This is topic Mr. Nasher strikes again! in forum Film Handlers' Forum at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=001998

Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 03-07-2001, 02:17 PM:
 
 -

Today is indeed a sad day today, as the magnificent General Cinema Northpark 1 & 2 theater in Dallas, Texas is being murdered. This theater set the standard for presentation in projection and sound quality and has not been duplicated since it's closing on October 21, 1998. It was closed by the ever-greedy Mr. Nasher of the Northpark mall in his desire to turn such "wasted space" into a Foley's. Recently a couple of parties with the financial resources and desire to restore this fabulous theater approached the Nashers, but they were not interested and coincidentally enough, the theater was quickly slated for destruction.

It is ashamed at what greed will do to a person. The Nashers are more than financially set, yet they proceeded to destroy a staple landmark of the movie industry so they can expand the mall for more retail space. This theater could have been reopened as the "show theater of Dallas", which it always was before and bring people back into the mall. I guess having another store that sells overpriced soap is more important.  - What do you think?

Pictures of the demolishing can be seen by CLICKING HERE.

Pictures of this theater when it was still open can be seen by clicking "pictures" below and selecting "GCC Northpark 1 & 2".

[ 08-16-2004, 05:25 PM: Message edited by: Brad Miller ]
 
Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 03-07-2001, 02:31 PM:
 
A very sad day indeed!


I fondly remember seeing a 70mm DTS print of "Titanic" at the GCC Northpark with a group of other Kodak
engineers on February 3, 1998. "Perfection" --- what more can I say? Great sound, flawless print, bright and
steady picture. The theatre's modest "mall" exterior and tiny lobby hid the gem that was inside. After the show,
Ron Beardmore graciously gave us a tour of the booth, and shared his love of the 70mm format and projection with
us.

AFAIK, that 70mm print of "Titanic" was the same one screened at the White House, and personally approved by director James Cameron --- which shows how much distributors appreciated the quality of presentation at the Northpark.

A perfect example of "Film done RIGHT!"


------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 


Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 03-07-2001, 03:01 PM:
 
I have never had the fortune to visit the Northpark theater. But I have heard many stories about it, and I certainly do not doubt its greatness and significance. With so many lousy theaters in operation today, the movie industry really NEEDS a place like this.

Mr. Nasher... I don't know you.... but I'm pointing at you.
 


Posted by Ken Layton (Member # 133) on 03-07-2001, 04:02 PM:
 
It's greed pure and simple. Too bad greed drives him.

 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 03-07-2001, 04:14 PM:
 
Mr Nasher, You're an iddiott. I'll be looking down on you where ever you go.
Mark
 
Posted by Jeremy Spracklen (Member # 18) on 03-07-2001, 08:02 PM:
 
It is a sad day indeed. I will never forget the time that I spent there learning and being entertained. Not only was the presentation flawless, but the projectionists were always friendly and happy to oblige when asked for a booth tour. When in the booth, you were surrounded by history, and not just the normal "history" of old movie posters and banners that most movie theaters contain. They had kept a wall of fame that held old newspaper articles and comment cards that were collected throughout the years. These were from regular people who were all amazed by what they saw, and felt they had to speak up about it. The city of Dallas has trully lost something wonderful.

And to Mr. Nasher, I am also pointing at you. However, unlike Joe, I am using a different finger.
 


Posted by Mitchell Cope (Member # 32) on 03-07-2001, 08:41 PM:
 
I fondly remember seeing "The Graduate" there, probably sometime just after it opened in the mid-60s. It was "the place" to go with a date, plus it was probably the only movie theater in town showing the most popular 1st run movies.

In those days, it had the "classic" General Cinema Corp shadowbox design. Dallas has lost too many excellent movie theaters. I still lament over the loss of the "Palace" downtown.
 


Posted by Ethan Harper (Member # 472) on 03-07-2001, 08:52 PM:
 
I never had a chance to experience Northpark. Although, I have heard many great stories from those who had gotten a chance to see their flawless presentation continuously. I wish that I could have been able to be lucky enough to see for myself but unfortunantely, Mr. Nasher for some unknown reason, decided to take it upon himself and DESTROY such a proud theater. What a travesty this is. I do not understand why anybody in their right mind would take such a phenomenal place away. Especially if finances were available to re-open Dallas's superior show theater. That is just pure stupidity! Northpark will surely forever be missed by those who have witnessed it's spectacular, perfect performances, and by those who haven't.

Mr. Nasher, Thank you for taking such an awaited, historical experience away from everybody. Your greed has exceeded you. what an ass!!!

I have heard several stories about other people's experience at Northpark. I wonder if there could be anybody else out there that could share some more with me.

------------------
--"That's my story and i'm sticking to it!"--


 


Posted by Jason Burroughs (Member # 68) on 03-07-2001, 09:18 PM:
 
Mr Nasher has had a reputation for putting the dollar before anything else. The demise of Northpark is further proof.

It is a black eye to Dallas to loose such a great theatre for good. Many people throughout the area were hopeing for its triumphant return. What is even MORE sad is that we have not only lost a great theatre but opened the door for a new AMC mulitplex. Thats right, AMC has been in talks with Mr. Nasher about building a new google plex near the Northpark Mall.
 


Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 03-07-2001, 09:20 PM:
 
I have seen poor people on this earth that are as happy and contented as can be. Then I have also seen very wealthy people who are the most miserable SOB's you can imagine. I'll almost be willing to bet Nasher, Smasher, or whatever his name is fits in the SOB column. The world is full of idiots, and probably always will be.

For those who remember Harry Truman, he said it correctly. Mr. Truman said, "The problem with the people in this country is they worship money."

I'll be almost willing to bet that Nasher is one of those who worships money.


 


Posted by Richard C. Wolfe (Member # 431) on 03-07-2001, 11:07 PM:
 
I'm wondering how to enter this discussion without offending anyone.I think each generation has its own definition of standards that they judge their own time by.What is considered superior to one generation may be considered just ordinary to another. Those of us that grew up prior to the sixties were devastated to see the great theatres of our and previous generations destroyed and replaced by theatres such as the GCC Northpark 1 & 2.

Maybe they had excellent projection and sound, comfortable seats, were clean and many of them even had a curtain. But where was the showmanship, and more then that, where was the theatrical invionment? A bland box for auditoriums, lobbies that were no better. It's a shame that we brought up a generation thinking that these were great theatres. We can't blame that generation as it wasn't their fault. They were robbed of the opportunity to experience really great theatres. Some of them are still around, but are now Performing Arts centers. If you want to see some magnificent theatres which were built for the presentation of movies, go visit the Fox's in St Louis, Detriot, or Atlanta, the Shea's Buffalo in Buffalo, Radio City in New York, the Chicago in Chicago, the Los Angelas in LA, the Paramount in Oakland and the list goes on and on. Every city and town had a theatre or theatres of that caliber, maybe much smaller, but just as flamboyant.

I never thought that I would see the day that anyone would miss a theatre built in the sixties or later. My generation thought of them as depressing substitutes for the real thing.

I do realize that they represent the best of the post TV generation... so forgive me for my comments. I will let you mourn your loss as we mourned ours. I'm just saddened that you didn't have the opportunity to experience the movie palace era. There will never be another like it.
 


Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 03-08-2001, 12:02 AM:
 
Richard, you didn't offend me. Seeing a "Grand Old Lady" fall is not a pleasent thing. Luckly, Historical Societies were able to rescue a few. I wish they could have rescued more. It is likewise a shame to see some of these magnificant theaters butchered to add more little boxes called auditoriums.
 
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 03-08-2001, 04:41 AM:
 
Richard, since you are unfamiliar with this theater allow me to elaborate as to why it is missed so much. The Northpark theater was known for it's presentation quality. Sure there are older theaters that have magnificent muriels on the walls and all sorts of decorative touches to them and I have visited many of them. (The recently restored Paramount theater in Abilene, Texas is an excellent example of a classic grand single screen. They even have twinkling stars and moving clouds on the ceiling.) They are indeed quite impressive places to visit, but they all suffer in terms of presentation due to acoustics, small screen size, keystoning due to the incredibly high booth atop the balcony (or 2nd balcony) and so forth and so on. Unfortunately, when it comes down to presentation they quite simply could not touch the presentation quality of Northpark.

I am not trying to say the older classic theaters built in the first half of the last century are not magnificent in their own respects, but past the eye candy part of them their presentation has many faults. The same analogy can be made today. If I am choosing a multiplex to attend, I will not attend a theater just because it has neon in the lobby or because I like the drapes on the walls. I make my selection based upon the care of the film handling as well as the equipment and acoustic design of the auditoriums. In short, once the lights dim, all that matters is the picture on the screen and the quality of the sound. Sure the Northpark theater didn't have fancy chandelirs or muriels on the walls, but that isn't what experiencing a movie at the Northpark was about. The lobby was small and could not handle the volume of customers. (Imagine 1200 patrons exiting a movie all at once.) The bathrooms only had a couple of stalls in them! The box office only had 2 stations and frequently people had to stand in extremely long lines wrapping around the building just to get a ticket. In short this theater had many flaws in it's design, but in regards to the actual presentation of the film, nothing else came close nor has ever since.

Seeing a movie at the Northpark was always about presentation, and nothing more.
 
Posted by Aaron Haney (Member # 747) on 03-08-2001, 05:42 AM:
 
Brad, can I use the "F" word on this forum? If so I have something I would like to say to Mr. Nasher.

On second thought, I have something to say even without the "F" word:

I will not patronize the Northpark Mall ever again!

I would suggest that anyone else who lives in Dallas do the same.

I was born in the Dallas area, I grew up there, and lived never more than an hour's drive away until just three short years ago. I frequently go back for a visit. Ever since I moved away, I have waited to do my Christmas shopping until after I returned to Dallas to visit my family, and the Northpark mall was always part of that shopping trip. Not anymore. Not ever again.

The Northpark 1-2 theater was responsible for my love of movies, for my love of 70mm, and for my love of the theatrical experience. Before I was able to drive I would beg and plead with my parents to take me to the Northpark to see movies. After I was able to drive, I rarely went to see movies anywhere else. I had other theaters that I liked, but none compared to Northpark.

Yes, it really was that good. I recently exchanged e-mail with someone who would regularly drive 200 miles to visit the Northpark theater.

