This is topic Which is the best/worst projector? in forum Film Handlers' Forum at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=000018

Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 05-30-1999, 01:46 AM:
 
The best projector that I have used so far is a CENTURY SA that was at the
worst theatre I have ever worked in, ironically. The image was steady and it was
really reliable....no problems. And they weren't in the best shape a projector could
be in, either. The sprockets are small, but it didn't seem to harm the film of cause
any problems.

The worst projector EVER is the Christie 35mm. It was designed to be
"maitenence free" but in reality requires more maintenence than any other
projector that I have ever seen. First off are the belts. They don't last too long and
are finicky and unreliable. They also shed immensely and the shutter belt loves to
break. perfect belt tension is always difficult to achieve and varies from projector
to projector. Then there is the Ultramittent which really isn't very ultra at all. The
picture is never steady and is always moving around somehow, even with a brand
new intermittent. They can also become so noisy that you can hear them chattering
away inside the auditorium during the movie. Chrsitie says this is "Normal and no
cause for concern". Yeah right!

Then there is the lens turret. This also helps with the image unsteadiness. Simply
opening and closing the lens turret to thread can knock the lenses out of alignment,
and when the movie starts the image is way too high or low. Only cycling a lens
change or messing with the manual toggle is this fixed. Of course, let's not forget
the Christie Dolby Digital basement reader. It is pure crap. It would work fine if
the projector itself did not cause so much vibration!!! Christie will not admit that
this is a problem, just that they require a bit more tweeking. I have also been told
by Christie that the LED's drift over time, and I must constantly check and
increase their voltage. What good are LEDs if they drift down like exciter bulbs? I
think Christie is just using this as a lame excuse to cover up the real problem with
their basement reader--the projector itself and it's poor design! Christie must have
the worst designers in the world!

For all of the troubled projectionists out there cursed with Christie P35GP
projectors and basement readers, there is a fix for the vibration problem, but it is
not too pretty. Fortunately, it is extremely simple. Just get a bunch of napkins.
Thread the film normally with just 1 perf of tenion on the sound drum. Now take
the napkins and fold them up and tape them so that they remain folded. They must
be pretty thick---thick enough to pad the arms of the sound drum. Now take 1
foled napkin an slide it between the lower arm of the sound drum and the reader.
Do the same with another folded napkin. This way the arms are padded from the
vibration and the show should run perfectly provided that everything else is set up
correctly. You may see some slack in the film going into the sound drum, but that
is OK. Maybe all Christie projectors from now on should ship with a box of
napkins.

What is your favorite/least favorite projector?
 


Posted by Brad Miller on 05-30-1999, 01:47 AM:
 
Well, I would say the Century JJ is the best projector, but then it is virtually the
same machine as the SA...except it runs 70mm.

The worst? Oh there are so many...only one??? Ballantyne comes to mind. But
then so does the early Simplex units.

Currently there are four main projectors on the market to choose from. Century,
Simplex, Christie, Cinemecannica. Obviously there are others, but these are the
four you will see everywhere. If you are speaking "worst for all time" then I am
really going to have to think about that! But if you are speaking "worst currently
readily available" then may I strongly agree with you on your views toward the
Christie machine.

This machine has such great intentions and could've been a fantastic piece of
machinery. Unfortunately, it is a piece of...

Now don't get me wrong, I'm not bashing Christie...just their projectors. Christie
makes the best platters and the best projectors money can buy! Unfortunately,
they must've run out of money in the R & D stage when they were designing the
P35GP.

My biggest beef with the Christie is the shaky image. These units shake so bad, it
actually blurs the image on screen. Is it the gate/trap design? Perhaps it is the
physical vibrations of the machine itself. Who knows? Christie sure doesn't. And
no, changing the gate bands does not help.

My other big beef is the constant maintenance these machines require. No matter
how good a deal the initial cost is, you will spend far more money on the upkeep
than if you went all out for a Century JJ in the first place.

If you look at the new theaters being built today, you will typically see an "all
Strong package" or an "all Christie package." I've come to the conclusion that
Christie must throw in these projectors free with the purchase of the lamphouse
and platter. After all, they'll make their money back on parts.

And that's my two cents worth.
 


Posted by Brad Miller on 05-30-1999, 01:48 AM:
 
Correction to my previous post...

The 5th paragraph should read "Christie makes the best platters and lamphouses
money can buy."

Crediting them to making the best projectors money can buy was a tremendous
error.
 


Posted by Scott Norwood (Member # 30) on 05-30-1999, 01:49 AM:
 
The only equipment that I've worked with in an actual theatre (the only theatre I've
worked in...) has been Century SA's, serial numbers 150 and 151. I send some
photos for Brad's picture gallery, for those who care. These are beautiful
machines and are incredibly reliable and easy to work on and maintain, especially
for someone who came from working with tiny 16mm equipment. I have an
ancient Super Simplex at home (in about 200 pieces) which looks like it'll be fine
for home use but isn't anywhere near as refined and well made as the Centurys. I
had an RCA Model 100 35mm head that looked like a nice machine, but I gave it
away because of poor parts availability (Simplex parts are relatively easy to
get...forget about getting RCA parts). Here's a question: what's everyone's
favorite 16mm projector? I've worked with most of them: for portable classroom
machines, the Elmo 16CL (current model) is great, as are the older B&H 300
series and the B&H JAN machines (good luck finding parts, though). The current
Eikis are decent, too, but aren't so great on damaged film. Kodak Pageants are
OK, but feel flimsy and are hard to clean...the easy-to-focus soundhead is nice,
but the sound quality is generally not so great, even on the later models with
transistor amps. I have a Graflex (the older model 920 with the heavy metal
construction) at home, which is decent but not great...the gate pressure control is
nice but sound quality leaves a lot to be desired. I know people who love the
Pageants, though. I also know someone who really likes the Bauer 16mm, but had
to junk his because of poor parts availibility. The Bauer is the only autoload
machine that I've ever seen that was decent, though. For 16mm theatre
projectors, I've only really worked with the Eiki EX-6100's. These give beautiful
pictures, but aren't much fun to work with due to poor design and a stupid
electronic control system (probably won't be too hard to replace with mechanical
controls, though). The worst part about these is the badly designed changeover
(changes after two seconds); the best part is the sound...these are by far the
best-sounding 16mm projectors that I've ever used. The Eastman 25s look great,
but I haven't used them extensively. Some people like the Elmo xenon models or
the Norelco one. Thoughts? Someday I want to run Eastman 25s with carbon
arcs (which I've never run and would very much like to try)!
 
