Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Domestic appliance conspiracy theory (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Domestic appliance conspiracy theory
Rex Oliver
Film Handler

Posts: 65
From: Greenville, NC. USA
Registered: Apr 2013


 - posted 03-19-2016 02:16 AM      Profile for Rex Oliver   Email Rex Oliver   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Besides movies adn movie equipment-I regularly visit an appliance forum site-they too love or hate new machines.I don't care for them-what is with a dishwasher or washer that takes 2-3 hrs to complete a cycle-Isn't the machine supposed to save you TIME by you not having to do the job?TIME is a more precious resource than the water or power as far as it goes to me.I now shop for appliances at the thrift shop-or swap shop as they are called here.Esp for dishwashers or washers.and in the NC area thunderstorms kill many circuit boards in machines.And the "spin-sploding" incidents involving both LG and Samsung TL washers.Most of these are user errors--but since the machine is "sophisticated" shouldn't it at least prevent iteself from being destroyed?

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-19-2016 08:58 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Rex Oliver
what is with a dishwasher or washer that takes 2-3 hrs to complete a cycle-Isn't the machine supposed to save you TIME by you not having to do the job?TIME is a more precious resource than the water or power as far as it goes to me.
The point is, you don't have to spend your own time doing the dishes. Who cares if the machine takes longer than a human? I'm watching TV while it does the work.

 |  IP: Logged

Tony Bandiera Jr
Film God

Posts: 3067
From: Moreland Idaho
Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 03-19-2016 11:14 AM      Profile for Tony Bandiera Jr   Email Tony Bandiera Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That is true Mike, but the problem I have with the new gen dishwashers is that because they have to run longer, they use over DOUBLE the electricity of an older model machine....

In many areas, the electricity costs a LOT more than the water does. (Very true here where I live.)

And as I mentioned before, they don't clean worth a damn. (To get truly clean dishes from a new d/w, you HAVE to pre-rinse so much that you've now wasted MORE water than the old units used ..so double whammy.) And THAT is also more wasted time. (also note that they "save water" by using half of what the old ones did, so your dishes are simply being run longer in twice as dirty water.)

Leo, thanks for naming the brands. I am surprised that the Samsung dryer had issues..

And to everyone who has newer appliances....a very wise investment is to add whole-house surge protectors to your main breaker panel (and if you have a subpanel serving any appliances, add one there too) as well as point of use (ie plug in) surge protection to 120v appliances.

Most brands of breaker panels make "plug-on" or circuit breaker style units that use two spaces in the panel. Those are an easy DIY install. If you have no open spaces in your panel, there are "hardwired" versions, but those require an electrician to install. (Even so, that added cost is, IMHO, still worth it to protect your appliances ...as a bonus, ALL of your home electronics get protected as well.)

Total cost for the protectors will be around $100-200 total, well worth it.

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-19-2016 12:44 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The way I understand, most household appliances are made by two companies, Electrolux or Whirlpool and they are basically all the same except for, maybe, exterior design and the brand label. All the companies we used to know like General Electric, Westinghouse, Tappan, Amana, etc., etc. have been bought and sold so many times that nothing remains but the name and the label that gets slapped on as the product rolls off an assembly line.

It's same with the consumer electronics brands we all used to know like RCA or Zenith. They exist in name only. The same with Polaroid. You can't really buy an RCA product, anymore.

So, it doesn't surprise me to hear somebody say that "XYZ" brand appliances suck... because they ALL suck... they are all the same except for the label.

 |  IP: Logged

David Buckley
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 525
From: Oxford, N. Canterbury, New Zealand
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted 03-19-2016 02:48 PM      Profile for David Buckley   Author's Homepage   Email David Buckley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
These American brands, yeah. But Samsung are a Korean company, and thus aren't part of this conglomeration of brand names.

 |  IP: Logged

Justin Hamaker
Film God

Posts: 2253
From: Lakeport, CA USA
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 03-19-2016 03:31 PM      Profile for Justin Hamaker   Author's Homepage   Email Justin Hamaker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm currently shopping for a washer and dryer, so I've been paying attention to product reviews. Especially looking for anything which suggests any particular brand or model has a high failure rate.

In the big picture, I think this is a product of using the public to beta test your product. Putting it out for the general public without having taken the time to test it and make sure it works - especially in a real world environment under normal day to day usage.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 03-19-2016 04:09 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm not passing judgment on the reputation of individual brand names, here. An otherwise reputable brand that usually has good quality control associated with it can have a bad day with a design decision on an individual model (Ford Pinto, anyone?) or a part that went into a complete production run, and started to fail prematurely once in the field. I'm not willing to write off an entire brand on the basis of one bad experience, even if the brand name were a reliable indicator of who actually made the thing.

I have to confess that I was wondering if this was what happened here. This model of Samsung dryer was released, sold at the full price as a gleaming new model, then the motors started to go out in significant quantities, and Samsung thought, "Oh, bugger - we've got another 256,098 of these sitting in the warehouse - what do we do with them? I know - make Home Depot and Lowe's offers they can't refuse to take them and sell them as sale or special offer items. Let's say that 20% of those then fail under warranty and we need to pick up the tab for someone to come out and replace the motor. OK, so we split the cost of that service call and motor across every 5 units that we sell wholesale - job done." 80% of the customers end up happy, and the 20% that don't are a PR bullet that just has to be bitten.