If I close my eyes, I can still see and hear in my mind the magnificent presentations that took place there. I do not believe these memories are enhanced by nostalgia. As I grew up and my perceptions and tastes became more sophisticated, the Northpark still continued to impress me.

I actually liked waiting in line at the Northpark 1-2, even in the rain. I've still not seen another theater that has picture quality quite like it. And with 70mm dead as a doornail and TI's crappy 1280x1024 digital "cinema" system threatening to take over everything, I guess I never will again.

My hands are shaking as I type this. I feel like someone just killed my dog.

Brad, I am curious about these parties who were wishing to revive the theater. Were you involved with them? Can you give us more information? Also, I thought the equipment had been removed and sold. If so, unless the exact same equipment was taken back and installed and tuned the same way, it would not have been the same.

The idea of AMC building one of their horrible "theaters" in its place just adds insult to injury. If anyone from AMC is reading this: Don't even try. You will never be as good.

Richard, Brad is right. This theater was not known for its decor. It was known for its presentation. And when the lights go down, that's all that matters. A full-blown "palace" design would have been nice, but that's not what made this theater great.

------------------
Aaron Haney
Professional Complainer
Apple Computer, Inc.
 


Posted by Dwayne Caldwell (Member # 417) on 03-08-2001, 06:09 AM:
 
The very first movie I ever saw was Star Wars. I was probably three and a half maybe just four years old, and I saw it at the Northpark 1 and 2 theatre. Needless to say the experience blew me away (as my mother can attest having told me on numerous occasions that both my brother and I had our eyes glued to the screen at every moment). So it can be said that my passion for films bloomed at that very location, and holds a special place in my heart. Even if it is just a sixties movie theatre. I saw numerous shows there including all the Star Wars films with the exception of Episode one. It didn’t feel right not being able to watch Phantom Menace at the Northpark theatre since they shut it down. I always felt though that as long as the building stood, there might be a chance of its resurrection. But now Mr. Nasher has utterly destroyed it. Now normally I’d just shake my head in irritation and shrug at the fact that consumerism has won out once again. But I’m afraid I can’t just shake my head this time.

I honestly have to say that Mr. Nasher is a complete and total BASTARD! I apologize to the members of the forum for using such a vulgar term but BASTARD seems to be the only adjective suitable enough to describe this BASTARD’S actions without getting into some really heavy language. But I don’t expect Mr. Nasher (a.k.a. BASTARD) to understand the effects of his actions. I know I’m not alone on this. There were several letters in one of the Dallas Morning News papers in October of ‘98 sharing the common viewpoint that shutting down the Northpark 1 and 2 was disheartening as well as a mistake. But as I understand it Mr. BASTARD doesn’t like movies that much to begin with. It’s his mall. Let the BASTARD do what he likes. It doesn’t mean I have to like it though.

But that mall seems to cater only to the rich or extremely snobby. Anyone on this forum who has ever been inside the mall will know what I’m talking about. There are clothing stores galore along with expensive interior restaurants. But I don’t remember seeing any bookstores inside. At least none worth talking about. Oh but they got Abercrombie, Pier One Imports, and several other high fashion clothing outlet stores. Now that I think about it, I don’t think there’s anything inside that costs less than six fifty. That’s why the movie theater has to go! Come to think about it, most paperbacks are about six dollars, so maybe that’s why there’s hardly a bookshop in sight inside that mall. Just because Mr. Nasher’s preferred clientele enjoy epicurean raiment and edible delights is no reason to expect they’d enjoy broadening their imagination with a good book, is there? Oh but these people are willing to shell out fifty dollars for a stinking aromatherapy candle!

Anyway many thanks Nasher for dozing down my childhood memories like so much clutter. Thank you for marring and tainting Northpark’s sacred ground so you can service the hundreds of snobby customers while denying the thousands upon thousands of movie customers a place to enjoy a truly remarkable film presentation. You grumpy old BASTARD!


------------------
The man with the magic hands.


 


Posted by Randy Loy (Member # 112) on 03-08-2001, 10:52 AM:
 
This thread demonstrates how emotional those of us that love motion picture theatres can get over places that have made the motion picture experience so magical for us. I see this phenomenon with both drive-in theatres and "hard tops" and it always hurts when the theatre of our dreams disappears to be replaced by a retail outlet or whatever. What it usually boils down to is money and real estate developers love money as much as we love movie theatres. We see the magic of the cinema, they see the magic of a bigger bank account. While to most of them it is simply business, some of them can also be quite mean when it comes to making money.

About ten years ago my wife and I became involved with a project to try and save a single screen 1940's movie house that had recently closed. It was the town's only theatre and the owner of the property had decided that it wasn't making enough money to suit him so he wanted to redevelope it into retail and office space. To my knowledge the owner never personally ran the theatre, he had managers do that for him as he had other non-film related businesses to run. The theatre was merely a real estate investment.

When the plan to redevelope became known, some of the locals got together and approached the property owner about keeping the theatre alive as a performing arts center. Town folk provided testimonials to the local newspaper about how much the theatre meant to them. Many had gone there all their lives and some had met their spouses there or even became engaged there. It was an emotional issue.

