This is topic Loop loss in Simplex 4 Star soundhead w/reels in forum Film Handlers' Forum at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=003974

Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 09-09-2002, 12:17 AM:
 
One of the 4 star sound heads (running reels) on startup yanks out its loop between the constant feed sprocket & hold back sprocket.

Has anyone a suggestion on what to look for?


 


Posted by Darryl Spicer (Member # 711) on 09-09-2002, 12:25 AM:
 
A couple of things to check or look into. Pad roller distance on sprocket and belt tension for take-up reel. Have they changed.


 


Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 09-09-2002, 12:32 AM:
 

The take-up belt is leather, hasn't been run in 5 years & may have shrunk. What's the outline for setting up the take-up belt?


 


Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 09-09-2002, 12:43 AM:
 
Install VKF sprockets, set the pad rollers to spec, and clean up and/or adjust the clutch tension. Your problem will go away, presuming you are not running a print with crappy splices or stripped out sprocket perfs. Very seldom have I seen this happen because of the belt, unless it is just too loose. A tight belt will not cause this to happen. The belt is not supposed to slip on the shives, anyway. That's what the clutch is for.

By the way, are you experiencing your problem on start-up? Or, are you experiencing this after start-up? How far into the reel are you when it happens? The clutch setting might be just too tight if it is happening sometime other than start-up. Restoring the loop on the fly is very easy to do, but it is still a pain in the rump to do it, especially if you snag your finger on a splice and it drags your finger(s) through the pad roller and sprocket. (Been there)

If you are running 6,000 foot reels, you have to be vary careful about your clutch settings as well as their cleanliness and over-all condition.

RCA had a real crappy clutch in some of their 3D magazine setups. They were not a conventional disk-leather-disc sandwich design. If they got oily or dirty, the projector would come up faster that the clutch could compensate for. This resulted in a little slack in the film. When the take up finally comes up to speed, it would jerk the loop away from the constant speed and holdback sprocket. Back in the old days with Acetate film, it would strip out the sprocket perfs, especially if the holdback sprocket is worn out. Those sprockets took a real beating and wear much faster than any other sprocket.

I'll almost bet your holdback sprocket teeth are worn to the nubs.


 


Posted by Stan Gunn (Member # 554) on 09-09-2002, 02:47 AM:
 
Just been there.
the drive belt between picture head and sound head is loose.

------------------
KALEE FOREVER. CARBON ARC, THE ONLY LIGHT FOR THE STARS!
ALL PARTS FOR VICTOR AND KALART VICTOR 16MM PROJECTORS.SERVICE TO 35 AND 16MM PROJECTION EQUIPMENT.
35MM sprockets made to order.
 


Posted by Dick Prather (Member # 1136) on 09-09-2002, 02:50 AM:
 
The belt should be tight just to turn the pully. Sounds like you need to clean and adjust the take up clutch. You may be too loose and forming a little slack then doing a hard catch up and ripping sprocket holes or tearing the film. Not knowing which type you have it is hard to advise. You can start by slightly backing out the locking nut on the end of the take up shaft. Unless it ia an XL type take up, adjust the nut to just start start the reel so there is no back up into the soundhead. There are different schools on weather to oil the clutch or not. A couple of drops won't hurt. Oil any other oil holes such as shaft, etc. Make sure your sprocket teeth are clean. Do NOT clean them with the machine running. Same for the pad rollers then adjust them for proper sprocket clearence. That should help.
 
Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 09-09-2002, 02:54 AM:
 
What's the procedure for adjusting the takeup clutch tension?
I've really never, ever adjusted the clutch tension on a takeup, just the supply reel. Maybe I've been lucky.

I've just been running loops on this thing so far, this problem popped up as I was heading out the door.

The magazines are Simplex, same silvertone finish as the Simplex 35 & the sound head.

The holdback sprocket teeth seem great.

quote:
By the way, are you experiencing your problem on start-up? Or, are you experiencing this after start-up? How far into the reel are you when it happens? The clutch setting might be just too tight if it is happening sometime other than start-up.

