Simplex Standard) to adapt to sound after 1928 with a big bulky Soundhead. Devry designed an
integrated unit where Picture/Sound was all in one Housing much
like most of your 16mm AV Projectors. This made the Unit not only
lighter overall but more Compact.

Myself, I would like to use a Gilmer style Cogged Belt System on my XD as I believe it would run much quieter and no lubrication needed.However I have never had Chain issues that some talk about.I use a REYNOLDS MFG Chain and it works Flawlessly. Maybe
back in the day Chain Quality wasn't what it came to be. When the Spanish Motorcycle Company MONTESA made a model called the Diablo in the mid 60's it had the worst chain that could possibly be put on a motorcycle. It kinked up and destroyed sprocket teeth among other things. Montesa sent a Sheet to dealers telling them to soak the chain in a pan of 30wSAE ND oil and literally set the pan on fire to cook the chain.(The Fire Marshal Loved This,NOT!)Believe it or not it worked but most of us just went to a Domestic made chain from Diamond Industries...

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Fowler
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 07-02-2014 07:10 AM      Profile for Richard Fowler   Email Richard Fowler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Devry 12000 with all driven film sprockets was a passable machine……the XD I removed from many screening rooms and dailies packages usually went to the dump….except for the intermittent assembly.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-02-2014 01:30 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There are a lot of issues with the DeVry's. Many of the rollers are not machined for any clearance in the image and sound area. There is also a dead heading roller in the sound head section that can seize up... I would never run any valuable film on one. The last one I had went in the dumpster about 5 years ago!

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 07-02-2014 07:36 PM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Agree with Bob Koch and Mark. The only precision item was the Simplex Int.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.