This is topic How many hours of 35mm film will an AW3 platter hold? in forum Film Handlers' Forum at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=010509

Posted by Justin Hamaker (Member # 2165) on 06-19-2010, 09:48 PM:
 
When we do the Twilight/New Moon showing on 6/29, I'm considering building the prints together and just setting the cues to bring the lights up and down. I would probably use trailers to build a 10-15 minute intermission between the two.

As a side note question, has anyone ever run an interlock this way? I would be interlocking 2 projectors.
 
Posted by Louis Bornwasser (Member # 3063) on 06-19-2010, 09:56 PM:
 
Film is much thinner now. Should work OK. Louis
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 06-19-2010, 10:17 PM:
 
52 inch decks can hold (acetate) 4.5hrs of film.

This is where SPECO came up with their platter name "LP-270" - 270 minutes (4.5hrs) of film on one of their metal decks.

It's quite common to see a double feature stacked on one deck.

"Twilight" was around 130 min and "New Moon" was around 126 min. Then add your 15min trailer pak inbetween, and it's gonna be a full deck.

I'd recommend having a film wrap made to go around that entire roll so that end will definitely not go loose on you since you're gonna be right close to that edge.

-Monte
 
Posted by Chris Slycord (Member # 4239) on 06-19-2010, 11:22 PM:
 
quote: Monte L Fullmer
I'd recommend having a film wrap made to go around that entire roll so that end will definitely not go loose on you since you're gonna be right close to that edge.
http://www.film-tech.com/products/safetyring.html [Razz]
 
Posted by Manny Knowles (Member # 1171) on 06-19-2010, 11:47 PM:
 
Having seen my fair share of tail wraps, I'm curious why you'd want to run the risk of disaster, rather than play it safe and prepare them on individual platters? It takes only 2-3 minutes to rethread...
 
Posted by Justin Hamaker (Member # 2165) on 06-20-2010, 01:01 AM:
 
@Manny
There are actually several different reasons why I would want to do it. The main reason is I will have so many film built up at that time I may need it just so I have enough platter decks and centering rings.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 06-20-2010, 01:45 AM:
 
Forgot about that safety ring thingey.

Was thinking on something that didn't have to cost - like a scrap piece of film and wrap this around the print and tape the end down securely and write on the tape what the title is.

Some M/O's have to think, "not spending money" when what you got will do justice.

thx-Monte
 
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 06-20-2010, 01:56 AM:
 
A piece of film or nylon with velcro won't keep a print on the platter, though. It can't prevent it from moving... at all. The Safety Ring keeps it on the deck. I should find some of the video I took when testing the Safety Ring before it was released. It took quite a shock and yet the print remained on the deck.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 06-20-2010, 08:49 AM:
 
I agree on the F-T platter ring. Best thing ever made for platters. It costs far far less than just one lost show due to thrown print or a tail wrap. A film ring is still does not offer enough safety factor.
 
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 06-20-2010, 09:01 AM:
 
Agreed here too. We've done two movies on one platter here since 1980. The platter ring took at least 98% of the worry out of it.

One thing to keep in mind though, those are fairly long movies and it's possible the Film-Tech ring might not fit (it extends into the platter about 1.5" all around).
 
Posted by Galen Murphy-Fahlgren (Member # 4535) on 06-20-2010, 09:54 AM:
 
If your platter is timed spot on (20 rpm high, 1 rpm low), you may want to slow it down just a touch. In my experience, the "ideal" timing settings will try to fling a print of that size at some point after the two hour mark. While a platter ring should prevent it going over the edge, it is still preferable to keep it from moving in the first place.
 
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 06-20-2010, 11:41 AM:
 
We did extensive testing of the safety ring with all lengths of films with the worst possible timing settings we could manage, and also with 70mm film. We were unable to toss the film, even when we went in and intentionally jacked the last half hour of a long movie into an "S" and a "U" shape around the brain.
 
Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 06-20-2010, 08:25 PM:
 
Galen... If you time your platters as per Brad's notes on the "Tips" page it won't throw a print. If you time them the Christie way it will throw a print.
 
Posted by Carl Martin (Member # 1146) on 06-21-2010, 06:11 AM:
 
twilight is about 2:01, new moon about 2:10. i'm planning on doubling them on a platter without joining them, so they take up less space and i have more control over when the second one starts. of course i'll have to thread twice that way.

i assume i'll have 4 different films playing that day on that screen so i won't have platter decks to spare. glad to have a safety ring.
 
Posted by Galen Murphy-Fahlgren (Member # 4535) on 06-21-2010, 11:32 AM:
 
Well, I don't have platters anymore, as I am out of the biz now, but in my experience running Indian movies, I found that Christie spec was a surefire way to throw long prints, and using the timing method from the tips section was not foolproof either. On prints in excess of 8 reels plus rolling stock and trailers, in order to prevent thrown prints entirely, I timed platters using the Film-Tech recommendations, then dialed back the high speed to about 18 rpm or so. This is just what worked at my building for me.

I've never had platter rings, nor was it possible for me to get them. I think it would still be preferable for the print not to move, because sometimes even if the print stays on the deck, it can start a brain wrap, but I could be missing something.
 
Posted by Chris Slycord (Member # 4239) on 06-21-2010, 12:13 PM:
 
quote: Carl Martin
i'm planning on doubling them on a platter without joining them, so they take up less space and i have more control over when the second one starts.
Why would you not have control as to when it starts if they're joined? Wouldn't you just hit the stop button to make it wait till you were ready to start?
 
Posted by Carl Martin (Member # 1146) on 06-22-2010, 02:43 AM:
 
sure, i could do that, but then i'd have to be there to stop it, which is just one more thing to remember. plus, this way i can clean the projector between shows.
 
Posted by Chris Slycord (Member # 4239) on 06-22-2010, 09:44 PM:
 
quote: Carl Martin
sure, i could do that, but then i'd have to be there to stop it, which is just one more thing to remember.
Or you could have it programmed to stop when the movie is over. That way, you don't have to do anything between shows and you've got a program setting to use for future double-ups like this.
 
Posted by Carl Martin (Member # 1146) on 06-24-2010, 02:50 AM:
 
i'm sure some automations can do that, but ours can't.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 06-27-2010, 03:48 AM:
 
I've got both features with a 15min preview reel in between the two features all tied together on a AW3 deck and got close to 6 inches from edge of filmroll to edge of deck to spare.

Also, it's all cued so that when that print is heading through 5 P35 Christies on an interlock, it will go nonstop from start to finish, so the lights will come up half during credits and play half through the previews, then come down when the 2nd feature begins and ends about 11:30pm.

Then, the real fun begins afterwards: 7 P35 units are going to be getting one "Eclipse" print on one side of the building, two houses will get another print, 3 houses will get another print, one house on digital, and the final house will play one by itself.

it's gonna be a crazy night..... - Monte
 
Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 06-27-2010, 10:53 AM:
 
Monte, you are the only one here who described HOW you interlocked or are planning on interlocking. I asked 7 months ago how many houses people ended up interlocking with a single print. Nobody answered. I guess they were ashamed.
 
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 06-27-2010, 12:56 PM:
 
Guess I have fun with interlocking since it's quite the challenge to acccomplih since when you hit that start button, everything MUST work.

thx-Monte
 




Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2