Right at startup. Thread, hit the motor, bam, it snatches out the loop.

{ EDIT )
Just saw you guys' replies after sending this post. Thanks!


 


Posted by Dick Prather (Member # 1136) on 09-09-2002, 03:03 AM:
 
William,
There should be a large screw and a hex nut on the end of your take up shaft. Loosten the large screw and back off the nut sightly and test. Try this untill you form a small loop at start up. Tighten slightly untill loop goes away when starting. You don't have to move the nut very much to adjust it. If it rips right away with no loop adjustment is too tight (back off nut). You should also take it apart and clean it if you can.
Dick
 
Posted by Kenneth Wuepper (Member # 1174) on 09-09-2002, 12:36 PM:
 
Dear Mr. Hooper,

I know this may be a dumb question but I will ask it anyway.

Are the takeup reels "easy start?" The center hub and the flanges are not tightly fastened so that when the machine starts and there is a rapid wind in the takeup, the hub turns freely from the heavy flanges. This 'inertia' in the flanges can cause the film to be abused in the sound head exit sprockets. Dirt coupling the flanges to the hub of an "easy start" may also cause this problem.

The solid reels are ok for the feed spindles but they are death in the takeup magazines.

Hope this is helpful.
Sincerely, KEN
 


Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 09-09-2002, 03:28 PM:
 
Stan, Are you sure yours is a 4-Star? I suppose it is possible, but I never saw a 4-Star soundhead driving a projector with a belt. With the Simplex XL on a 4-Star, it would run backwards without an idler gear.
 
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 09-09-2002, 03:42 PM:
 
William, I think your problem is in the clutch adjustment since I read your edited post. If you have the sandwich clutch, give it a turn or two if the belt and its tension is otherwise ok. The belt could be loose - but I doubt it. However, it would still be worth checking.

Just as a passing thought.....is there any binding of the take-up shaft? Take the belt off, put a reel on the spindle and give the shaft assembly a spin. It should spin freely. If not, time to dismantle, clean, and lubricate the shaft and the bore.


 


Posted by Scott Norwood (Member # 30) on 09-09-2002, 05:25 PM:
 
Stupid question: is the holdback sprocket loose on its shaft? The takeup reel might be yanking the film at startup and pulling the sprocket around the shaft. (Any chance you could post a picture? I haven't seen the 4-star soundheads.)
 
Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 09-09-2002, 10:08 PM:
 
Since I gather this wasn't a problem in the past check the clutch assembly
Some of the simplex magazines used a conical clutch and it may have a worn sopt on it causeing it to snatch

 
Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 09-10-2002, 12:30 AM:
 
The machines haven't been run for 5 or more years, & I didn't know them when they were running. This one was partially disassembled, &
I'm getting them back up.

I'll be back there on Friday, & will go through all the suggestions.

I really appreciate this, everything is going MUCH slower there than it should due to rust, age, disuse, deterioration, etc. Being able to picking up some speed on troubleshooting in that booth is excellent.


 


Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 09-10-2002, 01:23 AM:
 
Ahhhhh....that sheds much light on the subject. Sounds like a little "midnight oil", a big jug of coffee at your side and some TLC on those machines.

It is probably dirty stiff loose belts, and some coagulated oil in the spindle bores, as well as deteriorated clutches. All are very easy fixes, and will cost little money (if any at all) except for the cleaning materials and the labor involved. If you have leather belts that are shot, you might want to consider using "Roundthane" belts. I never had any trouble with them, although I still prefer the old leather ones.


 


Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 09-11-2002, 12:28 AM:
 
Paul, where do you get Roundthane belts?
A searh for Roundthane on the Grainger site came up empty.

 
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 09-11-2002, 01:08 AM:
 
I think you can still get them from a theatre supply dealer.
 
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 09-11-2002, 04:39 AM:
 
I'll reiterate what others have said, and add something else.

#1 Make sure you are using slip hub reels for takeup. It is basically impossible to run solid flange 6000 foot reels as takeup without that bounce.