A local architect joined the committee and volunteered his professional labors, committees were formed, grants were sought, and volunteers went to work trying to come up with a workable business plan. We thought we had a shot but in the end we lost. We found out that not only had the property owner been toying with us, when demolition began he instructed the contractor to take absolutely EVERYTHING to a landfill. He didn't want any of us to get anything. Not one theatre seat, wall sconce or scrap of cloth from a curtain or wall covering, not even to purchase. He wanted it all discarded and his orders were followed to the letter. The place is now a large chain owned pharmacy.

It's too bad that so many developers subscribe to this mindset. If they didn't, maybe our world wouldn't be so bland and people wouldn't have such low expectations.
Now days every town seems to have the same "big box" retail outlets so all towns sort of look the same. There isn't much room for things that dare to be exciting and different and really stand out.

We discuss the issue of the corporate mentality in the exhibition industry on this forum all the time. Millions of dollars spent to build a multi-plex but presentation is lacking and a lot of people still stay home because they're more wowed by the picture and sound they get at home with their home theatre set-ups. Either that or they begin to believe that ALL movie theatres present product in a mediocre fashion.

There is indeed room for places like the Northpark 1 & 2. I just wish those of us on this forum, people who have a love for the biz and the dedication to meet the challenge, had the financial means to make it happen.



 


Posted by Scott Norwood (Member # 30) on 03-08-2001, 11:08 AM:
 
This whole thing sounds pretty sad. I've never been anywhere near Dallas, but everything I've heard about the Northpark suggests that it really was "the" place to see "big" films in 70mm.

I certainly don't dispute that the owner has the right to do essentially whatever he wants with his own property, but I do find it sad that he didn't seem to think that the "foot traffic" that a theatre generates or the "goodwill" value that would be generated by restoring the place to the status of a first-class theatre would be worth anything to his surrounding properties, even if the theatre itself wasn't as profitable per square foot as a retail (or other) establishment.
 
Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 03-08-2001, 04:01 PM:
 
The same sad story has happened in Rochester NY. The Riviera Theatre (near Kodak Park) where many of the 70mm roadshows of the 1960's played, was forclosed for back taxes and torn down to build a CVS drug store. (The Norelco AAII projectors are now safe in Kodak's huge 2000 seat "Theater on the Ridge").

The Monroe, a sister theatre of the Riviera, is now an adult book store, with the owner threatening to tear it down for what else, but a drug store!


------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 


Posted by Evans A Criswell (Member # 381) on 03-08-2001, 04:54 PM:
 
Here in Huntsville, AL, just a few months ago, the building for the old Madison Theatre was demolished to make way for a rebuild of Parkway City Mall. That theatre had 70mm capability with Dolby 6 track stereo and in its last few years in the 1980s was run by the same manager, Ralph Freehauf, that currently runs the Regal River Oaks Cinema 8 in Decatur. He is a true professional and I would loved to have been around to see some of those 70mm presentations in that Madison Theatre. It had a 70 foot screen. The closing of this theatre in 1986 was the "death of the big screen" here in Huntsville.

Evans A Criswell
http://home.hiwaay.net/~criswell/theatre/



 


Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 03-08-2001, 07:11 PM:
 
Evans, out of curiosity about the theater in Huntsville - I wonder if that was the same theater that had Norelco AA's in it in the late 60's. It had huge windows in the projection booth, and a Cinematation peg board automation that worked sometimes.

(that was the theater I was referring to when I called the automation as junk because the projectionist had nothing but troubles with it.)

However, I thought it was a beautiful theater sporting a well-maintained booth and auditorium.

I was TAD with the navy attending the NASA minature component repair school to obtain a NASA certification on repair of miniature components. SPACO, Inc. - Are they still there?


 


Posted by Evans A Criswell (Member # 381) on 03-09-2001, 09:55 AM:
 
Paul,

I'll have to ask Ralph about the Norelco and Cinemation automation. He managed it at least from 1982 until it closed in 1986, so it might not have had the same equipment during that time as it did in the 1960s.

Was the theatre you remember on Memorial Parkway in the Parkway City shopping center, with a Murphy's store? If so, that was the Madison. Or was it on Airport Road on Queensbury? If so, it was the Westbury Cinerama. If it was downtown, it was either the Lyric or Martin. If it was on the Parkway just north of where Univeristy Drive intersected it, at a mall called "The Mall", then it was the Alabama Theatre. Those were the only theatres we had, other than the drive-ins, at the time, in Huntsville.

Evans A Criswell
http://home.hiwaay.net/~criswell/theatre/

 


Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 03-09-2001, 11:18 AM:
 
For those interested in the destruction, here are four more pictures taken on Thursday, March 8th.

CLICK HERE

As of the morning of March 8th, the magnificent auditorium #1 which everyone remembers the Northpark for is now being demolished.


 


Posted by Jason Burroughs (Member # 68) on 03-09-2001, 01:38 PM:
 
I used to work with the manager who was running GCC Northpark I-II at the time Star Wars opened. He described 2 lines that literally wraped around the entire building, 1 to buy tickets, and 1 waiting to be seated. Police officers had to be placed behind the concession stand to keep patrons from "rushing" the consession workers as they toiled to keep up with the crowds. Auditorium I was a missmatch to the rest of the building, but BOY was it worth it.

I also used to work the the manager who ran Interstate's Place Theatre in downtown Dallas. I'm not sure of the years, He showed us pictures of the theatre, it was magnificent. Today only the lesser Majestic still stands downtown, and it is only used for live venue performaces, not film.
 


Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 03-09-2001, 11:02 PM:
 
Evans, It has been a long time ago, but for some reason, the Martin kinda rings a bell.
 
Posted by Stefan Scholz (Member # 147) on 03-10-2001, 09:23 AM:
 
The best have to go, everywhere. In January 2000 I was called, if I was interested to get a pair of UP 700 East German 70 mm projectors for my collection. The called turned out to be a movie technician and former projectionist of the place they come from. It was a classic 70 mm theatre, and he said it is scheduled for stripping and conversion into a shopping area with 2 or 3 shoeboxes left for movies.
When we picked up the stuff it was freezing inside, but outsidewas rain and about 58 degrees. ...
The place turned out to be of classic design, correct viewing angles and 0 degrees 11 minute downtilt projection angle. To say THE perfect 70 mm theatre. Unfortunately we never had a change to see a film in there. When we arrived the seats had been ripped out and piled up, and light circuit ditribution boards had been willfully demolished. I was able to get a set of blueprints, which afterwards showed the perfection used in engineering this place in 1967.
Later on a friend of mine found documents from an international convention where the theatre was landmarked as the "one of the major examples of most perfect architecture for wide gage film playback", with "absolute perfection in acoustical design and treatment". It would have been worth to restore this famous theatre, but dumbheads of today preferred to rebuild shopping space. Of course, the town was too small to accomodate a 700+ seat theatre in 2000 with 8500+ inhabitants left from originally 30000+. And the youth of today, not beeing familiar with roadshow spectaculars does not show enough interest.

 
Posted by Bill Enos (Member # 440) on 03-10-2001, 09:38 AM:
 
Mall theaters are just like the rest of the rest of the tenants--if your gross isn't
high enough for your square footage you've got to go. Sentimentality in the commercial environment of the mall has no place, it is just good business to get rid of ppoorer performing tenants.
 
Posted by Jerry Chase (Member # 660) on 03-10-2001, 10:16 AM:
 
Somehow, the whole thread reminds me of Southpark. "Oh my God, You killed our theatre! You bastard!"

Of the many theatres that I actively projected or managed, 90% are shuttered or torn down. I don't like it, but such is life.

A word of advice: Take lots of pictures on Kodak film, and sneak in a video camera with Kodak video tape before you favorite locations are history. While you're at it, take pictures of the staff at your place of employment and write down their names. Trust me, twenty-five years later, you'll be happy you did.

I just emailed a scanned copy of a photo to an old friend co-worker showing him with hair and in his disco outfit. Life changes. Everything has a lifespan and then dies. IIRC, the death of disco was celebrated. Now if rap "music" would just shuffle off the stage of life...


 


Posted by William T. Parr (Member # 677) on 03-11-2001, 09:07 AM:
 
I have one word to describe Mr Nasher

I hope I do not say anything that will get me in trouble here, but he's an ASSHOLE!
 


Posted by Aaron Haney (Member # 747) on 03-13-2001, 07:13 AM:
 
Bill, the Northpark 1-2 was not part of the mall itself, it was in a separate building. It shared the parking lot with the mall, but it stood on its own. When it was first closed, Nasher was supposedly going to tear it down extend the mall out to where it stood. That plan fell through, but the building remained until now. I don't know if he was just in a hurry to get rid of it, or if he has finally got a plan together to build something on that space. Regardless, I will never set foot in his mall again.

From what I have been told, the Northpark's sound system was one of the first two THX installations, and was personally designed by Tomlinson Hollman. (I've heard that the letters THX refer not only to Lucas's "THX-1138", but also to "Tomlinson Hollman's eXperiment" -- perhaps Ted Costas can confirm that?) Never in my life heard a sound system so powerful yet accurate. It was truly one-of-kind. I seriously doubt another theater will ever be built that has such a good installation.

If AMC really does throw up one of their horrible googleplexes in its place it will be a travesty. I don't for a minute believe the mediocre sound systems and lousy acoustics that characterize AMC theaters can ever match the Northpark.
 


Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 03-13-2001, 04:19 PM:
 
I let Tom Holman know about Film-Tech posting photos of the demolition of the Northpark. Here are his insights about the theatre:

___________________________________________

Thanks John. I had heard that. With the Avco having been twinned and
the Florida site never having worked out, the first three THX
installations are all gone, and these are the only ones I did myself.

There were problems in North Park. The GCC picture frame box combined
with high-frequency screen spreading to cause lots of early reflections
that changed timbre, so it would not be considered to be great by today's
standards, but I'm sure it was way ahead of its time. BTW, it had a
peculiar problem at first: there was a lot of hiss coming from the
screen. So I asked the projectionist to turn off parts of the sound
system, one at a time, starting from the input, to see what was wrong.
When he got done turning it all off, the hiss was still there! It turned
out to be reflected sound from the air conditioning diffuser slots in the
ceiling, causing a discrete reflection off the high-frequency reflecting
screen. Cleaning the ducts cured the hiss. Also, the North Park had an
unboxed in sump pump behind the screen that would come on audibly during
the movie. I asked for it to be boxed in, but was never back myself to
confirm that.

