This is topic Scanning Film frames in forum Film Handlers' Forum at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=010304

Posted by Katie Trainor (Member # 1149) on 02-04-2010, 03:07 PM:
 
I am looking for advice on the best set-up for scanning frames of film either 35mm or 16mm film on reels or cores that is very gentle on the film. Any ideas on what rewinds to purchase, scanning equipment, camera equip, lightboxes etc
Apologies if I am not putting this inquiry in the correct forum.

Many thanks,

Katie Trainor
NYC, NY
 
Posted by Randy Stankey (Member # 64) on 02-04-2010, 09:34 PM:
 
Are you talking about scanning a whole movie or large section of a movie? Or do you mean you would like to scan one or two frames out of the movie?

If you are talking about scanning the whole movie there is no way to do it unless you use a telecine. That's a special machine to scan film to video or a computer file.

If you want to scan a few frames it might be possible to do it with a flatbed scanner if it has the capability to scan transparencies. Some models do. Some models don't. You have to check the specs of the piece of equipment in question to know for sure.

There are special devices for scanning film but I don't know any film scanners like this that wouldn't require you to cut the film to insert it into the machine.

But, don't forget! Even if you are able to scan a print you have to consider copyright ownership. That just opens up a whole different can of worms.
If you are scanning 16mm film the title might be in the public domain. If it is, you would be in the clear. If not, you could be getting yourself into trouble by scanning the print.
If you are scanning a 35mm film it is very likely that somebody else holds the copyright on the title.

Regardless of the copyright status of the film you are planning to scan it is up to YOU to find out if it is all right for you to do this and you must do it BEFORE you start scanning film.
 
Posted by Jim Bedford (Member # 4) on 02-05-2010, 12:42 PM:
 
My guess is that since Katie is screening mostly nitrate for an archive, copyright isn't the primary issue.

quote: Randy Stankey
Are you talking about scanning a whole movie or large section of a movie? Or do you mean you would like to scan one or two frames out of the movie?
These are the operative questions. If you're doing just a frame or few, an Elmo document camera with a light box should work well. These can be mounted between rewinds and don't place any stress on the film. As Randy mentions, there are scanners that also do this job but probably aren't as gentle on film as you have to handle it more than placing it on the lightbox surface on the Elmo.
 
Posted by Martin McCaffery (Member # 37) on 02-05-2010, 01:55 PM:
 
Jeff Kreines has a great scanner that the Library of Congress uses. Give them a call.

Though honestly, if you are scanning nitrate for an archives, you should be talking to people who are doing this now.
 
Posted by Richard P. May (Member # 3598) on 02-05-2010, 03:59 PM:
 
Hi Katie,
We have a scanner which we use in the lab when a client wants a still shot, or something is needed just for internal examination.
One of the important things we had to find was one which would take a continuous strip of film, unlike most scanners that have a holder for maybe six frames, and no ability to place part of a roll in its gate.
We found one called Prime Film 3600U, which works just fine. It is built for still frames, so when using it for movies you get two frames, but that's no problem as the extra can be removed after seeing the preview scan.
After the scan is done, it transfers the image into Photoshop, or any designated software, and you can manipulate it to your choosing.
As to handling the film, the scanner can be put between a pair of hand rewinds, and the film removed between scans for moving to the next shot. You can't keep it in the gate while winding.
It needs to be near a computer with supplied software to make the initial scan. The PrimeFilm box itself is maybe 6 x 9 inches, and very light. Much smaller than the typical flatbed scanner.
As to copyright or other ownership, that's something I'm sure you know how to handle.
Any further questions, contact me directly.

Dick May
 
Posted by John Hawkinson (Member # 1135) on 02-05-2010, 08:14 PM:
 
I'll second the recommendation of Jeff Kreines' Kinetta scanner. But really, we need a bit more info. And Jeff's will presumably set you back 5 or 6 figures. Since you're asking here, rather than AMIA-L or somesuch, I imagine maybe you don't have that kind of money? In which case, well, it all gets complicated.

--jhawk
 
Posted by Mike Olpin (Member # 1115) on 02-06-2010, 10:03 AM:
 
Like this:  - [Big Grin]
 




Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2