As for dryer fires, I can't believe that the filters don't have some sort of air flow sensor in them that shuts the things down if the filters get clogged. I once tried to use ours after my wife had run it for 5-6 cycles without cleaning the filter. I couldn't understand why my clothes were still a bit damp after an hour on the "hot as Hades" setting. Then I investigated the filter, and the lint coating on it was literally too hot to touch. No air had been getting out, and so it was basically circulating superheated steam in the drum. I thought at the time that this can't be particularly safe.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 03-19-2016 09:22 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Consumers Reports is your friend in these matters.

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-19-2016 09:23 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: David Buckley
These American brands, yeah. But Samsung are a Korean company, and thus aren't part of this conglomeration of brand names.
The same with Dishlex, Simpson, Volta and others. They are all owned by the Electrolux Group, based in Sweden.

Samsung is but another worldwide conglomerate that owns many industries from consumer electronics to shipbuilding and construction. I don't know which arm of the "Samsung Group" makes home appliances but I don't think it's the same part of the conglomerate that makes cell phones.

In the U.S., Sears company sells the Kenmore brand of appliances and in Britain, the John Lewis company sells their own house brand. Both of them are just OEM by Electrolux.

I bet you a nickel that, if Brad wanted to sell a line of home appliances, all that would be necessary would be to pay the right monies to the right people and sign a stack of contracts then, in a short time, we could all be buying "Film-Tech" washing machines and refrigerators. Brad (or whomever the hypothetical businessman) wouldn't have to lift a finger to do any manufacturing or logistics. If he played his cards right, I bet he wouldn't even have to do his own advertising.

Today's consumer appliance industry is, literally, "Lick 'Em and Stick 'Em." Items roll off an assembly line from some factory in a third-world country where they literally slap labels on the boxes before they load them into shipping containers bound for parts unknown.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 11-16-2016 06:58 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Our Samsung washing machine, bought as the same too-good-to-be-true Black Friday sale last year, has been recalled, because there have been incidents involving this model self-destructing during the spin cycle.

What with this and the incendiary batteries in their new cellphones, Samsung's brand image has gone from reliable if unspectacular, to avoid-at-all-costs deathtrap in less than a year. Out of morbid curiosity I'd be interested to know if anyone was involved in the design of both products, if just a senior executive signing them off.

I am also very unimpressed with the way that they're handling the recall. You complete a form on their website and are then emailed a PDF form to complete, print and mail in, onto which you're supposed to stick the serial number label from the bad machine, and enclose a copy of the receipt for the replacement you buy. Then they send you a check. Disposing of the bad machine is entirely up to you: they do not collect it. So I bet that there will be lots of people out there who mail in their labels, buy a new machine, and then give the old one to a friend, sell it on Ebay, give it to a thrift store ... in short, it remains in use and capable of disintegrating and hurting someone, or worse. Samsung should have been more proactive in making sure that the bad machines are actually taken out of use, IMHO.

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 11-16-2016 10:12 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have a GE front load washer that has a serious bug in its vibration-control software. Once in a while it gets stuck in an infinite spin cycle loop where it thinks it can't rebalance the load. It stays in a very slow spin indefinitely. When this happens you cannot interrupt the cycle or pause it or anything. The front controls are dead and the washer will continue in this mode for hours. The only way to stop it is unplug the power cord or flip the circuit breaker. Then you can start a spin-only cycle.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-16-2016 10:26 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
When we got married, our house had a water heater that was already pretty old just going by the looks of it. The former house owner didn't even know how old it was. It finally bit the dust last week, after we used it for 16 years. I'll be curious to see how long the brand-new one lasts. Anybody want to put any bets?

 |  IP: Logged

Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-18-2016 08:08 AM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
^^^^ Warranty plus one month [evil]

 |  IP: Logged

Sam Graham
AKA: "The Evil Sam Graham". Wackiness ensues.

Posts: 1431
From: Waukee, IA
Registered: Dec 2004


 - posted 11-19-2016 04:46 PM      Profile for Sam Graham   Author's Homepage   Email Sam Graham   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mitchell Dvoskin
Sharp flat screen tv's in the USA are not longer manufactured or sold by Sharp USA. They licensed the name and related trademarks to a Chinese company. I'm not saying the Chinese versions are necessarily bad, but they are not Sharp.
That's true about most TV manufacturers not named Samsung, Sony, or LG today. But in most cases, the manufacturing is all the Chinese companies are doing...the design and specs are still with the manufacturer.

I have one of the last Philips TV's actually manufactured by Philips in my bedroom.

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Cassedy
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1661
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Dec 2006


 - posted 11-19-2016 06:10 PM      Profile for Jim Cassedy   Email Jim Cassedy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Waaaaay back in the early 1970's, when I was in High School, I worked,
for a short time, I worked in the "small electronics" section of
a regional department store.

One of the things we sold were a line of not too expensive clock radios
sold under names like Soundesign, General Electric, and the store brand.

But if you opened them up. . . they were all EXACTLY the same radio, but
sold under different brand names. The only difference was that the chassis
was punched with multiple holes so that one brand could put the knobs on
the top, or another one could put them on the side, in various configurations.
Same with the loudspeaker placement. The chassis was designed so that the
small speaker could be on top, the side or the bottom.

But electronics-wise, they were exactly the same radio.
(But you paid more for the "GE" radio than you'd pay for the Soundesign
or store branded version of the same radio)

I suspect this was true of many appliances. Some time in the late 80's,
Consumer reports published a chart which in which you could look up the
model number of your TV and find out where it was made.

Once again, the chart documented that a couple of Japanese and Korean
companies (at that time) were making the bulk of the TV sets sold
under various electronics and department store brand names.

And, just as in my 'clock radio' story- - the difference between many of
the brands were simply cosmetic and a model number change.
Internally, many were exactly the same.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.