This is topic Seagull bet in forum Film Handlers' Forum at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=001474

Posted by Per Hauberg (Member # 529) on 09-25-2000, 04:03 PM:
 
Having a bet in the air, i need the help from someone remembering:
Jonathan Livingston Seagull - any kind of stereo sound (cinema prints) ? -maybe even 70mm ?

Per
 


Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 09-25-2000, 07:56 PM:
 
Now there's one I haven't seen on film in *long* while... Has it really been 26 years?

The print we had in Las Vegas was mono-optical--don't know if there were any mag prints in the larger first-run cities in the US.

I was 18 when that film came out and was just starting my first paid camera position (TK-41C in the studio, TK-60 in the truck, Arri 16BL in the field). The photography in that film, especially the day-for-night stuff, was an inspiration!

Sorry, doesn't answer your bet does it?

 


Posted by Tim Reed (Member # 137) on 09-25-2000, 08:25 PM:
 
I'm not 100% sure, but seems like I remember that being in 4-track mag.

I'm maybe 80% sure.

------------------
Better Projection Pays!
 


Posted by John Wilson (Member # 269) on 09-26-2000, 07:59 AM:
 
Probably was released with mag copies. I remember running it as a double with Jesus Christ Superstar (good double, eh?) which was a four track print.

The IMDB doesn't stipulate its sound format but this was interesting...

Film negative format (mm/video inches)
35 mm

Cinematographic process
Panavision (anamorphic)

Printed film format
35 mm

Aspect ratio
2.35 : 1

I could have sworn I remember it being flat. Am I going insane, Tim? Do you remember?
 


Posted by Tim Reed (Member # 137) on 09-26-2000, 11:03 AM:
 
It was scope, John. That much I am sure of.

------------------
Better Projection Pays!
 


Posted by Paul Mayer (Member # 355) on 09-26-2000, 07:29 PM:
 
I'll second that--it was 'scope. Looked really good on the Parkway's deep curve (D-150?) screen.
 
Posted by John Wilson (Member # 269) on 09-29-2000, 02:03 AM:
 
Okay...it was a long time ago...

You do not live as we live...
You do not fly as we fly...
You are therefore, henceforth and forever...
...outcast!

(Poor Jonathan )
 


Posted by Martin Frandsen (Member # 74) on 09-29-2000, 02:14 AM:
 
Well if it's not in 70mm, then it's not good enough, right?
 




Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2