Posted by Mark Ogden (Member # 43) on 05-30-1999, 01:49 AM:
 
Best projector? Gotta be the Norelco AA 2 35/70. Rock solid, even after 40 or
so years. If you head out to LA you see that these are still rolling in all the major
theaters in town, including all of Mann's Westwood screens (even the Village,
where most of Hollywood's big premieres happen.) All three screens at the
Chinese are still on them, and the projector on the #3 screen is one of the original
Todd-AO machines! Mann's staff keep these beauties rolling flawlessly.
 
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 05-30-1999, 01:50 AM:
 
Yes I agree the Norelco AA2 is great...you have NO EXCUSE for threading it
out of frame (like anyone does that anyway...right?) and in 70mm the picture
looks painted on the screen. They are a bit big and bulky, but they have proven
their worth. It's a shame they do not make them anymore (or replacement parts,
either). In 35mm they are not quite as goo from my experience, however. I have
used a Century JJ only once or twice, but it seems like a good all around
projector for both formats.

Also, thank you for complimenting Mann Theatres. I do not work for the Chinese
in Cali, but it is good to hear praise where praise is due.
 


Posted by Ken Layton (Member # 133) on 05-30-1999, 02:39 AM:
 
35MM Best Projectors:
Brenkert BX-80, BX-100
Simplex X-L
Century C and SA
Motiograph AA
Devry 12000 series
Holmes Type 8 Portable

35MM Worst Projectors:
Ballantyne Pro-35 (couldn't project a steady picture or hold focus if life depended
on it)
Christie Gearless (should be called WORTHLESS)

16mm Best Projectors:
B&H 567 Arc Lamp with easy CHANGEOVER SYSTEM
B&H JAN Xenon Conversion
B&H 140 Carbon Arc
RCA Port-o-Arc
Eastman model 25

16mm Worst Projectors:
Graflex 16 (muddy sound)
Eiki (too flimsy and picture unsteady)
Ampro (too heavy!)
 


Posted by Brad Miller on 05-30-1999, 02:39 AM:
 
Ken,

You forgot Norelco AA2 on the "Best" projector list.

Christie "Worthless." I like that! I think I'll paint that on my Christies I work
with!!!
 


Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 05-30-1999, 02:40 AM:
 
The best straight 35mm only projector is the MotioGraph AAA
The best 35/70 is either the Westrex 5000 or the Norleco AA2
The worst 35mm projector is the shakemecanica V5 or the Tokiwa portables
I don't mind the pro35 as the ones I service have steady pictures on about 45'
screens. The do have a extra adjustment screw for gate tension that can be
critical.
The worst 35/70mm is the Crown Imperial which is a BX100 on steroids
 
Posted by David Johnson (Member # 173) on 11-30-1999, 03:20 AM:
 
I wonder who is servicing your "Christie" projectors? I would suggest that you shoot him and find someone else. I have installed around 80+ and find them to have the best qualiity picture you can get, they are rock steady and if they are in front of a Christie consol you will have edge to edge focus and perfect illumination. It is true to say that they are not maintinance free, and require a lot more maintinance than most projectors. The basment readers still have some problems but most are caused with Kodaks 2383 film stock, I was running one today with an old print of "Miricale on 34th street", the print was rooted but it remained at a constant 6 on the DA20, but this was an old print not on 2383 stock.
David
 
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 11-30-1999, 03:15 PM:
 
Wow! I think you get the prize for bringing the oldest topic (6 months to the day) back to the top of the forum. (This thread was even before the new forum program was implemented.)

Most of the problems people seem to have had with the Christie projectors was in fact that exhaust blower in their lamphouse. After Sean James of Christie recommended I remove them, 90% of my problems went away and soon after mentioning that on the forum, I got many emails from people who did the same and most of their problems were gone as well.

I will however stand behind my Centurys as the best all around projector. Norelcos and Simplexes are also excellent, but Norelcos are too damn big and too expensive to service (in that occasional instance when they need it) and Simplexes have that roller in the soundhead which embedds dirt into the emulsion and are generally rougher on film. For size, cost, ease and cost of maintenance and frequency of maintenance required...the Century keeps winning out. But that's another thread.

As to the Christie lamps and platters...they can NOT be beat in my opinion.
 


Posted by Christopher Seo (Member # 7) on 11-30-1999, 03:22 PM:
 
Waitasec... how is an exhaust blower in the lamphouse affecting the projector's performance?!
 