#2 Check your clutch for wear and proper tension. I am finding that a dry pad is MUCH more reliable and consistent than an oiled pad, but others will disagree.

#3 Check your pad roller tension to make sure the film can't effortlessly slip past the sprocket with the pad roller closed.

#4 Make sure you don't have any oil on your takeup belt or pulleys. Odds are since you are running a Simplex that they are covered in oil.

Now two more things...

#5 Consider adding a slow start kit. That extra second or two as the motor gets up to full speed makes a tremendous difference.

#6 Make sure after you thread the projector that you turn the motor by hand until the tension grabs at the takeup reel, then advance a few more frames minimum just to be sure.

Hope that helps.


 


Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 09-11-2002, 06:45 AM:
 
Thanks again. What are the components in the slow start kit?

 
Posted by Tim Reed (Member # 137) on 09-11-2002, 09:17 AM:
 
quote:
I've just been running loops on this thing so far, this problem popped up as I was heading out the door.

Right at startup. Thread, hit the motor, bam, it snatches out the loop.


I think Scott Norwood is on the right track. How are things on the drive side? If it goes as soon as you hit the motor switch, a woodruff key or teeth could be missing. Something could be spinning free.

------------------
Better Projection Pays!


 


Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 09-11-2002, 11:55 AM:
 
The SH-10** have flywheels on them, I never seen the use of a slow-start kit on any of them unless it was pulling or running a 14,000-foot Cinemechannica tower or a 14,000-foot Eprad Sword, or anything else that uses a 14,000-foot reel.

One has to remember that William's machine has been sitting idle for close to 5 years now. The problems he has does not surprise me for a machine that has been sitting that long.

Since there has been so many thoughts expressed here, I will be happy to talk to William on the phone if necessary to get more answers to help him solve his problem. William, please email your phone number to me, and I will be happy to call you.

I completely agree with all of Brad's comments with the exception of No. 5. However, if for some reason William's soundhead is not equipped with a flywheel, a slow start kit may be in order. William, what size reels are you trying to use?

Incidently, Roundthane can be obtained from Strong International, Wolk, and probably others as well. Someone told me that Lowes Hardware might even carry it.

If push comes to shove, I have heard of people using a "V" belt and it works nicely.

I disagree with the woodruff key theory. The magazine is driven by the external constant speed sprocket shaft gear. That gear also drives the projector. If the key was sheered, the projector head would probably not run at all, and if it did, you probably see all your loops disappear in the projector head in less than one second.

William is only losing the loop between the constant speed sprocket and holdback sprocket in the sound head. If there was a chipped gear that drives the projector, he would definately hear it.

If the upper Bronze gear in the soundhead gearbox was heading south and it jumped a tooth or two, it would cause that loop to disappear between the constant speed and holdback sprockets. I seriously doubt that being the case, since there is no real load on the holdback sprocket other than the tension of the take-up anyway.

Paul


 


Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 09-12-2002, 12:41 AM:
 
I just had a 2000 ft. reel on it. I tried it just before walking out the door last weekend, when the problem was noted. I won't be back over there until Friday night. I don't think that cell phones work at those altitudes. I know the air conditioning doesn't. I already went through checking out & setting up the pads & sprockets, & a close visual inspection when cleaning the sound head up, & I don't think there's any mechanical damage. From the diagnosis by you folks, & also because it's the only thing that I hadn't taken apart & put back together, I bet it will turn out the be the clutch.


 


Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 09-12-2002, 04:03 AM:
 
William, I'll bet that's probably where you will find the problem.

For those of you who also have just about any soundheads in a booth that have been idled for that long, you will probably have the same problems. It probably would not make any difference if you have a flywheel-equipped motor or not.

I can't speak all of the soundheads, but I can say this:

If you have some old RCA 10** soundheads without flywheels, there is a slow start kit built into them....in a form of a power resistor inside the 4-inch black box mounted on the motor. That resistor is in series with the motor's starter switch and the start winding, unless someone has removed or defeated the resistor over the years.

