This is topic Technicolor strikes again in forum Film Handlers' Forum at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.
To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=001592
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 10-21-2000, 11:35 AM:
I just love posting these Technicolor disasters. We got a print of Almost Famous on Thursday. The DTS holder was in the can...complete with busted-in-half clear plastic retainer... but no disks.
I called Technicolor. They said "When that print was shipped, we did not have any in stock, and we are still out of stock today."
Figuring that was their way of saying I was screwed, I called DTS. They said they had disks, but couldn't ship them out without a direct word from Dreamworks. (This must be fairly new...I've called them a couple of times previous, and they've shipped disks with no question.)
So I called my booker, who called Dreamworks, and they called DTS, and the word came back from my booker that the disks would be overnighted.
So yesterday afternoon, I got the disks... FROM TECHNICOLOR.
Talk about the left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing........
Posted by John Walsh (Member # 168) on 10-21-2000, 11:50 PM:
Technicolor probably needed an OK from DTS or Dreamworks before they could ship the disks. But to keep you off their backs, they lied and said they didn't have any.
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 10-22-2000, 07:51 PM:
Mike,
A prime example of why you should have SRD instead. This no disks trick still happens all to often to theaters all over the place. Too many theaters keep the disks and sometimes proudly display their collections of them. If you have a really high end sound system you may detect that DTS does indeed sound better, by a small margin, than SRD does, but SRD tracks don't become seperated from the print. DTS is now a secondary digital format in most booths and Sony doesn't even come into the picture so
ya can't really blame Technicolor for this one, only the dealer that sold you the DTS unit in the first place.
Mark@GTS
Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 10-22-2000, 08:40 PM:
Mark
DTS is a superior system for it allows multi language and no problems of print wear and no bit pooling and it is technicolors screw up
The screw ups are in the minority for especially in canada the shipping of disks is automatic and I have never heard of any complaints from any US theatres that I have sold dts systems to about not getting disks.
I wonder if your oposition to dts is based on the fact you are not one of there dealers
Posted by Michael Cunningham (Member # 210) on 10-22-2000, 09:16 PM:
While I agree that DTS does have a plus side in the "no print wear on soundtrack" department, there are some problems with using this format. First, missing feature discs. While this may be a rare occurance with most first releases of new prints, those poor second-run theatres out there have a hell of a time with this. Second, keeping your entire presentation in digital. How many theatre chains do you know of that will pay to have their policy trailer's sound track placed on the weekly DTS trailer disc? Also, trying to keep programmed only those trailers whose luck it is to still be included on that weekly disc can be a real nightmare. I'm not trying to bash the quality or performance of DTS, but until these problems have been addressed DTS will always be a secondary choice for digital processor.-Mike
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 10-22-2000, 10:00 PM:
No Gord,
I knew posting that would get your attention!! And it is not meant to bash Mikes decision to get the DTS unit. Who knows he may have had the unit since the beginning at Jurassic Park.
As far as me favoring them or not has nothing to do with us being a dealer or not. We in fact get them cheaper than most dealers do, as we do with Dolby, since we get a better break from a distributer than if we were a dealer. We are in fact an authorized service center though, and to me that service capability matters more than being a dealer. We have sold many DTS units to our customers only to have to repair all of them, upgrade drives, and other problems all at the customers expense.
Indeed if that print did not come straight from Technicolor and was routed from another theater it was then not Technicolors fault, it was the previous theaters fault. The seperate disk is the one major drawback of the DTS system for the average theater owner and a huge drawback for the move over/second run theater. While it may support multi language that has little or no meaning in most places with the exception of large format, and even there with limited use. There is not a large format theater around here that runs multi language.
Indeed DTS has made the readers more reliable but only with many upgrades and modifications. All at the customers expense. That is what has made it a secondary format.
