This is topic What is a good plater sytem to use with a small footprint in forum Film Handlers' Forum at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.
To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=001394
Posted by Alan Gouger (Member # 543) on 09-06-2000, 10:36 PM:
I need a plater system with a small footprint.
What do you recommend. Im looking for an option to run a full feature using one projector in a small booth.Thanks!
Posted by Ken Layton (Member # 133) on 09-06-2000, 10:50 PM:
A Strong/Potts with the special order 48" decks.
Posted by Doug Fields (Member # 589) on 09-06-2000, 11:10 PM:
I agree with Ken here. I have a Strong/Potts platters in all 4 theaters. I love them. They tend to get a little noisy at times, but the newer ones we have, 1999 - present, are great. Very quiet, smooth, and make up very tight. 
That matters to me as we move prints on a whim in this place. And oh, by the way, I have the special order feet in all theaters. As a matter of fact, the platters take up more space than the footprint does. Good luck.Doug Fields
Posted by Aaron Sisemore (Member # 145) on 09-06-2000, 11:24 PM:
The Christie MW3 Miniwind (the newer version that is exactly like a full-size AW3 inside, *NOT* the older ones with all the components on a single 'motherboard' which Christie no longer supports) comes highly recommended, although you are limited to 2:35 running times...and its SMALL....almost to the point of 'cute' 
Aaron
Posted by David Kilderry (Member # 142) on 09-07-2000, 04:59 AM:
An Eprad MUT takes up half the footprint of any platter!David
Posted by John Walsh (Member # 168) on 09-07-2000, 10:43 AM:
Shhh, David! They might start making those things again! You will scare away every tech within 50 miles, and wipe out the light bulb inventory of the theater in one shot!
Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 09-07-2000, 12:21 PM:
Actually they made a wall mut as well that had a 0 footprint. You could also bring back Swords
Tecco also makes a small platter
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 09-07-2000, 03:33 PM:
I have installed quite a few Strong/Potts 48" platter systems. They always run nicely. Just installed 6 standard size Potts in a new 6 plex here in Greensburg Indiana. No problems at all with them right out of the box.
Mark
Posted by Randy Stankey (Member # 64) on 09-08-2000, 12:19 PM:
I second the Strong/Potts.I like the way they run. They are pretty easy on film (IMHO) and they are easy to fix/work on 'cuz they were designed from parts from common sources. You can go to a vacuum cleaner shop or an auto parts store and get a lot of things for them.
The only two "cons" are that they don't hold a lot of film (Just make an intermission if it's over 2:45) and you have to raise and lock the yo-yo inorder to thread. (if you don't get the ones with the "electronic brains".)
Posted by Dave Cutler (Member # 515) on 09-08-2000, 02:31 PM:
Speaking of the 'eletronic brains,' they suck. They constantly need to be re-calibrated and often times need to be re-programed. Re-programing requires a laptop with a special adapter plug. Even if it does accept the re-programming the brain might lose it's programming in the middle of a show and throw a print. It was a very common occurance at the 24-plex I worked at. I am speaking of the DMC platters, I don't know if the SCMC are better.
Posted by Randy Stankey (Member # 64) on 09-08-2000, 04:39 PM:
I just assumed that we were talking about the "old style" Potts with the micro-switch brains. They're like Buddy Lee!
Posted by Dave Cutler (Member # 515) on 09-08-2000, 05:42 PM:
I have used the older Strong/Potts as well, and I like them much better. You do have to raise the yo-yo and lock it in place, but I never minded. With Christie's you have to move the take-up assembly, with Speco you have to move the take-up roller. It's just one of the things that had to been done, and I never minded. I had better reliability with the old microswitches, they rarely go bad, and they are a snap (and cheap) to replace when they do. I love the older Stong platters.If you are unfortunate enough to have the Strong DMC and the brain 'dies,' you have to replace it, and the upgrade to SCMC is about $350 per brain. Let's see, that $350 times 2 brains per platter system times 24 systems. That's $16,800 just to upgrade the brains! There is also an upgrade for the yo-yo as well, but I don't know the cost.
Sometimes I think that things are getting too automated. I mean, do you really need the autoswitching on the new Strong platters. Is it that hard to raise the yo-yo and switch between payout, rewind, and makeup on the older Strong platters. Sometimes simpilar is better.
Posted by Pat Moore (Member # 380) on 09-08-2000, 07:33 PM:
Dave; The upgrade from DMC to SCDC Payout heads isn't quite so bad. The SCDC Card and new sensor mask go onto the same plate as the DMC, and the List Price for both is around $220. Most dealers discount and we'll always work with situations as they come up.I've not had that many problems with the DMC. The main problem seems to be with the payout assembly needing recalibration -- an easy enough process but a problem if you end up doing it too often. I've found that changing the payouts between platters seems to make that happen more often. What happens is that the head sometimes tries to recalibrate itself when it's plugged-in (powered up). In theatres where that's occurring, I ask the operators to be sure and keep the payout arm in the OFF position when they plug it in. That seems to correct most of the problems of lost calibration.
The SCDC versions of the platter addressed that -- each time it's powered up the card recalibrates. It's essentially like a cruise control on a car -- it tries to keep the payout arm in the center of its travel, throttling up or down (within limits) as required.
Both the SCDC and DMC versions have software that can be upgraded using a laptop.
You're right, though -- sometimes simple is nice and the microswitch is that. Yet, a smooth running linear control is awfully good too.
Posted by Dick Vaughan (Member # 540) on 09-13-2000, 03:58 AM:
Not sure if they're still available but I seem to recall Cinemeccanica(pause for North American abuse to die down) made a small foot print 3 deck that had platters that would take 3 hours instead of standard 4.
Posted by Wayne Cope (Member # 437) on 09-13-2000, 10:20 AM:
David's post on the make-up table reminds me: I have a micro-size booth with a full-size platter. The make-up table (which is not overly large) is almost the last straw! If you haven't already, give some thought to space required for make-up and break-down, and get MUT dimensions for the platters you're thinking of. Otherwise, your film handlers will need an exceptional sense of humor to work that booth!If I had more time on my hands, I'd take my MUT apart and bolt the components separately on arms attached to the wall. That's how tight it is in our booth!
Posted by Dave Cutler (Member # 515) on 09-13-2000, 11:49 AM:
Can you use a Goldberg platter reel on a smaller platter deck? If you could you wouldn't need a MUT at all. Just build on the platter reel and then run the show onto the platter reel during it's last show and break it down at the build up table. Can you run a film onto a platter reel without scratching though?
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 09-13-2000, 03:16 PM:
Yes and yes.
Posted by Dave Cutler (Member # 515) on 09-14-2000, 09:58 AM:
Goldberg platter reels are "As Good as Gold." Very worth investing in, if you are working in a seriously confined area.
Posted by Wayne Cope (Member # 437) on 09-15-2000, 01:28 AM:
Thanks for the tip on the Goldberg reels! I've never used one. I look forward to checking one out.
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 09-15-2000, 04:53 AM:
Even if you have to buy one out of your own pocket...DO IT! The Goldberg platter reels are one of the best accessories a projection booth could possibly have!!!