Posted by Nicholas McRobert (Member # 205) on 11-30-1999, 06:30 PM:
 
Having worked with only a few types of projector, I have come to the conclusion that Kinoton are definitely my favorite out of the bunch.... At the moment, I work with 10 FP20's. These are over 6 years old and are still run like new. As far as maintenance goes, there is very little apart from basic stuff. They are extremely easy to thread, VERY kind to film (even the chopped up, damaged festival prints that we get from all corners of the globe) and the new SRD reader soundheads are an excellent conversion add-on.

From what I have seen of Christie projectors, my opinion is that they are the Spawn of Satan....sent only to reap havoc and destruction on our industry. But then, they are cheap, and that's what the big chains want (especially American ones at that)....spend $$$$'s on rocking chairs/big popcorn machines and pennies on projection gear. Most cinemas here in the UK seem to favor Kinoton, Cinemecannica and Strong/Century machines. Christie aren't really up there.....yet! (thank God!)

Nicholas
 


Posted by Scott Norwood (Member # 30) on 11-30-1999, 06:44 PM:
 
I'm sure that Kinotons are nice, but I will also point out that the Century machines that I have worked with (C's and SA's) were all at least 30+ years old. They ran like new--nice, steady picture; quiet intermittents; etc. And I will assure everyone that these machines did not benefit from heavy preventive maintenance...one pair of machines (the C's) still had the original carbon-arc lamphouses (Peerless) which also ran beautifully (also, with limited maintenance).
 
Posted by Nicholas McRobert (Member # 205) on 11-30-1999, 06:56 PM:
 
Many of the older UK theaters, (especially the ABC Chain) still use original FP20's (then made by Philip's) from the early 1960's. Any of these that I have seen are pretty much as you describe your Century Machines. They are probably one of the most common machines available here from that period that *haven't* been broken down for spare parts or been made redundant (and they are still quite pricey when purchased 2nd hand). German engineering is amongst the best in the world, and this is extremely obvious when you use these machines. I guess it's like the best-built cars....mostly German and Italian.

Nicholas.
 


Posted by Nicholas McRobert (Member # 205) on 11-30-1999, 07:11 PM:
 
Brad - sorry to keep going on and on about the Kinoton stuff, but have you ever tried out the Kinoton ST range of "non-rewind" platter systems? I've used Christies before, but the Kinotons are sooooo simple and work so well (without any tweaking at all, I might add...) but again, they are pretty damn expensive! Like the projectors, there are quite a few of these from 25 years ago still in everyday (trouble-free) use at some locations.
 
Posted by Stephen Winner (Member # 8) on 11-30-1999, 08:17 PM:
 
I have always been quite partial to my ol Simplex XL's here because they have never given me a hint of trouble. I have never stopped a show, or seen other projectionist here stop a show for a projector problem! (aside from all the dirt I got on "Eyes wide Shut" that collected in my sound head, and fouled up the sound!)

The only thing that annoys me is those little thumbscrews on the gate seem to like to jump off, roll a couple miles around the booth, then get lost under a piece of equipment. One time I had one drop through the hole in the floor where the DC leads come up from the rectifier! (see the closeup in the Byrd pictures in the gallery!)

I have started to get up a collection of 16 gear at home, and I can say the worst 16 portable ever built has to be the Singer 1100 slot loads. I have had pretty good luck with my 1552, and my 2592 running some pretty trashed films without missing a frame at all. The only annoying thing about B&H autoloads is that the autoloader does not like to release if the projector hasn't been used for a while. It supposed to release when the take up reel puts tension on the film, but sometimes sticks, and has to be released by hand. I have an EiKi 6100 up in the booth, and have used it a few times for shows, and viewing my own personal collection It takes a little while to load, but that's the drawback to a manual loader. The advantage is that this machine is pretty gentle on the film. I have a hard time telling it from the 35mm when a good print is loaded up! The only problem is that this machine doesn't look like it would be up to daily service, the mechanicals just don't look beefy enough!

 


Posted by Jim Ziegler (Member # 86) on 11-30-1999, 08:28 PM:
 
Wouldn't removing the lamphouse blower in the Christies cause problems with airflow and bulb cooling?

 
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 11-30-1999, 08:40 PM:
 
In response to the Christie exhaust blower in the lamphouse, this all depends on your roof fan. In other words, if you remove an exhaust fan, is the blower on the roof pulling enough to feel at the bottom of the exhaust stack in the lamphouse? If so, REMOVE THEM. Your pictures will sharpen right up as there will be no more "bounce" from these blowers...cause they will shake the entire console! (It would be nice if Christie made sturdier feet on their consoles. )

By the way, before anyone tries removing a blower, you should NOT remove the one that sits on top of the negative end of the lamp blowing down. I'm speaking of the one mounted at the front, top that blows air upward into the stack. The lamp blower can be cushioned to prevent shaking as is explained in "Christie P35GP tips" on the front page of this site.

Granted, brand new and in perfect condition, these blowers don't cause problems...but once they collect a bit of dust and get just a hair off balance, the shaking will begin. Also, these blowers are an "accessory" and are not shipped with all Christie consoles, so perhaps David is not receiving these blowers in the first place.

I've never personally ran anything Kinotone, but I do hear they make excellent equipment. I'd be interested in their platters and their projectors, although I can't imagine their platters being better than Christie's AW3 or Century projectors.
 


Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 11-30-1999, 09:33 PM:
 
If there is a problem with the blowers in the Christie consoles, then no blame can be pointed towards the projector. Any projector on a Christie console should shake after awhile, right? If this is still an issue, I have yet to come across it. Maybe Christie has fixed the problem in the latest batch of lamphouses. Remember, this lamphouse can't be beat!