Century has an after-market kit you can either make or buy. I can't remember what the Motiograph SH-7200 or Weber Syncro-Film soundhead used. I am mostly familiar with the Century, RCA, or Simplex Soundheads.

There is a difference of opinion on how the slow-start kit is installed. Some say it is acceptable to place a 1 or 2-Ohm 200 Watt resistor in series with motor and forget about it. It works....but keep in mind that the resistor is always in-line with the motor even when the motor is running.

An older 1/4 horse motor like the Leland that the SH10** and the Robbins & Myers the RCA soundheads use draw about 4 to 5 amps when running under normal load.

Let's say you have a crappy electrical system in your city like they did in most cities years ago. You were lucky to have 105 volts on a good day. At 5 amps of motor current draw with a line voltage of 105 volts, the motor will only see about 100 volts. Sure, the motor will run. However, it will be starved of electrical power. Magnetic "slip" will occur, and the motor's inductive reactance will decrease. This will cause the motor to run at a hotter temperature, and eventually will burn out. In addition to that, the resistor will get hot which could create a potential fire hazard if not placed in an isolated area where it can't set something else on fire.

There are many old cities in the boonies that have old electrical systems, not to mention the old theatres that have electrical systems that are nothing short of a total disaster.

I prefer the other way. The same way RCA and others did 60 to 70 years ago, maybe even longer than that. Put the power resistor in series with the starter switch and start winding. When the starter switch dis-engages, the resistor is basically disconnected. The motor run winding will then receive full line voltage without being short-changed.

I have seen many motors burn out because of electrical power starvation. Not only that, but the power resistor in series with the start winding can actually save the motor from start-winding burn out in event the starter switch failed. The resistor would usually fry and burn out before the start winding would.

Save a couple of bucks and do it right. It is your choice.


 


Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 09-12-2002, 07:23 AM:
 
Paul said"There is a difference of opinion on how the slow-start kit is installed. Some say it is acceptable to place a 1 or 2-Ohm 200 Watt resistor in series with motor and forget about it. It works....but keep in mind that the resistor is always in-line with the motor even when the motor is running.."

There is nothing wrong with a 2 ohm in serries almost every SH1000 or RCA in canada (even the 4 stars) when running large reels had a inline resistor and never a problem. In fact it is probably the smoothest rampup I have seen excluding running them on an inverter

 


Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 09-12-2002, 04:22 PM:
 
Gordon, they will run. I don't question that.

P=I squared R. You can't argue with mathematics.

5 amps on two ohms = 50 watts of power down the drain, and a 10 volt drop across the resistor. If the line voltage is 110 volts, the motor is only getting 100 volts.

Too low.....Eventually the motor will fail, usually on a Friday Night.

If you guys are going to do that, at least make sure the voltage applied to the motor is within the designed specification. Measure the voltage across the motor, not the motor and resistor.

Most motors I have seen are rated 105 to 120 volts, and I personally don't like the idea of powering it with 100 volts. It is simply out of parameters.

Here is a classic example of an out-of-parameter operation in general electronics: One of our transmitters here at the radio station was running out of parameters for about 15 years or so. Result? $1,200 worth of burned up inductors, $700.00 for a rebuilt modulator block, $200.00 for a -72 volt power supply, and several modulator drivers at the tune of 400 bucks each. All just within the last two years, not to mention the lost revenue because of transmitter down time.

I prefer to operate motors and electronic equipment within the designed parameters.

Sorry, gentlemen---I have to stand firm on this.


 


Posted by Dick Prather (Member # 1136) on 09-12-2002, 04:58 PM:
 
We also ran resisters in series with motors in several downtown theatres in Portland for over 15+ years on SH-1000 and 9030/50's with no problems. I ran that way at the Portland Fox with XL's over SH-1000's We also ran factory slow start kits at other houses and saw little difference between the two. Most theatres ran without. Paul, maybe our voltage ended up at the low end.

