This is topic LAST MOVIE YOU SAW? in forum Film Handlers' Forum at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=002914

Posted by Carl King (Member # 398) on 12-28-2001, 07:48 AM:
 
Just curious about this. When was the last time a working (full time)
projectionist went to see a movie as a customer?

I honestly can't remember the last time I went to a movie on a night off.
 


Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 12-28-2001, 09:09 AM:
 
I normally see about 6 films a year in theatres.

I only go to theatres with projectionists and I also tend to only go to theatres with curtains. Thus my choices are severely limited. I generally catch whatever the Senator Theatre in Baltimore, MD is playing.
http://www.senator.com

I think Monsters Inc was the last film I saw in a movie theatre (THX and in EX and everything).

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
 


Posted by John Walsh (Member # 168) on 12-28-2001, 10:46 AM:
 
Just watched "The Majestic" at the theater I work at; my better half wanted to see it. It was slightly out of frame, and the stereo didn't kick in, so I went up to fix it. Noticed the film damaged at the end of R4; probably damaged while mounting.

That's why I avoid actually going to theaters and watching a film... anything wrong bothers me too much.
 


Posted by Ian Price (Member # 14) on 12-28-2001, 01:18 PM:
 
Hell, I went to two films last night.

First I went to see The Majestic at a notably inferior theatre on "free popcon day". They were tremendously busy and the staff was behind. The trailers were all scratched to shit. The feature looked like the aperature plate wasn't in all the way and the crdits were out of frame. But the film was mercifly unscratched so I watched it without complaint. I enjoyed the scenes in the theatre itself. I would have liked to run the Majestic. I love the idea of the apartment above the theatre and the usher living in the basement. Nobody would be late to work. I did find the fact that they were a small town and had Matinees at 11 & 2 evenings at 6 & 9 a little far fetched.

Then I went to see Ali at the new Stadium 14. The presentation was much better as was the sound.

Both films I enjoyed watching. I don't need or want to watch them again. I feel that the set decoration in The Majestic was Oscar caliber and I would like to see Jon Voit get an Oscar nod for his portrayal of Howard Cosell, it was uncanny.
 


Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 12-28-2001, 01:39 PM:
 
The DLP presentation of "Shrek" at the AMC Pleasure Island 24, in Downtown Disney in Florida in late May. I had already seen the movie in my own theatre, but wanted to see the DLP (it was fine).

Sheesh, I gotta get out more.
 


Posted by Les Brock (Member # 1041) on 12-28-2001, 02:12 PM:
 
I tend not to go to the theatre unless I know that the projection and sound is what it should be.

The last movie I saw was The Others as UCI Norwich. UK. (November 2001)

The print was not that good ( picture weave and heavy density ) but I know that the projection equipment was not at fault as previous to that they had run Moulin Rouge which looked and sounded superb.
 


Posted by Joe Beres (Member # 678) on 12-28-2001, 02:50 PM:
 
I go to films all the time. I really love going to the movies. That is why I got into being a projectionist in the first place. I find that in some ways it is more relaxing actually being able to relax and sit on the other side of the glass, but only when the presentation is decent as being a projectionist has made me even more picky. I recently caught up with Lord of the Rings and Oceans 11. I hope to see some more films in the near future as well.
 
Posted by Keith Peticolas (Member # 971) on 12-28-2001, 03:10 PM:
 
Hi folks. Last movie I paid to see was "Apocolypse Now Redux" at the Century 16 in Anchorage. Terrible experience. The print had scratches all up and down the right side. Started out of frame and focus and late. I really wanted to run up to the booth and fix it myself. The room had not been cleaned very well. Just really an unpleasant experience. When I want to watch a movie from now on, either I wait for the DVD or run it myself.
 
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 12-28-2001, 03:50 PM:
 
Hmmm, Steve only goes to theaters with projectionists and curtains. What an interesting combination. I only go to theaters with truly good sound, bright picture and non-scratched/dirty prints. This currently leaves me only one option in the Dallas area and only 2 auditoriums at that, so generally I do not go.

So Steve, if the theater has a stain on the screen, emulsion scratches through the print, warbly mono sound played through a speaker with the LF driver blown, but it DOES have curtains AND a projectionist, do you still go?


 


Posted by Aaron Sisemore (Member # 145) on 12-28-2001, 07:19 PM:
 
Ian:
'free popcorn day'? Must have been the Airport or Pacific RP 16.? At least it wasnt one of my theatres, heads would have rolled.