Mark
Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 10-23-2000, 08:27 AM:
Actually DTS is more reliable to second run theatres as they don't have to deal with abraided SRD or SDDS tracks tha then have high error rates
Posted by Tom Kroening (Member # 201) on 10-23-2000, 09:22 AM:
I'm going to have to agree with mark on this one. All the dts units I have worked with have had some sort of problem. Mark, im not sure if you installed the DTS at the rock but one of them needs repair. At the theatre I work at now we have 8 dts units. 1 is out for repairs, and 2 of the have at least one bad drive. While SRD has its problems, it is the more popular format and i've never heard of an SRD track being seperated from the print ; ) I see the problem of theatres not returning disks. There's a stack of them in the booth right now. (as i do not break down prints i usually only build them, i can only keep reminding the other manager to include the disks).
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 10-23-2000, 10:09 AM:
Tom,
Yes, I did install the units at the rock. One is a year or so newer than the other but it does not surprise me that one is bad. I hear your story all the time, and it's odd that I got a call from a customer just this morning that is going to bring his 6D down for overhaul on Wednesday. Man, I better start stocking upgrade kits here at GTS! I love ! All that comes to mind is Ca-ching...Ca-ching. Gord, Its odd that you are the only one here hat does NOT have any DTS woes and the ONLY one that does have Dolby woes........perhaps your customers never use their units. 
Mark
Posted by John Walsh (Member # 168) on 10-23-2000, 10:53 AM:
Not to add fuel to a fire...;We have two DTS units. I find them to be very reliable, but have had a few problems with them over the past three years (to me, a "problem" is when you must run a show in analog because the digital unit won't work.)
On the other hand, our three SR-D units (over three years) have never failed.
I know that's not very many for a sampling, but....
Also, I'm sorry to say, people at the theater I work at seem to make it their mission in life to forget to include the DTS disks on ship-out night. At least once a month, I find disks for films that were returned. So, while I really like DTS for techinal reasons, missing disks does seem to be a real problem.
To me, not getting DTS disks is just like not getting a reel of film. Film exchanges do not say; "We are still out of stock of reel one today. Sorry." I'm paying the film exchange to deliver my print -complete-, including disks. It's bad enough they don't want to inspect prints (to verify the disks are there,) but don't give me this, "disks are not my problem," garbage.
Of course, the film exchange should then go back and fine the theater that forgot the disks in the first place.
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 10-23-2000, 11:20 AM:
To clarify a few things about my original post:We are an off-the-break theatre (usually) and we have played hundreds of DTS movies since getting the system in '94.
Only twice have I been totally unable to get disks at all, and only a handful of times (less than ten, I reckon) have I had to call Tech, ETS or whoever to get disks.
The reason I bought DTS had nothing to do with anything but the price. At the time, Dolby was on some movies, DTS was on others, and Sony was just coming out. It was a choice between spending $5500 (which I had) and $12,000 (which I didn't).
Finally, after over six years of use, I have had zero repairs on this DTS unit. I've had the occasional goofup (sound dropping out, etc.) but it's so rare that it's not a problem. Would I buy DTS again? Yes, but only if they give me a free jacket! 
I am amazed that theatres keep the disks. WHAT FOR? Back in the NFS days, I once forgot to send some disks back with a print, and I got a phone call asking for them. THAT'S what's needed, along with a stiff penalty for theatres that don't send the disks back.
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 10-23-2000, 12:15 PM:
I agree with Mike on the stiff penalty. Theaters should definately be charged for the disks if they are not returned. I know that DTS has made attempts to rectify this problem but it still has a way to go to make it perfect.
Sure I would sell a DTS unit to a theater but only as a secondary system.
Mark
Posted by Dustin Mitchell (Member # 372) on 10-23-2000, 12:37 PM:
DTS sounds spectacular, that's all that matters to me. We rarely have problems with our 6 units.
