Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows

This is topic Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1 (2010) in forum Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets at Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE.

To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://ft-forum.com/ft/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=003706

Posted by John Wilson (Member # 269) on 11-15-2010, 04:17 PM:

DCI
2048 x 858
2.39:1
91GB
Full run time: 2:28:18
Credits offset: 2:14:38 (Unverified)
-------
35mm
Scope
8 Reels
SRD/DTS/SDDS

Man, those are some long credits!

Posted by John Wilson (Member # 269) on 11-17-2010, 03:20 PM:

DCI

Correction to total running time (Incorrect on hard drive label) and credits offset verification.

Full run time: 2:25:53
Credits offset: 2:14:38 (Verified)
Rolling credits start: 2:17:57

Posted by Monte L Fullmer (Member # 2797) on 11-18-2010, 04:23 AM:

yea, almost 10 minutes worth .. almost breaking the end credit record of "2001:a space odyssey"

Posted by Per Hauberg (Member # 529) on 11-18-2010, 08:00 AM:

...and with the difference, that by "2001", people stayed to get all that wonderful music...

Posted by Jonathan Smith (Member # 5609) on 11-18-2010, 04:30 PM:

John: In your experience, would those values for the start of the rolling credits be roughly correct for 35mm as well, or are there slight differences between it and DCI?

Posted by John Wilson (Member # 269) on 12-20-2010, 05:40 AM:

I believe in this case they are identical, Jonathan.

Posted by Michael Brown (Member # 890) on 01-02-2011, 06:44 PM:

In every case shouldn't they be completely identical?

Posted by Chris Slycord (Member # 4239) on 01-02-2011, 07:46 PM:

quote: Michael Brown
In every case shouldn't they be completely identical?

Not necessarily.

[off-topic]Like they screwed it up in "Jackass 3D" by making 2D prints and leaving a couple minute thing in there talking about how you need the 3D glasses. If they'd made it properly, the few 35mm prints would've had a slightly different offset for the credits.