Last movie I have seen in its entirety? That would be 'Monsters, Inc.' in Fortuna about a month ago.

-Aaron

 


Posted by Aldo Baez (Member # 790) on 12-28-2001, 08:35 PM:
 
I went to see Lord of the rings at a midnight showing in Long Beach, it was decent but it was very dim. And everytime I go to the Edwards the projector stops about 5 minutes after it starts and then starts a few seconds later. It's as if its a usual occurance and someone is there to fix it.
 
Posted by Rick Long (Member # 213) on 12-28-2001, 08:40 PM:
 
I have to agree with John Walsh on this one. It bothers the hell out of me to watch a film that I know has only been in the theatre 3 days and notice the scratches already.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 12-28-2001, 08:44 PM:
 
The last one for me was "Lord Of The Rings" seen at the not real Cinerama, Seattle Cinerama Theatre.
Mark @ GTS
 
Posted by Frank Angel (Member # 248) on 12-28-2001, 09:03 PM:
 
There are NO commercial theatres in Brooklyn, a city of 3 million, worth getting indigestion from suffering through poor-to-horiffic presentation and showmanship. I THOUGHT there were still a few quality houses in New York City, but I was proved wrong, at least for the Loews Astor Plaza. Imagine watching one of your favorite films of all time and having to suffer through white splice flashes at EVERY shot change because the usher-sprocket jockey didn't frame it properly after he finally "corrected" a glaring misframe at the opening of the film. The reissue on 70mm of Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY was the last film I saw; the one before that was two months ago. And that's about the average, one every two months or so.

And Brad, you are right about presentation, you want picture and sound to be perfect. But don't dismiss showmanship; it doesn't have to be either/or -- great picture and sound, while abandoning everything else -- patron comfort, an interior that actually has some character rather than looking like a uninviting hovel, ammenities like curtians, an attentive USHER that can actually be summoned to help you with a problem, and yes, a curtain.... even such an extravagance as a projectionist at lease SOMEWHERE within a few minutes of the booth. These ammenities don't have to at the expense of picture and sound. Just because your theatre has a curtain doesn't mean it has to have crap on the screen and AM sound. Used to be that the flagship, first-run theatres always had BOTH, and it didn't seem to take any great magical powers to do it.

I liken these utilitarian, character-less black box "cinemas," even though they may have good picture and sound, to a 5 star restaurant that offers fantastically prepaired meals, but which has these culinary delights served, not by a head waiter, but by a HS kid with spiked hair, a ring in his nose and grungy cloths -- he throws down the plate on a dirty table that has no table cloth and one leg shorter than the rest so it wobbles every time you put you fork down. The floors are sticky and when you need water, there is no one anywhere to be found. You want your steak cooked a bit more, but when you finally find another high school kid, he tells you there is NO COOK in the kitchen -- the cook only comes in on Friday when he prepairs all the meals so they can be automated the rest of the week by the minimum wage help.

The way the HOUSE is run is as important as the way the BOOTH is run. They are two sides of the same coin. If the patron is unhappy with EITHER, or further if he isn't IMPRESSED by either, he stays home in HIS theatre where his comfort and sense of taste are catered to. No one tells him in HIS theatre to ignore the fact that the place looks shabby or that there are kids making noise in front of him or that his bathroom smells like a cespool. It simply isn't enough to put a great picture on the screen, sound in a room with stadium seating and then pretty much abandon the patron who enters that ugly black hole at his own risk.

We should demand both, or the economics of unhappy patrons will force changes that may quickly make the sorry state of today's cinema get even worse.
 


Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 12-29-2001, 12:07 AM:
 
Brad,

The Curtains and projectionist are necessary but not sufficient!

But with curtains, the likelihood of a stained screen are less than with a naked one and with a "projectionist" a poor show is also less likely therefore, using the above criteria, ones odds of a good presentation are increased. Furthermore, exhibitors that invest in projectionists and curtains tend to also not skimp on the quality of the show, by definition.

Basically now, there is one theatre in DC I will go to and one in Baltimore.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
 


Posted by Joel Pantoja (Member # 1045) on 12-29-2001, 01:36 AM:
 
I'm not full time, actually I'm not even part-time anymore, there are enough people trained (minimum knowledge) to thread the projectors. Owners are really tight with payroll and I get paid more than an assistant manager so now that they're trained I'm out. (That was the deal, my choice.) I know that I should be ashamed but my real job is being a tax preparer and tax season is fast approaching. There's a lot of prep work that I am in charge of that should have been done weeks ago, plus a few estate tax returns' deadlines that snuck up on me while I was "part-timing" it at the theater...

