This is topic Guess how many Digital Cinema screens EP2 will be released on... in forum Digital Cinema Forum at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=16;t=000076

Posted by Ted Costas (Member # 473) on 04-10-2002, 12:36 PM:
 
I am giving away a small box of THX Swag to the person who comes closest to guessing how many Digital Cinema screens will be playing Episode 2.

The rules:

All posts must be in before May 1st, 2002.

The contest is limited to Fim-Techers only.

Only one "guess" post per person.

No one from THX, Dolby, Boeing, Technicolor, QuVis, Avica, EVS, Grass Valley, Barco, or Christie may play.

If there is a tie, and two people guess the same correct number of screens, the person with the most posts to the Film-Tech forum (life-time) wins.

Good luck, and may the force be with you.

 


Posted by Jerry Chase (Member # 660) on 04-10-2002, 01:03 PM:
 
"I am giving away a small box of THX Swag to the person who comes closest to guessing how many Digital Cinema screens will be playing Episode 2."

Hmmm, since equipment "plays" and screens only reflect or "show," I'll guess zero. You may contact me for instructions on where to send the swag

Some definitions of "play."
To cause (a compact disk or audiocassette, for example) to emit recorded sounds.
To exhaust (a hooked fish) by allowing it to pull on the line.

(Yeah, my mom was a teacher.)


Are you dropping a line and playing the film-techer pool, Ted?


 


Posted by Chase Taylor (Member # 778) on 04-10-2002, 01:05 PM:
 
64
 
Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 04-10-2002, 01:05 PM:
 
Worldwide, or just North America?

Digital Cinema screen count as of May 16 opening?

And how many screens with FILM prints?

Ted: can you confirm that the printing duplicate negatives for all the film release prints are being made directly from the Digital Source Master (DSM) files? Or is the film recording done from the Digital Cinema Distribution Master (DCDM) files, or onto the master positive stage to save time and reduce costs?

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 


Posted by Ian Price (Member # 14) on 04-10-2002, 01:37 PM:
 
27

That's right, I said 27!


 


Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 04-10-2002, 01:42 PM:
 
The number of DLP screens ostensibly in place on the release date, multiplied by .95, rounded down (about 5% of the total DLP screens will be out of service for one reason or another on that date, running their 35mm upgrade instead).

What is a THX swag??



 


Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 04-10-2002, 01:44 PM:
 
Hmmmm, I'll have to wait until closer to May 1st to make my guess. It certainly would be nice to receive the THX Stag theater. (That was a typo, right? )

BTW, on May 1st you will want to printout this thread BEFORE you award your prize, as people *could* go in and edit their posts after the announcement.
 


Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 04-10-2002, 01:50 PM:
 
David asked: "What is a THX swag??"

Swag: LOOT, SPOILS, profits, a pack of personal belongings

Wish list: Boxed DVD set of Star Wars Trilogy

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion
 


Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 04-10-2002, 01:52 PM:
 
Pardon me John, but did you say a boxed "DVD" set of the Star Wars trilogy? Uhmmmmmmmm, I think that "DVD" needs to be changed to "brand new 70mm prints".


 


Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 04-10-2002, 01:54 PM:
 
"brand new 70mm prints" --- I'll drink to that!!!

But unlike some other friends on Film-Tech, I don't have a 70mm screening room at home.

(But we do have an "intimate" 2200-seat one with a 25 x 55 foot screen in Kodak's Theater on the Ridge in Rochester).

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 


Posted by Bob Maar (Member # 763) on 04-10-2002, 02:20 PM:
 
Well if you are both going to be drinking I think I had best come to drink with you and keep the peace. I will post my guess after the tenth Martini.

Are we meeting in Dallas, Rochester or New York City?


 


Posted by Don E. Nelson (Member # 1049) on 04-10-2002, 02:34 PM:
 
**** A Digital Cinema question deserves a digital answer.***

100101 Binary (on opening day)
converted to real numbers, the base 10 equivalent is :
Fifty Four - 54 - VIV 5 tens and 4 ones.
------------------
...more signal, less noise!


