This is topic Vinegar Syndrome in forum Film Handlers' Forum at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=001036

Posted by Bernie Anderson Jr (Member # 410) on 05-27-2000, 08:45 PM:
 
I'm trying to understand more how the VS process starts and how to prevent it. Everytime I think I figured it out something trows me off. I purchased a trailer last month. The trailer was from 1965 and it didn't seem to be treated at all. It seems to me that it smells slighlt like VS. And the film came from Florida. Now this brings up some questions I have:

1. What does the role of humidity play in the VS process? Will just being subjected to humidity for a period of time jump start the VS process in a brand new Tri-acetate film?

2. Is there certain film stocks that have more of a chance of getting VS?

3. What procautions should be taken to keep the film from starting VS?

4. Is it true that Estar film won't Vinegar or is it too early to tell?

5. If the film is caught early enough is there anyway to counteract the VS?

6. Can other films start the VS process from sitting next to a print that's already gone bad?

And finally,

7. Are there smells that come close to smelling like VS but that don't do any damage?

Any suggestions on how to properly store prints and what tempeture and humidity levels should the room be? Right now, I'm storing my films upright in tin film cans. I know I should be storing VS films open so they air out but I'm using molecular sieves in the cans. Thanks for your help

Bernie
 


Posted by Aaron Sisemore (Member # 145) on 05-27-2000, 11:57 PM:
 
Bernie Said:

"Is it true that Estar film won't Vinegar or is it too early to tell?"

Polyestar film, being made of petrochemicals rather than cellulose acetate cannot develop vinegar syndrome as there is no acetic acid in the film's chemical composition. In a VERY long time (probably longer that most of us will be alive), however under the right (wrong?) conditions, polyestar film may get unstable and turn back into the petroleum by-products it came from...

Aaron

 


Posted by John Wilson (Member # 269) on 05-28-2000, 05:52 AM:
 
Bernie,

Get them out of those tin cans. Also, make sure you separate any suspected prints from your good ones as soon as you can.

If you want to ask guys that deal with this everyday go to the 16mm forum at www.historyinacan.com

Good luck.
 


Posted by Bernie Anderson Jr (Member # 410) on 05-28-2000, 06:32 AM:
 
John said: "Get them out of those tin cans"

You mean to get the VS prints out of the can? Is it okay for the good prints to be in the cans?

Bernie
 


Posted by Scott Norwood (Member # 30) on 05-28-2000, 07:24 AM:
 
Generally, the people that I've talked to seem to think that it's important for acetate-base film to have a chance to "breathe." This would indicate that tight-fitting cans would be a bad idea. Ventilated cans and/or acid-free cardboard boxes would probably be good choices for film storage. If you want to keep the film in cans, you might want to look into the "molecular sieves" that FPC sells; supposedly, these help to absorb moisture and control any vinegar odor that might be present. Another alternative, if you have a huge chest freezer or something, would be to seal up any vinegar prints in waterproof plastic bags and freeze them. This will slow down VS, but you'll have to let the films warm up in the plastic to room temperature before you can safely run them.
 
Posted by Jeffry L. Johnson (Member # 453) on 05-28-2000, 09:09 AM:
 
There's an article by Morten Jacobsen, "Handling actively degrading film - Tools and Products", in the May 2000 issue of "Image Technology", published by the BKSTS.
http://www.bksts.com

Mr. Jacobsen has several articles, parts of which are included in the above article, on vinegar syndrome at his web site.
http://www.dancan.dk
 


Posted by Mitchell Cope (Member # 32) on 05-28-2000, 02:23 PM:
 
I'm curious if anyone has ever had 8mm Kodachrome get VS? I have had home movies in a can (not sealed, but still in a can) since 1955 with no problem. Of course, these have always been stored at room temperature.
 
Posted by Bruce McGee (Member # 131) on 05-28-2000, 08:17 PM:
 
Ooh...Ooh...Lemme answer!!

No. I have never seen vinegar Kodachrome.