Anyway back to the point... I love movies and popcorn (my friends in the business don't get how I could still love popcorn after all these years around it). My wife and I try to see at least one movie per week but have seen up to five movies in one week, once. Even when I was a full time theater manager my days off would be spent at the movies. I have traveled over 70 miles to see an art film or an advance film screening at the Variety Club in San Francisco. Those were the good ol' days...

I'm lucky enough to have several friends who are still theater managers so I don't have to pay for 90% of the movies I watch. I really do hate bad customer service and bad film presentation. The other day while watching a movie at the local multiplex, I used my cell phone to call my friend (manager) in the office to radio the booth person and tell them to check the focus. Lazy? maybe, effective? Yes!

Last movie Vanilla Sky, yesterday. (Didn't think it was a rush out to see movie because of the reviews but now that I have seen it I didn't think it was all that bad.)


 


Posted by James R. Hammonds, Jr (Member # 673) on 12-29-2001, 02:11 AM:
 
The las movie I paid to see was AMELIE (i think) and the last movie I saw period was THE ROYAL TENENBAUMS last night.
 
Posted by Scott D. Neff (Member # 185) on 12-29-2001, 05:52 AM:
 
I don't think I count anymore as far as being too busy to see movies. Since I started working for Century and got my sweet little weekend and holidays off job, I see more movies than I can shake a stick at.

I think I'm gonna try and see a movie at every theatre in the bay area now... I'm not sure. But tonight I saw "The Royal Tenenbaums" (passed into the Century Presidio). As far as the last movie I PAID for -- sheesh -- it's been awhile... I think maybe "Wet Hot American Summer" at the AMC 1000 Van Ness in San Francisco... but damn that was worth it... hiliarious.
 


Posted by Adam Martin (Member # 641) on 12-29-2001, 12:02 PM:
 
It took me several days to figure it out, but ... Planet of the Apes while on vacation visiting my family. Everything else has been screening films for work or DVDs of stuff I missed.

 
Posted by Antonio Marcheselli (Member # 373) on 12-29-2001, 02:35 PM:
 
I go to theater as a customer as often as I can!
Unfostunately (but I'm not the only one I read...) often come to the theater is a sufference... This is why I'm building my owna HT room!!!

Last movie was "Harry potter".

Bye
Antonio
 


Posted by Dave Williams (Member # 299) on 12-30-2001, 03:22 PM:
 
I have seen a few during screenings at our own facilities, but as a customer, the last film I saw was "Brigham City" at the Jordan Commons in Salt Lake City, Utah. Presentation was great, no scratches whatsoever, and the stereo presentation was superb. Couldn't even tell the print comes with no digital sound at all.

My only problem with the film was all those damn mormons in it.

Dave
 


Posted by Jerry Chase (Member # 660) on 12-30-2001, 03:43 PM:
 
Hey! Watch it, Dave. Joe Smith was a Vermonter, and we protect our own.

Harry Potter, probably will see something else today or tomorrow.

 


Posted by Rachel Gilardi (Member # 4594) on 12-30-2001, 07:40 PM:
 
Last movie I paid to see, I think that was "O" but it was so horrible I walked out. Last movie I saw was Ocean's 11 at my husbands theater. I have never sat through a whole movie at the theater I work at....odd.
 
Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 12-30-2001, 08:14 PM:
 
Jerry said: "Hey! Watch it, Dave. Joe Smith was a Vermonter, and we protect our own".

He may have been born in Vermont, but in September 1827, he received the Book of Mormon just east of Rochester, in Palmyra, New York. Each year, many thousands of Mormons celebrate the Hill Cumorah Pageant:

http://www.lds.org/placestovisit/region/0,10749,1775-1-1,00.html
http://www.lds.org/placestovisit/location/0,10634,1831-1-1-1,00.html
http://www.lds.org/placestovisit/location/0,10634,1813-1-1-1,00.html

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 


Posted by Joseph Pandolfi (Member # 223) on 12-31-2001, 12:01 PM:
 
Lets See Other than my screenings"

OCEANS 11 (My Theatre) Flawless Presentation
MONSTER'S INC. (My Theatre) DTS defaulted to SR on updated R5
SPY GAME (Beacon Theatre in FLA.) Flawless Presentation
HARRY POTTER (AMC in FLA.) 2 reels scratched.
OCEANS 11 (Muvico Theatre in FLA.) opening week 1 reel scratched.