 


Posted by Scott Norwood (Member # 30) on 04-10-2002, 03:10 PM:
 
In North America? I'd guess 25 on opening day.
 
Posted by Miguel Angel Martorell (Member # 1110) on 04-10-2002, 06:48 PM:
 
157.

A swag sounds good but a 70mm Star Wars copy would be ...I donīt find words . Ok, this is too much. How about a super 8 mm. Star Wars copy?.


 


Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 04-10-2002, 07:32 PM:
 
I'm not sure exactly what the installed base of digital projection equipped screens adds up to in accurate numbers (I have doubts it could be any more than 75 to 100 screens).

I'll give an "optimistic" guess of 48 screens showing "Episode II" in digital projection on opening day. If I wanted to be more realistic, the total would be something like 32. But I'll go with 48.
 


Posted by Will Kutler (Member # 770) on 04-10-2002, 07:37 PM:
 
Hey Ted

If you REALLY, and I mean if you REALLY want to score points with us Film-Techers...what about some new prints of your "WOW" trailer : : : :!!!!!!!
 


Posted by Ted Costas (Member # 473) on 04-10-2002, 08:08 PM:
 
Sorry, I should have been more specific.

Guess the number of Domestic screens (United States and Canada) playing / showing EP2 on May 16th.

And "Swag" is whatever I can dig up around the office, throw in a box and mail out. And I don't believe there are any newly manufactured WOW! prints sitting around, but I'll look...

And Brad, if gambling is illegal on Film-Tech, my apologies.

John P., DSM, I believe. All the film prints will be gorgeous, printed off of several filmed out original negatives. No generation loss this time. No IPs, no INs, just thousands of original negative prints out there (or as close to original negative as you can get).

Yours, Ted


 


Posted by Adam Martin (Member # 641) on 04-10-2002, 08:39 PM:
 
You can put me down for 28.

That sounds kinda funny out loud.

 


Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 04-10-2002, 08:40 PM:
 
Gambling? Nah, call it a contest.

So since each print will in essence be a "show print", do we get hand scratched cue marks?

(Hmmmmm, maybe there's an R2 laying around the office. )


 


Posted by John Hawkinson (Member # 1135) on 04-10-2002, 08:43 PM:
 
I'll go with 43.

--jhawk
 


Posted by Aaron Sisemore (Member # 145) on 04-10-2002, 08:44 PM:
 
Seeing that ol' George is likely gonna try for MAXIMUM DLP exposure for this release, and there will probably be a DLP installation 'boom' between now and then, I am gonna think big here...

One Hundred (100) screens.

-Aaron

 


Posted by Darryl Spicer (Member # 711) on 04-10-2002, 10:05 PM:
 
Darn Aaron you guessed my number. Guess I will have to go with 75 screens
 
Posted by Jeff Akin (Member # 1198) on 04-10-2002, 11:17 PM:
 
I'll say 44

------------------
-----------
2 Time ICWF Champion

2 Time ICWF Hardcore Champion
 


Posted by Sean McKinnon (Member # 612) on 04-11-2002, 01:41 AM:
 
80 Screens
 
Posted by Frank Angel (Member # 248) on 04-11-2002, 02:09 AM:
 
I say 60.
 
Posted by David Favel (Member # 1125) on 04-11-2002, 02:45 AM:
 
35
 
Posted by Mark Lensenmayer (Member # 134) on 04-11-2002, 08:04 AM:
 
53
 
Posted by Greg Anderson (Member # 235) on 04-11-2002, 10:56 AM:
 
51

I desperately want the rumored, new DVD which will be the latest version of the old "Wow" THX laserdisc. I was never able to obtain the laserdisc in any legitimate, honest, ethical way... and I refuse to pay upwards of $300 to get it on eBay from someone who, likely, didn't get the laserdisc in any legitimate, honest, ethical way either.


 


Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 04-11-2002, 11:15 AM:
 
The THX "WOW" LaserDisc gets old faaaaast. Also, Brad, maybe you can lock this thread on midnight the very last day in April. People can't edit posts in locked threads, can they? Well YOU can, so I urge you to cheat.

Here's what I bet will be in the THX swag collection:
-THX Cap (duh)
-THX shirts (cool)
-THX poster(s)
-THX Jacket (I WISH!!! Bobby Pinkston gave one to Ian, I think. Ian is a bastard.)
-THX bumper stickers
-THX pens
-THX buttons
-THX stationary
-THX "Do not enter testing in progress" papers
-THX tampons
-THX toilet paper

Put me down for 112 screens.


 


Posted by Bob Maar (Member # 763) on 04-11-2002, 11:50 AM:
 
On May 16th EP2 Digital version will open on 22 Screens.

Take it to the Bank
 


Posted by Don Sneed (Member # 955) on 04-11-2002, 01:57 PM:
 
My guess world wide will be 35
 
Posted by Jacob Huber (Member # 1138) on 04-11-2002, 02:51 PM:
 
I'm gonna say 20
 
Posted by Don Sneed (Member # 955) on 04-11-2002, 04:41 PM:
 
Hey if I win, please put into the swag box an THX approve spoon,fork, a THX approve coffee mug, and maybe throw in a THX approve dinner plate !!!
 
Posted by Joe Beres (Member # 678) on 04-11-2002, 07:09 PM:
 
My guess is 63.
 
Posted by Ian Price (Member # 14) on 04-11-2002, 07:59 PM:
 
Joe,

Bobby Pinkston gave me a DTS jacket not a THX jacket.

It is black wool with black leather (pleather) sleeves. It has a realy cool gold DTS logo on the back.

And Joe, I am a bastard.

As the Jacket is XL and I am somewhere between an XXL and an 3XL I'll put the Jacket up for grabs. I was thinking of giving it to Joe as a way to keep him warm on these unemployed nights but now I am reconcidering.
 


Posted by Adam Fraser (Member # 1074) on 04-11-2002, 09:47 PM:
 
My guess would be 56

------------------
Adam Fraser
www.pinestheatre.com
 


Posted by Freddie Dobbs (Member # 915) on 04-11-2002, 10:59 PM:
 
Given that the wind is rising from the east and the moon is setting in the south,I would say 42
 
Posted by Steve Kraus (Member # 476) on 04-11-2002, 11:02 PM:
 
When does the contest close? Surely in the few days prior to release the numbers will be known and probably widely disseminated.
 
Posted by Ian Price (Member # 14) on 04-11-2002, 11:27 PM:
 
I'm feeling very crowded!

David Favel and Don Sneed 35

Ian Price 41
Freddie Dobbs 42
John Hawkinson 43
Jeff Akin 44

Bobby Hendeson 48
 


Posted by Laurence Hammett (Member # 1134) on 04-12-2002, 01:05 AM:
 
The Dolby boys are doing Boeing Installs hot and heavy as we speak.

My guess

92 screens

Interesting that this digtal image roll out isn't taking the Spielburg approach:

"If you be wantin Jurrasic Park in your cinema this summer you WILL be buying this here DTS box or you won't be havin no Jurrasic Park in your cinema this summer."
 


Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 04-12-2002, 02:12 AM:
 
All I know, Ian, is that it was a damn nice jacket! I don't know why I thought it was a THX one. I saw it trade hands while we were opening the already doomed Park Meadows 6 theater. And technically I am not unemployed but I can be if that'll get me a jacket!

Ian is king of swag, and that's why he'll probably win this contest!
 


Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 04-12-2002, 02:51 AM:
 
Good point Joe. I will lock this thread on May 1st. Someone remind me if I forget. And no, when a thread is locked not even I can alter it.
 
Posted by Jonathan Worthing (Member # 803) on 04-12-2002, 05:31 AM:
 
69

My favourite Number
 


Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 04-12-2002, 06:05 AM:
 
Y'know what sucks about 69?

