This is topic Manufacturers of new 35/70mm Projectors in forum Film Handlers' Forum at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=007230

Posted by Andrew McCrea (Member # 674) on 05-26-2005, 05:21 PM:
 
Hello fellow techers!

Do you know of any manufacturers (Kinoton, Strong, Christie, etc.) that are currently making new 35/70mm projectors?

I've searched their websites and the archieves but can't find anything for the life of me!

*I've still been searching, and while some say that they have 70mm projectors, there's no additional information for them. I do know of the VIC 8 35/70mm prpjector, but I'm looking for other ones too.
 
Posted by Paul Linfesty (Member # 214) on 05-26-2005, 05:44 PM:
 
Well, the Kinoton's projector wasn't hard to find.

Kinoton e-projectors
 
Posted by Andrew McCrea (Member # 674) on 05-26-2005, 05:47 PM:
 
Sorry, specifically I meant a console mount version.
 
Posted by Kris Brunton (Member # 432) on 05-26-2005, 05:57 PM:
 
Most manufacturers offer there projectors as a console mount or pedestal mount. The Simplex PR3570 or the Century JJ is available from Ballantyne as a console mount.
 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 05-26-2005, 06:17 PM:
 
Kinoton does not normally ever do console mount persay...the PK-60 being the notable exception for the American market.

The FP40 and FP-50 models are console-like though in that the projector is attached to the console. The console portion being an SK-50. I don't know if they ever offered the SK-50 for mounting an American style projector like a Simplex....but I've digressed far enough.

The Kinoton FP-75E is their current offering in a "cinema" grade projector. Kinoton has never, to the best of my knowledge, had a console type 70mm projector. They have always gone with the column type design. Even the DP 70 had the lamptable mount to the projector, not the projector to some sort of pedestal or console.

The Simplex and Century 35/70 projectors are no longer production items...they are "POA" (aka Price On Application). Which translates into we don't make it on a regular basis so if you want it, don't be in a hurry and we will price one out for you.

I would think that those two could be had cheaper if magnetic sound was not needed since both use the identical 35mm optical soundhead (now) of their 35mm counterparts. Also the gear train are nearly identical. The film path stuff is what is primarily different.

The FP-75E and the Vic-8 (to the best of my knowledge) are both production machines.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 05-27-2005, 03:42 PM:
 
One has to be careful of the FP-75E though. It cannot reliably run 70mm at 30fps.

Mark
 
Posted by Christian Appelt (Member # 1067) on 05-27-2005, 03:57 PM:
 
Andrew,

how about a rebuilt DP70 which will outlast all current machines and has much gentler handling of film which is a point when you run older acetate 70mm prints?

The gentleman above my post should know more about that option... [thumbsup]
 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 05-27-2005, 06:51 PM:
 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
One has to be careful of the FP-75E though. It cannot reliably run 70mm at 30fps.
Sez who? Just what problems have you run into? The pair under my service seem to not care what speed they run at up to 30 fps (and perhaps a wee bit more).
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 05-27-2005, 06:59 PM:
 
Sez the operators at the Seattle Cinerama Theatre that tried to run a 30fps print.... Odd you were there a the F-T Drink Night
when it was being discussed... you musta been mezmerized by all the cheese. The machine there kept blowing rail fuses and shredding film when it was run at 30 fps. Blowing just one rail fuse is a really bad thing on most electronic drive machines... it certainly was on the RCA FR-35 electronic machines. One fuse gone equals instant ultra high speed on what ever servo the fuse happens to blow. You should see the reel servos when this happens [Eek!] .

Their FP-75E runs just fine at 24 fps though... perhaps one of those guys will chime in. I wanna say it has since been taken over by another DP-70..... but they would have to confirm that one.

BTW: The only way they could get it to run was with the gate tension all the way down.

Mark
 
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 05-27-2005, 07:22 PM:
 
Mark, I must ask...

Why was the gate tension cranked in the first place?

Was the print properly inspected from head to tail before projection?

Was the print properly lubricated before projection, or were they just trying to run an old and probably brittle acetate print dry out of the cans?

Are they aware that the omega spring in the Kinotons can drastically alter the ACTUAL gate tension?

The skate alignment can also shred film if aligned too high.