 


Posted by Stefan Scholz (Member # 147) on 12-31-2001, 02:44 PM:
 
Answer to the original question,

this X-mas eve, the movie called "Night of the hunter" directed by Charles Laughton, accompanied by some great 40's shorts. In our living room, brought in by a friend and his portable projection setup.

Commercially A.I., I even paid for the ticket. Total desaster. Brightness around 4 fl, gorgeous Dolby A with 70's style speakers.
This is even among the better theatres out in this rural area...


The X-mas performance showed, why I hate those Potter (TM) and Lord of the Rings (TM) "commercials", it does not require computerized Hi-Tech and Super surround sound, collectibles and marketing to get a suspenseful, grabbing night out.

The other event is the reason, why I stay out of commercial screenings. Unfortunately, the DVD has become more and more first choice of movie reception, as no theatre is willing to go highest possible standars. You can be lucky to have something done with love and knowledge... Support it. Buy the ticket.
 


Posted by Joe Smith (Member # 190) on 12-31-2001, 09:05 PM:
 
quote:
Joe Smith was a Vermonter

What makes you think I'm a Vermonter??

And what's with this "was" stuff?? I'm still here!!

quote:
in September 1827, he received the Book of Morman

But I'm not quite that old....

HAPPY NEW YEAR!!


 


Posted by Adam Martin (Member # 641) on 01-01-2002, 02:15 AM:
 
quote:
But I'm not quite that old....

Are you sure? How are we to know without a photo?
www.americanprophet.com

 


Posted by Dave Williams (Member # 299) on 01-04-2002, 02:14 AM:
 
Allow me to clarify that my hatred of mormons is only a small hate. I only hate small mormons.

Actualy I was born and raised mormon, although my family is from Polermo, Sicily, and they were born and raised roman catholic. Back in 1933 when my great grandfather was turning states evidence against the now infamous louisiana mafia, he moved to california to escape the wrath, changed his name, his race (registered for duty in WWII as a mexican) and his religeon.

However he never stopped the mafia thing. Made millions running a three chair barber shop with this little private room in the back that I was never allowed to go in.

Or was that a movie I went and saw.

Dave
 


Posted by Jonathan Worthing (Member # 803) on 01-04-2002, 04:31 AM:
 
The last film a saw at Odeon Bridgend WALES Was JaraSICK PUKE III what a pile of


The last film I saw on TV was STARTREK II.

"LIVE LONG & PROSPER"

(BRAD WE NEED A SMILIE FOR THE ABOVE.)


 


Posted by Evans A Criswell (Member # 381) on 01-04-2002, 10:07 AM:
 

Here are the past few movies I've seen in theatres (as of now):

1. Lord of the Rings, Carmike 10, Huntsville, 2002/01/02 (the longest movie I've seen in a long time)

2. Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius, Regal Madison Square 12, 2001/12/28 (didn't get to see end of movie due to problem -- someone who has seen this please go to movie review forum, read my notes, and fill me in if I missed anything of significance)

2. Not Another Teen Movie, Regal River Oaks Cinema 8, Decatur, 2001/12/14 (short, dumb, and funny)

3. Monsters, Inc., Carmike 10, Huntsville, 2001/12/07 (saw it again to see the new outtakes and bloopers in the credits)

4. Shallow Hal, Regal Hollywood 18, Huntsville, 2001/11/28 (saw it mainly out of morbid curiosity)

5. Out Cold, Regal River Oaks Cinema 8, Decatur, 2001/11/24 (funny, dumb comedy)

6. Harry Potter and the Sorceror's Stone, Regal River Oaks Cinema 8, Decatur, 2001/11/23 (long but enjoyable)

------------------
Evans A Criswell
Huntsville-Decatur Movie Theatre Information Site
 


Posted by John Schulien (Member # 215) on 01-04-2002, 11:46 AM:
 
1. Kiss Me Kate, in 3D, at the Music Box in Chicago. Cool!
2. Lord of the Rings, at Lincoln Village, Chicago
3. Harry Potter, Lincoln Village
4. Moulin Rouge, at the Vic (Brew & View) in Chicago
5. Harry Potter, somewhere near San Antonio, Tx, with the inlaws.