The biggest problem I see with William's set up is the fact it sat for 5 years. Anything sitting that long needs to be cleaned, checked, and readjusted. I am guesing he does not have a XL (cone) take up and has the later part Simplex part Powers takeup which can be touchy on the adjustment. Since thre AAFMPS painted all their rebuilds hammertone gray they might be the XL type. If so the adjustment is completely different. Also as Brad mentioned you need floating hub reels for take ups or you will have problems. Some pictures of his project would be nice to look at. Hope you get it working.
Dick
 


Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 09-12-2002, 07:48 PM:
 
At this point, all I am trying to say is:

If you elect to use the resistor in series with the motor, check to make sure your applied voltage to the motor (AT the motor) is within specifications with the resistor in line. If the voltage is not, at least put a time delay relay that would bypass the resistor after motor start-up.

I will not question Gordon or Dick saying they have not had any real problems. This is probably because a 1/4 HP motor is such an over-kill and is probably "playing" with the projector to begin with. Some projectors have not been blessed with such an over-kill.

I just think it is a bad idea to run anything outside its designed parameters.

I have changed motors because of run winding burnouts in a theatre that suffered from low line voltage.

As a thought - the motors the 5-Star uses (and others as well) can be ramped up slower without using that resistor. Just put in a start capacitor of a lesser capacity. The size will probably depend on what kind of motor is being used, but some experimentation might be needed to fit your needs.


 


Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 09-13-2002, 09:30 AM:
 
1 HP motor is 746 watts a 1/4 Hp motor is only 188 watts meaning the actual running current is about 1.5 amps (all give or take) which is close to what I have measured on several Leyland motors
at 1.5 amps the motor is only being starve a very small amount of power
During start up the inrush current is controled and the motor is then forced to ramp up to speed
Never had a motor replaced because of the inline resisitor

 
Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 09-13-2002, 01:30 PM:
 
True in a textbook case. Even running under no load, the motor will draw more current that the textbook says. The last 9030 motor I clamped under normal load was about 4 to 5 amps.


 


Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 09-14-2002, 12:15 AM:
 
Well, Gentlemen, I did some tests today, and I thought you would all be interested in the findings. These tests were done in Oak Harbor while the movies were running. There are three screens in that theater. Here are the results:

Projector No. 1....It is equipped with a Dayton motor, 1/4 HP rated at 6 amps line draw. This motor is in series with a power resistor for a slow ramp on start-up. The motor draw while running is 4.33 amps, and the power resistor is dropping 8.37 volts. The voltage at the motor terminal block is 115 volts.

Projector No. 2....It is equipped with a Crompton/Greaves 1/4 HP rated at 5.2 amps line draw. This motor is in series with a power resistor for a slow ramp on start-up. The motor draw while running is 3.27 amps. and the power resistor is dropping 7.46 volts. The voltage at the motor terminal block is 115.1 volts.

Projector No. 3....It is equipped with a Gould (Century) 1/4 HP rated at 3.8 amps. There is no power resistor in series with the motor. There is a ballast resistor wired in series with the start winding. The motor draw while running is 3.04 amps, with 120 volts at the terminal block in the motor.

You will notice projector #1 and projector No. 2 voltage drops on the resistors plus the voltage appearing on the on the terminal blocks do not appear to add up. Remember this is an inductive/resistive circuit, which is mathematically vectored.

I then came home to check one of my R&M MI-4275PA motors. It is a 1/4 HP motor used on the RCA-1040 soundheads. This motor has a rated draw of 4.6 amps at 110VAC. With the motor running under a no-load condition, the current draw was 3.96 amps with 122VAC on the motor terminal block. The starting current was 17 amps.

When I was at Southsound, the Leland motors on the Simplex SH-1007's had about a 5 amp draw when running, and the starting current was about 25 amps. My R&M KS-145-frame motors I had on my 9030's drew about the same as the Lelands did on startup, but the run current was about 4.5 amps.

I am very glad this discussion took the floor in this thread. While I was checking the characteristics, it was noted the power resistors in Projector No. 1 and Projector No. 2 were too hot to touch even for my alligator hands! This can be a very bad situation. Read on....

