This is topic The Integrity of the IA in forum Film Handlers' Forum at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=001426

Posted by Tim Reed (Member # 137) on 09-14-2000, 09:26 PM:
 
This is from an email conversation I had with a friend recently, regarding some interesting bits of info I dug up in old IA articles. Dig this:

In the early days of motion picture exhibition, two men were usually employed in the booth per shift: one man for each machine. This was something that had been in place since the beginning. The union projectionists continually fought battles with theatre owners, who were always trying to get this cut back to just one man.

The projectionist's argument was one that could not be taken lightly: public safety. Since nitrate film was highly combustible, they argued that it was absolutely necessary to always have a man standing by the operating machine. The idea being that, in the event of a film break, a man would be right there to quickly kill the machine and prevent a fire. Whenever an operator's machine was at rest, he was free to tend to general booth duties.

The projectionists pulled no punches in accusing theatre owners of greedily putting profits above the safety and well-being of its patrons. "The public's safety should be the first and only consideration", the projectionists said, "therefore, there MUST be two men per booth to satisfy this requirement." The operators maintained that they allowed no compromises when it came to the public's safety. None. "Safety must be insured at all costs."

Who could argue with that?

In 1950, safety film came into widespread use and the fire threat was eliminated. So, with the public completely safe, the union would have no further opposition to one-man booths, right? After all, as was repeatedly stated for the record, they had only been concerned with the public's safety.

In 1952, the IATSE expressed their concern for the public by introducing a resolution opposing the use of safety film.


------------------
Better Projection Pays!


 


Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 09-15-2000, 06:10 AM:
 
Tim Reed said: "In 1952, the IATSE expressed their concern for the public by introducing a resolution opposing the use of safety film."

If true, "introducing" a resolution could have been the effort of a small minority of IA members in fear of losing their jobs. Did the resolution pass and become policy?

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
 


Posted by Tim Reed (Member # 137) on 09-15-2000, 09:18 PM:
 
It's true. The whole story was culled from official IA reports in the trades, from circa 1945 to 1952.

I don't know what happened beyond that.

------------------
Better Projection Pays!


 


Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 11-10-2000, 09:33 PM:
 
In Ontario it was the mid 60's before the Law was ammended not requiring 2 operators in any theatre over 600 seats.
It was 1984 before the changed the law requireing two operators for 70mm operation

 
Posted by Rick Long (Member # 213) on 11-10-2000, 09:48 PM:
 
Are we then to celebrate the overcoming of Union tyranny, in these enlighted times, by rejoicing in the fact that some non-union operators are being paid minimum wage to run a 16-plex?


 


Posted by Dennis Atkinson (Member # 345) on 11-11-2000, 08:54 AM:
 
In 1932 the Unions were fighting double reels. THeater management like the new reels because it gave the projectionist time to do other things while the show was running.
The union fought the reels for the same reason.
 
Posted by Christopher Seo (Member # 7) on 11-11-2000, 12:34 PM:
 
By "double reels", do you mean a switch from 1000' to 2000' reel lengths?
 
Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 11-11-2000, 12:53 PM:
 
In Ontario the Toronto Local 173 always helped introduce new technology and did not fight automation or large reels or platters being introduced.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 11-11-2000, 05:17 PM:
 
Chris,
Yes, thats what he means. Changing from 1000 foot reels to 2000 foot reels.
Mark
 




Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2