The fuse issues sound like a Kinoton goof, but the rest of it sounds like operator error to me. Actually, that brings about another question...

Why did the operators not TEST the 30FPS before putting an actual print through the projector? Did they have no junk film to play with for testing purposes? Had they done this, the fuses would've blown with no film damage.

-------------------

Andrew, if you are going to insist on a console mount 35/70 projector, go with an older Century JJ that has been rebuilt at a place that knows what they are doing. (I would recommend Hadden.) That will outperform anything Strong is capable of producing nowadays at any price.

The Kinoton is the smarter choice though.
 
Posted by Louis Bornwasser (Member # 3063) on 05-27-2005, 07:34 PM:
 
1. According to Cinemeccaniac/Milan the Vic 8 has been obsolete for at least 20 years. (This was discussed at the factory while they were checking out a "rebuilt.")

2. I have 8-10 complete JJ in stock and could probably find another 10-20 easily, With the usual Century "updates" these could be excellent machines. My customers normally recycle the SA's but tend not to reinstall the JJ's. (The slight difference between them and SA "confuses" the low level troops!)I mention this since the factory probably has no recent experience; there are PLENTY around.
 
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 05-27-2005, 07:37 PM:
 
And the sad part about it is that the Century JJ will walk all over a Century SA when running 35mm film in every aspect.

Oooooh, but those wide sprockets are just SO HARD FOR THE KIDDIES!!! [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 05-27-2005, 07:39 PM:
 
quote: Brad Miller
And the sad part about it is that the Century JJ will walk all over a Century SA when running 35mm film in every aspect.


Agreed 100% Brad!

_____________________________________________

quote: Brad Miller
Why was the gate tension cranked in the first place?

>I didn't say it was cranked just that it had to be run with ZERO tension.... They more than likely started out at normal tension. It normally requires at least some gate tension.......

Was the print properly inspected from head to tail before projection?

>Ask them that but they are pros for sure and I would have to assume yes for sure.

Was the print properly lubricated before projection, or were they just trying to run an old and probably brittle acetate print dry out of the cans?

> It was a decent 30 fps print(at that time) of "Oklahoma". It ran a few months before just fine on a pair of DP-70's at the Ebert Fest.

Are they aware that the omega spring in the Kinotons can drastically alter the ACTUAL gate tension?

>Fuck the Omega spring... if its that critical the design was poorly done! Show me another 70mm machine that has that critical of gate tension.

The skate alignment can also shred film if aligned too high.

> They ran a bunch of 24 fps 70mm stuff with zero problems during that same fest.

The fuse issues sound like a Kinoton goof, but the rest of it sounds like operator error to me. Actually, that brings about another question...

>Who knows....... I was surprised too, that why I mentioned it here.

Why did the operators not TEST the 30FPS before putting an actual print through the projector? Did they have no junk film to play with for testing purposes? Had they done this, the fuses would've blown with no film damage.

> The fuses did not blow until a ways into the film.


Beyond what I was told(You were there too.) and can answer here you'd have to ask them,you know them too, but I think they told me just about everything about that fest. I was pretty surprised to hear about the problem my self and sat and heard the whole story. I do have quite a bit of experience with other electronic projectors that operate similarly to the Kinoton and overall they were pretty reliable but a servo problem can be EXTREMELY spectaculuar to see happen [Big Grin] !
 
Posted by Scott Norwood (Member # 30) on 05-27-2005, 07:55 PM:
 
What happened to that 70mm print of Oklahoma? Did the whole thing get shredded, or was it just a few feet that got damaged? I'm glad I saw it when I did (in Boston, about seven years ago). [Mad]

Question: who is making mag heads now that Ampex and Teccon are out of business? Obviously, there is a market for heads for 16mm and 35mm dubbers, but I can't imagine that there is very much demand for 70mm mag heads (sadly).
 
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 05-27-2005, 07:56 PM:
 
Sorry Mark, but no I don't know who ran that show. I guess I was obsessing over the cheese with Steve.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 05-27-2005, 08:02 PM:
 
What happened to that 70mm print of Oklahoma? Did the whole thing get shredded, or was it just a few feet that got damaged? I'm glad I saw it when I did (in Boston, about seven years ago).

Not much was damaged. Brad, I will let you know who it was but the guy has run alot of 70 and there were other operators present as well.