I have one Christie P35GPS projector that I spent an entire night cleaning out all of the gears, pulleys, and just about everything else, including each individual notch in each gear. I installed new belts (always replace all of the belts at the same time) and put a little Panef belt dressing on them. To this day the projector runs extremely smooth and the Dolby Digital error rate is down to the low teens! (Actually reads about 3 to 4, which is perfectly fine). Picture is remarkable when the labs print them correctly. Belts have not begun to shed yet (it's been about 3 months or so).

Now I have 15 more to do like this! AAAhhhhh! I just don't have the time. I would if I didn't have to run movies as well. Running movies always gets in the way for me.
 


Posted by Michael Cunningham (Member # 210) on 11-30-1999, 10:16 PM:
 
Let's see, best/worst projector huh? Of the machines I have worked with I would have to go with the Norelco (Todd AO) as far as steadiness and film handling capability. Of course, its large size and difficulty of acquiring parts lowers its quality some. Second would be the Century projectors (both 35 and 35/70). Good stable image and low worry factor, as long as you remember to grease and oil all the proper points! Next would be the Ballantyne Pro 35's. They're a good projector for a beginner to learn on and can produce a decent image if tweaked with enough. Lastly would be the current crop of machines I'm dealing with, Simplex. While easy to thread and maintain, to a degree, they have real trouble producing a steady image. There's a lot of bob and weave in those gates!!

-Mike
 


Posted by David Johnson (Member # 173) on 12-01-1999, 03:17 AM:
 
I have never experienced problems with the Christie blowers, and to this date I have never experienced any vibration problems at all with Christie, are you sure it is not a 96HZ flutter that you have? this is quite a problem with 2383 stock. I am currently installing 8 Christie consol's and projectors so lets hope I don't have any. As for Kinoton, I look after around 150 FP20/30 and DP75s, and agree that they must be one of the best projectors around. But when it comes to Vibration the old FP20 can be a real problem on some (but not all), numerous calls and correspondence with Kinoton has failed to resolve the problems. Last week I fitted a brace from the movment to the frame on the worst one we have and it looks like it has cured it. Kinoton have braced the movment on the FP30 and taken other measures to correct the problem. Now they have a direct drive and this seems to solve all the problems. As for the Kinoton platter (the older style) with out any doubt the best platter I have worked on far Better than the "Christie" they have two minor problems, the delay relay (timer) will short on the odd ocasion and cause a wrap around, this is easily cured by replacing it with a "National" plug in type, and the small capacitor that conrols the direction of the control motor can on the odd occasion go, this can also cause a wrap around and can lead to a failed gear box because if the motor goes in the wrong direction the limits will have no effect and the Variac will go all the way around and jam up causing the gear box to strip.
David
 
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 12-01-1999, 03:32 AM:
 
Sounds like I'm safer (to the projector) if I stay with the AW3!!!

Anyway, no it's not the 2383 flutter. I know exactly what you're talking about, but I only experience that if I run a print without FilmGuard. One pass through FilmGuard and that flutter's a thing of the past. I'm talking about actual vibration from the lamphouse. It is easily felt on the projector and turret. Generally it has a pulsing to it that is unmistakable. Be happy it hasn't happened to you yet. Hopefully Christie will find a fix to that problem, as it is the only real flaw in the SLC console.

What company do you work for?
 


Posted by Nicholas McRobert (Member # 205) on 12-01-1999, 04:42 PM:
 
Brad...

Trust me on this one.....if you ever get the chance, try a Kinoton platter! The guys at the Christie-equipped theater in the next town are jealous as hell
 


Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 12-01-1999, 05:38 PM:
 
I need to test a Kinotone platter for my product reviews for the site. Perhaps somebody from Kinotone would like to send me one (for free)?
 
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 12-01-1999, 08:46 PM:
 
I too will be happy to install one in the Film-Tech screening room if Kinotone sends out sample platters.

 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 12-02-1999, 07:05 PM:
 
There is no question, the Norelco AAII deserves a place in the projector hall of fame. It was exceptionally well thought out (especially for its time).

I can generally get both the 35 and 70mm pictures as steady or steadier than any other projector. The 35mm optical head is also one of the best designs. The mag head is only of its only weak points...both stabilizers are the same size and will cause some flutter. Also making the mag head a 10-track presumes the 6-track and 4-track sections will wear out at the same time...I don't know anyone that has had these since the 4-track days that doesn't have spent 6-track sections with good 4-track sections. Oh and despite claims to the contrary, the AA2 is supported by Kinoton and wearables are available...the difference is that you almost NEVER need any parts for it except tension bands and sprockets.

The current generation Kinoton 16, 35 and 70mm projectors and allied equipment will pretty much embarass other projectors in the quality of picture department (and basement readers too...generally they get penthouse performance)

The Century projector is a cement mixer, they always run but hardly the best of design. Mechanically they are flawed in that the vertical shaft must be precisely aligned at 3 points and Century never had the machining to pull it off. Fortunately, the gearing is crude so the slop isn't so bad (again it is a cement mixer). The weak points on the machine (gear side)the main drive, intermittent drive and shutter drive. The driving gears have a bad gear ratio to their driven gears. (Ever notice that the sprocket gears almost never go bad?)The grease application system is also kinda wanting since it depends on regular attention and inherently wants to sling the grease off. Having the main drive gear hidden doesn't help things much.

Are they easy to fix? Sure! A screw driver and a adjustable wrench can do a whole bunch on the machine. The problem is, you often have to. Sure there are a lot of 40-50 year Centurys still out there doing the job day in and day out but none of those oldies are still running on their original gears (save maybe their sprocket gears)

On the film side things are much better. They generally never really got their projector head to line up very well with their soundheads (mag or optical)though. The trap is a heat sucker with no heat shielding. The lens alignment is also rather crude and on the single lens units the option is to have the lens receiver rock or not be able to focus due to its upper lens guide. On the plus side, being able to rock the lens allows for perfect centering when going between formats if the projectors are off center to the screen.