 
Posted by John Gordon (Member # 523) on 01-04-2002, 06:53 PM:
 
First off, I am no longer a full time projectionist, but I am a full time worker.

The last movie (I much prefer the term motion picture, but use the word movie a lot too) I saw was on Dec. 31. And I had to see and hear a movie on that day so I could reach my goal for the year. I try to see at least 100 movies a year, in a theater of course. And I saw two that night. Jimmy Neutron and the stupid Not Another Teen Movie (but I did laugh), of which brought me to exactly 100 movies for 2001. Prior to JN and NATM I saw I Am Sam and Vanilla Sky. This weekend I plan on seeing Lord Of The Rings, again.

The 100 a year goal includes seeing/hearing movies more than once, but always in their entirety and always in the theater. In 2000, I did not quite make it, only saw about 85. Of the 100 I saw in 2001, included 8 shorts, a movie is a movie regardless of the running time. And of the 100, 99.5 of them were all presented via film. The .5 was a special screening of Space Cowboys where it was film and DLP (first reel DLP, second reel film, third reel DLP, and so on).

Along with seeing movies, I also try to see and hear motion pictures in formats besides 35mm, such as 70mm. Of the 100 motion pictures last year, saw of course 35mm, but also 70mm and even 16mm--though finding 16mm screenings is difficult. And hopefully I will make the 70mm screening of Spartacus, which is coming up on the 12th of this month.

And for some of my previous movie going experiences, here are some other numbers of note: My all time record is 204 motion pictures in one year. My record for movies in one day, of feature length (meaning no shorts), would be 5 movies. And those 5 were in five different theaters. Nowadays, I try and limit it to no more than 2 movies a day, or better yet, split it to 2 days. The furthest I went to see a movie—which would also be my costliest as well—was about 2200 miles (Los Angeles to Dayton Ohio to see two Cinerama movies), and that trips main purpose was to see the 2 movies. I used to drive 200 miles one-way on movie trips, about once a month, for the sole purpose of "going to the movies." Today, the closest theater I attend is the local neighborhood theater 5 miles from my house, but the better theaters I go to are about 50 miles away.

When going to the movies, my first and foremost requirements are good picture and sound presentation. I do not expect to see a 100% accurate presentation (of which I ask, can a 100% accurate presentation be achieved?), but damn close should be strived for. I understand there can be problems with equipment and such. And I will complain and walk out of movies when warranted. But when I return, I expect the problem(s) to have been fixed. And of the few problems I ran into last year, when I had returned, I am happy to say the problems were fixed. I am lucky in one respect in that I see and hear a share of movies at studio screening facilities, which have always been great presentations. The presentation of Lord Of The Rings at the Academy Theatre (Motion Picture Academy) was most excellent. But I am also happy to say, and amazed, that at my local neighborhood theater I have yet to see a movie where a print has been damaged—and I do not usually go on opening weekends. And I saw at least 40 movies there last year. Now, I guess its off to the movies!


------------------
John Gordon
Cinema Applications Engineer
QSC Audio Products, Inc.
1675 MacArthur Blvd.
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
(714) 957-7100
john_gordon@qscaudio.com http://www.qscaudio.com


 


Posted by Evans A Criswell (Member # 381) on 01-04-2002, 08:27 PM:
 
quote:
The 100 a year goal includes seeing/hearing movies more than once, but always in their entirety and always in the theater. In 2000, I did not quite make it, only saw about 85. Of the 100 I saw in 2001, included 8 shorts, a movie is a movie regardless of the running time. And of the 100, 99.5 of them were all presented via film. The .5 was a special screening of Space Cowboys where it was film and DLP (first reel DLP, second reel film, third reel DLP, and so on).


Wow! You've definitely got me beat. I only saw 47 movies in theatres last year. There were definitely some "dry periods" where there were no movies I wanted to see. I saw 66 in 2000, 53 in 1999, and 80 in 1998!

------------------
Evans A Criswell
Huntsville-Decatur Movie Theatre Information Site
 


Posted by Joel Pantoja (Member # 1045) on 01-04-2002, 09:54 PM:
 
You're the man John!
 
Posted by Ken Lackner (Member # 1002) on 01-04-2002, 10:32 PM:
 
Rachel said: "Last movie I paid to see, I think that was "O" but it was so horrible I walked out."