Last week, we had an intermittant seize up, and it pulled the motor down to a complete stop. How long stayed in that position before the power was shut off, I don't know. It is an unmanned booth. When I got there and diagnosed the problem as a locked up movement, there was no apparent damage to the motor. However, it did take out the motor's circuit breaker. If it had not, that power resistor could have started a fire. There was evidence of adjacent wire overheating in the resistor's area. That resistor must have become hotter than Hell before the breaker tripped.

After I turned three sheets of green in color, I have immediately decided to convert to a start-winding ballast as soon as I possibly can. In event of a lock-up, it'll probably take the breaker out faster, hopefully. I think the ballast will still protect the start windings from burning out, especially with projector No. 3. Just a guess, but I think the resistor in No. 3 is rated at about 50 watts.

If you want to check your line draws, be sure your line clamp is calibrated, and the needle is not sticking. A sticking needle can happen when you are using Amprobe line clamps. The needle might stick or be inaccurate if the lock slider is not be fully disengaged!

For those who have the power resistor in series with the motor, I would strongly advise you to check it and make absolutely sure it is clear of anything that could catch fire.



 


Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 09-14-2002, 08:07 AM:
 
Sticking meter? You mean there is something other than a DIGITAL ammeter? Come on get on the DIGITAL bandwagon...if it is digital, it HAS to be better!

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
 


Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 09-14-2002, 12:49 PM:
 
Unfortunately, there are many analog meters in service. However, there some applications where I prefer to use an analog meter.

Most of the time I use digital meters because of their accuracy. The meter I used for the tests was a digital line clamp. It is far more accurate than my old Amprobe.


 


Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 09-15-2002, 11:44 AM:
 
Paul said"Last week, we had an intermittant seize up, and it pulled the motor down to a complete stop. How long stayed in that position before the power was shut off, I don't know. It is an unmanned booth. When I got there and diagnosed the problem as a locked up movement, there was no apparent damage to the motor. However, it did take out the motor's circuit breaker. If it had not, that power resistor could have started a fire. There was evidence of adjacent wire overheating in the resistor's area. That resistor must have become hotter than Hell before the breaker tripped.

After I turned three sheets of green in color, I have immediately decided to convert to a start-winding ballast as soon as I possibly can. In event of a lock-up, it'll probably take the breaker out faster, hopefully. I think the ballast will still protect the start windings from burning out, especially with projector No. 3. Just a guess, but I think the resistor in No. 3 is rated at about 50 watts"


Probably the resitor save the machine from other gear damage when it locked up

THe resistor should be mounted in a ventelaited metal cabinet and heagt resistant wire is normally used (appliance)
The wattage should be 200 watts in most applications not 50


 


Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 09-15-2002, 01:40 PM:
 
The gears on the vertical shaft were severly damaged. I had a "spare" vertical shaft assembly from a junk machine that saved the day.

The Gould (Century) motor that I did testing on probably is a 50 Ohm power resistor which has been in service for at least 20 years now. If it is a 2 Ohm resistor, there is just no way it could be a 200-Watt device It is just too physically small. The Gould motor that is on the other machine (by the looks of the ratings) is a very efficient motor as compared to the others I tested. That 50-Watt (if that is what it is) resistor is in the start winding circuit only.

If the use of the 200 Watt resistor desired to be placed in series with the motor, mount it as Gordon suggests to be on the safe side. Don't use any power rating smaller than 200 Watts for this purpose as Gordon already pointed out. I certainly agree with Gordon about that.

As for me, I won't use them in series with the motor. I am converting mine to the way they did it 70 years ago.

Next time I get a chance, I'll verify the rating on that specific resistor used in the Gould motor. I will also verify the size if the resistor in the R&M motor used with the on the 1040 and 1050 soundheads. I am guessing R&M used about a 100-Watt resistor used with the start winding. I would also guess that the power rating and electrical reisitance value of the resistor selected by the motor manufacturer was based on operating characteristics and efficiency of the motor.