The view.
 


Posted by Richard Fowler (Member # 893) on 04-12-2002, 06:33 AM:
 
Joe.....close your eyes
Richard Fowler
TVP-Theatre & Video Products Inc. www.tvpmiami.com
 
Posted by Brad Haven (Member # 954) on 04-12-2002, 06:42 AM:
 
my guess is 82.
will you post it overseas?.
 
Posted by Darren Briggs (Member # 1071) on 04-12-2002, 01:04 PM:
 
My entry is...

16
 


Posted by Antonio Marcheselli (Member # 373) on 04-12-2002, 06:38 PM:
 
In Italy one (1) theater, I guess.

Antonio
 


Posted by Mike Carro (Member # 232) on 04-12-2002, 06:56 PM:
 
I have no idea how many Digi theaters there are but I'll say
50
 
Posted by Rick Long (Member # 213) on 04-12-2002, 11:02 PM:
 
94
 
Posted by Jeff Skallan (Member # 891) on 04-13-2002, 03:37 AM:
 
Put me down for 31 screens.
 
Posted by Steven Privett (Member # 718) on 04-13-2002, 03:52 AM:
 
Well I'm gonna say 28
 
Posted by Bruce Hansen (Member # 281) on 04-13-2002, 11:57 AM:
 
There will be something wrong with the digital-crud files, and it will open only on 35MM. So my answer is: 0. (Hay it's worth a chance, right).
 
Posted by Richard Topping (Member # 871) on 04-14-2002, 10:59 AM:
 
For North America & Canada, I will say 60.
 
Posted by Paul Cassidy (Member # 951) on 04-14-2002, 12:30 PM:
 
The only digital projections we will have in Noo Zealand is at the end of the projectionists Hands

------------------
A KIWI eats,roots & Leaves.
 


Posted by Rick Long (Member # 213) on 04-14-2002, 03:18 PM:
 
BTW, Richard,.....Canada is IN North America.


 


Posted by Gerard S. Cohen (Member # 994) on 04-14-2002, 04:18 PM:
 
My guess is 123 screens.


 


Posted by Greg Mueller (Member # 17) on 04-14-2002, 07:42 PM:
 
one to many

------------------
Greg Mueller
Amateur Astronomer, Machinist, Filmnut
http://www.muellersatomics.com/
 


Posted by Jon Miller (Member # 163) on 04-14-2002, 08:21 PM:
 
I'll wager 89 worldwide, which is, of course, eighty-nine too many!
 
Posted by Ted Costas (Member # 473) on 04-15-2002, 04:58 PM:
 
This is getting good.

As an FYI, there are 19 D-Cinema sites currently in North America, give or take a few Technicolor Digital Cinema installations, and with 31 days to go, time is a serious factor.

Good luck!

Yours, Ted
 


Posted by Joe Grace (Member # 341) on 04-15-2002, 05:36 PM:
 
I am going to say zero also.


Joe
 


Posted by John Walsh (Member # 168) on 04-15-2002, 05:41 PM:
 
I will take a guess and say 60. I know there will be at least 5, because we have signed up with Technicolor for that many, and I'm going crazy to prepare the booths for them.
 
Posted by John T. Hendrickson, Jr (Member # 849) on 04-15-2002, 08:16 PM:
 
You heard it here first: 136
 
Posted by Bob Maar (Member # 763) on 04-15-2002, 08:38 PM:
 
OK, If John has signed up for five I am raising my guess from 22 to
350. Please send the swag to my house...Ted, if you can't find swag vigorish will do.


 


Posted by Paul Konen (Member # 41) on 04-15-2002, 10:45 PM:
 
I will say 49.

Ted, since I already have a THX Broadway frame in Lucite, please select the next in line if I am successful.


 


Posted by Michael Coate (Member # 757) on 04-16-2002, 06:19 AM:
 
quote:
As an FYI, there are 19 D-Cinema sites currently in North America

Ted,
Some recent Texas Instruments/DLP literature listed the North American digital screen count at 30.


quote:
give or take a few Technicolor Digital Cinema installations

Is the difference of 11 digital screens possibly the "give or take a few Technicolor" installations?