We also learned a great deal in that theater. I had anticipated hgih
frequency reflections off the screen returning to the wall nearby the
loudspeakers, so had put absorbing material around the horns for several
feet. What I didn't anticipate was a fore-to-aft reflection in that
auditorium between the back wall of the theater and the "THX" wall, so
Jim Kessler and I had to go out to a Home Depot like store and buy lots
of thick fibreglass and go in in the middle of the night and drop it over
from the top of the wall, since the space between the screen and the wall
was small. We "unfurled" the absorber from the top of the wall, and
voile, the problem was fixed.

Another story is that we learned the hard way that speakers behind the
screen can't have shiny parts in the North Park, because you'll see
twinkle of light that are brighter than white shining through the screen.
So a THX requirement became flat black loudspeakers!

Feel free to post this.

Best regards.

Tom

www.tmhlabs.com
email: tomholman@tmhlabs.com
___________________________________________
 


Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 03-13-2001, 05:52 PM:
 
Just so Tom knows, the sump pump was boxed in and the ducts were cleaned religiously. Now I know why they were!

Regardless of any other particular details of Cinema I, it was still the best combination of acoustic design and equipment I have ever heard.
 


Posted by System Notices (Member # 2357) on 08-16-2004, 04:32 PM:
 

It has been 1251 days since the last post.


 
Posted by Andrew McCrea (Member # 674) on 08-16-2004, 04:32 PM:
 
This was one of Winnipeg's best theatres. It was also Manitoba's largest single-screen theatre until it was split at the balcony in 1979.
 -

I wish I could have visited the Northpark. Are there updated links for the demolition pictures?

Thanks.
 
Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 08-16-2004, 04:43 PM:
 
And they even left the A4 bass cabs on stage now that is a real waste [Mad]
 
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 08-16-2004, 05:26 PM:
 
Link to demolishing pictures on page 1 of this thread fixed.
 
Posted by Andrew McCrea (Member # 674) on 08-16-2004, 09:23 PM:
 
Thanks Brad!

So Gordon, did you recognise that that's the Capitol? Would the screen have taken up that whole area? It had XL's and Xebex, right?
 
Posted by System Notices (Member # 2357) on 09-07-2015, 10:02 PM:
 

It has been 4039 days since the last post.


 
Posted by Aaron Garman (Member # 1653) on 09-07-2015, 10:02 PM:
 
As someone new to Dallas now, reading a thread like this just makes me want to cry.

Thanks Mr. Nasher.
 
Posted by Buck Wilson (Member # 5885) on 09-08-2015, 09:10 AM:
 
Demo pics links broken again

What a shame the things people are driven to do by money. [Frown]
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 09-08-2015, 11:59 AM:
 
The GCC Northpark 1-2 theater was a stellar enough venue to be worthy of hosting movie world premiere events. I blame the loss of the Northpark 1-2 on a couple of things. Certainly Mr. Nasher was the executioner. But the rise of stadium seated theaters and the financial problems of General Cinema in the late 1990's put Northpark 1-2 on death row. The movie-going public of Dallas-Fort Worth deserves a good bit of blame too. They threw their support behind stadium seating and circus style lobbies.

The Dallas-Fort Worth market was ground zero of the stadium seated theater building binge, which kicked off with the AMC Grand 24 in May of 1995. That binge ushered in the term "megaplex." AMC and Cinemark both went nuts building new stadium seated theaters around the metroplex. Audiences flocked to these new theaters, turned on by the novelty and overlooking the serious design flaws that come with stadium seated auditoriums. The theater building binge almost resembled an arms race and it threw several large chains, including AMC, into bankruptcy. General Cinema was a casualty, going bankrupt in 2000 and dissolving in 2002.

I'd argue THX and 70mm were also casualties of the stadium seating boom. Theater operators figured stadium seating was a big enough gimmick they didn't need other gimmicks like 70mm projection capability or THX certification. This is despite the fact some of these theaters were getting equipped with screens too big for 4-perf 35mm and the fact stadium seated theaters have far worse acoustical challenges than normal sloped houses. Many new stadium seated theaters put digital sound only in a couple or so houses. But, hey, you still have that stadium riser! Oh, by the way, be careful you don't fall down the damned stairs in the aisle when needing to rush to the bathroom during the movie!

The stadium seated theater building boom can also be blamed for common width screens becoming so popular. Is that ceiling in the stadium seated theater too tall? No problem! We'll just mask vertically and make ordinary dramas and comedies HUGE and big epic movies SMALL.

I have yet to hear a stadium seated theater sound system come anywhere close to how good the sound was at the Northpark #1 THX. And the Northpark 1-2 was stuck playing lossy compressed digital sound (DTS & Dolby Digital) in its final years! Newer theaters with d-cinema are playing 24-bit 48kHz uncompressed LPCM audio tracks. They ought to be sounding even better than the Northpark did, not worse. What's their excuse?

A ticket at the Northpark #1 THX didn't cost a premium price, not even to see Titanic in 70mm DTS. The AMC Northpark 15, built about 300 feet away from the bones of the Northpark 1-2, has not one but two premium theaters, an IMAX-labeled house and an ETX house. Their ticket prices are almost $18 and $16 respectively for shows just in just 2D!