Posted by Scott Norwood (Member # 30) on 10-23-2000, 12:40 PM:
I have no idea why theatres fail to return DTS disks. The only thing that I can think of is that it's really easy to forget to take the disks out of the DTS unit if the next film to play in a given theatre isn't going to play in DTS (in which case one would obviously have to remove the disks from the old movie to insert the ones for the new movie).
Still, that's no excuse for not returning them to the distributor. I don't believe that I have ever personally failed to return a set of DTS disks, but I have accidentally left them in the DTS player when moving a print from a DTS house to an SR-D house... (though they eventually would get found when the print moved to a DTS house or was shipped out.
The only problem that I've had with DTS (the product) is that the units with the bad drives will occasonally lock up in the middle of a show. Rebooting the players between shows seems to fix this problem, though it should be unnecessary. In general it's a good system and I do like the idea that it's based on commodity hardware which is generally reliable and not horribly expensive to repair/replace. Sure, DTS isn't perfect, but it sounds good and costs less than SR-D even with the drive upgrades, etc.
If I were a second-run theatre, though, I'd go with SR-D because of the "missing-disk" problem, but that doesn't mean that DTS is a bad system by any means. (Hey, they support 70mm, which is more than SR-D or SDDS can do!)
Posted by Dave Cutler (Member # 515) on 10-23-2000, 01:11 PM:
I don't understand the argument from Technicolor that it wasn't their fault. I agree with John W that a theatre is paying for a complete print. A film with timecode and no discs is NOT complete. If the discs weren't returned to Tech then it is THEIR responsibility to replace them. CD's are extremly cheap to make, there is no excuse for any print to be delivered without discs, if it is DTS encoded. I also agree that theatres that don't return the discs should be fined, if you don't include a reel than you get it trouble. Not returning the DTS discs is just as bad.As far as the other argument about which system is more reliable, DTS or SRD. DTS is more reliable, and here is why I think so. DTS had some harware problems yes, but get the upgrade and the problem is solved. When DTS is operating correctly, it is flawless. SRD, while not having hardware problems, that I am aware of, has serious soundtrack problems. That's something that you can't just fix, it is ever persistant. Your soundtracks will occasionally go bad and there is no fix for that. I would rather have a system that doesn't have sound dropouts, and when the system isn't working just make sure your analog is working properly. There is nothing wrong with running a movie in analog, it can and should sound amazing as well.
I personally don't think that every movie that comes out actually benifits from a digital soundtrack. Huge special effects movies and action films, yes. But not everything NEEDS to be in digital anyway.
Posted by John Walsh (Member # 168) on 10-23-2000, 08:51 PM:
Two reasons why the disks are forgotten: Inexperienced people not being paid very much, and told to; "hurry up." (As Scott pointed out,) the disks sit in the drawers out of sight, so they are forgotten.Also, many of the "kids" truly think that most times the print is thrown away after we have it. There are only two 2nd run theaters within 10 miles of us, (and they are both single-screens) so they don't think that's where our print might go.
After all, they send back damaged prints once in a while, and no one seems to notice. So they must not be used again, right?
Posted by Bill Enos (Member # 440) on 10-23-2000, 11:45 PM:
Digital? Is it worth the trouble at all? Rarely does it sound significantly better than good (and easier to keep good) analog. There are no discs, no errors, no shifting in and out, no goofy drives, no failure prone processors, digital is just an expensive half assed mess designed to sell malengineered equipment and service for same. Just how it looks to me.
Posted by Bob Minge (Member # 574) on 10-24-2000, 12:19 AM:
Sorry Bill, I have to disagree. Go to someones theater with a CP500 and get them to switch from digital to SR to A to Mono and then back up in order again to digital. There is a difference between each one. I have done this for customers so they can hear the difference. Yes, a good analog sounds great, but some customers, with a choice, will choose digital over analog if they know. I have some customers who want to know if I will be playing a certain movie in our big theater to hear it in digital. Or they will get to the theater late after I have moved it out of the digital theater and they are disapointed and wished they had gotten here a week earlier.
some of those customers are the ones who ask for a film and I tell them it was here for 3 weeks and just left yesterday.