Not that it matters, but just for the record, I LOVED "O." Huge Julia Stiles fan. In fact, I am looking at the banner on my wall right now.
 


Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 01-06-2002, 05:59 PM:
 
The last movie I saw from beginning to end without leaving my seat was Dazed and Confused. I felt confident the projectionist knew what he was doing. I saw it at the Fargo Theater in Fargo, North Dakota. The movie was made in 1993.


 


Posted by Andy Muirhead (Member # 712) on 01-06-2002, 06:38 PM:
 
I've never paid to see a film in the 9 years i've been working in the industry. The last thing i want do when i'm not working is go see a film, feels too much like work, even if i was in a cinema i've never been to, i would still be in work mode.
 
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 01-06-2002, 06:53 PM:
 
Andy, I have to agree with you. I have been in this industry for 35+ years now, and after running billions of feet of 35mm crap through the projectors, I generally have no desire whatsoever to plop my butt in a seat to watch it.

But since I was a guest in the theater, I figured, "What the hey"....and surprisingly, I acually enjoyed the movie.
 


Posted by John Gordon (Member # 523) on 01-07-2002, 11:28 AM:
 
So,
For those of you who have no desire to see movies in a theater, does this mean you watch movies on DVD, or worse yet, VHS tape, or do you not watch movies at all? Just curious.

Something that has always been funny to me is the fact I know many people in this industry, both exhibition and production side, who's life blood is the movies, but never go to the movies. But many will watch videos.

As you can tell from my previous post, I much much prefer to see and hear motion pictures in a theater, as intended. And watching a complete movie through the port window, for me is not watching a movie (of which I have never done, even when I was a projectionist).

One thing I have learned when I go to the movies is to remember film is not a perfect medium. Problems can occur, and will. But when it comes to opperator error, that is a different story.

As for 2002, went to see and hear 2 movie this past weekend. Only 98 more to go.


 


Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 01-07-2002, 07:50 PM:
 
John, when I watched the movie in the Fargo this Christmas vacation, the kid (Jeremy, I think) running it did an excellent job on his presentation. It sure is nice to sit in a theater to watch a movie when everything works like it is supposed to, such as the curtain, half-lights, and the whole shebang! Josh Jones put that movie together, and when I was watching him assemble the print, I discovered he had some very good booth habits. Those booth habits show on the screen, too. Although Josh did not run that movie, his workmanship really shined on the screen. Good job, Josh.
 
Posted by Josh Jones (Member # 447) on 01-07-2002, 08:08 PM:
 
you forgot that i forgot to bloop the splices, as they did go pop at the reel changes, couldnt find any blooping ink or black markers. it wouldnt have been popping if I hadnt used the old splices. oh well.

Josh
 


Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 01-07-2002, 08:43 PM:
 
Oh, well. Usually I ignore faults like that - it is impossible to make a 8 year old print perform perfectly. (unless, of course, the print was perfect..)


 


Posted by Ari Nordström (Member # 288) on 01-10-2002, 02:49 PM:
 
I took my kids to see "Atlantis" a couple of weeks ago. They loved the movie but I couldn't get past my annoyance at the poor framing and mediocre sound. It's difficult to go watch a movie withoutgetting annoyed these days so I actually do prefer DVD.

My spouse wants to see LotR, though, so it seems that I have to suffer through yet another mediocre theatre with a mediocre presentation...
 


Posted by Ray Derrick (Member # 1001) on 01-11-2002, 08:47 AM:
 
Saw Harry Potter just before Christmas at a friend's two-screen cinema on the coast south of Sydney. Great picture, superb sound (helped along by nicely subdued acoustics). For an analog guy I have to admit the Dolby Digital track sounded pretty darn impressive.

I like to watch movies when the cinema is fairly empty. I can get in there after all the advertsing crap has ended and still get a seat in the sweet spot. Also while things like scratches annoy me, there is nothing worse than some one-ton-dumbo crunching crips, rustling his crisp packet and slurping coke in the seat just behind me. If I ever buy into a cinema, the candy bar will only sell icecream (with soggy cones!!).

------------------
Ray Derrick
President
Panalogic Corporation Pty Limited
44 Carrington Road
Castle Hill NSW 2154 Australia
Phone: 61 (0)2 9894 6655 Fax: 61 (0)2 9894 6935


 






Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2