This is topic Crossovers in Booth Monitors in forum Film Handlers' Forum at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=003595

Posted by Manny Knowles (Member # 1171) on 06-16-2002, 05:02 PM:
 
I keep reading about crossovers and booth monitors...why do some people seem to use these terms interchangeably?

Why would the booth monitor contain crossovers?

Aren't they usually in the processor or the loudspeakers? I've also seen them as add-ons for the amps.

But...in the monitor? What gives?
 


Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 06-16-2002, 05:04 PM:
 
It all started with the THX crossover monitor. In fact it is probably the best place to put it since it eliminates one of the potential places for ground loops to sneak up and bite you
QSC and USL also have a cross over monitor
 
Posted by Manny Knowles (Member # 1171) on 08-25-2002, 05:40 PM:
 
I wish I had known that the CP-650 did not have built-in crossovers (like the CP-45). I just got Component Engineering MS-100 Monitors, so I am not in the market for a crossover/monitor.

Could you please post some recommendations for rack-mounted crossover networks?

I am using JBL 4675-8LF speakers and QSC 1400 amplifiers.

I do not like the little boxes that plug into the back of the amps. They are ugly and they can be bumped out by accident.

~Manny.
 


Posted by Richard Fowler (Member # 893) on 08-25-2002, 07:05 PM:
 
Smart 624 bi-amp crossovers have a nice feature of a passive backup if the main system fails...it is unbalanced so some thought in harness make-up has to be considered. The QSC DSP boxes can be mounted to an accessory rack panel to create a crossover set-up. The cans where always a pain due to tampering and connection problems in humid situations.
Richard Fowler
TVP-Theatre & Video Products Inc. www.tvpmiami.com
 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 08-25-2002, 09:01 PM:
 
Add on crossovers...

Ultra Stereo's XTA-300s are VERY tough to beat in terms of matching to a JBL 4675C or equivalent...their passive bypass mode is better than most people regular crossovers.
http://www.uslinc.com/products/xta.htm

I also use RANE crossovers (2-way and 3-way)
http://www.rane.com/

Below is the rear view of a pair of RANE 3-way (AC23B) crossovers wired into a rack we recently assembled


Next is the front of the rack (with a Dolby CP-650 w/EX)...the AC-23 does has it's share of knobs! Continiously adjustable delay on any two of the three sections is a tough one to beat for fast accurate alignment.

Lastly, is a picture of the rear of the rack...at the bottom is a QSC SF-3 (sub filter) that is similar to their rear mounted crossovers (the XC-3) which are also quite good.

Personally, I don't like having the crossover in the processor...it makes the wiring of the monitor unecessarily cumbersome. Furthermore, not all crossovers are made equal. Just because you like a processor doesn't mean they make a good crossover.

I like crossovers on the amplifier or in the monitor...no extra work is involved. If I were you, I'd problably just get the USL XTA-1s and be done with it...never had one fall out and who is looking the back of your racks to judge prettiness?

And since DIGITAL is in...there are DSP solutions available too. Items like QSC's DSP-3 and DSP-4 which will also go on the back of the DCA amplifiers. (though they can work standalone). DSPs clearly offer the most flexibility in terms of features and customizing the crossover (and other functions).

Check out the DSP-4 at
http://216.149.53.76/products/amps/dsp/dsp4.htm

Or the less expensive (though a bit noisier but has phoenix connectors) DSP-3.
http://www.qscaudio.com/products/amps/dsp/dsp.htm

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"


 


Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 08-26-2002, 01:55 AM:
 
Bah!

The only need for a booth monitor is to monitor....nothing more other than it can be a good troubleshooting device to check for audio distortion, and to see if you have a clean signal coming out of the processor and/or power amps.

Hey, Steve....did you wire those racks? A real beautiful top-notched job! Wow! I am very impressed by the quality of wiring and workmanship in those pictures!


