This is topic Cue Dots done wrong! in forum Film Handlers' Forum at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=003035

Posted by Michael Hunt (Member # 772) on 01-31-2002, 11:12 AM:
 
Grrr!!!

I've just finished making up print number UK 20 of Apocalypse Now Redux, and some previous idiot decided to hack there own cue dots into the ends of the reels where they'd run changeover...

The bloody home made things are about the size of three sprocket holes!!!

'Homemade' cues have always been a pet hate, especially as I run both changeover and platter depending on which screen I'm using...

I wish those people who don't have a proper cue dot marker would refrain from hacking holes in prints, and put temporary dots on using wax pencil or other removeable media...

The print is on a platter at the moment, but will be transferred to 6000' reels for its last screening next week, and I just know that these bloody hacked in cues will be on the wrong reels (i.e. in the middle of my 6000'ers)

------------------
There must be more to life than Film and Rugby...

Gwan Glawster!!!
 


Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 01-31-2002, 12:22 PM:
 
Non-standard cues should ALWAYS be removable (e.g., small adhesive dots) and removed before sending the print on to the next theatre. Likewise any cues for automation should be completely removed and any residue cleaned off with a solvent-based film cleaner like FilmGuard.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion
 


Posted by Joe Beres (Member # 678) on 01-31-2002, 12:31 PM:
 
YES YES YES!!! I ran a print last night that had cue marks all over it. THe reels must have been reconfigured three or four times. Some of the cue "marks" were punched holes that were about 3/8" in diameter and in the middle of the right half of the frame!!! I was flabbergasted.
 
Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 01-31-2002, 12:47 PM:
 
#$%&@!#* Hole punchers are for PAPER, NOT FILM!

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 


Posted by Joe Beres (Member # 678) on 01-31-2002, 01:44 PM:
 
Speaking of bad cue marks...
Why is it that so often I see prints with really nice (andplainly visible) printed cue marks and then scratched cue marks (often sloppy) right over the top of the printed marks. I swear that there are projectionists out there whose entire goal is to exemplify film done wrong. Is there a website for them as well? (www.film- .com)


 


Posted by Larry Shaw (Member # 388) on 01-31-2002, 02:02 PM:
 
Does anyone know if the Clint Phare or a similar cue marking device is still available?
 
Posted by Bill Gabel (Member # 1105) on 01-31-2002, 02:14 PM:
 
I believe Christy's Editoral Supply in Burbank Ca. had
them in their catalog.

Page 35

Theatre Cue Marker 35mm $58.00
70mm $58.00
Replacement Cue Marker scribes $30.00


 


Posted by Joe Beres (Member # 678) on 01-31-2002, 02:26 PM:
 
Yes they do, You can download their catalog at www.christys.net or call them @ 800.468.6391
 
Posted by Larry Shaw (Member # 388) on 01-31-2002, 03:09 PM:
 
Thanks Bill & Joe, I found them in their .pdf catalog for $58.00.
 
Posted by Bill Enos (Member # 440) on 01-31-2002, 03:42 PM:
 
Last time I inquired (about 4 months ago) Cardinal Sound & Motion Picture in Beltsville Md. still had some Cline Phare cue markers.
 
Posted by Gerard S. Cohen (Member # 994) on 01-31-2002, 03:45 PM:
 
There must have been a time when cue markers either weren't available, or were too expensive, for I have a hand-made marker
made from a brass screen-door hinge, with tiny holes bored, and tiny punch-pins brazed opposite. By inserting the film and closing the hinge, four very tiny holes were made in precisely the correct
position. Rust-proof, one-piece (no Pharo scriber to get lost),
it is operated with one hand and fits easily in a vest pocket.*
Cost: zilch, plus time and the satisfaction of do-it yourself.
I wonder when the maker met his Maker?
*(Yes, many of the old-timers worked in vests, with green-eyeshades!)


 


Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 01-31-2002, 03:57 PM:
 
Are there any cue scribers that actually place the cues at exactly the same area of the film where the lab's cues were? I have never seen a scriber actually match up. When some bozo adds his own because frames are missing, your eye catches one then gets quickly diverted to an adjacent one nearby. At least if the cue scribers would be a perfect match it wouldn't be quite so annoying.

I do agree all projectionist cue marks should be removable. The easiest way is just to lay a piece of Neumade clear splicing tape where the cue should go and place a tiny round sticker on top of it. That makes removing it easy and one frame is plenty to see the thing.
 


Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 01-31-2002, 05:52 PM:
 
Yeah, Larry we still have some 35 and 70mm cuers left....Also have a bunch o scribers.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
 


Posted by Bill Gabel (Member # 1105) on 01-31-2002, 06:05 PM:
 
When we do work print screenings the Asst. Editors send
me prints with paper dots for cue marks. But sometimes
the very early screenings they will use china marker slashes
for cues. If a print comes in at the very last minute
for a screening and has no cues. I use a china marker
for my cues. (This has happened a lot on Miramax film
pick ups from around the world).


 


Posted by John Walsh (Member # 168) on 01-31-2002, 11:16 PM:
 
I have a Cline Phare ("Signo-Marker") c/o cue scriber that makes a dot just about where the lab puts them. I would think different labs use different scribers, so you probably can't get one scriber match all.

The old-timer who taught me told me not to whine about hard-to-see marks and pay attention ("They're supposed to be hard to see!") But if they were particularly dark, to only scribe over the first and third dot.

I notice some prints from overseas have very small dots; a German print had square "motor start" cues and round c/o cues. I ran a wonderfully photographed French film about birds that had no cues (someone drew ugly grease pencil slashes across the frame.)

I would imagine there are people who think by making the cues impossible to miss, think no one will miss the c/o. So they are using the right reasons to do the wrong thing.
 


Posted by Michael Hunt (Member # 772) on 02-02-2002, 02:07 PM:
 
personally, I'll put removeable cues on for a one off show, but use a Premier cue dot marker, and lightly mark them...

The hand carved dots in this print of Apocalypse Now are about two feet across on the screen!!!

------------------
There must be more to life than Film and Rugby...

Gwan Glawster!!!
 


Posted by Scott Norwood (Member # 30) on 02-02-2002, 05:30 PM:
 
John -- German prints also have a non-standard distance between the cue marks. I think the motor dot occurs sooner than it would with US-standard cues.

I use a Clint Phare cue marker. It's possible to make cues with this that are no more obtrusive than lab cues. It is the only acceptible way (to me) to make cues on existing prints. Hole-punchers are particularly bad offenders...
 


Posted by John Walsh (Member # 168) on 02-02-2002, 11:11 PM:
 
Scott; Thanks, I didn't know about the different distance between cues on German films. It can't be too far off, since it looked OK when I ran it.

I ran a brand-new IB print of a 1952 film and noticed for the first time you can see the image through the serrated cue.
 


Posted by Mathew Molloy (Member # 666) on 02-03-2002, 01:09 AM:
 
Some time ago I saw a near-mint print of Bambi. Heads and tails were still intact on this original release print as well. However someone in obvious need of a pair of glasses saw to it to scratch six or so X's across the entire frame for both motor start and c/o on every reel - including a set just for curtain cue. I will never forget that.

Another Bozo move I see often is a print where someone's cut in their own reel changes because they were too lazy to find the actual splices only to have the next dufus scribe/punch new cues on (usually 5 minutes before/after the real cues!) Ran a print of Apocolypse about 3 years ago that was nothing but shoe polish and c/o cues from one end to the other.
 


Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 02-03-2002, 11:55 AM:
 
Are you sure that wasn't the XXX rated version of Bambi
 
Posted by Craig Hanham (Member # 1010) on 02-06-2002, 09:28 PM:
 
yeah well um er I've got to admit that I scratch my own marks when necessary , but in my defence I have copy of the SMPTE standards for cue marks over the bench, and I try to make them as subtle as possible. Since I run change over I have to check splices and marks as normal set up.
I agree with the remarks concerning some of the blind or ignorant projectionists out there.
"A cue dot should be .094" (2.38mm) in diameter, the centre half way between top and 2nd sprocket hole .281" (7.14mm) from rt-hand edge of film with heads up on emulsion side." and marked on 4 consecutive frames. (about 1/6 second viewing time). The c/o cue is 18 frames before start of tail - so those prats who cant strip tape and cut a new frame to splice up a patter etc well nuff said.
Its the motor start cue that varies - for Academy leaders 10 feet 12 frames before c/o cue: for universal leaders 10 feet 8 frames.
Like all those good film-techers who like to see film done right I hate over-exuberent marks that stand out like dogs-balls.
Fortunately most labs still print cue dots,so those few poor under priviliged beings who still do changeover rarely have to take things into our own hands, but could the phantom marker wielder stop blacking them out.
But what twit in their right mind would actually punch a hole completely through the print OH DEAR.

rant over
embarrassment
will do better in future


 


Posted by Jeffry L. Johnson (Member # 453) on 02-06-2002, 11:29 PM:
 
SMPTE-55 (SMPTE Universal Leader)
Motor Cue
4 frames
Distance between Cues
168 frames
Changeover Cue
4 frames
Distance to Last Frame
24 frames
TOTAL LENGTH
200 FRAMES
====================
ASA Z22.55 (Academy Leader) and SMPTE-301 (SMPTE Projection Leader)
Motor Cue
4 frames
Distance between Cues
172 frames
Changeover Cue
4 frames
Distance to Last Frame
18 frames
TOTAL LENGTH
198 FRAMES
====================


 


Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 02-06-2002, 11:37 PM:
 
Fortunately most labs still print cue dots,so those few poor under priviliged beings who still do changeover rarely have to take things into our own hands."