D-cinema has some serious compromises, with fake 'scope being one of the worst. The letter-boxing approach on the chip reinforces the practice of building theaters with common width screens. Combine this with soft focus d-cinema projection. Yeah, the image may be rock steady and not have any dirt or scratches, but it still doesn't look as good as the same image on my TV set at home.

I miss the Northpark 1-2. Several things have happened over the past 20 years to greatly diminish my enthusiasm for watching movies in movie theaters. I had a better time going to the show back then.
 
Posted by Aaron Garman (Member # 1653) on 09-09-2015, 12:22 AM:
 
Premium Large Format, now being used more often (even on TV trailer placement) is just a downright lie. I saw Furious 7 in XD. It cost extra. It was the same piece of content that was playing just down the hall. And while the presentation was ok (Cinemark West Plano), I don't see how it justified the higher ticket price, especially when the movie was letterboxed. I had a better experience watching it at the Legacy in a normal auditorium with a common height screen, with a far less expensive ticket.

Sad thing is the marketing ploy is working: the more and more folks I talk to not in the business or in the know (casual movie goers) LOVE these "premium" houses. I'd love to see some hard statistics on whether or not these premium houses actually do better.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 09-09-2015, 01:05 AM:
 
Well, since the industry "yardstick" is the dollar, rather than the ticket, of course the PLF screens will do better because of the ticket prices. Couple that with the fact that those PLF houses get the biggest movies on opening weekend and the best showtimes, they can't exactly miss.
 
Posted by Daniel Schulz (Member # 1881) on 09-09-2015, 01:13 AM:
 
quote:
(snip)...The Dallas-Fort Worth market was ground zero of the stadium seated theater building binge, which kicked off with the AMC Grand 24 in May of 1995. That binge ushered in the term "megaplex....
I'd argue THX and 70mm were also casualties of the stadium seating boom. Theater operators figured stadium seating was a big enough gimmick they didn't need other gimmicks like 70mm projection capability or THX certification. This is despite the fact some of these theaters were getting equipped with screens too big for 4-perf 35mm and the fact stadium seated theaters have far worse acoustical challenges than normal sloped houses...

The stadium seated theater building boom can also be blamed for common width screens becoming so popular. Is that ceiling in the stadium seated theater too tall? No problem! We'll just mask vertically and make ordinary dramas and comedies HUGE and big epic movies SMALL.

I have yet to hear a stadium seated theater sound system come anywhere close to how good the sound was at the Northpark #1 THX. And the Northpark 1-2 was stuck playing lossy compressed digital sound (DTS & Dolby Digital) in its final years! Newer theaters with d-cinema are playing 24-bit 48kHz uncompressed LPCM audio tracks. They ought to be sounding even better than the Northpark did...
D-cinema has some serious compromises, with fake 'scope being one of the worst. The letter-boxing approach on the chip reinforces the practice of building theaters with common width screens. Combine this with soft focus d-cinema projection...

I agree with this whole post. Someone buy this man a beer.
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 09-09-2015, 02:21 PM:
 
quote: Aaron Garman
Sad thing is the marketing ploy is working: the more and more folks I talk to not in the business or in the know (casual movie goers) LOVE these "premium" houses.
To quote Cypher, as he bites into the imaginary steak created by The Matrix, chewing, he says "ignorance is bliss."

Movie studios and theater operators are taking full advantage of that ignorance. Next to no one is calling them on the blantant misuse of the term "large format." They're getting away with it by using brand worship of IMAX or various other premium sounding acronyms or brands. The customers don't know any specifics of what kind of equipment is in the booth or what kind of content is being played. The buzz words and high prices just trick the customers into thinking they're getting something extra when in reality they're usually not.

Movie productions have literally turned into TV productions, complete with video cameras. Yet the dramatic content now often pales in comparison to the quality of series television (cable in particular).

Meanwhile there are more TV shows trying to emulate the CinemaScope™ look by using anamorphic lenses in production then cropping the results to 1.77:1. American Crime, Season 2 of True Detective and Fear the Walking Dead are examples of anamorphic shot TV productions. I think this is very pretentious.

About the only thing in d-cinema production I could consider "large format" is the new Arri Alexa 65 camera. Its 6K resolution CMOS chip is the same size as a 5-perf 65mm film frame and requires the use of lenses similar to those that would be used in 70mm film productions. Unfortunately none of that extra resolution is getting to the movie screen unless it is laser recorded onto a 70mm film print. But who needs that when buzz words are enough? The Arri Alexa 65 was used on portions of Mission: Impossible - Rogue Nation, with the final digital intermediate down-rezzed to 2K and distributed on a near HDTV resolution 2K DCP. That didn't stop them from using the Alexa 65 logo on the end credits.
[Roll Eyes]

This nonsense is all buttressed by the broad use of that damned "digital" word. If it's "digital" then there's no reason to think about details.

I think the Northpark 1-2 theater might actually still be around if so many people in the movie industry and movie-going public weren't so willfully ignorant of details.

quote: Daniel Schulz
I agree with this whole post. Someone buy this man a beer.
I like a good India Pale Ale.
[beer]
 
Posted by Aaron Garman (Member # 1653) on 09-09-2015, 11:52 PM:
 
I think a perfect irony will be to see something like Mission: Impossible get a 4K Blu-ray release from its 4K digital intermediate when the DCP was only 2K. [evil]
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 09-10-2015, 12:14 AM:
 
quote: Aaron Garman
I think a perfect irony will be to see something like Mission: Impossible get a 4K Blu-ray release from its 4K digital intermediate when the DCP was only 2K. [evil]
The sad thing is the DI is probably only 2K, but the bastards would probably try to up-rez it to 4K and attempt to pass it off as Ultra HD.