I have a couple of hundred Kodachrome 16mm films of my family and friends that date back to the late 30's. Other than damage inflicted by an old KODAK silent projector, they are in fine shape. They have not been in cans for about 25 years. I wind through them yearly.

I also have some 8mm color films from the mid 60's that are also OK. All processed by E-K.

In the same room I had nearly 100 collected titles go vinegar, some as new as 1984.

I think it is all in the processing quality.

DeLuxe sucks big 'uns, IMHO...


 


Posted by Jason R. Weinsteiger (Member # 456) on 05-28-2000, 11:23 PM:
 
bernie sayeth:

"I purchased a trailer last month. The trailer was from 1965 and it didn't seem to be treated at all. It seems to me that it smells slighlt like VS. And the film came from Florida"

-----

you didn't happen to buy this from jason Lindroth on eBay did you? your story sounded a lot like mine, and i checked my emails from him and he was indeed from Florida. in his eBay add, he claimed the trailer i bought ("the magic voyage of sinbad") to be in excellent condition, but it stank of VS and was really really red. i emailed him and he appologized, claiming to know nothing of film, and asked me how much he should refund me. i got the trailer for half price. More eBayers should be like him (easy to deal with, not unknowledged

jasoN

------------------
"That's what life is - a series of down endings. All Jedi had was a bunch of muppets." -Dante Hicks
 


Posted by Bernie Anderson Jr (Member # 410) on 05-29-2000, 12:49 AM:
 
Bruce said: "I think it is all in the processing quality."

okay, here's something that people I've talked to can't answer. Example: Let's take a trailer reel, if I were to put my stinky trailer that I bought on a reel next to a film that had gone through a good process and is clean of any smell, would the stinky film jump start VS in the good print? Or...would it start to decompose from the acid odors from the VS film. I guess what I'm trying to say in a long winded way is, once that good film comes in contact with the VS film, will the good film now become VS?

Bernie
 


Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 05-29-2000, 12:54 AM:
 
Generally speaking, yes. Never store a VS print in the same room as one that does not have the "disease".

I recommend storing in cardboard boxes (never store in cans) in a climate controlled environment, keep the VS prints separated from the good prints, and you shouldn't have a problem.
 


Posted by Bernie Anderson Jr (Member # 410) on 05-29-2000, 12:57 AM:
 
Jason wrote: "you didn't happen to buy this from jason Lindroth on eBay did you?"

I'm not sure, I can't find a copy of the letter I sent but if it's the guy who was this paragraph about the film being in a collection for the past 30 years and has a generic picture of a trailer with an old NSS band then it's him. I think he even sent it out when he got the check, because of my rating he didn't need to wait for the check to clear. It wasn't a big deal it was cheap. But it ticks me off, it's IB tech and a long trailer in really good shape and the only thing is the VS. At first it didn't smell but I ran it once and then when I put it back on the core it was a little stinky. It's not bad as the one other film I have but it's there. It's funny, I would have thought that I would have smelt it when I opened the box but it seemed fine. I'm gonna give Filmguard a shot. Everyone's talked about how good it is, why not? Anything's worth a shot.

Bernie
 


Posted by David Kilderry (Member # 142) on 05-29-2000, 06:59 AM:
 
I have some 70mm that is vinegar and it is so disappointing to see (smell) happen. From what I have read, I suspect it is the process, ie anyone ever known IB Tech. to be effected?

To throw a cat among the pigeons.....Nitrate has the best track record of survival. I still have some pre 1920 stuff that is perfect, anyone have safety or polyestar that is older to argue the point!

David
 


Posted by Scott Norwood (Member # 30) on 05-29-2000, 07:46 AM:
 
IB Tech is _definitely_ affected by VS, sometimes more so than acetate. The real problem is that many of the "treatment" processes that were used in the '70s and '80s to remove scratches somehow also accelerated the vinegar process. This sort of process was great for distributors (since it gave some extra life to old prints, temporarily at least), but terrible for collectors (since it caused the film to go vinegar).

There were a few treatment processes that didn't have problems, but they're the exception rather than the rule. That's why "untreated" IB Tech prints often go for higher prices than "treated" IB Tech. I suspect that the treatment was more common with 35mm than with 16mm, but I can't verify that.
 
