Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Century's Vistavision and Cinerama (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Century's Vistavision and Cinerama
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 07-05-2014 07:10 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For many projectors...it would be easier/better to shim the lens mounts rather than the gate/traps...then you are not stressing the film by putting it through a twist. Note, shimming the gates or lenses do not compensate for keystone...they do allow you better lateral focus...if you are off center...you have keystone or non-linearity if you shift the lens.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Matz
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 672
From: Billings, Montana, USA
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 07-05-2014 08:18 PM      Profile for Steve Matz   Email Steve Matz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The ODEON Booth in the 1980's with the 3 Cinemeccania Vic 10's in Place. The VV Projectors removed close to 2 decades earlier with the BTH's. Quite a departure from the 5 projector Booth Photo...

 -

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 07-06-2014 05:22 AM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve,

Those are Vic 8s, not 10s (Xs).

The Odeon started out with normal 1930s BTH machines, as were normally installed by Odeon. These were replaced by the Mk. 1 SUPAs, then the Vic Xs, one of which is preserved by the PPT, then by the Vic 8s shown in your picture, then at the last major refurbishment by new Cinemeccanica machines which can take the large spools on the base of the machine, rather than using the tower. In all cases three machines were installed, except for the brief period when the VistaVision machines were also installed. At least one of these seems to be using a follow spot port. I've seen, or seen pictures of spots in three different positions, but I don't know if all three were ever installed at the same time.

A photograph exists of a fourth temporary machine installed for Napoleon, and at one time a monochrome Eidophor was also installed. A Ross Scenoscope, similar to Brenograph, survived long enough to be converted to Xenon, but had gone when I last visited the box some years ago.

As far as I know at least one film machine remains, and at least two digitals.

Three projectors was quite common, either to provide a spare, or to show 35 mm material with a 70 mm feature. A few cinemas, I know of two, installed a fourth machine in the 50s for showing 3-D with changeovers. I've never seen more than four 'normal' projectors. Mark, were all of the RCMH machines 'normal' projectors, and if so, do you know why the additional ones were installed?

The Pictuteville has seven projectors installed, three Cinerama, one Vic 8 for normal 35 and 70 mm films, one DP-70 mainly used with a special lens for showing 70 mm film on the Cinerama screen, one Christie digital, originally 2k, but now replaced by 4k model, and a small subtitling projector. The vast majority of normal shows are digital now, but six of the projectors are normally used during the Wide screen Weekend. It used to have a 16 mm machine, but this was removed to make room for the DP-70.

The last time I was in the box at the Loews Jersey there were three 35 mm machines, one 16 mm, two spots, but only one of them set up at a port, and two non-functioning Brenographs, but this was in 2002, and I believe things have changed there now. Mitchell, what is there now?

Even the tiny place where I still project from time to time has four projection positions, two 35 mm and one digital permanently installed, and slides, 16 mm, video etc. can be installed in the fourth position, but this is seldom done now.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-06-2014 10:11 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Stephen... RCMH was for a number of decades the test bed for Simplex when they were in N.J. So it's hard to say what was what in that booth. Likely Simplex had them running tests on differing gear trains in the very same machines. Remember with the E-7 there is an oblique and a later vertical shaft model. I will have to try to dig out the old magazines that show the Simplex ads and the pictures of the booth there...

 |  IP: Logged

Geoff Newitt
Film Handler

Posts: 49
From: FARINGDON, OXFORDSHIRE, UK
Registered: Dec 2011


 - posted 07-07-2014 06:31 PM      Profile for Geoff Newitt   Email Geoff Newitt   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Twenty odd years ago, one of the two film societies at Southampton University was still running BTH SUPA Mk II projectors with Peerless lanterns converted to xenon. I don't remember seeing a film on them, but they still ran a show every week. IIRC the cause of the focus problems was that the aperture plate was in front of the film path rather than behind, so the film tended to overheat and flutter in the gate - much worse for B&W, as the silver dye absorbed heat so readily.

I've not visited the projection room at OLS for a couple of years; last time, the middle Vic 8 was still there, but had an NEC installed so close to it that it was unusable. IIRC, there were two NC3240s and I think there was a Sony something or other that had been brought in temporarily. It's certainly the case that in the 'digital era', projectors move in and out of there at an astonishing rate.