 


Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 08-26-2002, 05:46 AM:
 
Paul, yup, those were my wiring jobs. Thanks for the compliments.

As to the booth monitor, I agree as to it's funcion. However, you are already running a set of low-level lines to it for minitoring anyway...as such it is an acceptable area to have the crossover. (likewise on the amplifier).

I tend to not like combining components since a good monitor maker may not be a good crossover maker and if a single piece dies, it shouldn't take down the system. Then again, I'm normally wiring racks in bulk so saving time is also a concern.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"


 


Posted by Manny Knowles (Member # 1171) on 08-26-2002, 06:26 AM:
 
Steve:

Thanks for those GORGEOUS photos. I'm fastidious about wiring but that is an awesome example of what to shoot for in terms of tidiness.

Thanks also to you and Richard for the info and the links.

~Manny.

"Who would have thought that when it came time to cash in your chips, this old "diseased maniac" would be your banker?" -- Lex Luthor in Superman: The Movie.
 


Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 08-26-2002, 07:49 AM:
 
I have always like as few devices as possible to eliminate noise and possible ground loops. As such I do like the DCM and THX combined monitor crossover
For almost all other jobs I use the Smart crossover



These racks use my favorite crossover the Component Engineering and the the processor in one is a CP65 the other is a Mod6 and the crossovers are Smart

This is during construction of the Fairview Complex in toronto and both these booths are 70mm equiped



 


Posted by Richard Fowler (Member # 893) on 08-26-2002, 08:33 AM:
 
War of the rack builders ......from a guy who neatly delivers 100 - 120 systems a year
Richard Fowler
TVP-Theatre & Video Products Inc. www.tvpmiami.com

 
Posted by Sam Hunter (Member # 1119) on 08-26-2002, 09:07 AM:
 
WOW!
Steve thats some great work! I used to work for a Motorola RSS and one of my duties was systems installations of radio communications networks and control systems and I really liked performing neat and orderly installations. Its refreshing to see quality work like this. Believe me I have seen many a rats nest as I'm sure all you guys have.

P.S. Hey Gordon, Didn't mean to leave you out man. Your systems looks great as well!


------------------
Samuel Hunter Sr.

Death to DLP (Video)


 


Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 08-26-2002, 03:55 PM:
 
Thanks guys...I was actually just trying to show the crossovers...the racks happened to come along for the ride. The top picture showed the beginning of a string of racks (with different processors and amps...we try to be accomodating)...these racks ended up in the Cinema Center in Selinsgrove, PA.

I have found that hums and noises are funciton of what you use and how you install them.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
 


Posted by Oscar Neundorfer (Member # 458) on 08-27-2002, 06:57 AM:
 
I know this topic is on monitor/crossover issues but...

Steve,

Your racks look great! What kind of wire are you using, especially the different colors of wire?

Also, how are you labeling the wires? Are you using a label under transluscent heat shrink in various colors? Are these computer generated labels, p-touch labels or what. I have been trying to find a cheap, very easy, and flexible labeling system. Anyone got any favorite labeling methods?


Gordon,

Your racks look great, too! I really like the open frame racks, although that is not what we offer here at SMART. If I were doing racks for my own use, I would use the open frame variety.

Sam said, "Its refreshing to see quality work like this. Believe me I have seen many a rats nest as I'm sure all you guys have."

Yeah, Sam, I agree.

I would like to see a topic with pictures like this to show how it SHOULD be done. If anyone has a picture of their favorite rack wiring job, please post it, or maybe better, just provide a link to it so we don't clog up too much of Brad's bandwidth.

I am sure "normal" people would think I am crazy, but to me this kind of job quality is like a work of art, and is something I enjoy seeing in a way similar to my enjoyment of a nice painting or sculpture.
 


Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 08-27-2002, 07:47 AM:
 
Oscar the sides were still off while it was being moved that was a Hammond RKF serries knock down rack
As for labeling I make up sheets of lables on the laser printer and put it under heat shrink usually
Also 3M makes rolls of numbers and letters as well
 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 08-27-2002, 04:32 PM:
 
>>"Your racks look great! What kind of wire are you using, especially the different colors of wire?

Also, how are you labeling the wires? Are you using a label under transluscent heat shrink in various
colors? Are these computer generated labels, p-touch labels or what. I have been trying to find a
cheap, very easy, and flexible labeling system. Anyone got any favorite labeling methods?"<<

Once again thanks...

The different color wire is a mixture of Belden and West Penn wire. I use "snake" cable to come out of Dsubs (6-jacketed, shielded pairs). West Penn wire #291 comes in all of the colors. Belden #9451 also come in all of the colors...I much prefer Belden over West Penn.

As to labling...I am a minimalist. The colors speak for themselves...

Left = Red
Center = Blue
Right = Green
Ls = White
Rs = Yellow
S/W = Brown

I didn't invent them...Dolby has been using those colors since the CP-50 and onwards on their test points (with red and green on each and every forward scan solar cell).

The additional channels...
BSl = Violet
BSr = Orange

Left-Center = Grey
Right-Center = Black

The colors are used thoughout from cell to speaker. Makes things easy to trace.

The speaker wire gauges will determine what section of the speaker it feeds...larger going to the more LF section.

When it comes to labels...I tend to use 3-M's label tape. Also P-touch for the fronts of the equipment. Depending on the job, sometimes cables are tagged too.

I'll probably give Brady's and Panduit's label makers a bit more of a closer look.

I generally wire my racks so things are self-explanitory and adequate service loops (though I don't make them loops to avoid potential inductance) are "stashed" thoughout to allow for future changes (really helped out when "EX" happened a few years ago.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
 


Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 08-27-2002, 04:36 PM:
 
Bad idea. No outside links please. Those links always end up getting broken in the future and any time a website is linked outside of this one, the data (in this case images) end up getting lost and defeat the purpose of keeping an archive.

Please use the upload feature of this forum. That is what it is there for.


 


Posted by Antonio Marcheselli (Member # 373) on 08-27-2002, 05:11 PM:
 
Steve,

My compliments too! A wonderful job!

A question: is it a three amped system? If so, are the first three amps a three channel ones? If yes, I didn't know that they exist.

Just for my curiosity, how big is the theater where you installed that rack?

Bye

------------------
Antonio Marcheselli
Florence, Italy
 


Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 08-27-2002, 06:33 PM:
 
Brad,

Were you referring to my links? If so, they are all to pages, not pictures.

Antonio,

Those amps were QSC 4-channel amps. Channels 1 and 2 were bridged mono to feed the LF section. Channel 3 feeds the MF section and Channel 4 feeds the HF section. Thus you can put the power where you need it.

The theatre has a screen about 40-feet wide and the theatre is about 65 feet deep.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
 


Posted by Oscar Neundorfer (Member # 458) on 08-27-2002, 09:49 PM:
 
Steve,

Not to speak for Brad, but I think he was referring to my idea of posting pictures as links to outside servers. I was not aware until this evening about Brad wanting us to upload pictures to the film-tech site to prevent possible future broken links and for archival purposes. Now I know.
 


Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 08-27-2002, 10:06 PM:
 
Ah, now I see...thanks Oscar.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
 


Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 08-27-2002, 10:16 PM:
 
I should note that those of you that haven't read a RANE manual (any of their manuals)...you really should. For the "techno-weenie" they are a hoot!

As a for instance...most manuals will identify each connector and control on a unit...Rane is no exception. On the AC23 (3-way crossover) manual...when it comes to the power switch...the description is "two guesses"

The manuals are available for download from the site. There is also some very good general information contianed in their manuals and technical notes.