Also, I'm not 100% sure but their DP75E might be one of the first that was delivered. I'm no where near sold on electronic pull down except for special applications.

Mark
 
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 05-27-2005, 08:10 PM:
 
I've no doubt of the guy's experience...but did he have experience with the FP75E??? That's really more of the question.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 05-27-2005, 08:27 PM:
 
Yes, Its been in that booth for quite a while and used through other film fests and on a dialy basis. Most of the operators there hate the thing.

Mark
 
Posted by Louis Bornwasser (Member # 3063) on 05-27-2005, 08:55 PM:
 
Who is making 70mm heads?

1. Probably no one.

2. I have 6-8 brand new Teccon/Century 6 track heads.

3. Prob. all Teccon that are "out there" are still more than OK.

4. Relapping is (I understand) not as difficult as making the head the first time. (Check with Clyde McKinney.)
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 05-27-2005, 09:27 PM:
 
Electromag will make any type of head you want. They specialize in Mag film heads. Theirs actually perform quite a bit better than Teccons but not as far as the wear aspect. Have pretty much confirmed this performance on mag dubbers.

 -

I've removed alot of Teccons from DP-70's that were beyond use... they last a long time..... but not forever..... The reel question is will a JJ outlast a Teccon head? Definately NOT [Smile] . That does keep us working though

Electromag

There is one company making ferrite film heads in standard formats... TJB Magnetics. I've never used their products so can't vouch for them at this point.
TJB Magnetics


Mark
 
Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 05-28-2005, 08:05 AM:
 
What was the last 70mm print release that had mag striping? "Far and Away"? "Hamlet"? Who still has operational 70mm striping facilities? The smell of a freshly striped print was unique, but those VOC (volatile organic compound) vapors became increasingly regulated.

http://www.answers.com/topic/volatile-organic-compound

"Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are organic chemical compounds that have high enough vapour pressures under normal conditions to significantly vaporize and enter the atmosphere. (The term VOC is also occasionally used as an abbreviation, especially in biological contexts, for "volatile organic carbon".) A wide range of carbon-based molecules, such as aldehydes, ketones, and hydrocarbons are VOC's. The term often is used in a legal or regulatory context and in such cases the precise definition is a matter of law. These definitions can be contradictory and may contain "loopholes"; e.g. exceptions, exemptions, and exclusions. The term may refer both to well characterized organic compounds and to mixtures of variable composition. Most often the definition used is one from the United States Environmental Protection Agency..."
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 05-28-2005, 09:02 AM:
 
John, I think the last large scale stripping job was the last re-issue of L.O.A. where about half of the new prints were mag striped.

Mark
 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 05-28-2005, 11:39 AM:
 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
Sez the operators at the Seattle Cinerama Theatre that tried to run a 30fps print....
I think their problem is an odd occurance rather than indicative of the projector. I've run both of the AFI machines at 30fps with 70mm (and 35mm) and never a hint of hick-up.

There are special venue projectors (Ripley's) that are running dual 70mm 3-D (I think at 30fps...though I would need to confirm) in a day in and day out basis in a Rock-n-roll configuration without issue.

The AFI projectors are run rock and roll 7 days a week. There has been exactly one "over current" on rewind in the two years of operation and it was on one of the 35/16s...the machine performed a shut down.

quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
BTW: The only way they could get it to run was with the gate tension all the way down.
I don't get that one either...when switching from 24 to 30 fps...I don't recall having to adjust tension and it was always for picture stability on various films.

To be honest, this sounds like a gate that is not properly set up. There are several adjustments on the FP75...including skate height, lower gate position and upper tension. They can be dialed in.

quote: Brad Miller
Are they aware that the omega spring in the Kinotons can drastically alter the ACTUAL gate tension?
Brad, the FP 75E gates are NOTHING like the 35mm gates/skates you are accustomed to. No omega springs...the focus racks is also drastically different (and better).

quote: Brad Miller
Why did the operators not TEST the 30FPS before putting an actual print through the projector? Did they have no junk film to play with for testing purposes? Had they done this, the fuses would've blown with no film damage.
This is an excellent question...I know I have done this with the AFI projectors...which is why I find the claim odd that is being made.