Interestingly, the Vic 8s that replaced the Vic Xs were not new machines - I believe the left hand one was from the old training centre in Camden, for instance. Certainly by 1998 they seemed very tired. At the refit in 1998, three brand new Vic 8s were installed (craned in through the roof light) - but with the X6500H lamphouses from the early 80s reused. The mag penthouses were retained as well, I think (never used for a public screening post-98, anyway). And although the bases would take 4000m spools, a Christie platter was retained as well.

Anyhow - back on topic - my late friend Hugh McCullough once told me that when he worked there in the 70s and 80s (during the Eidophor and Napoleon period) that the only trace of the VV equipment was a couple of mysterious bolts left in the floor.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 07-08-2014 01:40 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Stephen Furley
16 mm, video etc. can be installed in the fourth position, but this is seldom done now.
We've just had four 16mm shows in as many weeks at the Egyptian after, I am told, many months of none at all. Funny how these things seem to go in waves...

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 07-08-2014 05:40 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Leo, what 16mm projector?

About two years passed since the last time we ran 16mm on an Eastman 25B, and when we started it up, found that an all-important rubber isolation coupling between the intermittent motor and the intermittent mechanism had deteriorated into some non-solid crumbly stuff. James Bond (yes, that is his real name) of Full Aperture out of Chicago machined a replacement part and personally did the repair; he got us up on the screen in time for the playdate -- ripped that projector apart and back together again practically with his eyes closed.

Letting a projector sit idle a few years without turning it on can wind up really takine a big bite out of one's posterior.

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 07-08-2014 09:50 AM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The main room at the DGA in Hollywood had 4 film projectors the few times I worked there. I'm not super-sure about the make/models, but one pair was 35mm only (Simplexes, I think?) and the other pair had a larger projector body. Kinda looked like a Ballantyne Pro or maybe a Norelco. IIRC the larger pair were 35/70.

Does anyone remember for sure? I wish I still had the photos.

At the time (2008-2010) they did not have digital permanently installed -- their projection booth was unionized, so they wouldn't touch video -- which explains why I was there. I'm told they eventually installed a pair of Barco's. I don't know if they removed any film projectors to make space, but I recall the rental projector was a tight fit in the center position.

OBTW, the IU Cinema has 4 projectors, but 2 are digital. Does that count?

USC's Norris Cinema Theatre used to have 3 projectors. A pair of Century JJ's and one Eastman 16mm projector. (Norris also had a carousel slide projector with a small Strong lamp house.) I believe the current setup uses a pair of Kinoton FP-38-E-S and one Christie digital cinema projector.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 07-09-2014 07:46 PM      Profile for Bill Gabel   Email Bill Gabel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Manny Knowles
their projection booth was unionized
The DGA was under Local-150's jurisdiction.

They had Norelco's in the old DGA theatre and moved them over to the new building's theatre.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 07-09-2014 10:09 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Frank Angel
Leo, what 16mm projector?
Kinoton FP38-E-S. Shutter and intermittent motion are electronic, hence less to dry out and seize up than there would be in a traditional, Maltese cross-based mechanism. It gives a lovely 16mm picture, and the use of 35mm lenses gives it great uniformity of focus.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-10-2014 11:14 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
BTH als had a issue with the radius of the curve of the gate Bill Bell wrote an article on it years ago Often wondered how much worse it would be with ester stock
I believe those vv are the ones that bradford now has and were restoring
Maybe someone local to the PPT could get permission to scan and copy the article and pictures on there vv machine

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-10-2014 11:56 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark--is that a Mitchell VV movement? Or a 4-perf Mitchell movement converted to 8-perf? Or something else entirely?

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-10-2014 01:58 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi Scott...

It was originally a Fox 2-Color camera. Same cameras that Paramount converted to Lazy-8 format. So it had a septum in the middle of the frame and recorded two 4 perf high images through 2 different lenses with red and green Kodachrome filters placed in front. In converting all these cameras the septum is removed and the gate opened up to the full 8 perf dimensions. The one thing that was not done in the original conversions was to move the registration pins to the normal frame line location. They end up on perf off the frame line. My movement was modified so the reg pins are at the frame line and a third pin was added. The original Mitchell and Fox movements always had a tiny image steadiness problem at the far end of the frame where the film was unsupported going into the gate. Attached is an image of an unmodified movement in a reflexed camera converted by ILM.

 -

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 07-10-2014 02:28 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
DGA had AA2's. Bob Perlmutter was there for years and was a good friend and customer.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-10-2014 02:31 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The DP-70 are still there Louis. I made them a new pair of change overs a number of years back for them...

Mark

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.