That's really what I expect from Hollywood these days.
[fu]
 
Posted by David Buckley (Member # 2600) on 09-10-2015, 09:57 PM:
 
quote: Aaron Garman
And while the presentation was ok...
And that there is the problem in one sentence. "OK" is "good enough"; there is almost zero will from the places where it matters for the presentation to be better than "ok".
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 09-11-2015, 09:45 AM:
 
The "good enough" thing is what pisses me off most about "digital." And it's not just in movie-going either. I see a lot of "good enough" or just plain WRONG crap going on in my line of work (graphic design/advertising).

There was plenty of "good enough" nonsense and poor workmanship that took place in movie productions when everything was shot on film and the audio was all analog. However, the big budget productions typically pushed the technology to its limits and had some pretty serious planning and strategy for how to do it. I'm still more impressed with many of the space battle visuals in Return of the Jedi than I am with any modern CGI sequence. ILM labored over the details in those film-based visual effects. They had to do so since there was no "undo button" and a committee of arm chair quarterbacks couldn't go back and compulsively change a bunch of shit on the fly. In the end those old analog-based effects looked pretty damned believable. Meanwhile a bunch of modern CGI looks like a stupid cartoon. It looks like a cartoon because the stuff is just churned out quickly with "good enough" standards. They're not pushing the technology to the limit.

Return of the Jedi is what got THX going, and added to the uncompromising status of the GCC Northpark #1 screen. They found and solved audio problems in that theater. It wasn't enough just to get the "THX" brand onto the theater and into newspaper ads.

Today it seems like the techs are only paid to just slap in the amps, speakers, etc. and then who gives a damn how well the finished system actually works? No one is even going to know any specifics of the configuration anyway since its all just "secret sauce" supposedly adding to a meaningless fake large format brand like IMAX, RPX, XD, Big-D, etc. The theater operators want customers to think that logo means the theater will be delivering the best possible movie-going experience. They obscure the fact many of these premium houses are not all equipped the same way and many of them are equipped barely any better than a standard priced auditorium.

Many big chain theaters have the sound turned way down in their standard priced auditoriums while running the volume louder in the higher priced rooms. At the GCC Northpark 1-2 I didn't have to pay extra for digital sound with sub bass deep enough to rattle the air in my chest. That was standard there.

I'm pretty disappointed with how surround sound is being handled in movie theaters right now.

In its beginning Dolby Atmos was showing a great deal of promise. Unfortunately the pace of new installations has slowed to a crawl, even with the hype surrounding Dolby Cinema and Atmos being a part of it. Out of the theaters that are installing it some are making compromises on the kinds of speakers being installed, skimping on the amps or not even installing surround sub bass enclosures. It's deemed too expensive to maintain a certain standard and have the audio working the way it should. Meanwhile all but four IMAX-branded theaters have dopey 5.0 surround yet charge huge sums of money for a ticket. Auro and DTS MDA are adding more confusion to this and, arguably, allowing theater operators to throw "immersive sound" hype at customers in a more cost cutting manner.

If I go into a movie theater I've never visited before I'm often now entering with really low expectations: slightly out of focus picture with less detail than my HDTV screen and mystery meat surround sound that might be 5.1 or 7.1 but have wimpy bass and questionable mid range. And that might include paying a surcharge for the not so remarkable experience. Gotta love "PLF" brand worship.
 
Posted by Eric Hooper (Member # 1730) on 12-23-2015, 08:19 AM:
 
Where exactly did the theater stand in relation to the mall?
 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 12-23-2015, 12:17 PM:
 
If you use the Google Earth application you can use its "historical imagery" slider tool to see various snap shots of satellite imagery between 1995 and 2015, showing the transformation of Northpark Mall over the past 20 year. The 1995 imagery (which is in black and white and fairly low in resolution) is the only available example in Google Earth that shows the Northpark 1-2 theater.

The theater was built north of the mall. It had an open parking lot on its East side and a parking garage on its West side.

 -

Below is a view of Northpark Mall today. I superimposed where the GCC Northpark 1-2 used to be in a shade of red. I wasn't thinking of blood, murder, etc. when I chose that color; it was just a coincidence.

Nordstrom was built on the bones of the #2 auditorium. The mall walkway leading North into Nordstrom, as well as pieces of the Apple Store, Kiehl's, Ebar, J. Jill and the "Nordstrom Court" sit on the bones of the #1 THX house.

 -

That part of Northpark Mall might as well be built on ancient Native American burial grounds. It's that much of a sacrilege as far as I'm concerned. I'm not going to do any shopping there.
 
Posted by Eric Hooper (Member # 1730) on 12-24-2015, 01:23 AM:
 
Thank you!!!
 
Posted by Aaron Garman (Member # 1653) on 12-24-2015, 02:10 AM:
 
Thank you Bobby. I've been trying to visualize this for awhile, but your photoshop skills make all the difference.

I'd certainly take Northpark over a Dillards any day.
 




Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2