It should be emphasized that the attached trailer was for the 1985 re-release of "E.T." and was newly-created (and inexplicably contained at least one shot not in the actual film) and not just a re-use of the original '81/'82 trailers.
Posted by Brad Miller (Member # 2) on 04-06-2007, 01:41 AM:
1-2-3, then 4-5-6-7 fits more evenly between the two reels.
I STILL do not know WHY it matters to anyone what the freakin' attached trailer was on a movie made years ago.
Posted by System Notices (Member # 2357) on 02-25-2010, 08:43 PM:
It has been 1056 days since the last post.
Posted by Michael Voiland (Member # 5386) on 02-25-2010, 08:43 PM:
I just built up the 2 deluxe archival prints.
Print number 3 has a lot of splices in it maybe 5 to 10 per reel
Print number 2 has a lot of emulsion side scratches.
Both came from a deluxe warehouse in California.
Just in case anyone was interested.
Posted by Bill Gabel (Member # 1105) on 02-26-2010, 07:26 AM:
And 70MM prints were available at one time.
Posted by System Notices (Member # 2357) on 07-06-2011, 05:46 PM:
It has been 495 days since the last post.
Posted by Jack Theakston (Member # 4484) on 07-06-2011, 05:46 PM:
Played Print #7 yesterday. Very nice! Good timing (a little reddish on some shots, but otherwise good), good gamma, and nice prints—reel 2 has some light lines at the start, but there's not a splice in the thing. SR Stereo sounded good. Ugly Clint Phare cues in the IN that this was printed from.
Posted by Mark J. Marshall (Member # 1409) on 07-06-2011, 08:26 PM:
Was E.T. still attached??
Posted by Jack Theakston (Member # 4484) on 07-07-2011, 03:11 PM:
Nope... 20 MILLION MILES TO EARTH happened to be
Posted by John Wilson (Member # 269) on 07-07-2011, 07:50 PM: