This is topic Re-striking a xenon bulb in forum Film Handlers' Forum at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.
To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=005563
Posted by Ken Lackner (Member # 1002) on 11-21-2003, 02:58 AM:
It is my understanding that a xenon bulb can strike at any state of cooling, that once it goes out you do not have to wait for it to cool down before you can strike it again. We had a show stop for a moment today and when we started it again the bulb would not strike. We had to wait nearly five minutes before we could strike it again. What could cause this? It is a Xenex II lamphouse with a Kni-Tron power supply. We use a mix of Christie and Osram. Not sure which one is in this house.
Posted by Howard Johnson (Member # 62) on 11-21-2003, 04:25 AM:
I tend to leave the xenon on unless there is a break of an hour. Every time you strike them it puts the eqivalent of perhaps 15 mins time on them - I'm not sure of exact time. I've found that different lamphouses vary in whether they will be difficult to restart after a short interval. It's easier to leave them on!
Posted by Chris Greenwell (Member # 1660) on 11-21-2003, 04:31 AM:
I had a power bump a few days ago, just enough to stop the machines. My older bulbs had a hell of a time striking back on, but the new ones striked right back up.
Posted by Joe Beres (Member # 678) on 11-21-2003, 08:24 AM:
I too have found striking, and especially re-striking a warm lamp, more difficult with an older lamps. Does it take a while for the initial strike at the beginning of the day? How many hours on the lamp?
Posted by Antonio Marcheselli (Member # 373) on 11-21-2003, 08:34 AM:
I worked in a theater that had many problems striking hot lamps. But the lamphouse had definively some problems since all the time the 4000 lamp was black after 4/500 hours.
Bye
A
Posted by Jeff Taylor (Member # 443) on 11-21-2003, 09:06 AM:
In theory a xenon lamp will re-strike at any temperature, but hot re-strikes are more challenging than cold strikes. There are several reasons for this, but the main one is that xenons are tougher to strike as the pressure inside the lamp increases. Different manufacturers pressurize their lamps to different levels at the factory to begin with, and there is a correlation between pressure and the quality of light output. Similarly, the hotter the lamp is the higher the pressure, which can lead to the hot re-striking problem. Also, as the hours pile up on a xenon lamp the electrodes naturally wear causing the gap to increase and making striking more difficult. Then there's the whole issue of ignitor voltage and run amperage which can cause more problems. If everything is running up to spec and your lamp is relatively new you should be able to re-strike hot, but it's not surprising that in a real world situation you might have problems, or at least have to zap it a few times to get a strike while hot.
Posted by Darryl Spicer (Member # 711) on 11-21-2003, 09:07 AM:
I used to work with Xenex II lamphouses year ago. This was a common problem with those. What they did was change the igniter to one that was used in a stong lamphouse. Problem never occured again.
Posted by Ian Price (Member # 14) on 11-21-2003, 11:41 AM:
We had a problem re-striking a hot lamp in our big house. It has a Strong Highlight, switching power supply and a Christie lamp. Since I have worked in many theatres with many size lamps, I knew that it was not the lamp. Indeed, eventually the power supply failed and was replaced. Now there is no problem, ergo it may be a power supply problem.
Posted by Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Member # 1303) on 11-21-2003, 11:55 AM:
Power supplies with lower no-load voltages will have problems starting hot lamps.
Posted by Ken Lackner (Member # 1002) on 11-21-2003, 02:02 PM:
No we do not have any problems with a cold strike in this house. Not sure how many hours are on the bulb, but it's a safe bet that it needs replacing. And if the show has stopped because the automation stopped it, the bulb will go out. No way to keep it on.
Posted by Travis Hubrig (Member # 1745) on 11-21-2003, 09:18 PM:
I run 7 Xetron XHN's, never had a problem with a hot bulb striking. I run Osram 1600 w bulbs and the few problems I encounter are due to improper cooling.
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 11-21-2003, 09:26 PM:
I'm curious as to what kind of lamps most of you with problems are using and what kind of systems you are using them in. For instance, you can sit there all day long at 5 second intervals and fire / extinguish / fire / extinguish / fire / extinguish a Christie lamp in an SLC style Christie console (not the older ones though). The same thing can be said for a Christie lamp in a Strong lamphouse with a switcher power supply (at least my 2K units can), and I've never had a glitch from a Christie lamp in a Cinemeccanica lamphouse with Irem supply either. The only time I have ever had issues like this is with high reactance Strong supplies and non-Christie lamps.
BTW, a tip I picked up awhile back that does work nicely. If you have a bulb past it's warranty hours and it is having issues striking and you do not have a spare handy for replacement, up the tap settings one notch for one show, then put them back. I've had lamps run another 3 months without a hint of problem after doing that. (Disclaimer - check with your service tech before doing this. It is ultimately his/her decision.)
Posted by Dave Callaghan (Member # 1544) on 11-21-2003, 09:48 PM:
According to an OSRAM publication, increasing the current is discussed in connection with bulb rotation.
After a rotation, OSRAM suggests operating the bulb at its current control range maximum to re-establish the arc root at the cathode tip to reduce arc instability / flicker.
When a horizontal bulb has just been rotated, OSRAM recommends operating the lamp for 30 minutes to 2 hours at the permitted maximum current to reform the cathode root.
Posted by Travis Hubrig (Member # 1745) on 11-21-2003, 10:09 PM:
I have been told, and maybe have read it here, that bulb rotation in a horizontal installation isn't necessary anymore.
The material and technology in the bulb is getting better and the deposit on the quartz isn't nearly as bad as it used to be.
Most of my bulbs never get rotated.
Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 11-21-2003, 10:12 PM:
Lamp rotation should be per the lamp manufacturer's recommendation.
Posted by Per Hauberg (Member # 529) on 11-22-2003, 08:01 PM:
On my new FP30D with Kinoton 700/2000 lamphouse, I was a bit disappointed, finding that the lamp has no manual dowser (or what is the correct word in english), only the c/o dowser, which is so small that it allows a bit of light to get around it - just enough to let You see the numbers of the leader on a dark screen. The automation is therefore born, so that the lamp can not stay turned on, when projector is not running. Lamp is ignited and turned off with every motor start/stop, unless You cut off the power (when treading film, etc.) I have always learned, that every ignition cots 15-20 minutes of the lamp's life, and do not find this good. Also, -now I have for the first time ever, a projector with a bit of automation, -I would like to use it to have my hands free for scratching, nosepicking and other duties, but I have to hold one hand in front of lens, to keep those darn numbers away from screen. Are these (otherwise great) lamphouses from Kinoton not equipped with proper closing devices, when installed for bigger lamps than my 700 watt, either ?
Per
Posted by Richard Fowler (Member # 893) on 11-23-2003, 06:24 PM:
ahhhhh....the manual douser is an option. Kinoton is like our hamburger food chain...Burger King..which you can have your burger any way you want....you just have to ask for the pickle ( manual douser )
Posted by Per Hauberg (Member # 529) on 11-23-2003, 07:50 PM:
Richard:
Of course, one always want the best possible price on new equipment, but...
well, -i'd better ask, if they've got a glass of pickles left down there...
p
Posted by System Notices (Member # 2357) on 05-15-2005, 01:02 PM:
It has been 538 days since the last post.
Posted by Brad Allen (Member # 470) on 05-15-2005, 01:02 PM: