Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » YouTube to follow Amazon by screening its movies inside theaters (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: YouTube to follow Amazon by screening its movies inside theaters
Martin Brooks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 900
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 04-19-2018 05:08 PM      Profile for Martin Brooks   Author's Homepage   Email Martin Brooks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Studio heads don't care that they're destroying the theatrical business (and in turn, the studios as well) because none expect to be around for more than a few years. All they care about is getting their bonus and/or stock option returns and so they manage no more than a year at a time (even though films have to be planned longer than that), which I suppose is a little bit better than CEO's who manage only a quarter at a time.

They also believe in day-and-date because it increases cash flow and supposedly reduces marketing costs, although with the frequency that I see movie ads running on TV (and I don't even watch a lot of TV), you'd think TV advertising was free. Personally, I think their spend is remarkably inefficient. They really don't need to advertise the same movie multiple times in the same show and they don't need to promote movies (outside of trailers shown in theaters) six months in advance. If they reduced marketing costs, more films would be profitable.

So they ARE going to destroy the theatrical business and once almost all films become the equivalent of "straight to video", they're going to see their grosses and profits disappear. Because over time, Netflix, Apple and others are going to pay them less and less and choose to license less and less as they each start developing more original content. And then there's also the factor (as I've already posted many times) that we're losing a substantial portion of theater seats. All of NYC is down to less than 75,000 seats. And look at what's happened in Westwood. Almost all the theaters there are gone except for the Bruin and the Village. (Are any others left there?)

IMO, the way you save the movie business is by restoring a much longer exclusive theatrical window and you also restore the home video sale exclusive window before you license for streaming, etc. But they'll never do that. IMO, home video sales would actually be higher because there'd be more anticipation for the film. When everything is available everywhere, all the time, it gets perceived as unimportant. (Although having said that, in physical media, it is true that most of the sales for a new title on in the first week of release).

It's actually too bad that the studios don't own theaters anymore because if they still did, they might care more about their future.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Cox
Film God

Posts: 2234
From: Melville Saskatchewan Canada
Registered: Apr 2011


 - posted 04-19-2018 05:32 PM      Profile for Frank Cox   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Cox   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Netflix is apparently looking at buying their own theatres:

Netflix has considered buying theaters

quote:


Netflix, the global streaming giant that has dramatically changed the TV industry and clashed with movie theater owners, may be ready to move onto the big screen in a new and surprising way — by owning cinemas.

The Los Gatos, Calif., company has explored the idea of buying movie theaters in Los Angeles and New York that would enable it to screen a growing pipeline of feature films and documentaries, according to people familiar with the situation.

Netflix executives considered acquiring Los Angeles-based Landmark Theatres, the circuit co-owned by Mark Cuban, but recently backed off the idea, said two people who spoke on condition of anonymity because the plans are private.

One of the knowledgeable people said Netflix decided not to pursue a deal because executives believed the sale price for Landmark was too high.

Although no cinema deal has materialized, the idea of Netflix buying a theater chain would mark a new phase in the company's rapid ascent to become one of the most powerful players in the entertainment industry.

Netflix has attracted its 125 million subscribers worldwide by releasing dozens of original films and TV shows annually on its fast-growing streaming service, bypassing the traditional theatrical market, as well as the cable bundle.

Netflix has promised to spend as much as $8 billion this year on original and licensed content for its subscribers who pay a monthly fee to binge shows and films. The company said in October that it would release 80 original movies this year alone, and has done film deals with such high-profile figures as Adam Sandler, Martin Scorsese and the Duplass brothers.

The downside for Netflix is that its movies are locked out of major theater chains, and have been effectively blocked from one of the world's most prestigious film festivals.

Netflix last week said it would not go to the Cannes Film Festival this year because the festival decided to ban movies from competition that don't have theatrical distribution in France. Last year, Netflix movies including "Okja" competed at Cannes.

"We want our films to be on fair ground with every other filmmaker," Netflix Chief Content Officer Ted Sarandos told Variety. "There's a risk in us going in this way and having our films and filmmakers treated disrespectfully at the festival."

Representatives of Netflix and Landmark declined to comment for this article. A person close to Netflix said there were no plans to buy Landmark.