Whatever the values are, I'll let you all know as soon as I find out. I might also point out that the less efficient motor may require a 2-Ohm resistor greater than 200 watts, depending on how big of a power hog the motor is.

If the motor is really a big power hog, maybe a 1 Ohm 200-Watt power resistor might be a better answer. There are several variables to take into consideration when the correct size is selected. The "One Fits All" theory may not always be the best solution.



 


Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 09-15-2002, 02:55 PM:
 
Paul, I ended up selecting a 2 ohm 200 watt for my JJs. I found the 1 ohm just didn't make enough of a difference to bother with. They are indeed quite large, as big as a baby's arm. They will only heat up during the starting, so unless you have people in your booth who like to jog the motor, you could actually hold them in your bare hands. Still though, definitely mount them someplace where if it was to heat up could not cause a fire.


 


Posted by Dick Prather (Member # 1136) on 09-15-2002, 03:28 PM:
 
If memory serves we also used 2 ohm, 200 watt resisters at the Portland Fox. They were fastened inside the Simplex heavy duty bases away from everything so you had to open the base doors to get to them. We had to thread on 7 1/2 to 8 because of the slow start. Never did snap a film there. We instructed operators never to jog start, always use the inching knob.
Dick


 


Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 09-15-2002, 03:56 PM:
 
Brad, I'll bet you have a very efficient motor on your JJ's. It would not surpise me if you found out the motors were running at about 3 amps or less under load. If you have capacitor start, capacitor run motors, it may be even less than that. Those motors are extremely efficient.

Dick, that is a very good call. Too many people "bump" the motors to verify the projector threading. As you, Gordon and I know, that is a very bad practice and is nothing short of abusing the machinery.

Brad, if you have people doing that to your machines, throw them out of your booth! I would if it were mine...

Looking at the RCA 1040 setup, the R&M motor on the 1040 soundheads use a 40-Ohm starting resistor. The resistor is rated at 70 Watts. Mine is tapped at 26 Ohms. See page 17 of the 1040 manual from the FT Archives.

Below is a picture from the manual. Pardon the quality, as I took a picture of my monitor screen.

Below is a picture from the Oak Harbor booth. The left picture shows the location of the power resistor in the ORC Console. The picture on the right is apparently a factory aftermarket slow start kit.

The advice that Gordon, Dick, and Brad has made is right on target. If those big "dogbones" are installed, mount those things where it cannot set something else on fire.



 


Posted by William Hooper (Member # 71) on 09-16-2002, 12:15 AM:
 
It was the clutch, the only part I hadn't pulled to pieces because it's simple & dumb & nothing ever goes wrong with it. It's fixed, thanks to all, especially Dick Prather who nailed it straight on with diagnosis & adjustment. It's a flat clutch, and with one-flat-at-a-time adjustment got right to where I like it.

I forgot to take pictures, but fyi the magazines are 2,000 foot silver painted Simplex magazines. There are some Simplex magazines for big reels here too, but they're black ones from some old XL or something.
1. there's no real reason to strap them on for a booth with just occasional shows & no 3D foreseen
2. The top one might foul the wall
3. It's nice when all the projector is more or less the same color.

 


Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 09-16-2002, 12:17 AM:
 
The Century box with the 25-Ohm resistor is a factory (of the era) slow start kit.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
 


Posted by Paul G. Thompson (Member # 655) on 09-16-2002, 12:53 AM:
 
William, I am happy to hear you have the problem resolved.

Steve, thanks for the info. Those kits work very well! There is absolutely no signs of overheating or deterioration. Since it is using a 25-Ohm resistor and the R&M uses one at 26 Ohms, the 25-Ohm is what I will experiment with. Since the Dayton motor is so much of a power hog, I will stay in the vicinity of a 70 to 100-Watt rating and get rid of those big 200-Watt dinosaurs. If I have to mount it in the console, I will put a heat shield in it to keep any heat away from the wiring in event of a starter switch failure.



 






Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2