Posted by Bernie Anderson Jr (Member # 410) on 05-29-2000, 09:55 AM:
 
I have a friend that has an IB tech 16mm print of something that's stinking away in his garage. shame.

You guys should check out the second site that Jeff Johnson posted, it's pretty informative but scray at the same time.

Bernie
 


Posted by Bruce McGee (Member # 131) on 05-29-2000, 02:04 PM:
 
I, too have a stinking 16mm IB print rotting in the garage, too. The base has shrunk so much that the image is breaking away and falling off of it.

As for processing, I know the histories of some of my films. Most were bought between 1972-1986.

I have films from WRS lab that look OK and are not stinking.

I just sold a feature from 1977 that had turned brown that Movielab in NYC did. It was not stinky either.

Foto-Kem prints are OK smelling, and have fair color.

DeLuxe prints are red and smelly. I chucked several about 3 months ago.

MGM Labs prints generally turn brownish colored. No vinegar yet. I have a 1971 35mm print by MGM that still looks nice, though slightly discolored, and no smell.

I only mentioned these labs because the prints I bought were brand new at the time.

The TV companies used to treat their prints with something that was so strong that it would bleach the ink off of the labels. Some of my IB prints were treated, and one is beginning to smell. My 35mm IB stuff is untreated and has no smell.

I have a Technicolor lab print of a 1983 LPP feature that is reeking from vinegar. I try to run it regularly.
It came from a depot in Dallas and my guess is that it was a hothouse.

Does anybody reading this know if Anscocolor eventually fades? I have a 1947 print of a 1935 cartoon on Ansco stock. The color is beautiful even compared to a print I saw recently on Cartoon Network.

 


Posted by Leo Enticknap (Member # 534) on 07-16-2000, 02:49 PM:
 
I've shown several German Agfacolor diacetate prints from the early 40s, and also thought that the colour dyes had survived remarkably well. The base hadn't, though - it had shrunk a lot (more than I would have expected a nitrate print that has lasted well of a similar vintage to have done)


I believe Anscocolor was simply the Agfacolor dye-coupling process renamed when it was used in the US after the War.

Leo
 


Posted by Martin Frandsen (Member # 74) on 07-16-2000, 03:50 PM:
 
How can someone tell if an IB-tech print has been treated?

------------------
It's the new small talk. You do it so awfully well! - My Fair Lady
 


Posted by Bob Leader (Member # 54) on 07-16-2000, 04:13 PM:
 
I think that all Acetate film will eventually breakdown and become infected with "vinegar syndrome". Only by keeping it in a cool and humidity controlled enviroment- can we hope to lessen it's decline.
In 30 years of collecting, I have seen some real tragedies. I have examined about a dozen prints over the years ,but I have never seen a 35mm IB Tech/4-track magnetic "OKLAHOMA" that wasn't infected in some way by vinegar syndrome. They must have all been stored and then scratch removed before a rerelease.
I once picked up a like-lab-new 35mm IB Tech/4-track magnetic "OKLAHOMA" that was as new as the day it was made. It only had the original A and B splices in it. But having been scratch removed - it smelled so strongly of vinegar- that I couldn't store it anywhere around other film prints. It had to sit out in the garage - where it actually rusted some tools near it!
Disney treated so many of it's 35mm prints that trying to find untreated IB Tech prints of Snow White, and especially Dumbo is next to impossible.
I would agree that keeping vinegared films completely away from other films is very important. I have seen how just one vinegared reel of film can affect the other reels of a film print.
I have had some vinegared prints sitting in the open air for some 20 years now - and they still run well. I have had a few vinegared films in cans - and they hardly lasted a few years.


 


Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 07-17-2000, 09:12 AM:
 
The Kodak web site has several articles regarding film storage and "vinegar syndrome":
http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/motion/support/technical/molecular.shtml
http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/motion/support/technical/vinegar.shtml
http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/motion/about/environment/mole.shtml
http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/motion/support/technical/storage2.shtml

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
 






Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2