The company's interest in cinemas may seem like an about-face, given Netflix's long-standing view that the traditional model of releasing movies in theaters before they hit streaming services is antiquated. Sarandos has consistently advocated for the simultaneous release of movies in theaters and on Netflix, an idea that is an anathema to most theater owners.

Owning a theatrical outlet would give Netflix a boost for awards consideration and make it more attractive for filmmakers who still want to see their movies play on the big screen.

"It seems Netflix would like to get some of its movies for Oscar contention or other types of industry awards," said Eric Handler, an analyst with MKM Partners who covers the major theater chains. "They're trying to get credibility. Netflix took off when a couple of their own titles got nominated for Emmys. That lent credibility to what they're doing. If they can do that for various awards, that might raise the platform a little bit."

Despite its ambitions and spending, Netflix has yet to crack the code of the movie industry. The buzz for its movies has rarely matched that for its TV shows, such as "Stranger Things," "The Crown" and "Orange is the New Black."

Recent awards contender "Mudbound," Dee Rees' acclaimed tale of racial divisions in the American South, was nominated for four Oscars but didn't win. Some industry insiders said the movie would've received more attention from academy voters if it had received a wide theatrical release. Netflix did win a best-documentary Oscar for "Icarus," about the Russian athletic doping scandal.

Netlfix's attempts at Hollywood-style blockbusters have been ambitious, but mixed. Its $90-million Will Smith movie "Bright" was lambasted by critics, though Netflix said it was a highly popular viewing choice for its subscribers. Netflix does not release viewership data for its shows and films.

The company also struck a deal with Imax to release the 2016 sequel to "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon," but few theaters would agree to screen the movie. Netflix in 2016 signed a deal to screen its movies at Florida-based chain IPic Theaters, which operates 15 luxury cinemas. Netflix's prestigious early cinematic effort "Beasts of No Nation" screened at Landmark's theaters in 2015.

"Netflix wants to establish itself as a critical exhibition source on both coasts," said a person familiar with the plans. "For awards consideration they need to be able to release pictures on screens in major markets."

Netflix's interest in the theater business comes as exhibitors are consolidating. AMC Theatres, the world's largest chain, was sold to China's Dalian Wanda Group in 2012. AMC then bought Carmike Cinemas and British exhibitor Odeon Cinemas. London's Cineworld reached a deal to acquire Regal Entertainment in December.

No one expects Netflix to purchase one of the giant domestic theater operators. Instead, it's more likely to pursue a deal with a smaller player that would give it a foothold in key industry markets.

An obvious choice would be Landmark, which hired an investment bank this month to explore options after potential buyers expressed interest in doing a deal, according to people familiar with the situation.

A deal to purchase Landmark, owned by Cuban and Todd Wagner, would give Netflix a footprint of theaters in major media markets across the country. The privately held chain has 53 theatres comprising 255 screens in 27 markets including New York, Denver, Washington and San Francisco, according to its website. The exhibitor has three Los Angeles locations.

Crucially, Landmark specializes in the types of specialty and foreign movies that often get Oscar buzz.

Buying a smaller movie theater chain such as Landmark would hardly be a financial strain for Netflix, which carries a market value of more than $130 billion.

Cuban and Wagner bought Landmark in 2003 from Los Angeles-based asset manager Oaktree Capital, which spent $40 million to take the company out of bankruptcy. Cuban and Wagner previously put Landmark on the block in 2011, but no sale occurred. Cuban and Wagner also own indie film distributor Magnolia Pictures.

An outspoken billionaire and "Shark Tank" personality, Cuban has long been bullish on Netflix. At a November business conference, he said that his largest holding is in e-commerce giant Amazon, followed by Netflix. Amazon is one of Netflix's biggest competitors in the streaming video market.

Amazon, in contrast with Netflix, has embraced the theatrical windowing model for now, partnering with established studios and distributors to release titles such as "Manchester By the Sea" and "The Big Sick" around the country before streaming them for Amazon Prime subscribers. Amazon's strategy has been welcomed in the exhibitor industry, which meets next week at the annual CinemaCon conference in Las Vegas.



 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.