Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: Eastern Promises (2007)

This is topic Eastern Promises (2007) in forum Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.

To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=002598

Posted by Bill Gabel (Member # 1105) on 08-21-2007, 12:31 PM:

Focus Features
Flat 1.85
SRD / DTS / SR (Cyan)
6 Reels
Deluxe

TES

Posted by Chad M Calpito (Member # 3736) on 09-19-2007, 09:48 AM:

Does anyone know what the Attached Trailer is & what loose trailers come with this film? Thanks! [Smile]

Posted by Jeremy Jorgenson (Member # 2989) on 09-20-2007, 02:35 PM:

Attached:
Reservation Road

Enclosed:
The Orphanage (El Orfanato)
The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford
Lust, Caution
Rendition
Kite Runner
The Darjeeling Ltd.

Posted by Ryan Navaroli (Member # 3477) on 10-01-2007, 05:30 PM:

IMDB lists this as 1.66:1. Can anyone either confirm or deny this?

Posted by John Wilson (Member # 269) on 10-28-2007, 07:52 AM:

IMDB's got it wrong. It's 1.85:1.

Posted by Martti Leivo (Member # 4553) on 11-19-2007, 04:22 PM:

The print we have is actually 1.66:1.

Posted by Peter David Bruce (Member # 4447) on 11-19-2007, 06:43 PM:

ours is 1.85.1

strange.. havent seen a company do it like this for a while.

Posted by John Wilson (Member # 269) on 11-20-2007, 03:51 PM:

How do you figure the print is 1.66:1? Ours is an open matte (1.85) and projecting at 1.66 would make it look rediculous with WAY too much headroom.

Posted by Martti Leivo (Member # 4553) on 11-22-2007, 05:18 PM:

Well, for one, the box the print came in says it's 1.66:1, and it looks proper projected through a 1.66:1 lens. =)

There is some empty space on the screen between the picture and our masks, which have only two settings and the narrower one is for 1.85:1.

Posted by John Wilson (Member # 269) on 12-11-2007, 09:04 PM:

Martti, I once had a print of Smokey and the Bandit labelled as Scope...it doesn't mean I had to run it that way.

Your second comment makes no sense to me either. The film's 1.85:1.