Overall though, the Century does put out a good picture that can be decently steady. It's shutter design (bow-tie) isn't as light efficient as others. To counter this Century has the double-dissolving shutter option that will get you a measurable (and viewable improvement) though it induces a hot-spot and is one more thing to wear out. When double-shutter GR-207 gears start to wear, the light will look like it is flickering though is it the bounce of the two shutters in relation to each other.

I have found the JJ's 35mm gate design to put out steadier pictures than the SA's gate design.

Simplex (XL/35) is, in my opinion, the best of the American projectors. The mechanical design is excellent thoughout. Like Century, there are XLs from the 1949 (first year of production, I believe) still going but unlike Century, a well oiled one is often running on its original gears (or at least the bulk of them are original). The larger sprockets are gentle on the film. The laterial guide roller is a bit flawed in that the heat treating process often induces a warp that can show up as a VERY slow weave on screen as it rotates about. Having to bend the gate tang about to get good intermittent shoe alignment is a bit crude too. Stong has "fixed" that now ny having the intermittent shoe now adjustable.

Like the projector, the Simplex 4-star soundhead can generally be made to run for ever (the gear box one) though there is often debates on the best oil to be used in it (hint, thicker than SAE 30). The loose loop design is better than Century's tight loop design but Simplex blew it when they put a contact part smack dab in the middle of the picture area and on the emulsion side! The current "5-Star" soundhead suffers from the same affliction and has the trendy belt drive problems that other soundheads have.

Take a 4-star soundhead and switch the pinch roller and impedance drum over to the AA2 style and you would have a great soundhead that would last forever.

Both Century and Simplex having projector heads that are still in production since the late 40s/early 50s that are essentually unchanged says alot about them and that cleary a lot of people like both.

Steve

------------------
"Old Projectionists never die, they just changeover!"



 


Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 12-03-1999, 11:00 AM:
 
I service many Fp20 and DP75's here amd Canada and the only ones that had to have the movements braced were the ones that were assembled with colums made by Ballantyne. For many years Ballantyne assembeld the machines making the main frame colum in the US It was not as heavy of construction and sometimes would twist. In all cases I renforced the colume inside with unistruct and all problems went away
We also have many of the Kinotone (also KTV) platters and are probably the finest built
 
Posted by Mike Bianchi (Member # 271) on 12-03-1999, 04:38 PM:
 
I'd have to echo the sentiments for the Simplex XL, it's definatley my favorite projector. The Century SA comes in a close second, especially for their ease of cleaning/open design. The Brenkert BX80 is also a fine head, for an older model.

I have to give the worst I've worked with to the Simplex E-7 - although it has it's redeeming qualities - particularly it's durability.

We're running two 1936 E-7's and they're still going strong. They don't have the most stable picture, and use a LOT of oil, but they still work every show!

Long live the XL, though, especially when equipped with the slotted shutter fan to allow more light for 3D.
 


Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 12-03-1999, 08:00 PM:
 
Funny most E7 have rock steady pictures
the do leak oil as they are a one shot oil system and that oblique shaft is a nightmare to work on
 
Posted by Mike Bianchi (Member # 271) on 12-03-1999, 08:23 PM:
 
This picture is not too unsteady -just not quite as steady as I'd like. The gates/traps have obviously gone years with little cleaning, and are pretty worn.

Yeah, the Oblique is a real pain.

We found a few replacements around the country, but the supply is pretty low...
 


Posted by Wallace Logan (Member # 225) on 12-03-1999, 08:56 PM:
 
I don`t know if it is the best or the worst but for 14 years I ran 2 Bauer U2s 35/70. They were the worst when you had to tighten a
loose screw you had to take most of the film head apart.
The theare was bought and turned into a rep
house and they are still in use.


Wally

------------------

 


Posted by David Johnson (Member # 173) on 12-04-1999, 12:33 AM:
 
I have never seen the FP20 you refer too, but possibly the US vesions are different from the German version we use. They are constructed from piece of 4mm sheet metal which is folded into a 3 sided section and the door performs the function of the 4th side, they are quite unstable, this was rectified with the FP30. But even with this simple construction we have around 5 or 6 which give us trouble out or over 100 we have in use, so it is not too bad. If Larry Shaw is reading this he may be able to give us some info about the US models.
David
 
Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 12-04-1999, 03:35 PM:
 
The Fp20 that came from Holland that we have here are as you describe a piece of sheet metal folded to make the three sides. But it also had a hoizontal plate with holes in it for the wire harness and the take up chain just below the lower sprocket and one just above the upper sprocket
The lamp house table was folded metal with2 fold U shaped peices for alignemtn and it joged backwards
The Ballantyne ones did not have the crossplates and would twisty and the lamphouse table went straight back and had two plates stickeing out towards the operator to support the lamphouse
Also I think they were heavey than 4mm but I will check as I have to do routine service at a 9 plex of them that are both versions nest week
 
Posted by David Johnson (Member # 173) on 12-06-1999, 12:22 AM:
 
Today I had a look at one of our FP20s the frame is only 2.5mm thick and does not have the braces you refer to, I have seen them, they are very old models and usually came with the early version of the turret and had different electrics which were 6 Volt control. Some of the later ones were also 6 Volt. The models that give us trouble are around 10 years old and have the 24 volt controls and the newer turrets.
David
 
Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 12-06-1999, 12:35 PM:
 