Oh, and that press release indicated "Episode II" would be released on 27 digital screens. Hope I didn't let the cat out of the bag... (Actually, I'll bet the number will increase by May 16...so 27 is not my guess.)
 


Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 04-16-2002, 05:37 PM:
 
Laurence Hammett commented in an earlier post how it is interesting the digital projection rollout is not taking the Spielberg approach (threats made about not getting a print of "Jurassic Park" if a DTS unit is not installed).

Arm twisting stunts are a terrible way to market any product. But it has to be said there is a major difference between DTS-S/DTS-6 units debut priced at $2500 and $3500 per screen and a digital projection system that costs between $200,000 and $300,000.

On top of that, DTS players as old as 9 years are still useable. Show me a digital projection system that will not be obsolete in 9 years.
 


Posted by Adam Birge (Member # 20) on 04-16-2002, 06:28 PM:
 
I'm going to go with 23....
 
Posted by Phil Hill (Member # 371) on 04-16-2002, 07:13 PM:
 
45...but 53-1/2 if you include the screens that have to switch to 35mm because the video projection failed.

>>> Phil


 


Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 04-16-2002, 08:26 PM:
 
Actually, I could care less, and in reality so could most of everyone else out there.....
Mark @ GTS
 
Posted by Richard Hamilton (Member # 321) on 04-16-2002, 09:20 PM:
 
"Actually, I could care less, and in reality so could most of everyone else out there....."

Really??? This topic is 5 pages, so "in reality", somebody must care!!!


Rick
 


Posted by Robb Johnston (Member # 239) on 04-18-2002, 03:38 PM:
 
Being a big fan of Kevin Smith, who is also a huge SW fan. I will have to go with the number 37. yeah, I read that bit about 27, but hopefully there will be a few more by then.

Movidude74@aol.com
 


Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 04-18-2002, 05:25 PM:
 
quote:
Really??? This topic is 5 pages, so "in reality", somebody must care!!!

They just want the swag.

My guess is 63. (I want it too.)


 


Posted by Joe Beres (Member # 678) on 04-18-2002, 06:56 PM:
 
Mike Blakesly-
I think I beat you to that one (see pg 3)

-joe
 


Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 04-18-2002, 08:04 PM:
 
I'm going to be optimistic regarding the digital installations and say at least 150. Something tells me Ted would not have started this thread unless he had something up his sleeve, and I don't think LucasFilm would really be all that proud to say that their movie was released on just 30 screens digitally. George wants more, and I'll bet he gets it.


 


Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 04-18-2002, 08:23 PM:
 
Richard Hamilton said "Really??? This topic is 5 pages, so "in reality", somebody must care!!!"

Actually if you polled everyone there you'd most likely find that they really hate the idea of accepting lesser image quality than if it were shown on film. This is just a screen count contest, nothing else.
Mark
 


Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 04-18-2002, 09:42 PM:
 
How much worse could the picture quality be considering he taped the whole movie with a video camera instead of film anyway? You know that soon consumer equipment will match or exceed what Lucas used to videotape and edit Episode 2.


 


Posted by Richard Fowler (Member # 893) on 04-19-2002, 12:13 AM:
 
Panasonic premiered a 24fps film/digital cinema ( standard not HDTV ) camera in the $3500.00 range at NAB a few days ago.......
Richard Fowler
TVP-theatre & Video Products Inc. www.tvpmiami.com

 
Posted by Bobby Henderson (Member # 840) on 04-19-2002, 12:47 AM:
 
Sony makes an excellent quality "pro-sumer" digital video camcorder featuring lots of nice "pro" style features like a progressive scan 3 CCD array --all for $1700. It shoots very good quality NTSC standard video and also has a memory stick input for shooting digital still images.

Canon's GL-1 has a very snazzy telephoto flourite zoom lens pack, 3CCD array and a number of other nice features. It lists for $2499, but some places sell it for as little as $2100.

Canon's XL-1s is the pro-sumer reference standard camera. You can use interchangeable lenses and do lots of other nice stuff with it. It costs $4500. That price bracket is getting into the DVC-Pro camera price bracket.

The only bad thing about those cameras is that they are geared only for NTSC standard video. My guess is it will be some time before HD level consumer camcorders hit store shelves, much less even arrive for the pro-sumer level. But on the bright side, the rush on developing faster and sharper CCD chips should bring about affordable HD digital camcorders as well as 10 megapixel still cameras within the next couple years or so.
 


Posted by Manny Knowles (Member # 1171) on 04-19-2002, 01:24 AM:
 
95 screens in the U.S. and Canada (combined) on opening day.

------------------
And, hey! Let's be careful out there.

~Manny.


 


Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 04-25-2002, 01:44 PM:
 
US and Canada, on May 16: 138 Digital Cinema Screens

Many thousands of 35mm FILM screens. (Ted - give us a final print count please.)

Zero 70mm FILM prints, needed for huge screens.
(Remember how obvious the CGI "digipeople" looked on the deck of the Titanic in the 70mm prints, even though the non-digital scenes looked great!? Same problem likely here, IMHO, unless 4K or greater resolution could have been used.)

Weren't there about a hundred 70mm prints each for "The Empire Strikes Back" and "The Return of the Jedi"? Shot on 35mm negative film (5247) having much less resolution than today's camera films, yet delivering great quality images on huge screens?

IMHO "The effects are thrilling, but the digital medium is still weak."

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: <A HREF="http://www.kodak.com/go/motion" TARGET=_blank>http://www.kodak.com/go/motion</A>


 


Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 04-25-2002, 03:30 PM:
 
The Widescreen Review 70mm filmography says there were 75 70mm prints of "Return of the Jedi". Qty isn't known for "Empire Strikes Back". "Star Wars" had 8 or 9 70mm prints on opening day, then more prints were struck later, but as with Empire, exact numbers are not known.


 


Posted by John Pytlak (Member # 331) on 04-25-2002, 04:27 PM:
 
Even little "secondary market" Rochester was able to experience the "Splendor of 70mm" for both films. Saw them at the Loews Pittsford III.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 


Posted by Michael Coate (Member # 757) on 04-25-2002, 11:44 PM:
 
quote:
The Widescreen Review 70mm filmography says there were 75 70mm prints of "Return of the Jedi". Qty isn't known for "Empire Strikes Back". "Star Wars" had 8 or 9 70mm prints on opening day, then more prints were struck later, but as with Empire, exact numbers are not known.

ACTUALLY...the Widescreen Review 70mm filmography mentions for "The Empire Strikes Back" that "100+ 70mm prints were struck -- a record at the time."

That figure of 75 prints for "Return Of The Jedi" *is* on the list, but is actually included in the entry for a *1985 re-release* in which 75 prints leftover from the original run were re-used. The original 1983 release included (also a record at the time) between 145 and 164 70mm prints, depending on the source used to obtain the print numbers.

(The item in the list also includes a bit of trivia that some of you might remember in that the 70mm prints of "Empire" contained numerous differences compared to the 35mm prints in that some of the transitional wipes were different, along with some shots and dialogue being different as well. The 70mm prints of "Star Wars" used a different sound mix than the 35mm prints with a variety of differences, but I'm unaware of any pictorial differences between the 70s and 35s...aside from print and projection quality, that is.)

Somewhat related...70mm print numbers and some interesting "presentation quality" quotes culled from Variety have been recently added to the entry for "Alien" (1979) in the 70mm filmography mentioned in this thread.
 


Posted by David Stambaugh (Member # 1102) on 04-26-2002, 10:30 AM:
 
I stand corrected. I thought I searched on the original release years but evidently I screwed up. Actually I'm baffled how that happened because I just looked them up again (1977, 1980, and 1983) and the numbers are as you say. Weird.

