Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: I want to see "UP" in Real-D, not Disney Digital 3D

This is topic I want to see "UP" in Real-D, not Disney Digital 3D in forum Digital Cinema Forum at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.

To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=16;t=000379

Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 06-01-2009, 03:27 PM:

Real-D is da bomb, yo. It's tight. It's all that. Better than sex. But Disney Digital 3D? Screw that.

Posted by Julio Roberto (Member # 4976) on 06-01-2009, 03:52 PM:

Yeah, Disney Digital 3D is so much worse than RealD 3D, but at least it's better than Dreamworks In-tru 3D, but worse than Dolby Digital 3D, but better than Imax Digital 3D, but worse than Sony Digital 3D, but better than XpanD, but worse than Master Image, but better than dual-projection, but worse than over/under 35mm, but better than 2D 2K, but not as good as Scope 2D 4K at 48fps.

Ahhhh ... choices .... hmmmm .... I think I'll just wait until it's out in blu-ray.

But only if they do a super-bit anaglyph 3D disc with DolbyHD sound ... or maybe I'll settle for DTS, not sure yet.

And only if the Anaglyph is the cool ColorCode Yellow/Brown type, not the crappy Red/Blue like in the 50's ... [Roll Eyes]

Posted by Tristan Lane (Member # 1169) on 06-02-2009, 12:35 PM:

Julio is starting to sound like Andy Summers.

"THX dolby super spl WOW"

Posted by Joe Redifer (Member # 3) on 06-02-2009, 01:15 PM:

Damn, even I forgot that kid's name. Good memory!

Posted by Tristan Lane (Member # 1169) on 06-03-2009, 11:31 AM:

All it takes is a quick visit to the picture warehouse!

The most awesome home theater ever

(sorry for perpetuating thread-drift) [Wink]

Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 06-03-2009, 07:41 PM:

quote:
Damn, even I forgot that kid's name. Good memory!

"Mr.Fredrickson" and "Russell."

Posted by Tim Reed (Member # 137) on 06-16-2009, 01:14 AM:

quote: Joe
I want to see "UP" in Real-D, not Disney Digital 3D

Humm, I don't want to see it at all. [Razz]

Posted by Mark Gulbrandsen (Member # 72) on 06-16-2009, 11:44 AM:

quote: Tim Reed
Humm, I don't want to see it at all.

Yea, they probably are not running in in 3-D at any drive inns... [Cool]

Posted by Frank Angel (Member # 248) on 06-16-2009, 04:37 PM:

quote: Julio Roberto
And only if the Anaglyph is the cool ColorCode Yellow/Brown type, not the crappy Red/Blue like in the 50's ...

Ah....the anaglyphic myth refuses to die. The 50's 3D releases were NEVER IN RED/BLUE ANAGLYPHIC -- that output of 3 or 4 years of major studio 3D releases were all polaroid/dual projection. 50's red/green anaglyphic was used for cheap 3D COMIC BOOKS, not for movies.

Posted by Jack Theakston (Member # 4484) on 06-16-2009, 07:11 PM:

It's your fault, Frank-- if you hadn't come up with that damn anaglyph print of CREATURE, we wouldn't have this problem [Big Grin]

Posted by Julio Roberto (Member # 4976) on 06-16-2009, 09:19 PM:

quote: Frank Angel
Ah....the anaglyphic myth refuses to die. The 50's 3D releases were NEVER IN RED/BLUE ANAGLYPHIC

Errrrr ... in case the [Roll Eyes]

emoticon and the spirit of the rest of the post didn't give it away .... I was being 100000% sarcastic like Joe and none of the stuff I said makes any sense. Actually, I'm pretty tired myself of debunking that myth ... [thumbsup]