These machines do not have turrets and were made in the 1960's. They are 6 volt control circuits> the metal appears to be about 6.5mm thick and the hoizontal brace panels are the same
 
Posted by David Johnson (Member # 173) on 12-07-1999, 02:56 AM:
 
It looks like your Kinotons are much stronger than ours, as I mentioned before they are only made from 2.5mm sheet metal, this would explain the vibration probems that we have had with some of ours, the FP30 is much more solid and has a frame, a modified motor mount and they have braced the movment back to the frame, the last time I heard the FP20 I braced has not given any more trouble.
David
 
Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 12-07-1999, 06:39 PM:
 
I always wondered why they never built the head on a piece of tooling plate like Westrex did for the 7000 serries projector and then use 19" racking for the column
I think maybe Sondor did on the dubbing studio projectors and also on some of the reqorked FP20's that MagnaTech sold
 
Posted by Walter Gonet, Jr. (Member # 263) on 12-14-1999, 12:03 AM:
 
I worked with many projectors and seem to agree with the majority. I liked the Brenkert BX series, Century C, and the older Simplex projectors. So far the worst I have worked with is the Christie P35GP. Also the latest Christie platters cause a lot of film scratches if the projectionist is not careful to make sure the film does not come off the roller(s) on the cluster assembly -- the keepers are poorly designed. I added a piece of rubber mounted to the keeper frame with two-sided tape which keeps the film on the roller and cannot slip out while threadeing.
 
Posted by Stephen Jones (Member # 16) on 12-15-1999, 07:22 PM:
 
In regards to the Kinoton projectors,they one of the best projectors I have used.Easy to thread and to maintain. They give a rock steady picture and great focus,give me A kinoton projector and platter any day. 2nd best projector is the Bauer U3 a very good solid projector but with my experience with them is the relay system they use can be unreliable if not maintained correctly and the auto turret can give problems but other than that they are ok. I have used these projectors for a lot of years and am pleased with them both, good performers leave the cinemecanica vic 5 for dead (worst projector ive used)

------------------

 


Posted by Per Hauberg (Member # 529) on 07-11-2000, 07:55 PM:
 
H O W D Y !

I'm new at the Forum (but old in the booth) and would like to shout it to anyone, who cares:
The Philips DP70 (AA2) is without doubt the king - sloppy dowsers or not, and in spite of what dealers of new projectors try to tell You, those nice people at Kinoton in Münich still can provide You with almost any bit part You need --but how often did You need anything...?
Bought my pair of DP's late 1974 - at that time they've been running for 12 years and in store for 2. Now they've been running 26 years for me 4-5 shows a day and still, every day in that booth is a pleasure !
Only complaint - there is no more real stuff around to run. Ran "Baraka" and "Out of Africa" last summer, -and that's all the prints left i little Denmark. -Well, -there is a 70mm "Hook", so thorn and worn, You'd better forget it... - but it sure did sound good, some years ago !

Before i got my own place, i have been running lot's of other projectors, the better ones being:
35/70:
Bauer U2 - far from being a DP, but a fair try. Just so darn clumsy: no room for fat fingers as on DP70, and the whole projector had to be taken apart, no matter how small a repair, you had to do. -Running godd, though.
Bauer U3 - not in any way that baddie, some people claims, allthough not Your best friend, when running worn 70mm prints...
(8 stops in one "South Pacific" show, -Yak!)
35 only:
Bauer B5, B11 and B14 (never tried the B12
:-( ) - fine germans. -Once bought a pair of B11's, but never had them in use yet. -Has anyone ever made "red light" for these ?
Westrex "Westar" 2000 ft, 4-track mag, 2500 watt Zeiss lamps and rock-steady on 45 feet scope - really liked those !

Bad guy's:
Victoria 4, 5, 8 and 9 (- got a V9 on 39 seats, 10 feet scope - that's acceptable, but screen any bigger that that - no way !)
Once tried a pair of V10's for some few weeks - nice steady 70mm picture - but we did not become friends at all.

Have just heard about possible 70DTS reissue of 2001. -My platter runs only 35, and DTS in house is also for 35 only. -Has anyone good or bad experience running DTS70 without backup - or DTS70 change-over ??
Either i will have to replace ST200 platter with ST270 or to buy 2 (or maybe 4) timecode readers - maybe even an extra DTS unit. Big expense for one film only...? (Only other try would be "Titanic" - and that one out for the third time, i don't belive pays the bills...) Please advise...!

BTW: (ok, -start laughing) Those DP70's are serving 104 seats, 15 feet screen - booth allowing nothing (in 1974) but Cinemec CX900 lamps - and no more's needed. CP 65 with MPU-1, DTS-6 and SR*D/Ex. 4.500 inhabitants,
33.-34.000 adm.'s a year, and i'm having the day off every midsummer's eve, christmas eve and new years eve and feel good about it, due to those two heavy old-timers.
Yep ! - Se You around...

Per
 


Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 07-11-2000, 09:23 PM:
 
Not to worry about DTS70 dropping out. Short of a power supply or drive failure, it won't happen.
 
Posted by Martin Frandsen (Member # 74) on 07-12-2000, 07:10 AM:
 
Hi Per, nice to see you on the forum, i no you have been a lurker for sometime nice to see you finally found time to sign-up and join!