In reference to other questions. I agree with Mark that electronic movements are not necessar for day-to-day theatre projection. Where they can excel is in special venue, rock and roll projectors are in screening rooms were image movement can be precisely controlled.

As to operating the projectors...I know the AFI guys seem to like working with the FP-75s more than the other machines in many respects...the gate closers and focus rack is something that is perferred (as is the tension adjustment). I don't like the 35mm pad shoes...they flex too much. I think it is cool that the centerline of the 35mm optical film and the 70mm film is the same.

The mag heads that came with the machines (10-track) are German in manufacture.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 05-28-2005, 03:14 PM:
 
quote: Steve Guttag
To be honest, this sounds like a gate that is not properly set up. There are several adjustments on the FP75...including skate height, lower gate position and upper tension. They can be dialed in.

Steve,

Were the gate not set up correctly would not all the 24fps stuff they ran also give them problems?

Mark
 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 05-28-2005, 05:54 PM:
 
The faster the machine is run the more likely the problem is going to show itself. I claim that the gate adjustments were not optimized for 70mm period. I've switched speeds on the fly without problems.

However, if they get it right for 30fps, it will work for 24 fps.
 
Posted by Michael Schaffer (Member # 1204) on 05-29-2005, 05:37 AM:
 
The only problems I ever had with the FP75E were belts for the double shutters breaking and another really interesting one where the lamp ignition would cause a hickup in the electronics which led to a framing offset. Kinoton Berlin got rid of that problem, I can't seem to remember right now what they did though. And the changeover between machines was a little "soft" with both images superimposed for a very brief moment.
 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 05-29-2005, 07:41 AM:
 
We always power the lamphouse (electronics, fans, ingniter) via the rectifier circuit and NEVER via the projector so I guess that is why we have not encuontered any projector related anomolies via lamphouse ignition.

The c/o is indeed too slow...the problem is that the c/o blades is the same as the lamphouse douser blade...it is heavy steel and is hard to move swiftly... Newton's F=ma applies here. They have not resolved this problem, in my opinion. If they were to make the blade out of aluminum it would be significantly better (and probably used a stronger solinoid.
 
Posted by John Hawkinson (Member # 1135) on 05-29-2005, 08:13 AM:
 
Reminds me of our Bauer U4 changeovers (which we have never really tried to make "sharper").

Is it insufficient to delay the douser close on the outgoing projector by a few milliseconds, or would that lead to a perceptible black gap?

--jhawk
 
Posted by Andrew McCrea (Member # 674) on 05-29-2005, 12:54 PM:
 
quote: Louis Bornwasser
1. According to Cinemeccaniac/Milan the Vic 8 has been obsolete for at least 20 years. (This was discussed at the factory while they were checking out a "rebuilt.")
Care to elaborate? What's changed? What's wrong?
 
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 05-29-2005, 03:22 PM:
 
quote: John Hawkinson
Is it insufficient to delay the douser close on the outgoing projector by a few milliseconds, or would that lead to a perceptible black gap?
Pennywise can and has done this on their CA21 automation to accommodate for the offset. It is adjustable in 0.1 second intervals. The only problem is that it forces you to let the automation run the show. Manual changeover buttons installed wouldn't have the "fix".
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 05-29-2005, 04:12 PM:
 
quote: Steve Guttag
The faster the machine is run the more likely the problem is going to show itself. I claim that the gate adjustments were not optimized for 70mm period. I've switched speeds on the fly without problems.

However, if they get it right for 30fps, it will work for 24 fps.

Are the machines you're running using mag striped prints, DTS, or seperate sound? Agreed that it should work at 30 if optimized. I've got to wonder if the mag tracks were a bit sticky on that print... I brought this up to them. I have to admit though that it makes me wonder that it being that critical at 30 fps of the electronics its running pretty close to its design margins.
 
Posted by Scott Norwood (Member # 30) on 05-29-2005, 04:15 PM:
 
Couldn't you just have a program that does nothing other than "open changeover on machine where changeover is closed, wait .1 seconds, close changeover on other machine" and wire the manual pushbutton to tell the automation to run that program?

I don't know much about the CA21, but I have a hard time believing that you couldn't implement something like that.
 
Posted by Steve Guttag (Member # 268) on 05-29-2005, 06:05 PM:
 
I've run both Mag and DTS 70mm on the FP-75s and at most speeds between 12 and 30 fps. Same with the 35mm.