Followup: I think it's the damn wheel mouse! When you select the year of release from the dropdown menu, if you roll the wheel before clicking on "Search", it advances to the next or previous year in the list. I must have accidentally changed the selected year before hitting search. (This is not unique to your site; I've had this wheel mouse thing happen when filling out forms on other sites).



 


Posted by Bob Maar (Member # 763) on 04-29-2002, 10:03 AM:
 
Ok Ted, This is my final guess before you remind Brad to lock the thread. Star Wars will open on 204 Digital screens in the USA and Canada. 15% of the Digital projectors will experience problems during the 1st day and end up playing with 35mm film. When I win the prize, send it to Joe in Denver as he has put up with my ribbing for over a year.


 


Posted by Lance C. McFetridge (Member # 95) on 04-29-2002, 03:19 PM:
 
116 US and Canada
 
Posted by Aaron Haney (Member # 747) on 04-29-2002, 04:09 PM:
 
I think Brad is right -- Ted wouldn't be asking this question if he didn't have something up his sleeve. I'm not even going to bother to guess. I've got some much better questions:

1. How many of these digital installations be non-DLP?
2. Will TI finally announce an upgrade from 1280x1024 to 1920x1080 resolution or higher?
3. If the answer to #2 is yes, how many theatres will have the newer, higher-resolution devices, and how many will be stuck with the older, lower-resolution ones?
4. If the answer to #2 is no, how many news stories that hype up digital projection will mention the resolution mismatch between the movie (1920x1080) and the projectors (1280x1024)?

And most importantly:

5. How many of these projectors will actually have been paid for by the theatres, and not by companies trying to jump-start the market?


 


Posted by Jeffry L. Johnson (Member # 453) on 04-29-2002, 04:28 PM:
 
106
 
Posted by Bryan Fournier (Member # 264) on 04-29-2002, 06:21 PM:
 
My guess is "72" digital presentations of "Star Wars: Attack of the Clones" on opening day.
 
Posted by Tim Turner (Member # 1109) on 04-29-2002, 06:40 PM:
 
It is a possiblity, that my theater will have it on two screen. But I was told, it was about 6-8 nation wide.
 
Posted by Gordon McLeod (Member # 33) on 04-29-2002, 09:11 PM:
 
Tim your circuit will have it on 6 DLP screens so I don't think you are the only circuit booking it
 
Posted by Rick McCluney (Member # 642) on 04-29-2002, 10:24 PM:
 
My guess is 127.
 
Posted by Mark DeLettera (Member # 125) on 04-30-2002, 01:06 PM:
 
My guess is 200 EVEN!!

------------------
Mark DeLettera
Eastman Kodak Co.
Worldwide Technical Svs.
Rochester, NY
mark.delettera@kodak.com
716-588-4189
 


Posted by John Moriarty (Member # 1153) on 04-30-2002, 01:35 PM:
 
I'm going with 39.

John
 


Posted by Ron Lacheur (Member # 1126) on 04-30-2002, 01:43 PM:
 
19
 
Posted by Jason Black (Member # 684) on 04-30-2002, 01:58 PM:
 
I'll go with a much closer to reality figure of 35 prints in the US/Canada.

------------------
The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese!
 


Posted by Per Hauberg (Member # 529) on 04-30-2002, 05:14 PM:
 
Well - now ImdB has published that the number will be 19, and that Mr Lucas is less than happy. "Only digital theatres will be allowed to run episode 3".
Allow us to be honest: Cinemas will do ok without Star Wars - What about Star Wars without cinemas ?

/ p.

 


Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 04-30-2002, 06:07 PM:
 
Well, with that posted bit of news, I am officially locking this thread a few hours early so no one can go back and edit their post.

Ted, please start a new thread for the final number and winner titled:

Guess how many Digital Cinema screens EP2 will be released on...the answer

That will make it easy for people to find the two threads during searches as this subject enters the archives.


 






Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2