Uh oh, now you've done it! (I'm going to go hide before Steve shows up. )
 


Posted by John Hawkinson (Member # 1135) on 02-07-2002, 11:16 AM:
 
I'm curious what people think about marking cue dots when a tail is cut short. For instance, last week I was preparing a print of {Hedwig and the Angry Inch}, and the tail of one reel was short by 2 feet 10 frames, which put the motor cue at 6.25seconds from the end.

I ended up adding a hand-made cue (w/ Clint Phare cue marker) 1 second from the end, but ultimately I'm not sure that was necessarily the right thing.

Choices seem to include:
a) It's not possible to have a perfect (cue at -8sec, cue at -1sec)
on this print, so no permanent cue marks should be made at all.
Use a temporary mechanism?
b) Make a permanent cue mark 1 second from the end, and expect
everyone to deal with the non-standard cue dot spacing (what I
did).
c) Make a permanent cue mark 1 second form the end, and 8 seconds
from the end, and assume that future changeover projectionists
will ignore the second set of cues (the lab cues), and not get
confused by the presence of 3 cue dots (I hate it when that
happens...)
d) Add an extra 2'10f of black at the end, and mark the cue dot
on that (at 1 second from the end).

In retrospect, perhaps d) might have been a better choice, because the scene was a fade to black anyhow (which is probably how it got short anyhow -- a careless job of plattering the print...), but it seems to have a significant chance of disrupting the experience, especially w/r/t the soundtrack.

I hadn't heard of the temporary adhesive dots that John Pytlack mentions before; perhaps that's something we should have in our booth. Is there a recommended vendor, or does one just use standard stickers available at a stationary store?

I suppose, even using adhesive dots, my inclination would be to leave them in place in a situation like this, since I would expect any changeover theatre would appreciate having the cues timed properly, and plattering theatres are unlikely to care. Though I suppose perhaps plattering theatres would like to avoid the disruption of presentation that spurrious cues might represent...
 


Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 02-07-2002, 12:34 PM:
 
John Hawkinson asked: "I'm curious what people think about marking cue dots when a tail is cut short."

I would opt for using temporary cues, with a new motor cue and new changeover cue at the proper distance from the last frame before the tail. Be sure your tail leader is really BLACK, and in frame so you don't see white framelines, etc. if you mistime the changeover.

For review, here is the cue spacing per SMPTE 301:

Motor Cue
4 frames
Distance between Cues
172 frames
Changeover Cue
4 frames
Distance to Last Frame
18 frames
TOTAL LENGTH
198 FRAMES

Brad's recommendation of putting only one cue dot on a piece of removable splicing tape is viable, since a good projectionist WILL see a single frame cue if they know it will be so quick. The tiny Avery gummed dots are fine, or you could use one of the Letraset or Presstype dry tranfer decals (if you can still buy them):
http://www.internetmodeler.com/2001/november/new-releases/decals_AFT.htm
http://www.dotprint.com/profiles/letraset.htm

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 


Posted by Steve Kraus (Member # 476) on 02-07-2002, 11:05 PM:
 
Craig Hanham wrote:
>Fortunately most labs still print cue dots,so those few poor under
>priviliged beings who still do changeover

Platters or big reels would be fine if the prints were delivered that way but for a screening room situation which is what I do as long as 20 minute reels are the rule I'll stick to changeovers, thankyouverymuch. With a late arriving print I can inspect one reel and be on screen in minutes--or if I have faith that the dots will be there--in seconds. And when the show is over the print can be in the hands of a waiting courier moments later. Makes life a lot easier when there are 15-20 different films to run in a week. Sadly, the vast majority of my work is not actually running the films but inspecting and repairing the damage done by the platter people (no Film-Tech-ers I'm sure!) Many of my prints are new or have only been screened reel to reel but no way to know until it's inspected.

It would be interesting to contemplate a world where all prints arrived in "Movie Movers" (tm) or similar and you would need only drop it on a platter and thread-up.