And yes, some customers don't care or don't know the difference. But I feel that it is my job to let customers know about the difference so they can look for it and understand the difference and make a choice. ------------------
Bob Minge
Manager/Projectionist
Westridge Cinema 5
Fergus Falls, MN
http://geocities.com/lakesandriverscinema/westridge_cinema_5.html
Posted by John Walsh (Member # 168) on 10-24-2000, 10:51 AM:
I feel digital is not only "worth it" but will probably replace optical someday. I also feel it is less maintaince. After all, people are supposed to check Dolby level after changing an exciter bulb, but few do.It is true that you need special equipment, but that equipment is getting cheaper almost every day, and with the internet, the info needed to set up digital systems is usually freely avaiable.
I bet that projectionists were complaining about the reliabilty of optical sound for years after it was introduced!
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 10-25-2000, 10:34 AM:
Guys,
You have to remember that all digital tracks are mastered from an SR 6 track print master(analog of course). Very rarely is the master in digital. There may be an exception to this for some large format films but those are small productions as compared to feature work.
Probably the best demo I have heard of SR compared to digital(SRD) is "True Lies". The SR tracks are of such high quality that switching from Digital to analog only really increased the channel seperation.
Mark
Posted by Dave Cutler (Member # 515) on 10-25-2000, 01:15 PM:
Mark said:
"Probably the best demo I have heard of SR compared to digital(SRD) is "True Lies". The
SR tracks are of such high quality that switching from Digital to analog only really
increased the channel seperation."And thats not enough reason to have digital? I agree that many films that are released in digital are a bit silly. For the majority of films Dolby SR is just fine. I personally feel that digital is only necessary for high action or effects movies that require the channel seperation that is gained from digital. For instance Star Trek movies benifit greatly from digital (as the originals did from 6-track mag), but films like, oh, Pay It Forward don't really need to be digital.
Just my opinion.
Posted by Bruce McGee (Member # 131) on 10-25-2000, 01:44 PM:
All this growling about the different systems. IMHO, I think the first mistake will be taking the sound off the film!DTS is an updated Vitaphone record!
It's a great idea, but once optical sound goes, then any 35mm sound machine will no longer be able to play any 35mm sound print. I think that the cyan track is the beginning of the end of optical, anyway.
I've been to theatres with mono optical sound and a fantastic, clear, bright, sharp, and steady picture.
I've also been in theatres with a dull image, and sound so loud that it hurt my ears.
I'd rather have the sharp bright image!
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 10-25-2000, 02:04 PM:
Mono sound can be loud too. That's not the fault of the digital playback.
Posted by Randy Stankey (Member # 64) on 10-25-2000, 10:12 PM:
I STILL hear that old saw about DTS.
I call it "Jazz Singer-phobia".
Posted by Bruce McGee (Member # 131) on 10-26-2000, 06:59 AM:
Sorry. I ment to say that I saw films that were dull and dim that had sound that was so sharp and perfect that in one shot when a train went by, the intensity of the audio hurt my ears.
Sure, MONO can kill, too. 
I cant for the life of me remember the title of the film with the train.
Posted by John Walsh (Member # 168) on 10-26-2000, 08:57 AM:
It's true that most films are recorded in analog.But, the point is, the audio "delivery system" at the theaters be of high quality and lower maintance (which I think digital does.) Even if the audio quality was the same, I'd still like to have digital because of less maintance.
Saying that; "... it's analog sound to begin with, so playing it back in digital doesn't matter.." would be like saying; "... why do a 35 to 70mm blowup since the orginal negative is only 35mm?"
I'm sure we've all heard the increase in quality on even old recordings when the master tapes were transfer to CD's.