Rane also has the infamous PI-14 Psudoacoustic Infector...I suggest you all look it up to see this company has a sense of humor. http://www.rane.com/pdf/old/pi14dat.pdf

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"


 


Posted by Adam Martin (Member # 641) on 08-27-2002, 10:34 PM:
 
I can't contain myself any longer. NICE RACK! I'll be fine now. Continue discussing audio equipment.

 
Posted by Antonio Marcheselli (Member # 373) on 08-28-2002, 07:45 AM:
 
Steve,

I saw the QSC web: they are switching ones! I didn't know that there were multichannel professional amps and I can't imagine a non-switching 4 channel amplifier...

Bye
Antonio
 


Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 12-02-2002, 12:56 AM:
 
Ok...just for completeness...below are pictures of DSP based crossovers. These units are by RANE (RPM-26V) which are 2-in 6-out units so they will do stereo 3-way systems...as in this case.

With DSP crossovers, you tend to get quite a bit of processing without paying too big a noise hit.

For instance, in this system, the RPM-26V has the above mentioned 3-way crossover (with independantly selectable crossover points, styles and slopes for each section), delays on each section (if needed) and up to 13 parametric equalizers! Of which they too are programable so that you can turn some in to bass and treble filters or a CD horn equalizer (and set the filter to exactly match the horn you are using). With one of these, you can effectively bypass the equalizer in the cinema processor and achieve a flat response and not pay all the time-domain hit like if you had to do it all in the 1/3-octave world. This is not to say that 1/3-Octave isn't better in some cases but with parametrics, you can often achieve a flat response with only 5 or so filters...depending on the speaker system and room.

The big disadvantage is...ITS DIGITAL. From a reliability standpoint, analog crossovers will never "forget" their settings (though they can get noisy with cold connections or pots). One also must watch their levels and place the dynamic range of the sound within the capabilities of the DSP (you cant allow it to clip). However, you want to get as much signal in there to keep the "resolution" of the digital signal as high as possible for the best performance.

So DSP crossovers are not for the faint of heart or the casual installer but they are almost a must for dealing with "difficult" speakers. I have found that the inexpensive 3-way systems seem to need lots of help (if you didn't spend more than $2000 a speaker, you have an inexpensive 3-way) and the DSP crossovers can make the difference on these speakers. It is not small wonder that those speaker companies that make these inexpensive 3-ways all seem to have their own DSP crossovers to mate up with them.

The front of the units:

 -

The rear of the units:

 -

Perhaps I should do a review of the RANE crossovers someday. I like them a bunch.

Steve
 
Posted by Ken McFall (Member # 845) on 12-02-2002, 05:56 PM:
 
Steve... congrats on what is a work of art.

Some of the wiring work and racks that have been built for our company defy description. The builder could learn a lot fom looking at some of your pics.

Credit where credit is due.
 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 12-02-2002, 09:29 PM:
 
Thanks...but again it is the CROSSOVERS that I'm showin'!

Steve [Cool]
 
Posted by Will Kutler (Member # 770) on 12-02-2002, 09:37 PM:
 
Steve and Gord:

I am impressed with the pride that you have shown in wiring up and harnessing as shown in the pics [Big Grin] Maybe someone at Century Theaters should take notice!
 
Posted by System Notices (Member # 2357) on 03-04-2007, 05:12 PM:
 

It has been 1552 days since the last post.


 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 03-04-2007, 05:12 PM:
 
Nice work boys! Now if I could only get my boss to turn out that kind of work.... [Embarrassed] . I think he's from the Planet Ribbon Cable. I personally won't turn out crappy work like that or use the stuff [Roll Eyes] and still prefer to hard wire like yous guys do. Someone at CLACO has to maintain high standards.

Gord obviously owns stock in the Zip Tie Company [Big Grin] . Is that every 1/4 inch or every 1/8 inch Gord?

Mark
 
Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 03-04-2007, 05:23 PM:
 
my supplier worries that I might of died if they don't get a monthly order In some ways it is like my local pub they rely on me to meet the morgage [Big Grin] [beer]
 




Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2