That's SO true...
Posted by Jason Burroughs (Member # 68) on 10-13-2010, 06:24 PM:
Aside from lamp sizing, there's no practical way that a digital system consumes less electricity!
Yes you delete the projector motor, and platter, but honestly neither of these have a significant draw. The platter system would be ~400Watts max, and similar for the projector motor.
On the digital side you also have to include the server, at the tune of about 500Watts, and all the other ancillary equipment to deliver the content.
The projector and platter only consume power "on demand" and the server and its equipment consumes power 24xForever
Also the HVAC system shouldn't ever be turned off with digital, whereas with film it could be during the off hours.
On the discussion of failure of HVAC vs failure of any projection component, HVAC wins hands down.
Often the units installed are not continuous duty rated, and are installed in a uncontrolled environment. There's so much more to fail in a HVAC system, especially one not properly maintained.
HVAC failure can be mitigated by using monitoring systems and using failure prediction. Redundancy of systems is also another mitigation plan.
Any architect designing a space for digital equipment should fully understand ASHRAE TC9.9 and its specifications for Class 1 equipment.
Posted by Bruce McGee (Member # 131) on 10-15-2010, 11:24 AM:
Half of my booth is not currently air conditioned, and it really cooks back there. The half that is has 3 digi players in it, and since these klunkers suck more room air through them and blow it out on the roof than the replaced 35's by almost double, the booth AC system is having trouble keeping up. I predict the A/C system failure soon. We had a freon issue earlier this summer, and one of the Sony's told us that it was too hot to suit it, and the room temp never was over 80.
I know they are going to have to AC the back booth. Digital will be back there with fans so loud that I will hate being around them next year.
550 hour lamps. And I'm STILL the only one on the site that will replace one.
I can imagine the company enclosing the projectors in their own little climate controlled box. Its costing a fortune now just to stock lamps for these creatures!!
Posted by Aaron Mehocic (Member # 15) on 10-16-2010, 02:23 PM:
During our first expansion in 1996 the architectual design was not to air condition the booth. That was corrected about two years later after countless complaints by the then-manager. Although we never lost any shows due to excessive heat, it was very difficult on the Dolby CP-500 units. Many times during show checks I would notice the LCD screens barely able to register the proper information because they were being zapped so bad by the ambient temperature.
Posted by Tom Petrov (Member # 1534) on 10-16-2010, 11:52 PM:
Film is pretty much done in any new build. That is were it really matters, eventually the smaller theaters will go digital as well. Air conditioning or no air conditioning, it will happen.
As for theaters in India, they will play film for a lot longer.
Posted by Joe Elliott (Member # 4006) on 10-18-2010, 12:47 AM:
Bruce, the enclosure thing may happen, but they wouldn't air condition it, just blow massive amounts of air into it. You would then have to enter the 'hurricane enclosure' to service the projector.
Posted by Jake Spell (Member # 5294) on 10-18-2010, 11:07 AM:
If the projector has a maximum ambient temp of say 90F and the booth is 105F then it doest really matter how much air you blow around it, You are still causing damage.
Posted by Mike Blakesley (Member # 26) on 10-18-2010, 01:05 PM:
For what it's worth here, I have not noticed any significant change in our power bills since we digitized. I was expecting it to go up, since we went from a 2000W bulb to a 4000, but I guess maybe the platter not being in use has offset the difference.
Posted by Sam D. Chavez (Member # 1841) on 10-18-2010, 02:17 PM:
Mike,
I would attribute it to a more efficient lamp power supply. What were you using for a rectifier for your film lamphouse?
Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 10-18-2010, 08:09 PM:
That rectifier in that CH-20 console is a major power hog along with being almost 30 plus years old.
- (only thing bad with a Christie recifier since they really draw the amperage to operate ..)
Also, the rectifier in the NEC is a very efficent switcher rectifier...prob why Mike's wattmeter outside of the building didn't show an increase in power used.
Posted by Jake Spell (Member # 5294) on 10-18-2010, 10:09 PM:
I could be wrong, but I'm fairly sure that the lights,HVAC, exhaust fans, sound racks use enough power that the extra 2000 watts isn't going to be noticed on the power bill
Posted by Randy Bowden (Member # 587) on 10-18-2010, 11:58 PM:
Here is a youtube vid for enclosure that I mentioned earlier.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcg-nvJ9EB8
And another shot at Barco.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0T7aC1SzstA
Posted by System Notices (Member # 2357) on 12-15-2011, 02:04 PM:
It has been 422 days since the last post.