------------------
It's the new small talk. You do it so awfully well! - My Fair Lady
 


Posted by Scott Morrison (Member # 165) on 07-14-2000, 03:10 PM:
 
Just an FYI, Mark
There is only one auditorium at the Mann Chinese. The other two (the twins as they were called) were torn down to make way for the 'Hollywood&Highland' entertainment complex (future home of the Academy awards)
Mann was planning to build a 10 or so screen multiplex connected to the original Chinese, but Mann is on shaky financial ground so I have no idea the status of those.
BTW I agree, Norelco AA-II all the way!
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 07-14-2000, 03:53 PM:
 
I was not aware that the twins were gone. It has been a number of yers since I've been past the Chineese. When did were these demolished? I doubt that they would have used all AA-2's in the new plex. As I recall wasn't it Mann's predecessor that built the twins.
Mark
 
Posted by Scott Norwood (Member # 30) on 07-14-2000, 05:18 PM:
 
I was at the Chinese in February and the "twins" were gone at that time. The main theatre was using a pair of AA-IIs (though the show was being run on a platter that day).

Personally, I think that the Chinese is grossly over-rated. I love the decor, but better picture quality is available down the street at the Egyptian and better sound quality is available not too far away at the Dome.

I have not been to the El Capitan; I'm told that it's great, but it was closed for reasons unknown when I was in LA.
 
Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 07-14-2000, 06:01 PM:
 
Scott we all know that the best sound in LA area is at the Plitt Century Plaza theatre
 
Posted by David Kilderry (Member # 142) on 07-15-2000, 11:56 PM:
 
OK, top of the projector pile is Kinoton FP30 and FP50. FP20 honorable mention. Steady picture, reliable easy to work on. Oil leaks on FP50's are a little disconcerting though, about 30% of ours out of the box are leaking - a little only but its like the old FP20 probs.

The Kinoton Platter is without doubt the best in the 10 brands I have used, rock solid, reliable and they got an Oscar for it! No other plate comes close.

DP70 is up there (best on 70mm) and I like Bauer U3 (best on 35mm).

I cannot think of a projector I have completely disliked, although I would not jump to a Kallee 21 again, I hated having to stop for a ratio change!

Christie are a clever machine, but have the most abrasive gate area known to man and the reliabilty is a shocker. One 20-plex, 12 months, 5 dead ultramittants - fact! Easy to change, they need to be!!!

David
 


Posted by David Emery (Member # 382) on 07-16-2000, 12:06 PM:
 
Have any of you tryed the M35GP by Christie? We have 10 of them and on all 10 of them, I have never seen a shaky picture on any of them. I do agree about the lenses though even though the M35GP uses a slightly diffrent changeover to move the lenses than the P35GP. It still is easy to knock those lenses out of alignment but the only thing is all you have to do is switch formats and switch back and the problem is fixed. As far as the SLC console ours dont vibrate all that much. It may be bacause all of this equipment is stitting on a 6 inch thick concrete floor. I do agree though there is a lot of maintanence with these projectors no matter what.


 


Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 07-16-2000, 12:58 PM:
 
Kinoton platters are fine - a lot more film friendly than Cinemecannicas or Christies - until they go wrong.

The main difference is that the Kinotons have a complex system of relays and transformers for determining the speed of the feed platter. A horizontal tension arm determines the speed of the take-up plate, and the feed plate starts at this speed. There are two microswitches for 'slow down' and 'speed up' in the centre feed unit, and so when the arm hits on or the other the speed of the plate gradually adjusts. This is instead of the variable resistor found in most other platters.

As I say, when it works it's fine, and one thing I will say for Kinotons is that they feed a lot more smoothly at slower speeds (e.g. during the last reel of TITANIC). But if one of these relays, gears or inverters goes wrong, it's hell to fix compared to simply changing a resistor. The service manual is inaccurate, inconsistently labelled and written in bad German. And the price of spares for Kinoton/Philips stuff defies belief. I once had to pay £246 (well over US$300) for an intermittent shaft for an FP-20. That's right - £246 for a bit of aluminium about the size of a pencil.

Favourite projectors - Philips/Kinoton DP-70 (the only 35/70mm convertible I know which gives a rock-steady picture in both gauges), Gaumont-Kalee GK-37. Worst - Cinemecannica Victoria 5 (the rubber band machine), Westar 7000.

L
 


Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 07-16-2000, 03:11 PM:
 
I really want to try out the Kinoton and Big Sky platters. Big Sky claims to be unwrappable. I sure would like to put that to the test. The cool thing about the Big Sky appears to be the programmable EPROM. They must take lessons from Pennywise.

I am wondering why I am not seeing more Kinoton projector installations here in the US. From what I have heard second hand, they are cheaper than the Christie P35GPS. Since cheaper is always better in the eyes of the corporate people, you'd think the big chains would gobble them up! Does anyone have a good comparison chart for the average prices on various projectors?


 


Posted by Paul Linfesty (Member # 214) on 07-17-2000, 09:37 AM:
 
The Chinese II and III were closed in November 1998 to make room for the new retail-entertainment complex next door (which includes a subway stop and the new Kodak Academy Theatre. Last I heard, it will now include 4 movie screens (per the sign on the construction site).

I would have to disagree that this theatre is highly overrated. I've seen many excellent projected images at this theatre. The only bad experience I've had lately was for Bringing out the dead last October(dim, out of focus), but The Perfect Storm looked great.
 


Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 07-17-2000, 11:14 AM:
 
I saw a superb presentation of a 70mm DTS print of "Titanic" at the Mann Chinese on Hollywood Boulevard on January 15, 1998. Meredith Rhule was the operator that day. I wrote about it:
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/newsletters/reel/december98/pppp.shtml

A month later, the experience was equaled in Dallas at the GCC North Park with Ron Beardmore as the projectionist.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
 


Posted by John Gordon (Member # 523) on 07-17-2000, 11:48 AM:
 
Being the Chinese Theatre has come in this thread, it should be noted that it is a theatre that should be visited if you have never been there. It's big, grand, and has the old feel of a reel movie theatre. But if you want a better presentation, go to the Mann's Village in Westwood. Far superior picture and sound.
The problem with the Chinese is accoustics--dialogue has difficulty in accurate reproduction. Scope pictures are fine, but 1.85 gets swallowed up by the sheer size of the auditorium.
And as Gordon menitoned, the Odean (the old Plitt) theatre in Century, aud. #1, is one of the best. But not the best in L.A.
 
Posted by Paul Linfesty (Member # 214) on 07-17-2000, 12:08 PM:
 
Well, I THINK that Gordon wasn't being serious about the Plitt, since he used the smiley face. He was probably refering to the auditorium #2, which has the "extroadinary" HPS-4000 system (but only if John Allen's EQ cards are in place...whenever that is). The slightly larger house #1, however, does feature one of the best THX-certified houses in L.A., although the projection on most screenings are below the standard (this may have changed in recent years, I don't know).
 
Posted by Scott Morrison (Member # 165) on 07-17-2000, 05:26 PM:
 
Yes the Chinese has the feel of a grand old movie palace (not to mention the smell!)

Accoustics are better at the Village, Picture is better too, but smaller.
Loews Cineplex Century Plaza (aka Cineplex Odeon, aka the Plitt) Has great sound, but is weak on subwoofer, add a few sub cabinets (as I did for a press screening of "Enemy of the State") and It sounds great. Tony Scott (the director) told me so himself.
Whomever said the accoustics were good at the Cinerama Dome was joking, right?
When Disney premiered 'Evita' there they went to the trouble of putting in a flat screen and a drop ceiling to make it look and sound like a real theater, and not an accoustics experiment.

Speaking of Norelco AAIIs The Egyptian in Hollywood has a pair of the cleanest nicest you will ever see. They were removed from a theater in New Orleans, I believe, and completely refurbished (down to the bare casing) by Boston Light and Sound. They literally look brand new. The booth also has a Kinoton FP38 35/16mm electronic movement projector.
 


Posted by John Gordon (Member # 523) on 07-17-2000, 06:47 PM:
 
Scott,
You forgot to mention the Video projector (NO, not video, aaahhhhh!) in the booth. Yes it is there, but it is very well hidden, or I should say it blends well into the ceiling. I did not notice it the first time. Not until it was pointed out to me.

 
Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 07-18-2000, 09:46 AM:
 
You had to add subs to the century plitt HPS system Wow we thought that reference system only sounded good with its designers touch and no one else could tune it properly
congrats that a director liked you work better
 
Posted by Scott Morrison (Member # 165) on 07-19-2000, 01:16 PM:
 
No, I didn't forget, just left it out on purpose. Its a JVC Hughes 3XX series.
It was state of the art, pre DLP. They are a huge pain in the butt to set up, and aren't very stable after you do get them tweaked.
Accoustically the Egyptian has movable accoustic panels that slide out along the walls to cut the reverberation to an acceptable level. I love the sound in that house; When Nick Cage starts that Shelby in 'Gone in 60 seconds' the subwoofer vibrated my pant legs, Very cool. It was the best 5seconds of that movie.

 
Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 07-19-2000, 01:31 PM:
 
Is Paul Rayton still the chief operator at the American Cinemateque Egyptian on Hollywood Boulevard? Now, there was a true supporter of the 70 mm film format! I first met Paul during a screening of the 70 mm restoration of "Vertigo" at the GCC Galaxy in Hollywood.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
 


Posted by John Gordon (Member # 523) on 07-19-2000, 02:42 PM:
 
John P,
Yes, Paul is the chief projectionist at the Egyptian. And they had fun when the Egyptian held their 70mm film fest late last year. The image from a 30fps 70mm cannot be beat. The most impressive was the showing of the full 7 1/2 hours of War And Peace. Wow. Wow. Ever sit through a 7 1/2 hour movie and not get fatigued from a bad image. Wow.
 
Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 07-19-2000, 02:55 PM:
 
John Gordon said: "Wow. Wow. ... Wow."

I take it you were impressed with the 70 mm presentation???

I agree that 70 mm blow-ups from 35 mm are great, and sorely missed. But for the "WOW" factor, nothing today beats 65 mm origination and 70 mm prints. 30 fps is a bonus. Mike Todd had it RIGHT 45 years ago! Bless his soul.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
 


Posted by John T. Mellor (Member # 468) on 08-12-2000, 01:05 PM:
 
I guess I'm one of those older guys that have seen a lot of different equipment over the years I was the relief projectionist for the local in Philadelphia so I at time had the misfortune to run some UNIQUE equipment!!! The best AA-2s ,Simplex 35,Xl and Century SA Brenkerts were good but the 100 took a lot to drive it because of the size of the intermittent Everthing else works but not as good and for not as long Its the quality vs cost debate again, if the pencil pusher in the office has his way you probably still have to crank it.

Here is another one for all Best and Brightest lamphouse I ran Perrless mod 15's at a drive in and would like to find another pair we ran at 200 amps with no reflector I'll let you think about that one
 


Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 08-12-2000, 01:16 PM:
 
Hi JOhn,
The Peerless you are refering to are the old condenser arcs. Those are still in high demand for process work. Bill Hansard has a bunch of them and is always looking for more. They were probably the very highest output lamps made but for the Strong Jet Arc.
Mark
 
Posted by Aaron Sisemore (Member # 145) on 07-04-2001, 02:58 AM:
 
Exhuming this topic for Will Kutler. Enjoy.

-Aaron
 






Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2