As far as loosing the DTS disks, although true, that's not the fault of DTS. A system should be used as it was designed... ie: no one really complained about running Cinerama (threading 3 projectors and a sound reproducer.) It was required to get the quality desired. DTS has the lowest compression, can run multiple languges and operate other control functions. If these features are important, don't loose the disks!
Years ago it seend, engineers designed the highest quality motion picture systems they could; the work required to run them was secondary. Today, engineers design the "dumbest-downed" system they can, -then- try to squeeze in the quality afterward. Ho-hum.
Posted by Karen Hultgren (Member # 395) on 10-27-2000, 12:52 PM:
I see some of you may not be getting discs. If this is happening to you, please let me know. With approval from the studios, we now make one disc set per print. If a theater is getting a "used" print, it's true the first theater may have kept the discs. We cannot help that, but we can (w/the studio's permission) send discs to theaters whenever needed. Remember, the discs belong to the STUDIO, not DTS nor the film distribuator.Karen at DTS
khultgren@dtsonline.com www.dtsonline.com
Posted by Dave Cutler (Member # 515) on 10-27-2000, 01:55 PM:
Nor do they belong to the exhibitor.
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 10-27-2000, 05:18 PM:
I wasn't going to post my Techicolor disaster for this week, but since this thread got off topic, I decided to. Besides, it's a good one.We're playing Urban Legends 2 starting tonight. For some strange reason, my print arrived on Wednesday this week, so I put it together that nite. The last 200' of reel 1, and the first 200' of reel 2 had been FOLDED IN HALF down the middle at some point in the past. So there's a big crease down the middle of the film. The print was obviously run after the "fold" was straightened out, but that caused perf damage, since due to the crease, the film was now slightly too narrow for the average projector. Each reel also had scratches, a splice or two, etc.
So I called TES to order new reels. To their credit, they were very nice on the phone and said they would call the next day with an "ETA" on when the reels would arrive.
The next day... no phone call. As it turned out, I was out of town last night. Got home, and on my answering machine was a message from the bartender at the bar next door to the theatre, saying "This girl is here and says she's supposed to meet you at 9:00, so where are you," etc. Needless to say, my wife was VERY curious about this phone call! So I called the bar, and found out the "girl" was the TES courier with my new reels! She had left the reels at the bar.
So I hightailed it to the bar and got the reels. A happy ending, but ONLY because the print got here on Wednesday night!
Brad, maybe a new forum is in order...TES Horror Stories!
Posted by Frank Prete (Member # 627) on 10-27-2000, 07:33 PM:
With the way the recording industry is going, I don't think it will be too long before film masters are done in the digital domain. All of the editing is completed digitally, most of the mixing consoles are now 'virtual consoles' with each channel being called up on a computer screen.Much of the location recordings are done using the DAT format (Digital Audio Tape), and much of the ADR stuff would be done with any number of digital recorders.
Lets face it digital recordings are better all round. If you think you can get away without digital then you might find that your customers will start looking else where. With the recent upsurge of DVD units in homes these days, people are becoming more and more aware of the benifits of digital sound - whatever brand you choose! It is not surprising that Dolby have officially changed the name of SRD to Dolby Digital. Everyone recognises the phrase Dolby Digital.
I too have had frustrations with DTS discs not arriving, and on the other hand, I have heard some amazing sound in our DTS theatres. The same goes for Dolby Digital and SDDS. In the early days of digital we would often have a DTS print playing in our SRD house, and an SRD print playing in a DTS house. Now with films coming with multiple formats its not such a problem.
Frank.
Posted by Steven Gorsky (Member # 603) on 10-28-2000, 01:28 AM:
You mean you can't fold the film in half and play it on a 16mm projector
No wonder that didn't work 
Steven Gorsky
Posted by John Wilson (Member # 269) on 10-28-2000, 05:00 AM:
Nope...but it will play on a 17.5mm projector.
Posted by Steven Gorsky (Member # 603) on 10-28-2000, 08:29 AM:
I knew I missed something. Maybe I should have trimmed some off. 