John Hawkinson wrote:
>I'm curious what people think about marking cue dots when a tail
>is cut short.

Well you pretty much have to add a new C/O cue unless you want to rely on the sound of the head splice of the new reel going through to know when to change to it. I would just scribe the dot as you did. As you say, that then leads to the question of whether to make a new motor dot or go with the non standard spacing and adjust thread-ups of subsequent reels. I've done it both ways (including leaving information for the next operator in the latter situation. Lately I've been leaning towards the former (new cue).
 


Posted by Frank Angel (Member # 248) on 02-08-2002, 01:45 AM:
 
Although we are change-over venues, our policy for the last dozen years has been not to make any permanent cues (especially emulsion-scribed cues) on prints that come in without them (quite a few foreign films do), or prints with incorrectly placed cues. Our reasoning is that probably 98% of all theatres run platters or use LP reels; and they don't need cues. Making permanent cue marks means that the print will be unnecessarily marked for the rest of its useful life with useless, image-marring marks. Why should there be ANY foreign marks in the visible image that future audiences will see, when those marks serve no purpose?

Instead of the Clint marker (which, as good as it is, doesn't make a cue as unobtrusive as a black dot lab cue), we have been using Letraset cues for years. They are still available, although more expensive than before the company lost business to computer graphics. Letraset's black dots come on a thin strip in a convenient dispenser and can be applied directly to the base of the film so that removing them doesn't risk scratching the emulsion. We had been talking to the company based in England on the possibility of printing the dots on the strip so that they would be correctly spaced for frame distance. You would then only have to orient the adhesive strip over the four frames and the cue dots would be spaced correctly. They could do this, but it wasn't cost effective. So, using their off-the-shelf product (the dots are spaced closely together), you need to place each dot correctly in the frame corner slice it off the roll with the razor blade. Once you get the knack of it, it's takes only a few seconds. The adhesive is quite aggressive and you don't need to cover the dots with splicing tape. They have never come off in everyday operation. U can use regular cleaners like FilmRenew or Ecco 1500 and unless you make it a point to rub them off, they will stay put.

We let the next platter house or LP reel projectionist decide if he wants to remove them. Point is, they will come off if you don't need them.

We also use Letraset's line graphic tape. It comes in very thin lines that are great to cover up those gashes in the emulsion -- I've even used it to black out those XXXs that show up as cues. The lines (called Border Tapes) come in a variety of thickness, one size is the exact width of the soundtrack and it is great for blooping out splices. You can also use this material to strengthen badly made splices that have a gap between frames -- you know, the ones made by incorrectly aligned splicers that don't cut EXACTLY in the center of the frame-line. You can place the black line tape over the gap and then put a piece of splicing tape over it. The splice won't then buckle or fan-fold and you don't have to loose any frames.

The last Letraset product that we use is their graduated film. This is a sheet of thin film that has a gray scale from totally black opaque to transparent. When you get an old trailer or even a print where the sound just cuts off because of missing footage, you can create your own fade by applying the graded strip over the film. This causes both a picture and sound fade-out. It's not the same as getting the footage back, but it sure makes the ending less abrupt.

If anyone wants the Letraset product numbers and the Letraset contact in England, just email me. CinemaDude@aol.com
 


Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 02-08-2002, 02:28 AM:
 
When running changeover on prints that are cut short, this is what I always did.

Count the distance from the last frame on reel 1 back to the "motor" cue. I then took that number, made my "projector startup speed" calculation and noted with a piece of tape on the head of reel 2 what the thread up number was to be in the gate. Now I never actually placed "cues" on the print. My solution was to just go 1 second back from the final frame on that reel 1 and lay a piece of clear splicing tape down. The thin black horizontal splice lines were plenty for me to see and were nowhere near as obtrusive as a cue of any kind. When I finished with my last presentation, I simply unreeled the film a few feet and peeled off that piece of tape. This way I never had to put ANY marks on the film.

 


Posted by Steve Kraus (Member # 476) on 02-11-2002, 12:37 PM:
 
In today's episode of Film Done Wrong we have the usual example of masking taped-on leaders combined with a dose of breakdown-via-scissoring-the-print resulting in the loss of a frame at each join. But what interests me is the remnants of the tape used to build the print. Clear tape? No self-respecting wielder of masking tape would be caught dead using clear tape to build up. Did they run out of their beloved opaque tape or did an enlightened management put presentation quality first and refuse to buy it? We'll never know. But the intrepid platter jockey was not stayed in his/her effort to shave every possible second from the labors at hand. The solution? Color the *entire* width of the splicing tape with white grease pencil!
 




Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2