As to the shutter belt on the machines...that appears to be its weakest point...it is a convoluted path. To reduce the stress on it, they use a dissolving double shutter system to cut the speed on the unit down.

As to control system on the machine...the 70mm projectors use a significantly larger control system (MDE-24) motor...everything is water chilled (18C is the target). Again, I've seen no hint of being near its limit. Remember too, Kinoton uses essentially the same machine for special venue projectors up to 60fps 70mm.

I do understand your concern Mark...though I think either Seattle has an early unit or it was never really set up properly.
 
Posted by Michael Schaffer (Member # 1204) on 05-30-2005, 03:21 AM:
 
quote: Scott Norwood
Couldn't you just have a program that does nothing other than "open changeover on machine where changeover is closed, wait .1 seconds, close changeover on other machine" and wire the manual pushbutton to tell the automation to run that program?
You could, but the actual problem is not timing as such, it is that the dousers are so heavy, it takes them just a fraction of a second too long for X to close and Y to open, so there is a very brief moment when they are both open and the images melt into each other. I heard about an installation which had custom-made titanium dousers and they didn't know that problem...I have never seen it though. It is not really that big of a problem though. We ran those machines during the Berlin International Film Festival which has one of the most demanding audiences in the world. Nobody ever minded. But those who did care for and knew how to look out for image quality were uniformly wowed by what the FP75Es did. Same about the FP38Es we ran - which incidentally have the exact opposite problem: the changeover is a tiny little bit too slow, there is a very brief dark moment.
 
Posted by Stephen Furley (Member # 1277) on 05-30-2005, 03:58 AM:
 
quote: Michael Schaffer
And the changeover between machines was a little "soft" with both images superimposed for a very brief moment.
This isn't just a phoblem with thr eletronic machines, I've seen it on FP-30 Ds in more than one place. I've also seen machines where the changeover wasn't quite closed on the incoming machine, and light was leaking around the edge; had to hold hand in front of lens.

The more convetional changeovers like the ones used with Westar/Century machines seem much more positive, and have a definate 'snap' to them, while the Kinotons seem rather sluggish by comparison.
 
Posted by John Hawkinson (Member # 1135) on 05-30-2005, 12:14 PM:
 
I was envisioning an analog delay. 0.1 seconds (100ms) sure seems like a long time (2 frames!). Plus, having it work with manual c/o seems a big win.

--jhawk
 
Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 05-30-2005, 03:42 PM:
 
As of 2003 the Victoria 8 was still available as we took delivery of 4 of which one was a dual guage machine
 
Posted by John Walsh (Member # 168) on 05-30-2005, 03:47 PM:
 
It seems that the better option, today, is to purchase a good used 35/70mm machine. I would think there would be several avaible. A friend recently purchased two 35/70mm JJ's for installation at a school, and they were a poorly-machined nightmare right out of the box.
 
Posted by Michael Schaffer (Member # 1204) on 05-30-2005, 04:41 PM:
 
quote: John Hawkinson
I was envisioning an analog delay. 0.1 seconds (100ms) sure seems like a long time (2 frames!). Plus, having it work with manual c/o seems a big win.
That should work for the FP75E setup, provided the projectionist has acquired the right "feel" for the changeover in that setup, and presses the button early enough. But then, changing over nicely is to a certain degree a "feel" thing anyway...
We never looked into such solutions, however, because they way it worked was not perceived as being a problem by any.

quote: Stephen Furley
I've also seen machines where the changeover wasn't quite closed on the incoming machine, and light was leaking around the edge; had to hold hand in front of lens.
That sounds like the electro-magnet on which the douser is mounted is offset a little. That should be easy to adjust (provided the douser opens all the way on its pivot). You may also want to look at the douser itself. Maybe it is warped from lamp heat.
 
Posted by Darren Briggs (Member # 1071) on 06-04-2005, 05:02 AM:
 
AS far as I knew you can still buy a brand new Vic 8 now. Had a price for one last year.

Darren
 
Posted by Thomas Jonsson (Member # 1902) on 06-04-2005, 02:35 PM:
 
Correct. But the magnetic penthouse is no longer in production.
But I think Cinemeccanica can supply you with used ones in good
condition.

Thomas
 




Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2